Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Taps PBS To Advance Its National Talent Strategy With 'Code Trip'

theodp writes: You don't have to be Mitt Romney to question PBS's announcement that it will air the Microsoft-funded 'reality' show Code Trip, in which Roadtrip Nation and Microsoft YouthSpark will send students across the U.S. for a "transformative journey into computer science." Of the partnership, Roadtrip Nation co-founder Mike Marriner said, "Roadtrip Nation is proud to partner with Microsoft's YouthSpark initiative not only to inform others of the many career routes one can take with a computer science background, but also to engage in the much-needed conversation of diversifying the tech field with more pluralistic perspectives." YouthSpark is part of Microsoft's National Talent Strategy (pdf), which the company describes as "a two-pronged approach that will couple long-term improvements in STEM education in the United States with targeted, short-term, high-skilled immigration reforms." The Official Microsoft Blog reports that filming of Code Trip began this week, with the three students traveling around the country to speak with leaders including Hadi Partovi, the co-founder of Code.org and 'major supporter' of FWD.us, who coincidentally once reported to Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, and is the next door neighbor of Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith and a jogging partner of Steve Ballmer.

43 comments

  1. This is terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This SOUNDS nice and good but it should be obvious that these education efforts are just here to flood the market with teenage programmers, which will depress our wages. We really need to get together (maybe as a union) and fight this effort to educate children. This is as bad as the H1-B programs!

  2. You guys understand why they're doing this, right? by gcnaddict · · Score: 1

    The prices for engineers are quite high, and the PR cost in importing them is also quite high, so they're pouring money into education as a long-term investment in driving down the cost of developers in the future.

    Heh, might as well.

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
  3. Wha??? PBS would never have an agenda. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, right.

  4. Re:You guys understand why they're doing this, rig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly! That is why we need to join theodp IN THE QUEST TO ELIMINATE EDUCATION! #keepkidsignorant!

  5. This push for STEM is getting creepy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No one knows what the future will be like and what will the demands be for a profession. There was this cry of a shortage of nurses for years. And after the crash of '01 and '08, kids jumped into the 'safe' career of nursing because there was this shortage.

    Today, the job market for nurses is the worst ever.

    I see this push for STEM people creating a super glut in a few years. And employers will just make the standards even stricter - and still bitch how they can't get anyone "qualified".

    I don't see the growth that warrants this push for STEM people other than to increase supply and lower salaries and demand even more hours from workers.

    We need to get rid of being exempt from overtime. That's the other way salaries have been decreasing: increased time at the office.

    2000: Making 80K working 40 hours a week.

    2015: making 65K working 55+ hours a week.

    Shortage my fucking ass. We're doing the work of 2 people these days - just because employers don't want to hire another person.

    Oh! And the sideways insults - you know - if you can't get the job done in 40 hours then it's your fault because it's implied that you're stupid and maybe they should get someone smarter.

    But if you get your work done in 40 or less, then you don't have enough work.

    fuckers.

    I hate this profession. You grow up loving CS and programming but the profession beats it out of you.

  6. Wish Microsoft would sponsor a UX talent strategy by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    They're in dire need of better UX talent than they are of developer talent.

  7. Huh?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly! That is why we need to join theodp IN THE QUEST TO ELIMINATE EDUCATION! #keepkidsignorant!

    How is teaching them technology that is going to be obsolete by the time they are out of college keeping them ignorant.

    In K-12, kids should be learning the basics. Their time would be MUCH better spent learning more math and science (and physical fitness!) than learning some programming language. And by math, that includes logic - basic CS. And from their, ANY language is just a question of learning syntax - something that can be done in a morning.

    See, if MS were TRULY interested in educating our kids, they'd be pushing for teaching the fundamentals of CS. But they're not. They're pushing for the training of code monkeys.

    1. Re:Huh?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are 100% correct!!! That is why I said join theodp in supporting the alternative: DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING BECAUSE NO ONE ELSE IS DOING ANYTHING. #keepkidsignorant #keepstatusquo #donttryunlessyouruntheideabytheodpfirst #protecttheodpsjob

    2. Re:Huh?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are 100% correct!!! That is why I said join theodp in supporting the alternative: DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING BECAUSE NO ONE ELSE IS DOING ANYTHING. #keepkidsignorant #keepstatusquo #donttryunlessyouruntheideabytheodpfirst #protecttheodpsjob

      You're gross. #yuck #obnoxiousshilluseshashtagsfornoreason

    3. Re:Huh?! by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Do you really expect complete altruism? How about, you know, letting them help out with the added benefit that they may end up employing some of them in the future. I can not, really, accept that this site is full of people who are against education. It is not as if they are going to force people into STEM fields and then enslave them in Redmond. They will benefit as will others. Not everyone is going to go into the field so it may just foster interests from those who may not have considered it before.

      So long as it is not reducing education then I have no problem with this and, before you ask, I am certainly willing to discuss increasing the time spent in school as well as being quite willing to accept the increased taxes that would accompany that. I, for one, happen to be a fan of educating our children as well as we can. I am a fan of giving them options and getting them started on their careers early. I am all for an overhaul of our education system and am willing to put my money where my mouth is in the form of higher taxation should the rest of the population deem it to be so.

      Hell, as it is, my property taxes go to a school system that is incapable of managing their money or operating within their budget. This is a school I have not likely benefited from in any meaningful way nor did my children attend said school system as I lived out of state then. A very large percentage of my taxes go to support this school and I have a lot of land and pay a lot of taxes. You know what? I do not even mind - one bit. Every now and again I find something that they are doing and donate more money to them. At the end of the school year I donated a bunch of computer equipment to the elementary school. I have even purchased equipment for the CS lab at the school. Why? Educating the little bastards is important. There are no factories left, there are few jobs that are worthwhile without a degree, and it is the human thing to do.

      Let Microsoft throw some money into the system. Good. It is about time that they start this on a wider scale. More companies should be doing so. They want the human resources (our whole education system is designed around this principle) so let them pay more for it. Frothing at the mouth because it is Microsoft is damned silly. Try as they might, and they may, they will not be able to embrace, extend, and extinguish the education system - it's already broken. It is not like they can make it much worse than it already is.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  8. Why is it always about jobs by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    There is plenty of fun stuff in computer science. Trying to make people like it because it's "a good job" sounds like a way to make people bored with it.

    I became a programmer because I like programming. The fact that I can make money doing it is just a happy coincidence.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Why is it always about jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is plenty of grunt work to do, though. If a horde of people learn to program because it's a good job and they end up taking most of the mundane things so those with passion can focus on interesting problems, then it's all good.

  9. Spoiler alert! by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    Spoiler alert!

    The roadtrip will end in India.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  10. Re:You guys understand why they're doing this, rig by Tontoman · · Score: 1

    It will be interesting to see if the TV program has strong Microsoft product placement--like everyone using Windows phones and Surface computers.

  11. There is no shortage by BigDaveyL · · Score: 3, Informative
    http://spectrum.ieee.org/stati...

    I would contend that there is a shortage, but it is mostly for senior level people who may have some niche experience, which is true of almost any field. But for your run of the mill jobs, you don't necessarily need this. Most people, by definition, are average.

    Oh, and companies don't get a free pass, either. Many of them what a top 1% coder for bottom 50% wages if at all possible.

    Lastly, if there was such a shortage, we'd see companies hiring people that didn't have their "required" experience, but had a couple operational brain cells that could be coached up. I saw this during the dot-com boom.

    1. Re:There is no shortage by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0

      http://spectrum.ieee.org/stati...

      IEEE is an organization of engineers who have a vested interesting discouraging competition to keep their salaries high, and Spectrum has always pandered to that perspective. Their views of this issue as about as slanted as Slashdot's hive mind.

      I would contend that there is a shortage

      So would I. Most STEM fields have an unemployment rate of 3% or less, while the national average is over 5%.

      Most people, by definition, are average.

      Nonsense. That is NOT the definition of "average".

    2. Re:There is no shortage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      IEEE is an organization of engineers who have a vested interesting discouraging competition to keep their salaries high, ..

      Define "high".

      Most STEM fields have an unemployment rate of 3% or less, while the national average is over 5%.

      That average also includes un-skilled labor, fields that are having problems and fields that had shortages at one time but then became saturated because of propaganda like this: example, nursing. Nursing has the worst job market in history because of the thumping of "shortages" for years.

      Right now with the collapse in the oil markets, some petroleum engineers are now asking, "would you like room for cream?"

      ANY and EVERY company that says that they can't get "qualified" people are full of shit. requirements are capricious or about poaching talent.

      These days, if you do not meet the requirements 100% then your are unqualified. Which means many folks who would be AWESOME employees are being discounted for bullshit reasons.

      Bill, when I started in this field back in '92, the requirements were : proficient in 'C'. The interview would have one code something - a linked list or some other data structure or algrithm.

      That was it.

      Then you came in, drank from a fire hose, and did your work. And we did it.

      Today, with these laundry lists of "skills" - most are just frameworks and vendor products that are called "technology" to boost their values - many many very smart and talented people are being cast aside for capricious reasons.

      And then there are valid reasons - POACHING. I have seen many times many times these laundry lists of skills are REALLY about poaching talent from a competitor or from someone who has developed the tech - which is everyone in Silicon Valley. They want to steal tech from Google, Yahoo, Amazon, Intel, etc ... It's not about skills but about ROI and getting folks who have done something already and stealing tech.

      See, here on the East coast, we send out an email to everyone that says, "You know what we do. We need someone."

      Two weeks later a new guy starts - at lower pay. C++ programmers have gone from 80K/year in '01 to 65K/year '15 here - that's NOT adjusted for inflation. And they ARE qualified - all of them.

      All thanks to the fucked up hiring and bullshit in Silicon Valley.

      So, Bill - take your prima donna everybody is an idiot attitude and fuck off. Because you're just as much of an idiot as everybody else - maybe more so if you're in Silicon Valley. Because SV hasn't produced anything good and innovative since Cisco. I have seen your posts for the last year and it's the same arrogant conceited nonsense that I see WAY too often in tech - especially with the unethical fucktards in Silicon Valley.

      Oh, and get this, I have a manger that uses many people of different skill levels and finds a place for them. IN other words, the "idiot" works on things that the "genius" finds boring. He gets the projects done on time, on budget, and gets his bonus and so does everyone else. All, for being a great MANAGER. That's something the retards in Silicon valley don't understand.

      But unfortunately, SV has gotten this reputation from REAL innovators like Hewlett and Packard and the rest of you retards of have been riding their coattails.

  12. Re:You guys understand why they're doing this, rig by iluvcapra · · Score: 2

    The prices for engineers are quite high, and the PR cost in importing them is also quite high, so they're pouring money into education as a long-term investment in driving down the cost of developers in the future.

    That's like a 5-10 year plan. The messaging here is that Microsoft wants engineers from the US and wants people to become computer programmers, and they're doing "everything they can" to stimulate it, so just let us hire all the H1Bs we want this quarter. The messaging presents the premise that "there aren't enough engineers" in the US, thus H1Bs are justified today. "Maybe in the future" this situation will change, but for now we "have to" have "targeted, short term high-skill immigration reforms."

    Nadella and the people involved might just love computer science and want to share it with the world, these things do happen.

    You don't have to be Mitt Romney to question PBS's announcement that it will air the Microsoft-funded 'reality' show Code Trip

    Why are we supposed to question it, exactly? Is it some question of MS influencing PBS programming? That couldn't be it, considering how dependent PBS is on corporate sponsorship.

    Is it that the program itself sounds sorta fluffy and probably won't reach a wide audience, but it'll be a boondoggle that MS can use for tax evasion, while getting the Center for Public Broadcasting and several charitable foundations to pay for what essentially Microsoft's public relations? Maybe.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  13. Microsoft should film this show in India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why involve Americans? So they can train their H1-B replacement in a few years?

  14. Defund PBS by kqs · · Score: 2

    How dare PBS save taxpayer money by airing something that another group paid for. We must punish them for this outrage by removing their funding!

  15. Conversation or Propaganda by Kunedog · · Score: 1

    also to engage in the much-needed conversation of diversifying the tech field with more pluralistic perspectives.

    LOL yeah, why don't you try actually clicking that link and reading the comments. /. was totally fed up with this "much needed" agenda (and the spurious justifications for it) well over six months ago.

  16. The biggest question of all: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The biggest revelation in the summary is that Steve Ballmer JOGS?!

    How on earth can you be that huge and JOG?

    1. Re:The biggest question of all: by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      How on earth can you be that huge and JOG?

      Lots of people do, because exercise makes you hungrier. If you jog for an hour, you'll burn ~400 calories, which is the number of calories in a good sized bagel with cream cheese.

      Exercise to keep yourself healthy and strong. If you want to lose weight, change what you eat.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  17. Re:You guys understand why they're doing this, rig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, I was thinking this was more like a marketing budget line item. The more Windows exposure, the more upgrades to Windows 10 (is the timing really a coincidence?). Nothing to do with thinking of the children, innovation, or long-term strategic personnel planning. That stuff was never in Microsoft's DNA.

  18. Horrible name, missed opportunity by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    They should have named it "Code Sweat" and used this music as the theme song:

    https://youtu.be/CJ0p7k-KzWM

    "I wake up...in a Code Sweat. Hah!"

    Maceo, blow your horn.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  19. "Sure, I'd love to work for Microsoft!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Said no one, ever.

  20. Too Little, Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Roadtrip Nation is proud to partner with Microsoft's YouthSpark initiative not only to inform others of the many career routes one can take with a computer science background, but also to engage in the much-needed conversation of diversifying the tech field with more pluralistic perspectives.

    If Microsoft came to my classroom today, they would find students perfectly content programming and running Linux servers. No MS software to be found, and career opportunities abound. My alumni are in very high demand.

    Is that what is meant by "diversifying the tech field with more pluralistic perspectives"? Is that why Microsoft keeps laying off employees?

    1. Re:Too Little, Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh let me guess: you teach at Stuyvesant High School? Here is a news flash: people don't like you.
      "diversifying the tech field with more pluralistic perspectives" means bringing in people who aren't traditionally in CS. Like women and Latinos, etc

  21. Translated from MicroSPEAK .. by nickweller · · Score: 1

    'diversifying the tech field with more pluralistic perspectives." .. "a two-pronged approach .. STEM education .. targeted, short-term, high-skilled immigration reforms."'

    We want more H-1B visas ..

  22. Re:Wish Microsoft would sponsor a UX talent strate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They must have an excess of resources *somewhere*. They offered to provide significant funding, UI, an development resources to assist with porting our app to Windows 10. Basically no one wants to bother supporting it, so they decided they need to do the support themselves...

  23. Re:You guys understand why they're doing this, rig by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Considering that they will likely be providing the hardware gratis then, yes - it is likely to be Microsoft products. Do you expect anything different? Do you have a good reason for expecting anything different or, really, even desiring anything different? Never let perfection get in the way of good.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  24. Re:You guys understand why they're doing this, rig by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Every single person I know, except me actually, has or is going to upgrade to Windows 10 or plans on using it with their next computer purchase. I have been asking local computer users this question for months and no, I have not been advising them to not do so but I have suggested that they keep an eye on their privacy settings. I am not sure what that is worth but it is not my job to change their minds. Let them use what makes them happy.

    I do not know any local people who use Macs.

    On the tablet scene a number of people I know are chomping at the bit to get a Surface. They want Windows 10 on it. So far none of them have done so, as far as I know. They all pretty much seem to have current tablets based on Android but are electing to go to Windows even at the added expense. They all seem hell bent on the Surface too. I do not know anything about the Surface but I understand it is pretty decent. As I will likely be called in to help maintain these things I should probably invest in one. I really dislike the form factor. I do like, however, the Motion hybrid tablets - I bought a couple of those back in the day. I have no idea what the Surface looks like, I have yet to see one in the wild or even an ad for one. I understand that they can have attached keyboards? Meh... I will figure it out.

    Finally, a few people but only a few, are looking to get a Windows phone. From what I can tell they seem to like the idea of getting an app and having it work across their desktop, tablets, and phones. I see the value in that but I do not see how that applies to me. I will probably get a Windows phone and keep it activated for a few months to play with it. It depends on what is available for hardware more than anything else. Even my sister, a die-hard Android fanatic who has been doing all of her computing on a mobile phone (even writing a novel), is planning on getting a Windows phone.

    I guess my point is that, well, I do not think that they need to advertise Windows 10. This may be PR work but I do not think they need increased awareness. Everyone already knows about it. The whole free upgrade seems to have people quite enthusiastic and willing to try it out. Myself? I am going to keep my MSDN subscription but I do not see any use for Windows 10 as a main OS at this time. It runs fine in a VM and I bought VMWare for a reason.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  25. 2015 'Code Trip' a Remake of 2008 'Code Trip'? by theodp · · Score: 1

    Coincidentally, Microsoft in 2008 launched its own Code Trip project, which it described as "a road trip, a bunch of developers cruising around in a tour bus and geeking out. It's also an online TV show (or video podcast, or vodcast, or whatever the kids call it nowadays) chronicling their adventures throughout the western United States." So, the Microsoft-funded, Roadtrip Nation-branded 2015 Code Trip PBS show looks like a remake of sorts of Microsoft's own 2008 Code Trip, albeit with a more diverse cast

  26. Re:You guys understand why they're doing this, rig by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    From what I can tell they seem to like the idea of getting an app and having it work across their desktop, tablets, and phones.

    Wasn't the Internet supposed to do this for us already?

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  27. Re:You guys understand why they're doing this, rig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems unlikely unless you mean SaaS or Cloud stuff. People are still going to want devices to have software - hopefully. I am not a huge fan of turning the internet back into a bunch of dumb terminals renting out time.

    KGIII - ran out of posts again... 50 is a piss poor limit when you are up smoking all night.

  28. Re:You guys understand why they're doing this, rig by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    I was thinking more of the evolution of the Web browser from document viewer to (in theory) cross-OS/cross-device application platform.

    (50? I've wondered about that. I think my posting limit must vary with the phases of the moon or something--seems to change without rhyme or reason.)

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  29. Well, what do the Reps want? by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    The Reps bend over backwards to cut even the little bit of public funding left that goes to PBS and then complain that PBS goes in with big corp for pushing a questionable agenda. Restore and increase public funding for PBS with NO STRINGS ATTACHED and get some real decent and independent programming....or stop whining. All the Reps can do is say no to everything and then complain that nothing works right. How about a constructive proposal once in a while? But that would require them to look at facts and think rather than blurt out right-wing tea bagger populist bar talk.

  30. Typical Tokenism ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Each student, selected for their interest in computer science as well as their unique background, will interview leaders in the field and gain the exposure and insights into a variety of career paths incorporating technology."

    In other words let's select people who are unrepresentative of the typical make up of persons who are interested in computing - but hey, it's OK because we all know that men, especially white men, are bigots. By discriminating against men we are proving how virtuous we are, we may seem like bigots by our words and deeds but we're not the problem - it's everybody else(by everybody we mean white men of course).

  31. WTF is Romney Reference by coinreturn · · Score: 1

    WTF is the reference to Mitt Romney doing in the summary?