Slashdot Mirror


Broken Windows 10 Update Causes Reboot Loops For Some Users

An anonymous reader writes: The Guardian reports that some early adopters of Windows 10 are finding their computers stuck in a reboot loop after installing a particular update. KB3081424 is a cumulative update, packaging together a group of smaller ones for ease of installation. For some users, the update continually fails to finish installing before issuing a reboot command to the PC. "It downloads, reboot to install. Gets to 30% and reboots. Gets to 59% and reboots. Gets to 59% again and then states something went wrong so uninstalling the update. Wait a few minutes and reboot. Back to login screen," said Microsoft forum user BrettDM. "This happens without fail, every single time."

6 of 203 comments (clear)

  1. It fixes itself? by BenJeremy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ideally not a true fix, but a workaround, at least.

    At least it doesn't render the users' computers inoperable.

    I got the update just fine... but the Start Menu Item limitation (512 menu items max) is still not fixed with this update.

    Also, the Store and "Movies & TV" windows keep popping up randomly (I believe when I watch something with media player). Very annoying.

    One more thing... why the heck is the titlebar/menu coloring a hot mess? All white? There is a theme out there called "colors" that kinda-sorta fixes the issue, but it won't stick the accent color I assigned. At least it makes the desktop less visually messy. It seems that every iteration of Windows has given users fewer and fewer options to change colors and details of the user interface... while making the supplied themes progressively worse. I should be able to make Windows 10 look like XP, if I want to (I don't want to, really).

    For the most part, Windows 10 is fine... but annoying leftovers from Windows 8 and this interminable menu limitation is driving me nuts.

    1. Re:It fixes itself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree with you completely. I hung on to 2000 for as long as I could. I have grudgingly updated to XP and Win7 as necessary. Nothing specifically wrong with XP or 7 to make me resistant to upgrading to them... But there was nothing wrong with 2000 that made me interested in upgrading away from it. The UI was clean, familiar, and non-obtrusive. Every single version of Windows since it has struck me as a step backwards in terms of usability.

      Really the thing that needs to happen is that Microsoft needs to wake up and realize that nobody cares about the operating system. The only time anyone pays attention to it is when it is being annoying. If someone is talking about your OS, chances are you did something wrong. The purpose of the OS is to get me to my applications and get the heck out of my way. Every version of Windows since 2000 has added more and more unnecessary garbage that gets in my way. 8 was easily the worst.. Nice to see 10 step back a bit from it, but it still has a long ways to go. I have 10 on a spare laptop for farting around on during meetings and it is okay. Although yesterday the thing popped up an advertisement for a 30 day trail of O365. My OS is interrupting me for an advertisement?! Oh hell no.

  2. Re:Forced Updates-- What could POSSIBLY go wrong? by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is more about making life easier for Microsoft than it is about giving a damn about users.

    When I forcibly uninstalled the update to Windows 8.1 which started pushing Windows 10 at me, one of the things it said it was doing was adding a piece to monitor and evaluate how well system updates are going. Basically gather metrics on how bad they're doing.

    Microsoft has decided that it's their computer, that if they feel an update needs to be applied they will, and that if it breaks for some users that's an unfortunate side effect of having your customers doing your beta testing ... but thanks for doing our beta testing.

    The trend with computers and electronic devices is for the license to say "you don't own this, and you don't get a say in what we do to it". And people are going to start pushing back when they suddenly find themselves with a broken computer because Microsoft forced an update on them.

    Microsoft isn't going to pay to fix it, they're not going to pay for the loss of productivity. They're simply going to say "bummer", and keep doing it.

    Which if you or I did that we'd be charged criminally under the computer fraud and abuse act or something similar.

    But they have an EULA which says they're allowed to.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  3. Re:Forced Updates-- What could POSSIBLY go wrong? by Falconnan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    True, but that "non-obvious" part is the problem. It should be obvious, clearly labelled, and functional. The fact I can edit the registry and not nuke a computer is great. My father or uncle on the other hand... Just lots of "no". Though, really, I suppose I should thank Microsoft for the job security.

  4. The biggest problem with windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is that it reboots all the time, and you can't stop it, only delay it (and if you're not on your computer 24/7, eventually you'll miss the delay prompt and it will just reboot). I'm obsessive with saving (if there's one thing Windows has taught me, it's to hit control+s after every sentence in a document or email) so I haven't lost work, but countless coworkers have. Yet, they still always have excuses when I offer to install Linux on their computers.

  5. Re:Forced Updates-- What could POSSIBLY go wrong? by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Reading the patch summaries would be nice if most of them weren't a minor variation of "Fixes an issue with Windows on some computers". That's a pretty useless summary.