Slashdot Mirror


ARIN IPv4 Addresses Run Out Tomorrow

jcomeau_ictx provided that teaser of a headline, but writes: Not really. But the countdown at tunnelbroker.net should go to zero sometime tomorrow around noon, considering it's at 45,107 as I write this, it's counting down about one address every two seconds, and there are 86,400 seconds per day. Just happened to notice it today. Might be worth a little celebration at every NOC and IT enterprise tomorrow.

6 of 215 comments (clear)

  1. Slashdot crying wolf again... by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have heard of a monthly "running out of IpV4 addresses" on slashdot since 1998.

    And this story has zero meat to it just like the last 690 stories here about it.

    How about someone forcing HP to give up their gigantic chunk that they have been camping on unused for 40 years?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  2. Since we keep talking about the same thing.... by haus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...I may as well just refer to an old comment...

    http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

  3. Re:wft ever dude! by Geordish · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Back before the exhaustion policies kicked in, ARIN were burning through a /8 every couple of months.

    This is why taking back the legacy address allocations will not really be worth the time or effort. There is more demand than availability. If there was free reign allocation over it all, it would be gone before the year is out.

    Move to IPv6 already.

    Oh, and 11/8 recently became routable.

  4. Re:Wait Wait Wait... by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In 2011, they ran out from IANA. Now they are running out in ARIN, which is the supply allocated to North America.

    After this the only way to get IP addresses will be to pay a broker. The cost will go up and up over several years, until IPv6 is adopted, then the price will go down. IPv6 is already being rolled out in several places, so it's not an impossibility. Your phone more than likely uses IPv6, for example.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  5. Re:wft ever dude! by Xtifr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For the moment, I think we can limit ourselves to the number of atoms in the solar system. One rough estimate is that there are 10e29 stars in the universe. If the atoms were divided up approximately evenly between these star's systems, then there'd be 10e82/10e29=10e53. So we have one IPv6 address for each cluster of 10e15 atoms.

    Except! I've heard it estimated that about half the matter in the solar system is in the sun, and we don't want to use up the sun to build computers, because we need it to power the computers. So, 10e14 atoms per IPv6 left to work with.

    So the question before the audience is:can you build a device that implements an IPv6 stack and a minimal radio transmitter that allows it to communicate with other, similar devices, using only 10e14 atoms? If so, or if it can be done in less, then we may have a problem*. Otherwise, I think we should be fine for now.

    (To give you a rough estimate of what you're working with:10e14 atoms of silicon would mass about 46 nanograms.)

    Submit your solutions to iwannahelpdestroytheworld@weregonnafreakingcreatethesingularity.com :)

    * Although the problem may not be manifest until we convert the *entire* Earth, core and all, into these devices, along with all the other planets, and colonize the Oort cloud, and do the same there. :)

  6. Re:Well it is half true by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, it was never crying wolf. The wolf was actually there, it's just that it was a long way off in the '90s. It has been headed our way in a strait line ever since. You needed a telescope to see it in the '90s, now you don't even need to squint.

    And apparently, a warning that far in advance wasn't enough since there are still a lot of organizations with their pants down. How pathetic is that?