Slashdot Mirror


A Note On Thursday's Downtime

If you were browsing the site on Thursday, you may have noticed that we went static for a big chunk of the day. A few of you asked what the deal was, so here's quick follow-up. The short version is that a storage fault led to significant filesystem corruption, and we had to restore a massive amount of data from backups. There's a post at the SourceForge blog going into a bit more detail, and describing the steps our Siteops team took (and is still taking) to restore service. (Slashdot and SourceForge share a corporate overlord, as well as a fair bit of infrastructure.)

3 of 75 comments (clear)

  1. Sourceforge Badware risks ? by nickweller · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sourceforge is Badware risks .. http://i.imgur.com/Hhtgv0H.png

    1. Re:Sourceforge Badware risks ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sourceforge use to be great but has been serving crapware for a couple of years. You'd have to be off your rocker to use it if you have any choice, either as an author or an end user.,

      https://forum.filezilla-project.org/viewtopic.php?t=30240&start=90
      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/06/03/sourceforge_to_offer_only_optin_adware_after_gimp_grump/

  2. Re:Future of free hosting at Sourceforge? by fred911 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think ever since the bundleware fiasco the revenue is generated by ads.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2