Slashdot Mirror


Android M's Official Name Is Marshmallow

An anonymous reader writes: As they've done in the past, Google has revealed the name for the upcoming version of Android with a new statue in front of its headquarters. Android's sixth version will be called Marshmallow. Dave Burke, Android's VP of engineering, unveiled the statue on Twitter. Google has also released the Android 6.0 SDK and the final M preview.

92 comments

  1. Missed opportunity by jandrese · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was really expecting the statue to be an androided version of the Stay-Puft Marshmallow man. The statue is a little disappointing.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Missed opportunity by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was really expecting the statue to be an androided version of the Stay-Puft Marshmallow man. The statue is a little disappointing.

      i dunno, it doesn't seem as cute: http://phandroid.s3.amazonaws....

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    2. Re:Missed opportunity by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 2

      Exactly. This would have been awesome:

      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CM...

    3. Re:Missed opportunity by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Still better than the cold-looking Android mascot. Whoever thought "Borg Green" was a good colour choice is an idiot.

    4. Re:Missed opportunity by GTRacer · · Score: 0

      That was literally my second thought after hearing the new name. Right after "What happened to naming them after treats? Marshmallow is gross!"...

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    5. Re: Missed opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android dropped the ball the moment they opened up shop. Literally. Android is for fucktards who play games on their phones. Fuck google and android. Jaggoffs all of it

    6. Re: Missed opportunity by Threni · · Score: 1

      Over a billion owners of Android devices disagree with you, or at least, couldn't care less.

  2. That's amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It will usher in a whole new era of mobile experience. Or maybe people have long stopped caring about Android names and version-diarrhea.

    1. Re:That's amazing by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Funny

      It usher in the age of Gozer!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:That's amazing by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      There is no Dana, only ZOOOOOOOL

    3. Re: That's amazing by technosaurus · · Score: 1

      Too close to Mozilla's "There is no data, only xul"

    4. Re: That's amazing by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      where do you think they got that from?????

    5. Re: That's amazing by technosaurus · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately ridiculous Ghost Buster references throughout the code hierarchy is not the only reason the Mozilla code base is unattractive.

  3. M&M Mars didn't cough up enough money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how much Google was trying to get out of them?

    1. Re:M&M Mars didn't cough up enough money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Google's next Android version was going to be Key Lime Pie, I rejoiced because it was a somewhat more healthful dessert than the others and is connected to my home state of Florida. Ah, too bad, that was too healthful. They had to be sure all the calories were empty: Kit Kat.

      Are we going to see it again? Marshmallows nowadays may be all puffed up and somewhat sweet, but contain protein from eggs and, traditionally, extract from the root of the marsh mallow plant. I bet that Google will find marshmallows also to be too healthy, especially if money crosses their hands to make them want to take a little journey to Mars.

      To go with the same manufacturer--and to get a bit of a break from rectangular candy bars--they may want to say that Android M is now Android M&M.

  4. Perfect Name by bughunter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    'Marshmallow' is the perfect word for a label that carries no content, is all fluff, and whose sole purpose is to appeal to people with simple tastes.

    (Note that I'm not talking about the OS, but the practice of giving each version a cute name. Android is not alone in this practice, but with 'Marshmallow' they seem to have achieved the pinnacle of its banality.)

    --
    I can see the fnords!
    1. Re:Perfect Name by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't mind cute names, and I don't mind version numbers.

      What I can't stand is the arbitrary mixing of the two, especially as sometimes minor versions get a name bump and sometimes they don't. I seem to continually have to keep refering to a list of "version name versus number" lists when it's stated that the feature is new in KitKat and I'm wondering if it's there (oh no wasn't in Jellybean, but was in KitKat but only fixed in the second, unnamed release).

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:Perfect Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm banal appeal pinnacle pops and marshamallow sundaes. Why u use such big words ice cream man?? Confucius me!!

    3. Re:Perfect Name by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      If the minor version of Android Kit Kat ever goes beyond 4, someone failed.

    4. Re:Perfect Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like Marshmallows because they have gelatin.

    5. Re:Perfect Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compare with Debian release names and Linux kernel version. The problem is not unique to Android.

    6. Re:Perfect Name by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      'Marshmallow' is the perfect word for a label that carries no content, is all fluff, and whose sole purpose is to appeal to people with simple tastes.

      Maybe I have simple tastes, but I like the idea of relatively unique and absurd version names. If you search for "debian 8 <my issue here>" I could get any kind of old crap, because the number eight has so many other uses like that this page was made the 8th of August 2008 or whatever. If I search for "debian jessie <my issue here>" it's extremely likely the page has been updated with information relevant to my version. Simply because prior to the announcement, there was very little if any reason to use "jessie" on any debian-related page and it's fairly memorable as a unique version identifier for both writers and readers.

      TL;DR don't confuse nonsensical with useless

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    7. Re:Perfect Name by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      If the minor version of Android Kit Kat ever goes beyond 4, someone failed.

      The multiple point releases didn't have separate names, even though they have different bug fixes which of course not all handsets pick up.. But of course other versions do. Jelly Bean spanned 4.1 to 4.3 which really saw some rather massive changes, to the point where referring to it as a single name is kinda stupid.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    8. Re:Perfect Name by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

      And remember, Marshmallow is made from gelatin and, as the Simpsons taught us "Gelatin comes from the skin, bones and hooves of only the sickest horses".

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    9. Re:Perfect Name by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      You over-analyzed my comment. Think less about Android, more about Nestlé KitKat.

    10. Re:Perfect Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      marshmallows are made of COWS! Android is for COWS who only want to consume content and don't need a c/c++ compiler and say MOO! MOO, you COWS!!!

    11. Re:Perfect Name by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Wait, Doctor Who loves marshmallows...

    12. Re:Perfect Name by hankwang · · Score: 1

      "If you search for "debian 8 " I could get any kind of old crap, because the number eight has so many other uses like that this page was made the 8th of August 2008 or whatever."

      I think you underestimate the capabilities of Google of recognizing word collocations that often occur in queries and web pages. Right now, your statement is true because nobody starts a forum thread or mailing-list subject with "fubar issue in debian 8".

      If you google something like "fedora 22 nvidia", you won't see much posts dated 22th of June or whatever.

  5. like in Ghostbusters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nobodoy expected no evil ...

  6. Android M's Unofficial Name is Titanic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too big to fail and drowning in hubris.

  7. Can we ever escape the influence of Disney Frozen? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 0

    >> Marshmallow

    Can we ever escape the influence of Disney's Frozen movie?
    http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net...

  8. M&M by X10 · · Score: 1

    I was hoping for M&M. I don't like Marshmellows.

    --
    no, I don't have a sig
    1. Re:M&M by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      M&M is a trademarked product name, no doubt.

    2. Re:M&M by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      M&M is a trademarked product name, no doubt.

      So is Kit Kat, doofus.

  9. milkshake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why not milkshake :(:(:(:(

    1. Re:milkshake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what about "I Drink your Milkshake, I drink it all up"

  10. Bah by Godai · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Milkshake would have been more fun, if only for the image of an Android filled with chocolatey goodness and a pair of straws for antennae.

    --
    Wood Shavings!
    - Godai
    1. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mom's milkshake is always fun. She loves drinking my chocalatey goodness through my straw.

      I like drinking through her straw too.

    2. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe N for Nutella will bring that chocolately goodness (with some hazelnut)

    3. Re:Bah by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2

      if it's open source, wouldn't it be gnutella?

    4. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it's open source, wouldn't it be gnutella?

      Maybe, but who wants to run a P2P networking node on their smartphone?

  11. not marzipan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I was so hoping for marzipan.

  12. How many people just learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How to spell Marshmallow?

    +1

  13. Have they fixed non-secure FAT32 access yet? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Broken in Kitkat, still broken in Lollipop. Not every Android device will live its whole life in sight of the cloud! Portable file system access is a must!

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Have they fixed non-secure FAT32 access yet? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      They're holding out for the next version. One bug at a time keeps the upgrade treadmill running full speed.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Have they fixed non-secure FAT32 access yet? by evilRhino · · Score: 2

      Isn't FAT32 mostly obsolete due to volume size limitations?

    3. Re:Have they fixed non-secure FAT32 access yet? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      You can have 48 hours of music in MP3 in 32GB, and for the most part, no worries about security.

      Sneakernet still uses FAT32 for the most part because of the huge number of operating systems that can read it.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:Have they fixed non-secure FAT32 access yet? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      FAT 32 has been completely obsolete since Windows Vista came out. The reason for Vista is it was the first Windows version to support write access for UDF without additional drivers. At that point, every major OS and quite a few minor ones all supported a common filesystem format which supported large sizes, proper long names and a bunch of other features.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:Have they fixed non-secure FAT32 access yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Microsoft patented exFAT and got it as a mandatory part of the SDXC standard, completely fucking the general usefulness of MicroSD cards > 32GB. Thanks, assholes.

    6. Re:Have they fixed non-secure FAT32 access yet? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Isn't FAT32 mostly obsolete due to volume size limitations?

      Well, FAT32 supports up to 2TB filesystems.

      Windows artificially limits it to 32GB to promote NTFS, but you can use Linux to make a FAT32 partition bigger than that. You can even bring it over to Windows and format it FAT32

      Anyhow, Google really likes to avoid patents. They avoided the Apple "rounded corners" patent[1] (because the launcher part of that patent was different). Their Nexus devices don't have SD cards and thus can conveniently skip FAT32 and ExFAT support and all the Microsoft patents there.

      [1] - The rounded corners patent is a design patent covering a rounded corner smartphone with a grid of icons, of which one row of icons status static while you flip between pages of grids of icons. Android gets around it because the grid of icons is the app launcher, to which there is no static row of icons, and the closest you get would be the home screen, but then you have widgets which are not icons.

    7. Re:Have they fixed non-secure FAT32 access yet? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Broken in Kitkat, still broken in Lollipop. Not every Android device will live its whole life in sight of the cloud! Portable file system access is a must!

      Android has portable file system access but it is not the obsolete FAT32. Use UDF, it doesn't have the file or volume size limitations and it's supported by all major operating systems.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    8. Re:Have they fixed non-secure FAT32 access yet? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Or you can run any of third-party programs to format your volume under Windows, which otherwise doesn't have a real limitation.
      A tiny and simple one is called "fat32format". I used to have an 8GB ntfs Windows XP partition and bulk storage as fat, with the swap file and temp on one of the fat partitions which was also DOS bootable.
      Simpler times. With the OS on a real file system there was no great danger of corruption in case of crash (the PC was crazy stable anyway)

    9. Re:Have they fixed non-secure FAT32 access yet? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Makes me think of DVD-RAM, which is about the only place you use UDF. Remember DVD-RAM? I've never seen one.
      Double-sided 8cm DVD-RAM in a cartridge, that would be kind of cool.

    10. Re:Have they fixed non-secure FAT32 access yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SDXC cards work perfectly fine on my Windows PC, Macbook Air, Note 3 and Canon 60D so I don't know what you are crapping on about but whether Microsoft has patents on whatever doesnt actually make any practical difference.

    11. Re:Have they fixed non-secure FAT32 access yet? by tepples · · Score: 1

      All DVD uses some flavor of UDF, even a stamped DVD Video.

    12. Re:Have they fixed non-secure FAT32 access yet? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Next version, hell, the manufacturers are getting worse and worse on upgrading the OS in phones. Still waiting to see kitkat on a note 3 in Australia (never pay premium for a pseudo premium phone because you are just paying for premium advertising). Android start doing elemental updates, update elements of the Android OS rather than 'claiming' updating the whole OS so that people can get them without breaking warranty of lame manufacturers. That way you can get some elements of the phone OS upgraded even if you can not get them all. I'll keep the phone till it dies even if screen brightness is problematic and unpredictable, the stylus sort of mostly works and the GPS is not sure which country it is some times (not so premium at all).

      So allow for part upgrades of the OS, like screen interface, or security updates or functionality, whilst leaving the hardware interface intact(the stuff the user does not see or interact with) until a full upgrade. There is no need for full upgrades to change stuff like the GUI.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    13. Re:Have they fixed non-secure FAT32 access yet? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      You can also format a USB stick with UDF. Needs a little care because Windows has bugs when it comes to the partition table, but it will give a sane FS on Windows, Macs and Linux.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    14. Re:Have they fixed non-secure FAT32 access yet? by Imbrondir · · Score: 1

      They got these at the price of around a windows phone license on top of everything else. If you look at low end phones they always cap at the 32GB limit, or the license would become a very significant part of the total price.

    15. Re:Have they fixed non-secure FAT32 access yet? by danielbeaver · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is. But it is also unencumbered by patents, is widely compatible, and the limitations are less problematic on a mobile device (though it's definitely a problem if you want to do stuff like watch high-def movies on your tablet).

  14. But what about... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    ...Android: Other M?

    1. Re:But what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't talk about Other M

    2. Re:But what about... by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      I can't wait for Android: Soylent*

      * made exclusively from clowns, so you know it's sweet.

  15. When will people learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to use the title field in the appropriate way?

  16. I thought 'M' stood for Mine by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    Since Android phones can be hacked with a simple text, I was going on the presumption the M stood for Mine, as in, "Your phone is mine."

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:I thought 'M' stood for Mine by Ksevio · · Score: 2

      Fortunately you can disable that

  17. Who cares? by 0123456 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Still no support for the Nexus 7, which was on sale less than a year ago.

    If that's Google's idea of customer support, I'll have to replace it with an iPad.

  18. Fast adoption certain! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Its predecessor, Lollipop, clawed it way to 18.1% share in just 9 short months! In fact, Android versions released since October 2013 (KitKat) account for a whopping 57.4 share! With quick adoption like that, you should plan to upgrade your current phone to Marshmallow any day now.

    (Achievement unlocked: I typed that whole thing with a straight face.)

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:Fast adoption certain! by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Maybe they'll break 10% adoption of Marshmallow before they announce Nougat.

    2. Re:Fast adoption certain! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know it's fun to bash at numbers, but consider the following: I've already been writing material design/marshmallow style apps for a few weeks with android 2.3 support thanks to the compatibility library. This is why it doesn't matter that much in Android to have the latest version compared to iOS forcing you OS upgrades for the most recent UI gimmick. I know there are other serious upgrades in each version, but come on, most users don't even know what changes, only looks are important, and Android does a good job of allowing you to support really ancient versions of users. I mean, I could support iOS 3 (I still have apps running on that) but Apple simply gives you a finger and doesn't even let you try.

    3. Re: Fast adoption certain! by the+computer+guy+nex · · Score: 1

      The compatibility library doesn't affect security, which is the real problem.

    4. Re:Fast adoption certain! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you don't tie e.g. critical browser updates to system updates (shame on you Apple!), system version number doesn't mean that much. Also, those adaptation rates are IMO quite impressive.

  19. Queue the 'when does {insert my device name here} by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    get this update?' requests in 3,2,1...

    Yeah, your manufacturer does not care, since {insert your device name here} does not have:

    - Fingerprint sensor (too cool to do without)
    - NFC (for Android Pay) (more revenue for them)
    - 3+GB RAM (they don't want to figure out how to shoehorn it into your old {insert your device name here}
    - USB-C (too cool) (new cables to buy) ( more revenue for them)
    - and the OEM ROM, of course, to get the OTA flash

    So don't bother to ask. Wait for some of the millions of lemmings flooding the boards with "wheeeeeennnnnnn??????" and go figure out how to root your phone and
    put a Cyanogen ROM on it. Or just buy a new phone...

    And the manufacturer of your phone will not bother if at all possible.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  20. Field of marshmallows by pubwvj · · Score: 2

    Did you know that marshmallows are a real plant? They're a flower growing out in our fields. It's the original plant used for making real marshmallows candies, the white puffs. Pretty and cool. Very easy to grow.

  21. Re: Queue the 'when does {insert my device name he by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But but but I have a Nexus 4 from Google! Whennnn?

  22. One more version behind! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

    So this puts all the people who brought their android phone from a US carrier one more version of Android behind their expectations.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  23. Name schname. They're at letter 13 out of 26! by Sloppy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Android's total history has reached the half-way point, unless you know the name of something sugary that starts with a left bracket.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:Name schname. They're at letter 13 out of 26! by arielCo · · Score: 1

      100 Grand
      3 Musketeers
      5 (gum)
      5-Hour Energy (I've had phones like that)
      7-Up

      No love for even numbers ):

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    2. Re:Name schname. They're at letter 13 out of 26! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cue Little Bobby Tables joke.

    3. Re:Name schname. They're at letter 13 out of 26! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about [ocksucker ?

  24. Re: Queue the 'when does {insert my device name he by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    But but but I have a Nexus 4 from Google! Whennnn?

    About 3 months after the AOSP release from Google and Cyanogen or your preferred alternative make a working version for the Nexus 4.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  25. Nexus 4 by JohnStock · · Score: 2

    This is still a fantastic smartphone that is more than capable of running Android Marshmallow. If Google abandon this phone it wont be encouraging any of us to upgrade our hardware, but instead move to Cyanogenmod or other ROMS.

  26. Shady dealings by tepples · · Score: 1

    they may want to say that Android M is now Android M&M

    Android Slim Shady? I believe Google is content to let others be the king of controversy, especially if it would mean dropping a rap album onto every device Google Play the way Apple dropped a U2 album onto every iPhone.

  27. Wireless mesh network by tepples · · Score: 1

    but who wants to run a P2P networking node on their smartphone?

    Some people have proposed exactly that in order to work around abuses by incumbent cellular carriers. See Wireless mesh network.

  28. Recommended celebrity spokesperson by robbiedo · · Score: 1

    Kristen Bell as Veronica Mars.

  29. Great, too bad most won't have access for a while. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really hope this works out, but the fact is that most people will not get access to this till they full on replace their phone as most phone manufactures seem to put stuff one version of Android on the phone with a bunch of crap you don't want but can't remove and then leave it to die and never upgrade it again even if the phone can run it just fine or IF YOU ARE LUCKY, you might get one upgrade out of it.

    I really hope Google starts forcing the phone providers to allow updates to their Android OS in some fashion without involving them to void warranties doing it like most do now if they dare.

  30. I'm running Window 10 Mob Preview on my Lumia 530 by blackpaw · · Score: 1

    How many Android users will be running Marshmallow?

  31. Re:Great, too bad most won't have access for a whi by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    kitkat was supposed to be designed so that the pieces could be updated like pieces of a kitkat and that there wouldn't be immediate need for another full on version... like, that the os could be updated mostly without having to update evvveerything.

    and then they released lollipop and m straight after.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  32. The fark... by Zanadou · · Score: 1

    The fark... why?? Didn't Google release Android L ("Lollipop") less than a year ago? Why, couldn't this just be Android v5.2 ??

    Oh wait. This is the post-Chrome rapid version number churn era... unless a product is updated by big, big, major version numbers at least three times a year*, "consumers" will consider it outdated and old-hat. Right?

    ( * Along with simplified, condescending changelogs ("coz, technical words scare people!!!") that basically boil down to "we updated your experience and fixed some "issues". Enjoy our product! Lololozz [smile emoji] " )

  33. Marshmallow?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marshmallow?!? What? No hat tip to Leonard Nimoy? Should have been 'Marshmelon'.

  34. Kitkat, Lollipop and Marshmallow by juniordias · · Score: 1

    What will be the name of the next version of Android? Sugar?
    Jokes aside, I found pretty cool Marshmallow name.
    I had many problems with the Kitkat version, but were resolved with the lollipop version, it is now expected that the new version does not bring complications!

    No way, we have to wait and see what's new!
    Decoração com Balões.