Slashdot Mirror


Lennart Poettering Announces the First Systemd Conference

jones_supa writes: Lennart Poettering, the creator of the controversial init system and service manager for Linux-based operating systems has announced the first systemd conference. The systemd.conf will take place November 5-7, in Berlin, Germany. systemd developers and hackers, DevOps professionals, and Linux distribution packagers will be able to attend various workshops, as well as to collaborate with their fellow developers and plan the future of the project. Attendees will also be able to participate in an extended hackfest event, as well as numerous presentations held by important names in the systemd project, including Poettering himself.

2 of 416 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Free speech zone by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They will not invite someone to speak on that, but that is something I'm working on.

    In brief, the good:
    * Systemd makes it easier for distro maintainers to write startup scripts, which is something a lot of them wanted.

    The bad:
    * Poor understanding of interfaces by the lead developers.
    * Poor understanding of portability by the lead developers.
    * Poor understanding of separation of concerns.
    * Scope creep (there is no reason Gnome should depend on systemd).
    * Binary files are a symptom of idiocy......more specifically, binary/text is not something that should be decided by the init system.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  2. Re:Startup management subsystem by DrJimbo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd rather have a system that does it better without having to resort to scripts all over the place to make up for deficiencies in the system.

    You seem to be making the tacit assumption that everything works perfectly. If I am debugging a system then I would much prefer to deal with scripts (usually all in one place or otherwise easily found) than have to try to debug C and C++ code and XML schema. See Theodore Ts'o comments that were linked to above.

    It reminds of me dealing with Microsoft systems (many years ago from the NT days, maybe they have changed since then). *IF* everything works pefectly then it is fine but as soon as you are in the mode of tracking down problems then it becomes a nightmare. This is why I made the switch from Windows-NT to Linux when I was doing sysadmin at a university. If I wanted to use a system that was like that then I would use Windows. This tacit assumption that the system was designed perfectly so there is no need for any intervention is one of the reason people don't want to give up init scripts on their Linux systems and replace them with systemd.

    --
    We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
    -- Anais Nin