Slashdot Mirror


The Challenge of Working At Amazon

An anonymous reader writes: The NY Times has a lengthy exposé on the working conditions within Jeff Bezos's Amazon. "Even as the company tests delivery by drone and ways to restock toilet paper at the push of a bathroom button, it is conducting a little-known experiment in how far it can push white-collar workers, redrawing the boundaries of what is acceptable." Over 100 current and former employees were interviewed for the article, and they painted a picture of a demanding and punishing workplace that people tolerate in exchange for the ability to create. "In contrast to companies where declarations about their philosophy amount to vague platitudes, Amazon has rules that are part of its daily language and rituals, used in hiring, cited at meetings and quoted in food-truck lines at lunchtime. Some Amazonians say they teach them to their children." Of course, this attitude causes problems for people whose lives don't allow them extreme levels of effort: "The mother of the stillborn child soon left Amazon. 'I had just experienced the most devastating event in my life,' the woman recalled via email, only to be told her performance would be monitored 'to make sure my focus stayed on my job.'"

15 of 396 comments (clear)

  1. Article summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Key points I heard:

    - Midlevel mgmt can make their salary over again year upon year via bonuses and stock performance. (Implied: senior mgmt and up has it better)
    - Tech workers are expected to pay for their own desks, cellphones, travel on their "competitive salary"
    - It's regarded as reasonable to line up ambulances to cart away hourly workers who collapse than improve their working conditions
    - Standard office joke: Work comes first, life second and searching for the balance is against company policy
    - People weep openly at their desks, men exit conference rooms in shame, covering their faces so as to hide their tears
    - Anonymous feedback on employee performance is encouraged
    - Everyone is encouraged to confront every (non-manager) about sub-perfect ideas
    - Amazon is proud of being unreasonable in their demands

    Sounds like a toxic hell hole unless you're in the ruling class, then at least the money is good while it consumes your life.

    1. Re:Article summary by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Quite possibly it'll be the ultimate thing which buries the company though. Toxic workplaces tend to be very good at ultimately pursuing bad ideas that sink them, because they eventually drive away anyone who might have the drive to try and fix or oppose them. Drone delivery might be the first sign of that with Amazon. Plus - we haven't seen the fallout of a genuine crash in cloud hosting yet, and there's a lot of business being built on the idea that Amazon will always exist. Inject some genuine uncertainty and you have to wonder if they're in a position to deal with that.

  2. Re:Slavery 2.0 Rocks!!! by preaction · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't mistake the legality of quitting with the ability to quit: Many families do not have the savings to miss a single paycheck. Work them hard enough, make sure they can't take time off to interview for a new job, dismantle the social safety net, and you have wage slavery.

  3. Re:Work/life balance is extremely important. by Calydor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why would they want healthy, long-term employees? Someone who has worked in the same place for a long time expects raises.

    Instead they accept a high employee turnover and keep wages at entry-level.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  4. Re:Slavery 2.0 Rocks!!! by Archtech · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you can quit and go work elsewhere, then it is not slavery.

    Hmmmm. Even if the pay and conditions elsewhere are not better than where you are?

    Technically, you are not a slave unless you are legally someone else's property. But owning human property in the form of slaves has a downside. They represent a big investment, so you need to keep them healthy. That means reasonable shelter, board and lodging, clothes, some form of medical help when needed... it all adds up.

    Today the wealthy have discovered that it pays much better to leave the "slaves" free. That way shelter, board, lodging, clothing, and medical care are their problem, not yours.

    Exactly as modern imperialists have discovered that it's a mug's game to invade countries and take them over. Then, as Colin Powell memorably noted, you own them - and you're responsible for governing them. It pays better to stay outside their borders, lend their governments money, get them hopelessly in debt, and force all their citizens to work for you at rock-bottom pay for the rest of their lives. Followed by their children and their grandchildren.

    Isn't finance wonderful?

    --
    I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  5. Re:BBC Panorama filmed the slave conditions by Burz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The warehouse work is like slavery, just short of a whip - except they now use virtual whips to get their slaves straightened out.

    Sure, there's a little perk called a slaves wage, after-all, they need them to be fed in order to do the miles of walking per day.

    A written expose here.

    It seems the highly 'exceptional' people in Jeff Bezos' circle have re-invented Taylorism, which is an abiding disregard for the well-being of workers. This indifference and disregard is called "scientific". Efficiency is something to be squeezed out of people second by second, the long-term effects be damned.

  6. Re:Why not? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You have NO IDEA how fortunate you are. Or how bad things can be.

    During the Great Recession, some people were unemployed for THREE YEARS or more. The Obama Administration had to extend and re-extend unemployment benefits for people. Quite a few of them finally found jobs, but at substantially less pay. So you'd better hope that you really can live for 10 years without a paycheck. And that that "10 years" isn't coming from your retirement savings.

    It's not enough to have a really good skill set or be willing to move about the country like a migrant farm worker. Sometimes you don't know the right people in the right places, have the "perfect" match of skills or cannot manage to live on 120,000 Rupees a year.

    Or worse. you could be over 40.

  7. Re:Amazon's Self-Reinforcing Decline in Hires by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sure, a bit. Uber's the same thing. It's designed to make maximum use of crazy people and force the others to live up to that standard or be fired.

    I'll define 'crazy Uber people' not as 'danger to customers', but 'people who are bringing more value in terms of vehicle, skill and desire to please, than they are getting back in pay and benefits'. So the crazy Uber person is the one who keeps buying a new Lexus or whatever, vacuums their car three times a day and busts their ass to outperform all the other Uber drivers, so they can continue to win out over anybody else seeking to be a driver.

    The key factor is that they are giving more than they get back, in the belief that they're cornering some kind of market or buying in to something important.

    If you make a business that relies on people like this, you can demolish anybody else because you've worked out how to get voluntary unpaid labor, like the Amazon exec who was said to use her own money to hire subcontractors to do more. As long as there are people who are willing to do that, the market breaks and Amazon/Uber get to do what Wal-Mart did in small towns, break the back of other market participants so they can't break even or continue.

    Another way to be a crazy Uber person is to put more depreciation and wear and tear on your car than you can afford to repair (or replace). It's easy to be crazy in these ways. It's externalities which are easy to overlook. These Amazon/Uber business models are designed to leverage that kind of crazy as hard as possible, and kick out everybody who's not willing to lose (one way or another) on the deal. Psychology is useful in getting people to buy into this stuff.

    As they say, a cult.

  8. Don't like unions? by Rinikusu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because this is how you get unions.

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  9. Re:Slavery 2.0 Rocks!!! by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    you are wrong.

    speaking as someone who is out of work, savings near 0 (been out a long time) and there is essentially no social support. I can't meet my expenses on unemployment, not even close. and when unemployed, you cannot find a new place to live; they all insist you are currently employed! catch 22.

    I know what I'm talking about. I'm in that role. you are simply ASSUMING and you are, quite frankly, wrong and talking out of your ass.

    america will crush you and you can't expect the US to support its people when they are down and out. why the fuck do you think there ARE homeless people!!! dammit.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  10. Re:Slavery 2.0 Rocks!!! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Amazon appears to pay white collar workers (the subject of this article) fairly well. If you cannot afford to keep a family of 4 on $9,000 per month, then you're doing it wrong. Yes, Seattle housing has gotten more expensive - but you can still find hundreds of houses for sale that would have 3+ bedrooms (so little Johnny and little Mary can have their own rooms), 2+ bathrooms, and are standalone homes - and are available for under $500,000 (meaning about a $2,000/month mortgage - should be simple for a monthly income of $9,000).

    If the typical white collar Amazon worker cannot afford to feed their kids and pay a mortgage AND put away 10% of their income every month - then they really need some basic budgeting skills and self-control.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  11. It doesn't work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We are a vendor who works on a lot of high profile jobs that Amazon can't handle in-house. We work 40 hour weeks and our median employee retention is about 10 years. We also pay well and definitely know how to speak our mind when we think something is wrong, even sticking to our guns against anyone else if we can defend our position.

    Every. Single. Amazon. Employee. that comes to our office asks if we're hiring or know who is. I've never seen anything like it in my life. Every single employee is working on their exit strategy. And it's not some utopian meritocracy where the best remain the weak are purged. They're losing their best employees who are creative and smart because going into a 10 hour long meeting where everyone feels not just encouraged but required to criticize an idea isn't productive it's just everybody feeling they have to provide input or look like they're slacking. Sorry but sometimes something is good but Bob in accounting feels like he needs to add his 2 cents to be a contributor. Nothing is worse in a meeting than people who don't actually have anything to contribute feel mandated to speak up and derail a meeting because that's one of the 12 commandments.

    And for a process supposedly based on data, it ignores the largest data point that has been validated with over a 100 years of research: after 40 hours your employees aren't contributing anything. In knowledge based economies it's even lower, after about 30 hours you're just killing time.

    The model that they're chasing is the Chinese School system. What that accomplishes is cramming and metric pleasing but what it fails to accomplish is actual innovation and progress because all of your energy goes into satisfying the grading system not taking risks and giving your brain 2 seconds to step back and absorb what it's working on. There's no time walk around a problem when you're barely keeping up with your workload.

    Toyota figured that out with their NUMMI plant. They learned that if you push employees too far and you simply reward quantity over quality you end up with shit product.

    All Amazon is going to have in a few years is Type A assholes who are willing to kill themselves and they'll have no creatives, no inventors and nobody who actually is innovating. They'll have people who happily work 100 hour weeks to reduce the delay after clicking "Buy Now" and nobody coming up with the next Kindle.

    1. Re:It doesn't work. by bitingduck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And for a process supposedly based on data, it ignores the largest data point that has been validated with over a 100 years of research: after 40 hours your employees aren't contributing anything. In knowledge based economies it's even lower, after about 30 hours you're just killing time.

      Just quoting this part, but the rest of your post is a worthwhile read, too--I'd mod it up if I had points.

      I've seen a lot of people who "work 80+ hour weeks" it's pretty rare that any of them are doing even 30 hours of productive work most of the time. In some cases they're such a mess that they're breaking things and moving things backwards. It's one thing to have a crunch and work double for a week or two or three. Sometimes it happens, and in many cases you can even be productive for it. But when people try to sustain it, it breaks things. Where I am, QA are expected to stop you from working if you've been on shift more than 12 hours and are touching hardware. Or even if you look tired. And if it's friday and there's a big task that has to get done? Sometimes the best thing you can do is send everybody home-- stuff gets broken on friday afternoons and weekends when everybody's tired and in a hurry.

  12. Re:Why not? by vux984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh, yes. Because I saved money rather than spent it, I'm 'fortunate'.

    Fortunate on 2 counts actually.

    First You made more than you needed to live. Many people at or below the poverty line don't have extra money to set aside.

    Second, Evidently, nothing substantially unpleasant ever actually happened. When you had your six months or whatever living expenses saved away, you weren't laid off, and then fell off your front porch, wiping out your savings one hospital trip, and then some, and THEN finding yourself unable to work for several months... because no matter how much you set aside, there's always the chance that something bigger will hit you. You were fortunate that nothing bigger than you saved for ever hit you.

    I too have your savings attitude, and I think its extremely prudent. It lets you absorb life's little hits without it being a big deal. But I don't pretend for a second that I haven't been fortunate that life hasn't thrown a bigger hit than I can absorb.