Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Proposes Dedicated Airspace For Drones

An anonymous reader writes: Amazon has published two new position papers which lay out its vision for future drone regulation. Under Amazon's plan, altitudes under 200ft would be reserved for basic hobbyist drones and those used for things like videography and inspection. Altitudes between 200ft and 400ft would be designated for "well-equipped vehicles" capable of operating autonomously out of line of sight. They would need sophisticated GPS tracking, a stable data uplink, communications capabilities with other drones, and sensors to avoid collisions. This, of course, is where Amazon would want to operate its drone delivery fleet. From 400ft to 500ft would be a no-fly zone buffer between the drone airspace and integrated airspace. Amazon's plan also makes room for "predefined low-risk areas," where hobbyists and other low-tech drones can fly higher than the 200ft ceiling. "Additionally, it is Amazon's view that air traffic management operations should follow a 'managed by exception' approach. This means operators are always aware of what the fleet is doing, yet they only intervene in significant off-nominal cases."

2 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Amazon doesn't understand helicopters by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 4, Informative

    1. RC Planes are actually quite rare, but I've nearly hit them before.

    They generally fly from known airfields however, so you do learn where they operate from. From time to time, people do stupid stuff and fly them where they shouldn't.

    2. Model rockets are even more rare than RC Planes are, and they tend to go a LOT higher than 500ft. They are normally only launched from specific known locations and ATC is made aware of this before hand.

    3. A golf ball is unlikely to bring down a helicopter, it would be a one in a billion shot. Even if it hit it, it lacks the mass to do real damage. The drones that Amazon is talking about will be big enough and heavy enough to bring down some helicopters.

    Baseballs and Skeet-shooting generally don't happen over 200ft either, and only a complete idiot shoots a gun into the air when helicopters are near, and helicopters are NOT quiet. There are also only a few outdoor gun ranges around here, I know where they are and wouldn't fly over one anyway.

  2. Re:Next item on tonight's news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Slaughter of personal freedom? For nearly 150 years after the establishment of the United States, people were regularly put in prison for handing out pamphlets (think birth control or union advocacy). Free speech as we enjoy today was invented out of whole cloth by SCOTUS in the 1930s. For most of our history any speech which could plausibly cause civil unrest was considered legitimately subject to suppression by the state. Sort of like the rational basis test used today, which is the least restrictive judicial constraint on government power. By contrast, most state actions involving police powers were considered beyond the purview of judicial restraint, so any kind of test would have been considered quite strict.

    Until only several years ago, the Second Amendment to the US Constitution was _never_ considered a personal right as a matter of law. At the beginning of the 20th century, many states had stricter licensing laws regarding hand guns than they do now. In the 1800s anti-knife laws were all the rage, and states out-right banned bowie knives.

    For a thousand different reasons, you have much more freedom now than you ever did in this country. The only thing that has really changed is that enforcement is much stricter and penalties are insane. The rise of the regulatory state has created armies of law enforcement, and anti-discrimination laws mean that good-old-boys don't get a wink and a nod from the sheriff as much as they used to when violating the law. At the same time irrational public fear of crime (not unrelated to your own irrational fears) have caused penalties to skyrocket. The laws haven't changed so much as they're much more _ominous_.

    Learn your history, and especially your legal history. I did. At one time I was beginning to become as outraged as you. Then I decided to learn history and learn the law (I actually took a break mid-career for law school). Quit your whining.