Open Source, Collaborative Rich-Text, Web-Based Editor Almost Available
johanneswilm writes: Open source web-based editors such as CKEditor and TinyMCE have been available for more than a decade, and some closed source collaborative editors such as Google Docs have been available since 2007. Creating open source, collaborative, rich-text, web-based editors has proven difficult due to lack of standardization of the lower-level browser features. Now Marijn Haverbeke, the developer behind the popular CodeMirror has started such an editor, called Prosemirror, financed through a crowd-funding campaign. Meanwhile the W3C has installed a task force to rapidly standardize and fix the features needed in browsers to easily create richtext and semantic editors.
> Meanwhile the W3C has installed a task force to rapidly ...
Whoa whoa... hold on there. What version of the task force did they install? It is compatible with the current W3C? (It runs on Linux, right?) Is the source for the task force available? Is it running in the cloud somewhere as a virtual task force?
Do we have to explain that "has started" means that he's working on it, "(a)lmost available" means it's not done yet, and that those two conditions are not mutually exclusive?
"I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
If they do a good job on the protocol, then it should be reasonably reasonable to make a native binary which also speaks the same protocol. That would be awesome too: you can collaborate via the web if you don't have it installed, but use a native program which doesn't hog resources like they're going out of style if you're using it a lot
SJW n. One who posts facts.
I wonder, how will this editor compare to LibreOffice Online ("LOOL"), when it's finally released?
Hacker Public Radio is our Friend
I was able to spin up an instance of Etherpad Lite pretty easily. It's not very rich text, but does have programming language syntax highlighter and other plugins.
>> ProseMirror is intended to become open source (MIT licenced), but since I need to combine writing open software and earning a living, I am running a crowd-funding campaign to fund the work I put into the implementation. Until that succeeds, all rights are reserved.
In other words...this is the opposite of the type of open source projects we're used to, where someone writes something to "scratch an itch," releasing better and better versions into the open source community. Instead, this guy's said "hey, I'm building something cool, and I pinkie-promise swear to release it as open source, but only if you pay me $1M^H^H^H 35,000 Euro."
Do we have to explain that "has started" means that he's working on it, "(a)lmost available" means it's not done yet, and that those two conditions are not mutually exclusive?
Well, to be honest I think a car analogy would help.
I'm still asking the same question. Why would I want this?