Slashdot Mirror


Using HTML5 To Hide Malware

New submitter Jordan13 writes: SecurityWeek reports on the findings of a group of Italian researchers about web malware. They developed three new obfuscation techniques that can be used to obfuscate exploits like the one usually leveraged in drive-by download malware attacks. These techniques use some functionalities of the HTML5 standard, and can be leveraged through the various JavaScript-based HTML5 APIs. The research also contains recommendations about some of the steps that can be taken to counter these obfuscation techniques.

2 of 56 comments (clear)

  1. Direct link to PDF by rebelwarlock · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1507.03467v1.pdf

    Because 1) these geniuses don't know how to do a hyperlink, and 2) the article is completely worthless aside from a link to a page that links to the PDF.

  2. Re:Death of flash by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Informative

    You're absolutely right, of course.

    The main reasons plug-ins get attacked so much are that (a) they do more than browsers offer natively, notably including hardware interaction as you mentioned, and (b) they provide a big, juicy target.

    Expecting that moving those extra functions into the browser itself will somehow result in more secure implementations is optimistic. Every major browser fixes serious security vulnerabilities with updates, including the likes of Chrome and Firefox. They're right there in the release notes for the new version every six weeks, if anyone wants to look. The people and processes and tools used to make these browsers aren't dramatically more effective than the people and processes and tools used to make the popular plug-ins before. And it's often been the case that large, monolithic programs have proven harder to test and secure than a well-designed and well-isolated system of interacting smaller programs.

    The argument that browsers will somehow magically become more secure ways of doing the same things comes from the same mindset that says running Linux is the best way to avoid viruses because Windows is a security nightmare. It seemed credible at first, because few people were being successfully attacked while running Linux, but then someone made a Linux system that became popular with regular non-geek types, and today which platform has the fastest growing malware problem? It's probably Android.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.