Slashdot Mirror


Massachusetts Boarding School Sued Over Wi-Fi Sickness

alphadogg writes: The parents of an anonymous student at the Fay School in Southborough, Mass., allege that the Wi-Fi at the institution is making their child sick, according to a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court earlier this month (PDF). The child, identified only as "G" in court documents, is said to suffer from electromagnetic hypersensitivity syndrome. The radio waves emitted by the school's Wi-Fi routers cause G serious discomfort and physical harm, according to the suit. "After being continually denied access to the school in order to test their student's classroom, and having their request that all classrooms in which their child is present have the WiFi network replaced with a hard-wired Ethernet denied, the parents sued under the Americans with Disabilities Act."

3 of 588 comments (clear)

  1. What does Science have to say about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I mean, they should have some kind of proof that the Wi-Fi is the reason, right?

    1. Re:What does Science have to say about this? by Firethorn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There have been double-blind tests performed, but the subjects were quite upset when they learned that apparently it wasn't the wifi signals making them sick, but the blinking lights on the wireless devices.

      IE lights disabled, radios fully enabled, on highest power, transmitting data: No symptoms.
      Simulated status light activity, radios completely disabled and unpowered: symptoms.
      Lights & radio on : symptoms
      Lights & radio disabled: no symptoms.

      Conclusion: Clearly we need to investigate the status lights. ;)

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  2. Re:Blind test. by Technician · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Some cell tower companies and ham radio operators moving into elite neighbourhoods with high lawyer representation often will pre build the expansion and not install the equipment to collect baseline data and use the new complaints and lawsuits as baseline of the pre existing conditions. It's hard to make a case against the new cell tower or ham radio operator when the court case reveals to the plaintiffs the only operating device is the obstruction beacon.

    Later when the equipment arrives and is installed, the community is not informed. Only then can the real cases be identified. Most of the time, the numbers are in the 0's.

    If you put up a tower in a nice neighbourhood, make it look nice. Leave it unpowered for a few months. Reduce power on nearby towers to make marginal areas worse. Offer better signal by upgrades to nearby towers. Switch on the new tower to cover the poor coverage areas. Result, more even signal coverage with fewer towers running high power to reach into dead zones.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!