Slashdot Mirror


Popular Torrent Site Disappears From Google After Penalty

An anonymous reader writes: Following what appears to be a severe penalty, the popular torrent site KickassTorrents has become pretty much unfindable in Google. Meanwhile, the top search result in many locations points to a scam site that's serving malware to its visitors. For now, only DuckDuckGo presents the real site as a main result. With millions of visitors per day, KickassTorrents is arguably the most visited torrent site on the Internet, and has gained new users during the moments when the notorious Pirate Bay has been offline.

93 of 165 comments (clear)

  1. Points at DuckDuckGo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hideki!

    1. Re:Points at DuckDuckGo by hackwrench · · Score: 2

      Not sure what your post has to do with the topic, but for those who are curious you are drawing from the anime, Chobits.

    2. Re:Points at DuckDuckGo by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      For the search term "KickassTorrents":

      google.com returns "kickasstorrents.video" as the first result
      google.ca returns "kickasstorrents.pw" as the first result
      bing.com returns "kickasstorrents.ee" as the first result
      duckduckgo.com returns "kat.cr" as the first result, with a big "OFFICIAL SITE" red label

    3. Re:Points at DuckDuckGo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      google.com returns 1) kickasstorrents.video (fake site), 2) an advertisement and 3) kickasstorrents.eu (real site).

      bing.com returns 1) kickasstorrents.to (real site), 2) kickasstorrents.us (real site) and 3) kat.cr (real site).

      Bing is better.

    4. Re:Points at DuckDuckGo by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bing is better.

      I know each of those words but have never seen them used in that configuration before...
      most curious...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    5. Re: Points at DuckDuckGo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Better yet just go to the torrent freak website. They list the top 10 torrent sites and keep their links up to date. Torrent freak is also a great news site for the latest p2p happening. https://torrentfreak.com/

    6. Re:Points at DuckDuckGo by KGIII · · Score: 2

      It is posts like these that make me glad I do not know a damned thing about anime. They also make me less inclined to learn anything more about it.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    7. Re:Points at DuckDuckGo by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I find that Bing's results are often better than Google's. Unfortunately I seldom think to use them and Google is my default search and my home page should I ever actually reach my home page. (My browser opens up the tabs that were open when it was closed. I never really see my home page anymore. I am not even sure if I have configured it as of late.)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    8. Re:Points at DuckDuckGo by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I do not know if that is good or bad. The frowny emoticon indicates you are unhappy but that could be a good thing. I also speak not one lick of Japanese, Chinese, or Korean, or am even really sure what language it is that is being used. I suppose that means I suck.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    9. Re:Points at DuckDuckGo by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

      It's a nonsensical sound the main character uses for interaction in place of actual language

    10. Re:Points at DuckDuckGo by CmdrTamale · · Score: 2

      When it comes to dead crooners, some prefer Frank, others prefer Bing.

      I like Bing.

      So, there. It can be said and it might even be true. I might be lying.

  2. Google is becoming irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just like their search results. Kind of ironic that they have become a laggard in an industry they used to excel at.

    1. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by ganjadude · · Score: 5, Funny

      sad but true. Im finding myself using bing more and more because google is not giving me what i am searching for

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    2. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by amiga3D · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wahahahahahaha....damn that shit is hilarious. Sadly I have no points but you sure as hell deserve +5 Funny!

      Bing was set up on our computers as the default search engine but it only took about a week and now there's not a computer at work that still defaults to bing.

    3. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Even my 93 year old aunt knows what Google is and uses it. Hell, how many times do you hear someone say "Google it." Even their damn name is synonymous with the word search.

    4. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by 0123456 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even their damn name is synonymous with the word search.

      Doesn't change the fact that their search sucks. There's just no clear competitor yet who obviously sucks less.

      Just look at something as simple as trying to find a review of a graphics card, as I did a few days ago. Hundreds of retail sites which list the card, just because the page mentions 'review', before I get to an actual honest-to-god review.

    5. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      AltaVista? WebCrawler?

      Pepperidge Farm Remembers.

    6. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Same thing that killed Altavista. A search site is only as useful as long as it can resist this.

    7. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      a lot of the time im looking for historical documents from the american revolution. Its so hard to find without some sort of left or right spin, out of context until page 7

      on bing lately anyway ive been finding what i need around page 1-3

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    8. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Even their damn name is synonymous with the word search.

      Just because you refer to searching as "Googling" doesn't mean that you have to use them for your searches. As I mentioned in another post I use Startpage.com when I want to google for something.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    9. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      How does using a search engine gives you "points"? It means you're logged into a Microsoft account, so at one point in the future it's not going to be any better than Google, it could even be worst.

    10. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by fwarren · · Score: 1

      I am sure the average person who is googling out information on Justin Bieber or wants a new pair of shoes will find Bing works just fine for them. However I am an IT professional and Google just seems to get it right where Bing does not seem to have a clue about what I am looking for.

      I work with Linux and do quite a bit of programming as well as supporting Microsoft Windows desktops and servers. Every time I give Bing a chance with something I KNOW Google will show as the number one or two search result, Bing totally botches it up. Google just seems to know me to well. I can search for Screen and it usually realizes I am talking about GNU Screen.

      I give them a chance about twice a year. So far all I have received in exchange for trying Bing has been frustration and substandard search results.

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    11. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by jaklode · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Personalized search results might be scary, but are extremely useful.

    12. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by jaklode · · Score: 1

      You have to use Google, that's the definition of the word: ": to use the Google search engine to obtain information about (as a person) on the World Wide Web". If you use google as a general web searching verb, expect a cease and desist letter from Google's lawyers.

    13. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by jaklode · · Score: 1

      You're not using personalized search results then.

    14. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by pinzvidz · · Score: 1

      Excite? Oh, wait... I'll just step back into my TARDIS.

    15. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      I think the point is still Google has lost [some of] its relevanc[e].

      "Relevancy" is said only by those who don't understand the root word. And not everything is an extreme. One event does not make the point that Google has lost all of its relevance. You do get points for properly spelling its, though.

    16. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by RDW · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Google won't think for you.

      Unfortunately, Google tries to think for you all the time, and usually make a bad job of it. You can't possibly be searching for [thing you typed], you must mean [thing with a similar name that's much more popular on social media this week]. You don't want established information about [thing you typed], you want 3 search pages of the same [parroted news story vaguely related to thing from this morning]. You don't want [famous torrent site], you want [misleadingly named malware domain because we've nuked the actual site for some mysterious reason of our own]. Once upon a time, Google was used by people who were happy to think for themselves. Now it targets the mass market, and has algorithms designed to second guess poorly constructed searches at the expense of dumbing down the experience for the minority of users who can put together a precise set of search terms. It feels like a blunt instrument now - finding anything obscure always seems to need multiple quoted strings (like AltaVista back in the day) and Verbatim mode.

    17. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Google is great if you use it to not have to type in the full address of the page you usually visit.
      The problem is that Google tries to keep track of your interests to provide search results that are personalized and more relevant to you.
      This is all fine if you like to live in your bubble and never learn anything new.
      I often end up in situations where I have to leave my bubble and learn something that I've never been interested in before, in some of those cases it is completely hopeless to use Google, especially if the new subject has some overlap in expressions used (But with a different meaning.) with a subject I've previously searched on.
      DuckDuckGo provides different results that aren't part of my search bubble which could be useful, but it would have been better if Google found their way again.

      Right now Google feels a bit like an overtrained megahal bot. With too much training the responses become less creative and more just a repetition of the same.
      Now that I think about it it is probably not unlikely that Google uses matching algorithms that are similar to those megahal uses.

    18. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by inasity_rules · · Score: 2

      Simple solution: For work, use google and get optimised results.

      For whatever else you search (weird pr0n, I assume, it is always weird pr0n): use duck duck go and you won't (hopefully) be tracked.

      I have no fear.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    19. Re: Google is becoming irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To hoover (primarily British usage) doesn't require a particular brand of vacuum cleaner.

      https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/hoover

      To google will change meaning if Google lose dominance.

    20. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Google is as good as a centralized search engine is likely to get. But any centralized entity has an inherent evolutionary disadvantage in the Age of Information: it can be censored.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    21. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Why do they suck and if they sucked shouldn't there be clear competitors which sucked less?

      How good is Yahoo? At least they too offer a massive mail. And lots of picture space too.

    22. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by CronoCloud · · Score: 2

      Typing in "screen" and having GNU Screen come up is scary, because that means they are building search results based on your personal information.

      Or they might be tailoring the results depending on the User-Agent, in my case: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Fedora; Linux x86_64; rv:39.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/39.0

      I figure they do something like: "If User has Linux Browser User Agent then give priority to Linux related search results"

      Explaining why GNU Screen is the first result when I search for "screen"

    23. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by CronoCloud · · Score: 2

      try:

      "graphics card review -shop -buy"

      But I just slapped "Evga GT750 review" into google and the first 3 sites are actual reviews, the 4th being Evga's own site.

    24. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by sjames · · Score: 1

      I would love to see a cleanup for people trying to solve a technical problem. You do a search and find thousands of results where someone asks pretty much your exact question and instead of an actual useful answer, the thread dies after 4 or 5 people in a row berate the questioner and tell them to Google it. That, and of course, offer$ of possible answers (or not) from ExpertSexChange.com

      Admittedly, that may be a hard problem to solve in an automated way.

    25. Re: Google is becoming irrelevant by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Just tried it. Your exact quote, copied and pasted. Worked fine. Gave me a bunch of listings from the correct site. Even HTTPS, too.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    26. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I have been 'online' since the 1980s. Nothing personal but I sort of wish you would all go home. I may be stuck in my ways but I still blame AOL for the changes and I blame them for the death of USENET as well. Dirty bastards...

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    27. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Few people realize this. I am a long-term fan of Opera and have noted such frequently in the past. One thing to note is that Opera has now changed and is based on the same engine that Chrome uses. There is now a stable version of the new version though there is also a beta track (I have one Windows PC on it) but I have no idea how to get back onto it with other computers.

      The others, including this, are all on stable releases. I have not actually looked to see how to get onto the beta track though and the version numbers are different after updating. I have not found a repo with the latest Opera build in it either so one must go to the site to get it. There is also a beta (maybe stable - I have not checked) developer's version of Opera available.

      It is also open source so you can poke at the source, fork it, or do whatever you want with it now. This is a bonus for those who are interested. I have yet to find anything compelling enough to make me delve into it. I have found (and reported) a few bugs however. They are not dire enough to impact my browsing experience so I have not bothered to try to fix them and I am not at all sure that I could.

      The Git is here:
      https://github.com/operasoftwa...

      Enjoy.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    28. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I really think we could do with a bunch of new search providers (even paid *gasp*) who specialize in certain areas such as history, science, technology, news, etc... The subjects are so disparate that one provider really is unlikely to be able to effectively give results at a level beyond that of a layman. Having specialist searches would be, I think, a good thing even though it may fracture the market. I suspect that we would have to pay somehow though they could be ad supported but that leads to an extra level of complication in their business model.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    29. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by Skylinux · · Score: 1

      My experience as well. Search for some Windows patch or service pack and Google will give me the download page on position one.
      Bing might be better at finding some hip and trendy article about the service pack but it is not the information I asked it to find.

      This is not a Google search bubble thing.

      Disclaimer: last tested over a year ago

      --
      Everyone who buys Wild Hunt will receive 16 specially prepared DLCs absolutely for free, regardless of platform.
    30. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      Google gives less good results than it used to but with a strong adblocker like Adblock Edge or uBlock it's still okay. The important point is too check subsequent pages, and always check out and read any "EU censored" pages by using a proxy.

    31. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I'm getting GNU Screen as the first search result, as well, despite using Chrome on Win8.1 (and generally using Windows 99% of the time). Pretty sure that is based on personal profile / search history.

    32. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      In my tests, DDG returned the best results, then Bing, then Google. Which, honestly makes sense. Bing's results are better for the same reason Mac's are/were so much safer. Being #2, you get to avoid most of the effort because it goes into fucking up #1.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    33. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      UH. no. See: Xerox, kleenex, hoover, coke.

    34. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Just add site:stackoverflow.com to your query. Like "c++ garbage collection timeout site:stackoverflow.com". Done.

    35. Re:Google is becoming irrelevant by cavebison · · Score: 1

      > Hundreds of retail sites which list the card, just because the page mentions 'review', before I get to an actual honest-to-god review.

      Kind of like this site when I try searching for honest-to-god news.

  3. Uuuh no... by koan · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of references and it is easy to find.

    So not "unfindable".

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  4. Google showing malware results? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And who's surprised by that?

  5. Umm by jwymanm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Did they try just kickass? First result is kat.cr - it even comes up in the url/search bar while I am typing.

    1. Re:Umm by zedaroca · · Score: 1

      I get kickass.proxyindex.net/ as first result. Typing in the url bar obviously will show sites that are in my history, so it's not the same.

    2. Re:Umm by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I got kickass.to/usearch/Man%20Of%20Steel/ as my first result. The second result was the fake site, but the first result didn't land at the KaT homepage.

    3. Re:Umm by jaklode · · Score: 1

      Are you using personalized search results and have visited it before?

    4. Re:Umm by jwymanm · · Score: 1

      No, I actually have not been to kat.cr before. I tested it with incognito and it comes up also. It's only when I add torrents that it seems to get overloaded with fakes.

  6. Filthy pirates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For each copy of Windows you guys steal, Bill and Steve make less money. Which means another black baby in Africa gets malaria and one less Clipper gets a line of blow to do with his hooker tonight.

    Hope you're proud of yourselves, heartless pricks!

    1. Re:Filthy pirates! by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Damn! I'm so sorry. I never thought of it like that.

    2. Re:Filthy pirates! by Z80a · · Score: 2

      For each copy of Windows you "steal", you became a windows user regardless, and when you get hired by a big company, they have to actually buy windows (or get sued to give microsoft some cool millions) to you be able to work on it.

  7. Google needs our help (kickass.to kat.cr) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Seems that google has some kind of (memory) corruption otherwise they (don't) censor things.

    1.) So basically you can find the url via wikipedia:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    2.) Kickasstorrents have a (?censor resistant?) twitteraccount:
    https://twitter.com/kickasstor...

    3.) you can reach KAT:
    kickass.to
    kat.cr

  8. It moved to new domain by giveen1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    https://kat.cr/ That is their new location

    1. Re:It moved to new domain by Cito · · Score: 1

      Their original URL works still also.

      http://kat.ph/

      It redirects to .cr but that was their original still works

  9. Which is the "real" site? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    No link to the real site? I'm not sure which is the original and which ones are just mirrors and malware.

    http://kat.cr/
    http://kickasstorrents.video/

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  10. My test results - KAT is not on google by zedaroca · · Score: 1
    My first page results for kickass torrents on google are:

    Kickass Torrents: KAT
    kickass.proxyindex.net/

    KickassTorrents Homepage – latest updates and reviews
    kickasstorrents.eu/
    THIS IS THE MALWARE SITE

    KickassTorrents (@kickasstorrents) | Twitter
    https://twitter.com/kickasstor...

    KickassTorrents - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    KickassTorrents
    kickass.to/usearch/The%20Walking%20Dead/

    KAT - Kickass Torrents
    kickass-torrent.ytsre.eu/

    KickassTorrents Disappears From Google After Penalty
    TorrentFreak - 15 hours ago
    torrentfreak.com/tag/kickasstorrents/

    Profile of YIFY - Kickass Torrents
    rtwn.ca/ka/user/YIFY/

    KickassTorrents - Reddit
    https://www.reddit.com/r/kicka...

    Plus I'm getting a DMCA notice of 1 removal, but the link to the complaint doesn't indicate that it includes the real one.
    I hadn't googled in months. Good that this is another reason to tell people to duckduckgo things and stop using google (avoiding malware).

  11. never mind search engine results by ihtoit · · Score: 2

    Virgin Media have taken it upon themselves to reduce the Internet to "programmed" content by blocking certain sites pursuant to a court order which I have yet to see. They don't even offer a LINK. What I'm getting for my fifty quid a month is basically scheduled content just like the TV. It's a six hundred quid a year fucking television licence fee!

    Yet, they're advertising the internet. Selectively filtered content is NOT the internet.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    1. Re:never mind search engine results by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      It's a court order, they have little choice. But their blocking is also trivial to circumvent. Pirate bay is blocked, yes... but not if you go via https.

    2. Re:never mind search engine results by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      I'll save you the trouble, wb7301a is Virgin's paedo filter. Strange that Isohunt contains no child abuse content.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  12. Quawk It with DuckDuckGo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just switch to DuckDuckGo, like post NSA people did. You can even add !kickasstorrents to only search kickass in DDG.

    The sooner we all switch away from Google, a search engine that logs everything, (and also has adverts on pretty much every site, and analytics on every site,) the better.

    You realize that Google has all your kickasstorrent searches don't you? And if you are a lawmaker, then your kids kickasstorrent searches are also in the NSA database ready to be leverage against you? Get them into the habit of using DuckDuckGo till something better, more private comes along.

  13. Warning - kickasstorrents.eu is malware by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Other people in the thread have posted the eu site is malware - not sure about the us variant. the kat.cr is real.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  14. Claim is untrue for Australia by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

    kickass torrents

    First three results

    • Kickass Torrents: KAT kickass.proxyindex.net/
      Search and discuss new and favorite TV shows & TV series, movies, music and games.
    • KickassTorrents
      kickass.to/usearch/The%20Walking%20Dead/ A description for this result is not available because of this site's robots.txt â" learn more.
    • In the news
      Image for the news result
      KickassTorrents Disappears From Google After Penalty TorrentFreakâZ - 17 hours ago

    Story posted by Soulskill - probably the explanation

  15. signs you may be ignorant twat when using browser by iggymanz · · Score: 1, Insightful

    1. You use search engine rather than typing in known URL of a site, to get to a site

  16. Re:signs you may be ignorant twat when using brows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you RTFA, the domain name keeps changing, so it's difficult to remember when that happens.

  17. Re:signs you may be ignorant twat when using brows by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    if you follow the tech news site articles, the domain name has been announced in those, including the most recent change of April 24th

    Started 2008
    changed to kat.ph in April 2011
    kickass.to in June 2013
    kickass.so in December 2014

    then on April 23 2015 for one day kickass.tm then then next day
    April 24 to kat.cr

  18. tldr by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    tl;dr: their domain went down and it took a little while for the new ones to float to the top of google.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  19. The real winners by Z00L00K · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real winners are the malware creators that get their sites listed at the top now.

    In order to take down the torrent trackers providing grey warez the real black ware market feeding the true criminals and terrorists are getting free space to install adware and whatnot instead.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    1. Re:The real winners by anyGould · · Score: 1

      That is an interesting side effect. If Google is actually manually nuking the true site, you would think they'd take the extra five minutes to go a bit deeper, rather than serve up malware.

      In all honesty, I'd respect Google (and the folks who want Google to manage/censor results) if a search for that name came up with a box saying "Yeah, we know what you want, but we're not going to show it to you because [reasons]".

  20. Re:signs you may be ignorant twat when using brows by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    If you RTFA, it mentioned the fact that they are currently domain-hopping due to their domains being shutdown. It's hard to remember a domain that isn't the same as the one you visited last time.

    To agree to this, and show one can't be sure if it's a real or fake site there are at least 100 thepiratebay sites https://www.robtex.com/q/x1?q=... odd thing about the list is the real address (or last good address) is at the very bottom.

  21. I just tried that by aepervius · · Score: 1

    And from germany the first web site which comes up is NOT kat.cr, but some sort of weird proxyfinder site. The other one might be old site.

    Kickass Torrents: KAT kickass.proxyindex.net/ Search and discuss new and favorite TV shows & TV series, movies, music and games. The Walking Dead. - Kickass Torrents

    kickass.to/usearch/The%20Walking%20Dead/ A description for this result is not available because of this site's robots.txt â" learn more. KAT - Kickass Torrents kickass-torrent.ytsre.eu/

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  22. Re:uBlock Origin reports something by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 2

    uBlock Origin has prevented the following page from loading:

    http://kickass.to/

    Because of the following filter

    ||kickass.to^
    Found in: Malware filter list by Disconnect

    I'd take it's word for it, read the post below (the .to site has been down a few years now)
    Re:signs you may be ignorant twat when using brows
    by iggymanz

    But they still use the old IP address's out of Montréal, Canada; this game of hide and seek isn't working all that well.

    Kickass.to
    The IP address 68.71.58.34
    The IP address 78.138.99.144
    The IP address 205.204.64.122

    "Which hostnames and domains point to the same IP address as kickass.to? kat.cr"
    https://www.robtex.com/en/advi...

    Kat.cr
    The IP address 68.71.58.34
    The IP address 78.138.99.144
    The IP address 205.204.64.122
    https://www.robtex.com/en/advi...

  23. Re:uBlock Origin reports something by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    uBlock Origin has prevented the following page from loading:

    http://kickass.to/

    Because of the following filter

    ||kickass.to^
    Found in: Malware filter list by Disconnect

    Depends upon where uBlock gets it's information, while one shouldn't use this as a source or cite (it's poorly maintained) Kat.to has a bad scorecard with a grand total of 32-10=22, the -10 due to "45 pages found, triggering on average 1% antiviruses"

  24. Re:Free account (but credit card number) required by SirJorgelOfBorgel · · Score: 2

    That's not likely to be the real site.

  25. Re:Free account (but credit card number) required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have an account on Kickass and I was never asked for a credit card number, just a working email address. Anything asking for a card number as verification is almost certainly a scam.

  26. Re:Free account (but credit card number) required by Rob+Lister · · Score: 1

    That's a fake site, probably kat.to. It used to be correct but was hijacked about 6 or so months ago. kat.cr is the current one but it may not be for long; things change quickly in that world.

  27. Did you log out? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    Always suspicious of google search results if someone doesn't explicitly say that they were logged out.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  28. DMCA by Meneth · · Score: 1

    KAT isn't as good as it used to be. They started censoring torrents in response to DMCA requests a few months back.

    1. Re:DMCA by loufoque · · Score: 1

      Is that why there is barely any yify release?

  29. Kickass is dying anyway by loufoque · · Score: 1

    I'm finding it increasingly hard to find decent releases on kickass and have started moving back to the pirate bay.

  30. Hopeful by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Let's hope that the agency responsible for this has thousands of users searching for TV-series on the office computers and get directed by Google to the Number 1 malware site where they download said malware on the office computers.

  31. Penalty for whom? by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 1

    This is just as much a punishment to Google's own users, as it is to Kickass's. People who type in the search query are obviously looking to get to the site, not whatever malware-ridden crap Google is serving up now. Google is making their own service shittier, just to punish somebody else...way to cut your nose off to spite your face.

    --
    Stasis is death. Embrace change.
  32. Pareto principle by bangular · · Score: 1

    I've noticed that at least 95% of my searches can be answered within like 5 or 10 popular sites. I've set all my defaults to duckduckgo and in the rare case I need to find answers that aren't on wikipedia or stackexchange (which duckduckgo finds well), I'll use Google. It's not so much Google is vastly superior, you just have to decide your privacy is valuable and be willing to make small tweaks such as exhausting a less complete search engine before moving to Google.

  33. Using it for 2 years as the default by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    It's getting better. Most of the time I don't need to Google, but if I'm having trouble, I add g! to the beginning of my search and Google adds a data point to my advertising profile, but I get a second opinion, usually not very helpful.

    DDG seems too good to be true really. I wonder if they're *really* not watching.

  34. Technically you are "googling" at StartPage by xenoc_1 · · Score: 1

    StartPage is only Google-sourced. Sure, anonymized so not personalized, tracked, or bubbled. But exclusively Google-sourced. Says so right on the box.

    So you are "googling" at StartPage. If that isn't what you want, if you want results not wholesaled from Google, use StartPage sister site IxQuick.com. They are a metasearch of many-excluding-Google.

    Or use DuckDuckGo, which gets the vast majority of general purpose search from Yandex, but may still have a bit of Bing. Many specialty searches also feed DDG but it's primarily Yandex. Again, without the tracking, filtering and bubbling of Yandex or other search wholesalers to them.

  35. uBlock Origin not uBlock by xenoc_1 · · Score: 1

    I hope you mean the real "uBlock" which is uBlock Origin, the continuation by gorhill of his real uBlock code, not the sorta-sleazy plain "uBlock" that he handed over to a minor contributor - said contributor immediately launching a donation site, not updating nearly as frequently as "real uBlock" = uBlock Origin, and not including several of gorhill's latest features such as WebRTC "real-IP leak" blocking.

  36. Northern Light search engine was that. by xenoc_1 · · Score: 1

    The late-1990s early-20-oughts search engine "Northern Light" was exactly that (old screenshot image link ironically found on via Bing). It did just what you describe: "search providers (even paid *gasp*) who specialize in certain areas such as history, science, technology, news, etc", bundled into a singly search interface. There was both general purpose search that was free, and it also pulled in and offered premium results from topic-specialty paid providers. You could choose to search the "World Wide Web", or "Special Collections" (the paid part). Or "All Sources" to pull in both. If you had a paid account, you could see more than the excerpt on the "Special Collections" results, and choose which sources to use.

    It was the dawn of the Dot-Com 1.0 bubble. Northern Light was our last best hope for that consolidated search. It failed.

    At one point, during the Altavista dying-but-not-dead period, while Google was still a total newcomer, it was getting a lot of traction. But it got flanked by Google pretty quickly and sunk. It's now entirely a paid, sold for internal client companies' use, very different product with no public search engine at all. Product called "SinglePoint" and loaded with buzzword bingo in its description.

    1. Re:Northern Light search engine was that. by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Holy crap! I had completely forgotten about them. There was also Copernica kicking around back then as well. I do miss Altavista and reminisce about them more than is probably healthy. I was a big fan of the boolean search engines and the ease of narrowing down the results with it as well as getting specific results. Those traits seem to be returning at some of the alternative search sites though - something I see as a positive.

      I checked and the similarly named astalavista.box.sk is still available. FOSI is off-line and has been for a while. Those were my two favorite sites for pirating back in the day though FOSI was never search related but did have Copernica available for download.

      It is strange how search has evolved over the years. I remember turning down a couple of employees that came with a request to purchase a Google Search appliance, an actual piece of hardware, as I could not justify the expense with the rewards - even though we had a lot of data. Instead we coded up a perl script of our own and set a CRON job to run it and made our own search engine. It turns out my decision was correct as there are many free things to do this now that all work reasonably well. The purchase would have been wasted and valueless in just a few years. I am not even sure if they still sell their appliance or not.

      Now? Google does not even respect quotes around a term. I have found they do reasonably well if I let them have some private information and keep track - they do well at that but I can not keep that up for long without feeling icky. I would rather wade through a few more results, from time-to-time, than to have my habits tracked. I know, I am the product...

      Thanks for reminding me about Northern Lights. It brought back a flood of memories.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."