Slashdot Mirror


MIT's New File System Won't Lose Data During Crashes

jan_jes sends news that MIT researchers will soon present a file system they say is mathematically guaranteed not to lose data during a crash. While building it, they wrote and rewrote the file system over and over, finding that the majority of their development time was spent defining the system components and the relationships between them. "With all these logics and proofs, there are so many ways to write them down, and each one of them has subtle implications down the line that we didn’t really understand." The file system is slow compared to other modern examples, but the researchers say their formal verification can also work with faster designs. Associate professor Nickolai Zeldovich said, "Making sure that the file system can recover from a crash at any point is tricky because there are so many different places that you could crash. You literally have to consider every instruction or every disk operation and think, ‘Well, what if I crash now? What now? What now?’ And so empirically, people have found lots of bugs in file systems that have to do with crash recovery, and they keep finding them, even in very well tested file systems, because it’s just so hard to do.”

2 of 168 comments (clear)

  1. Linux File Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I find some of the current file systems to be adequately reliable. Even their performance is acceptable. But, the Linux systems are lacking.

    Is there a reliable Linux file system such as EXT4 that has an easy to use copy on write(CoW) feature to allow instant recovery of any file changed at any time?

    rm ./test
    restore --last test ./

    dd if=/dev/random of=./test bs=1M count=10
    restore --datetime test ./

    Novell Netware FS did all this and more in 1995 FFS! Fifteen years later and Linux doesn't seem to be able to do this. NTFS doesn't seem to be able to do this either. Yet Novell is dead?

  2. Re:But is it useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A sufficiently slow writing filesystem is indistinguishable from a read-only filesystem. Read-only filesystems are consistent. Therefore, a slow enough writing filesystem is consistent.

    For more serious analysis of crash-resistant write sequences, look elsewhere in this discussion.