Slashdot Mirror


Oakland Changes License Plate Reader Policy After Filling 80GB Hard Drive

An anonymous reader writes: License plate scanners are a contentious subject, generating lots of debate over what information the government should have, how long they should have it, and what they should do with it. However, it seems policy changes are driven more by practical matters than privacy concerns. Earlier this year, Ars Technica reported that the Oakland Police Department retained millions of records going back to 2010. Now, the department has implemented a six-month retention window, with older data being thrown out. Why the change? They filled up the 80GB hard drive on the Windows XP desktop that hosted the data, and it kept crashing.

Why not just buy a cheap drive with an order of magnitude more storage space? Sgt. Dave Burke said, "We don't just buy stuff from Amazon as you suggested. You have to go to a source, i.e., HP or any reputable source where the city has a contract. And there's a purchase order that has to be submitted, and there has to be money in the budget. Whatever we put on the system, has to be certified. You don't just put anything. I think in the beginning of the program, a desktop was appropriate, but now you start increasing the volume of the camera and vehicles, you have to change, otherwise you're going to drown in the amount of data that's being stored."

5 of 275 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Bureaucracy by war4peace · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah but the amount of occurrences where it does good is swamped by those where it does awful things to everyone.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  2. Re:It' called COTS by mwfischer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    but but but how can CIOs and Directors get free stuff if they don't allow private companies to power fist a publically funded organization?

    In the past these were discounts. Now they're licenses to steal.

  3. Re:No one should *ever* wonder why... by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, I agree government is dangerous -- so is anything that is powerful. Max Weber defined the state as the organization that has a monopoly on violence.

    But the blame isn't with the liberals, or the conservative libertarians, neither of whom want this kind of data collection. It's with the conservative authoritarians who want to expand the power of the police.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  4. Re:It' called COTS by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, COTS mean Commercial Off The Shelf. It was originally a military acronym dealing with things that didn't need a MilSpec....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  5. Re:There are good reasons for gvt bureaucracy, rem by goarilla · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A laissez-fair economy sucks as well. It makes the bullies and cutthroats rise to the top without any negative repercussions.