Slashdot Mirror


California Legislation May Allow First Responders To Take Out Drones

Required Snark writes: During the recent North Fire that burned vehicles on I-15 in California, firefighters had to suspend aerial operations because of the presence of drone aircraft, according to CNN. Quoting: "Five such 'unmanned aircraft systems' prevented California firefighters from dispatching helicopters with water buckets for up to 20 minutes over a wildfire that roared Friday onto a Los Angeles area freeway that leads to Las Vegas. Helicopters couldn't drop water because five drones hovered over the blaze, creating hazards in smoky winds for a deadly midair disaster, officials said."

In response, state officials have introduced legislation that would allow first responders to disable drones in emergency situations. A second bill would allow jail time and fines for drone users that interfere with firefighting efforts. "Senate Bill 168, introduced by Gatto and Sen. Ted Gaines, R-El Dorado, would grant 'immunity to any emergency responder who damages an unmanned aircraft in the course of firefighting, air ambulance, or search-and-rescue operations.' Los Angeles County fire Inspector David Dantic declined to comment on the specific legislation, but said his agency's aircraft cannot operate safely if a drone is in the same airspace."

2 of 368 comments (clear)

  1. CHP incompetence by nyet · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Is there going to be legislation introduced that allows drivers to ignore the instructions of CHP officers that tell them to do unforgivably dumb things?

    Like stay parked on a freeway with a wildfire raging nearby?

    Oh, no, of course not. Let's find a more convenient scapegoat for the CHP's utter incompetence.

  2. Re:Finally, a win against the Republicans! by Notabadguy · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Interesting. Every pedophile, deviant, and neo-nazi I know is a democrat.

    I wonder if there is correlation?