Slashdot Mirror


Girls Catfish ISIS On Social Media For Travel Money

MarkWhittington writes: Yahoo Travel reported that three women in Chechnya took ISIS for $3,300 before getting caught. They are now under investigation for Internet fraud, which seems to be illegal even when committed against the most fearsome terrorist army in modern times. The scam seems to be a combination of the Nigerian Prince con, in which a mark is fooled into giving the con artist large sums of money and catfishing, in which the mark strikes up an online romance with someone he thinks is an attractive woman (or man depending on the gender and preference of the mark.)

15 of 238 comments (clear)

  1. Catfish by ArchieBunker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can we stop using catfish as a verb? Its fucking dumb.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Catfish by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Informative

      I thought that was called noodling? That's what it's called here in Canada(Ontario specifically) and in the southern US.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Catfish by Sqr(twg) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, verbing wierds language, as Watterson wrote, but on the other hand; What word do you propose we use to mean "to swindle by assuming a false identity online"?

      Language evolves as new words are needed, and just because a word is already a noun, there's no rule saying it can't become a verb. (To "fish" is a verb.)

  2. Why is that illegal? by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If the intelligence agencies were smart, they would offer to match anything you were able to con out of known terrorist groups. The scam artists of the world would de-fund ISIS in about a year, all without firing a shot.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Why is that illegal? by zedaroca · · Score: 5, Informative

      The scam artists of the world would de-fund ISIS in about a year

      You forgot who is financing ISIS.
      According to the vice-president (and a lot of other more credible places), it's the US allies, that their funds from the US.
      The clip with Joe Biden
      News about him apologizing for telling them out
      Old Wikileaks leak about them financing anyone available to fight against Assad, and being interested in a big humanitarian disaster. Quotes from the e-mail:

      One Air Force intel guy (US) said very carefully that there isn't much of a Free Syrian Army to train right now anyway

      the idea 'hypothetically' is to commit guerrilla attacks, assassination campaigns, try to break the back of the Alawite forces, elicit collapse from within

      They dont believe air intervention would happen unless there was enough media attention on a massacre, like the Ghadafi move against Benghazi. They think the US would have a high tolerance for killings as long as it doesn't reach that very public stage.

    2. Re:Why is that illegal? by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You severely under-estimate the combined ability of the worlds scammers targeting a specific group... especially so with a group who have already shown they are prone to being manipulated.

      No amount of stolen museum works or oil wells or side income from slave brothels/human trafficking would save them from total plunder.

      Big pockets are all the better as lure the lure for more attacks.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Why is that illegal? by goodmanj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... Okay, so I get a friend in Saudi Arabia to send me a money order, marked: "for travel to the Islamic State, Allahu akbar". I show it to the US government, they pay me a reward, I split it with my friend.

      That's just off the top of my head, I'm sure a real con artist could do better. The problem with doing business with con artists is that they're con artists.

    4. Re:Why is that illegal? by Xest · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah if Turkey's latest actions where it's killed 260 kurds are anything to go by it's pretty obvious which side Turkey is on.

      Turkey is the new Pakistan, pretending to be pro-West on one hand to get nice military funding, whilst supporting the likes of the Taliban, Al Qaeda and ISIS on the other.

      All thanks to Erdogan.

    5. Re:Why is that illegal? by Xest · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Erdogan has turned a blind eye to ISIS fighters and weapons using his country as a transit point into Syria whilst blocking Kurdish fighters from doing the same and has put far more effort into bombing Kurds.

      It's got nothing to do with skin colour or religion, Turkey and the Kurds are both secular, ISIS is an Islamist group, and Erdogan is an Islamist leader, that's about it. Calling out a bad leader for doing more to oppress a group that has been in peace talks for 2 years and has been attacked by Erdogan's troops more than they've attacked Erdogans troops doesn't make me an Islamaphobe by any measure, particularly as there are more than enough muslim Kurds. Stop being so ignorant.

      Your post really couldn't be more useless, "it's a nationalism issue", what's a nationalism issue exactly? bombing the Kurds? great, but how does that justify implicitly supporting ISIS by letting them transit fighters and weapons through Turkey? how does that make it okay to attack the Kurds more so than ISIS? It doesn't matter what the motivation issue is, it's wrong all the same. Erdogan has long held the belief that ISIS are more of a benefit than a problem, and that's really not good for the West. Only now that they've attacked Turkey proper in a slightly more brutal way has his calculus changed somewhat and even then his instinct is not to obliterate ISIS, but instead to use it as an excuse to hammer the shit out of the PKK, and hit the YPG too.

      It's kind of sad how you had to see the problem as an issue of race and religion, I'm astounded that you'd then cry bigot - you obviously are wrestling with your own inability to keep religion and race out of a discussion it's wholly irrelevant to. Crying "Islamaphobe", talking about skin colour and shouting bigot wont detract from your own apparent bigotry where you jump to conclusions that bear no relevance to anything that was said.

  3. It ought to be legal to scam ISIS by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If it was legal to scam them they would be flooded with offers from so many girls it would either bankrupt them or they would stop recruiting because of all the scams. It would seriously disrupt their recruiting.

    It's just like banning people from joining them. We should be lining those people up and flying them over there right after they sign papers saying they aren't citizens anymore. Let them go, fight and die as long as they never return. They won't be in our country anymore. And on the flip side it should be perfectly legal to scam them. They are a criminal organization and I personally like the old world idea that someone that's breaking the law and fighting prosecution is then outside the law including it's protections. There aren't innocents in groups like ISIS, everyone should be free to target them with any action that would normally be deemed criminal.

  4. Re:This is a crap propaganda post by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is a crap propaganda post. How much the state department is paying you?

    *ahem* the politically correct word is poop. Please, think of the children!

    Okay,
    This is a crap propaganda post. How much the poop is paying you?
    Better?

  5. The realistic problem here is one of security by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 4, Interesting

    People pissing off ISIL/ISIS or interfering with non-public operations are a problem for states that are doing their own things officially. When you've got private citizens scamming them like this you wind up with lots of little bullseyes antagonizing ISIL which might provoke a reprisal of some kind.

    What we really need to do with all these non-state and semi-state actors like ISIL and Al Qaeda is start issuing letters of marque again. "You want to pick a fight with these guys? Go have it at. Follow these rules and understand you're on your own or we'll come after you ourselves."

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  6. Collateral Damage. by westlake · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This looks like it is all in fun.

    Until ISIS decides to set off a truck bomb on the street where these women live.

    The Islamic State is no mere collection of psychopaths. It is a religious group with carefully considered beliefs, among them that it is a key agent of the coming apocalypse. The Islamic State is committed to purifying the world by killing vast numbers of people.

    What ISIS Really Wants

  7. Re:They should legalize fraud against terrorists by ThatAblaze · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Man, I want to live in your world! Imagine if everyone legalized anything that was hilarious. I'd go around planting drugs on the police, and if I got caught my defense would be "sorry judge, it was just too hilarious to stop!"

  8. Re:Nice. by bloodhawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So you think somehow the gangs of LA are going to magically protect you from someone driving a garbage truck full of explosives into your neighbourhood or from a stranger walking up to you hacking at your head with a machete? man you must walk around with a 1 kilometer perimeter where the only people you ever see are LA Gang members.

    If someone wants to kill you bad enough then they CAN, embarrassing organisations like ISIS is a good way to not only get yourself killed but others around you. ISIS are a bunch of sadistic pricks with seriously warped moral compasses and they have a bunch of blind followers who will happily sacrifice their lives just to make a point that you can't fuck with them should they choose to do so, or are you really so niave that you think ISIS members don't exist in just about every country of the world?