Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Identify Possible New Substance With Highest Melting Point

JoshuaZ writes: Researchers from Brown University have tentatively identified an alloy of hafnium, nitrogen and carbon as having an expected melting point of about 7,460 degrees Fahrenheit (4120 Celsius). This exceeds that of the previous record-breaker, tantalum hafnium carbide, which melts at 7,128 F (3942 C). Its record stood for almost a century. At this point, the new alloy is still hypothetical, based on simulations, so the new record has not yet been confirmed by experiment. The study was published in Physical Review B (abstract), and a lay-summary is available at the Washington Post. If the simulations turn out to be correct, the new alloy may be useful in parts like jet engines, and the door will be opened to using similar simulations to search for substances with even higher melting points or with other exotic properties.

4 of 92 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Applications? by TheReaperD · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With current fuels, no. However, if you can build engines with much higher melting points the options for fuels grows and you may get an engine with higher power, better fuel efficiency or both. Or you could just end up with a really expensive paper weight. That's why modern companies are so skittish about R&D.

    --
    "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
  2. Re:Probably not useful by willworkforbeer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hafnium is about a dollar / gram. Nitrogen and carbon are plentiful and relatively cheap. Is this dramatically more expensive than current high temp materials?

    --
    Pretending this is my office full of bitter coworkers..
  3. Re:What's the temperature of molten lava? by shess · · Score: 3, Interesting

    a rocket propelled steerable solar system

    Unfortunately you're propelling the shell, not the star.

  4. Incandescant lights? by calidoscope · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm guessing the material should be quite happy to sit at 4000K, which would make for a much higher luminous efficiency than tungsten. Kind of like a 21st century version of the Nernst lamp (which was twice as efficient as a carbon filament, but half of tungsten's efficiency).

    --
    A Shadeless room is a brighter room.