Slashdot Mirror


Docs: Responding To Katrina, FBI Made Cell Phone Surveillance Its Priority

v3rgEz writes: There's a lot of lessons that the federal government should have learned in the aftermath of Katrina. Increased domestic surveillance, however, appears to be the one the FBI took to heart, using the natural disaster as a justification for ramping up its use of Stingray cell phone tracking throughout Louisiana after the storm, according to documents released under FOIA to MuckRock.

84 comments

  1. What else would the FBI by funwithBSD · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Federal Bureau of Investigation take away?

    They are not FEMA, or any relief organization, they investigate crimes. Of course they found something that would make it easier for them to investigate, damn our rights in the process.

    --
    Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    1. Re:What else would the FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In cases where the cell towers are disabled or unpowered, having some agency put up short-range temporary towers would give a connectivity path for people trying to call for help.

      However the summary gives me no reason to believe that's what they were doing.

    2. Re:What else would the FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Federal Bureau of Investigation take away?

      They are not FEMA, or any relief organization, they investigate crimes. Of course they found something that would make it easier for them to investigate, damn our rights in the process.

      Easiest way for us to respond properly is to cut funding for this kind of bullshit.

      Problem with that theory is the United States invented the concept of massive debt, so lack of funding isn't likely to stop a damn thing.

    3. Re:What else would the FBI by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Never let a crisis go to waste.

      Of course the FBI is going to order stuff they think is useful. And they're going to cover it in the usual law and order gloss. Not that I think stingrays are the best way to spend money, but one does assume that organized crime is also going to look at the chaos triggered by the hurricane in order to do more of whatever it is that they usually do. Therefore the FBI needs to be prepared.

      And the will likely use cell phones. Hence the stingrays.

      If you look closer, you will undoubtedly find that every Federal agency used Katrina as an excuse to order all sorts of useful toys.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:What else would the FBI by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Our Rights don't matter to the political class. They are in it to secure power and exercise it. The (D) and (R) parties are clearly on the same team.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    5. Re:What else would the FBI by meerling · · Score: 1

      From the summary of how the stingray works, doing what amounts to a spoof/man in the middle attack, I don't think it can work as a bridge. I'm sure a good electronic communications engineer and programmer could get it to do that with enough time, but the FBI doesn't have those kinds of people on hand, and it wouldn't have been fast enough for the disaster at hand in the first place.

    6. Re:What else would the FBI by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      I think Romans invented massive debt...

      see where it got them?

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    7. Re:What else would the FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nor is there any reason to believe the FBI would be the agency to do it.

    8. Re:What else would the FBI by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hey there, bucko - if the FBI could have prevented Hurricane Katrina with the use of Stingray gear, don't be so quick to get up on your civil rights high horse there and condemn it - the loss of life and property damage was pretty terrible!

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    9. Re:What else would the FBI by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      I think Romans invented massive debt...

      see where it got them?

      uhm, someone named romani went to the house??

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    10. Re:What else would the FBI by preaction · · Score: 1

      It says "Romans go home!"

    11. Re:What else would the FBI by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

      Romani ite domum.

      --
      Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
    12. Re:What else would the FBI by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Frankly, it would have been a WASTE of effort for the FBI to try to surveil phones.

      Just after Katrina hit and for at least a month or more afterwards, pretty much you could NOT do voice calls if you had a 504 area code.

      It was shortly after this hit that I actually discovered texting which I'd not done much of before.

      I found that people I could not call....I could text and at least get info to them on how to call me at a land line where I was staying (out of state) till things got normal again.

      But no, for a long time, you could not call anyone with a 504 area code cell phone.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    13. Re:What else would the FBI by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I think Romans invented massive debt...

      see where it got them?

      Bloody Romans...what did they ever give us?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    14. Re:What else would the FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure I follow you exactly.

      I can see the Fed's using Katrina as a cover to acquire and implement Stingray to further it's merits... Using Katrina as essentially, a 'test bed' of sorts, but I'm not seeing the organized crime aspect. I mean, NOLA, and gulf Mississippi and Alabama were in shreds. Power and water? Limited, if available. Travel? Not entirely limited, but not thoroughly functioning either. Recall all those stranded folks in NOLA?!? Most actual 'gangs' went towards Texas, as far as I know. I'm from outside Houston, and remember this fondly. Gangs didn't stay too long either, since Texas won't release you after 60 days on a murder charge, contrary to what Louisiana does. Surprise!!! And organized crime? There wasn't really much to organize. The souther half of the state was in shambles.

      What exactly are you going to organize and racket? Not going to rob and loot, as most people still around had nothing, or those who were guarding their house, had a damn near neighborhood militia set up. Good luck on that one! Besides. They had NOPD to worry about. Getting shot in the back for looking suspicious was a very real possibility right after Katrina passed! See recent police convictions on the bridge incident, and the several people who 'questionably died', in a burned out car not far from where police had been last identified. If you don't know what I'm referring to, please go dig it up. Also, see Houston's 'crime spike' directly after Katrina. They've got the numbers to prove where all the real problems came to after Katrina. DFW had a glitch as well...

      As for the Fed's? Katrina was just another excuse, in a long line of many. It's been 10 years, and to the majority of Americans, Stingray is still in the dark to them. It's very real, how well controlled Stingray information has been by the Feds. Now think of the projects and disaster excuses that have come and gone since then. Any other Government 'Projects' you have heard whipsers on? A few come to mind...

    15. Re:What else would the FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bloody Romans...what did they ever give us?

      They gave us a rich and fascinating example of the life-cycle of a civilization, and a window into the causes of death for an apex culture. Which is what was being referred to. I know you are re-stating a Monty Python bit, but it isn't really relevant.

    16. Re:What else would the FBI by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      Of all the Patriot act increased surveillence practices made legal after 9/11, the FBI to my knowledge has not used a single one against a suspected terrorist, yet you will find reams of evidence of use of these tactics in drug investigations.

      The war on drugs has perverted law enforcement, now all time and money is spent on the crimes (drug crime) that pays the officers themselves.

    17. Re:What else would the FBI by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Was that before or after they went in for counterfeit money...issued by the government. (They decreased the proportion of gold in their money and lied about it.)

      (I'm not saying your wrong, I'm saying it's not the first government to go into debt, and it's not the first citizenry to go into debt, so I need a better characterization of "massive debt".)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    18. Re:What else would the FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used it as an excuse to my wife to buy a new tv: to monitor the disaster with a larger screen in case we saw a detail others missed

    19. Re: What else would the FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you're a lot of fun at parties. /s

    20. Re:What else would the FBI by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      stingrays are only useful for going around the requirement of having permits. the cellphone operator company has all the information -and more- anyways.

      so it's only useful if you don't have permit.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    21. Re:What else would the FBI by HiThereImBob · · Score: 1

      "one does assume that organized crime is also going to look at the chaos triggered by the hurricane in order to do more of whatever it is that they usually do. Therefore the FBI needs to be prepared."

      I would argue that the MO of organized crime is not to try to identify where every federal and state emergency and law enforcement agency is flooding all of their resources and personnel and then join that party. Their intention is to make money, not be supervillans. They need things like funtional infrastructure (airports / shipping ports to import contraband, functional roads to move the contraband, working banks so locals have access to money, etc) which does not exist in these disaster zones. Please stop excusing the FBI's illegal behavior based on wild assumptions.

    22. Re:What else would the FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please explain the technical aspects of how FBI stingrays could prevent either a massive hurricane or levee break.

    23. Re:What else would the FBI by ExekielS · · Score: 1

      I think it was supposed to be sarcasm that was lost on those who modded "insightful"

      --
      ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    24. Re:What else would the FBI by KingMotley · · Score: 2

      How do you propose it does a man in the middle attack and NOT work as a bridge?

    25. Re:What else would the FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't organized crime include the entire government of Louisiana?

  2. Sounds helpful by hawguy · · Score: 4, Funny

    If there's anything that starving, homeless people need in a disaster, it's someone to listen in on their phone calls...which they can't make because they have no way to charge phones and no working cell towers to connect to.

    The FBI would be better off buying banks of phones with a built-in recording device connected to a wireless tower. At least that way they could help people while conducting their surveillance.

    1. Re:Sounds helpful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there's anything that starving, homeless people need in a disaster, it's someone to listen in on their phone calls...which they can't make because they have no way to charge phones and no working cell towers to connect to.

      Katrina was August 2005. This purchase request was made in July 2006. I'm pretty sure people found a way to charge their phones in 11 months.

    2. Re:Sounds helpful by hawguy · · Score: 1

      If there's anything that starving, homeless people need in a disaster, it's someone to listen in on their phone calls...which they can't make because they have no way to charge phones and no working cell towers to connect to.

      Katrina was August 2005. This purchase request was made in July 2006. I'm pretty sure people found a way to charge their phones in 11 months.

      Since they didn't include a time travel device in their request, I'm pretty sure that the FBI used their experience at Katrina to justify purchases for the *next* large scale Katrina-like disaster.... which will suffer from similar problems, including lack of coordinated response from the government since there are too many levels of government involved in disaster relief.

  3. Tracking by A10Mechanic · · Score: 2

    You know, being able to triangulate someone's location after a natural disaster might not be a bad thing, in cases of rescue. At least, that's how you justify it, at first. Of course, critical infrastructure for comms pretty much collapsed as soon as the batteries died, generators ran out of diesel, etc. Time is of the essence when deploying your stingrays!

    1. Re:Tracking by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      Except the cellular network can already do that. If anything stingray devices probably make that less accurate and less effective.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    2. Re:Tracking by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Although if you can deploy directly to a collapsed building and "see" locations at a local command center, instead of relying on relaying the data (from multiple vendors cell infrastructure?) possibly through a non-existent internet network, it still might make sense for SaR work.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    3. Re:Tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot how amazingly fucked the cell network was IVO New Orleans after Katrina. It's possible that they were tracking people through pen traps and that those were destroyed. It's possible, though I doubt plausible, that the intent is to use them to create some sort of hot spot when the cell network gets completely fucked, and the least complex answer is that a bunch of them in storage got destroyed.

  4. Good Guys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do the people working on surveillance for the FBI, NSA, etc, actually think that they are the good guys?

    1. Re:Good Guys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't be that naive.

    2. Re:Good Guys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, they do. They feel they are protecting us and doing their patriotic duty to their nation. Go talk to someone who has been indoctrinated in the military or lives inside the beltway and works inside the government, or even just talk to a regular cop.

      I have military in laws in my family, one of whom did some kind of SIGINT work for the NSA during the cold war. He's a "God and Country" sort of person; he holds very paternalistic views of the role of government in society. Not only about protecting us against foreign enemies, but also about doing what's best for your country, including obedience to the law.

  5. More surveillance, powers regardless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, no matter what, a natural disaster, kiddie porn, religious extremism, the response is *more* surveillance, *more* police powers, ..?

    And we can't even claim that it is surprising.

  6. Free Data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm curious. Do you get free data usage if your phone is connected to a Stingray? I guess it wouldn't be so bad then.

    1. Re:Free Data? by __aabppq7737 · · Score: 1

      the NSA manipulated AT&T's billing servers in conjunction with their Gemalto hack, so that customers' hacked SIM card's could be used behind their (the customers') backs without any notice.

  7. Look, some completely natural disaster happenned! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better take more rights and privacy away from the people....for their own god ofcourse!

  8. Katrina should be a learning experience by Scutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The list of things that local, state, and federal governments did horribly wrong in Katrina's aftermath is virtually endless. There should be plenty of opportunities to learn from it but it looks like they just keep making the same mistakes over and over.

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    1. Re:Katrina should be a learning experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to government. Government exists to justify itself and ever large taxes. Period.

    2. Re:Katrina should be a learning experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let us know when you graduate from 8th grade.

    3. Re:Katrina should be a learning experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, he clearly has an alarming lack of state indoctrination. Anyone who has been "educated" would never question or disparage the government in this way.

    4. Re:Katrina should be a learning experience by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Whether the things they did were wrong or not often depends on what you assume their goals to be. I believe that much of the land has moved from those who are impoverished to those who are wealthy. One can guess whether actions with this result were a mistake.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:Katrina should be a learning experience by r-diddly · · Score: 1

      Score:1,000,000, Insightful

  9. For once it was justified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Monitoring cell calls during such a state of emergency likely helped triangulate victims faster and deal with looters trying to organize on larger targets than just the corner liquor store such as banks.

    1. Re:For once it was justified by J053 · · Score: 1

      Except they didn't buy the Stingrays until a year later. Thank you for playing.

    2. Re:For once it was justified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Implanting tracking/monitoring devices in all infants would also make managing large populations and solving crimes more expedient. Since, as you state, the means can be justified by the ends, we should start doing this immediately. Alternatively, you can be called a goose-stepping tool. Tool.

    3. Re:For once it was justified by HiThere · · Score: 1

      IIUC, cell phone communication was down during and after the emergency. So monitoring cell towers at such a time would be purely wasted effort.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  10. Re:Rampant Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rampant lack of performance is right. If the Bush administration was trying to kill of the people in New Orleans, it was an epic fail.

  11. Re:Rampant Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice try.

    Bush tried to send the National Guard. The governor of Louisiana (a democrat) said no. Only after the corpses started piling up did she consent.

    Seriously. Think about what would have happened if Bush sent the military into a state, against the will of a woman democrat governor, into a city with a majority black population.

  12. Re:Rampant Crime by Woldscum · · Score: 1

    Nice try.

    Bush tried to send the National Guard. The governor of Louisiana (a democrat) said no. Only after the corpses started piling up did she consent.

    Seriously. Think about what would have happened if Bush sent the military into a state, against the will of a woman democrat governor, into a city with a majority black population.

    Not only a woman Democrat Governor. But a black Democrat mayor. Remember "Chocolate City" Ray Nagin. Who by the way is in PRISON right now.

      http://www.nola.com/crime/inde...

  13. FBI = a history of complete corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    abolish the FBI, and the DHS, then you will have your rights back.

  14. Priorities by k6mfw · · Score: 0

    It seems to me with all the problems and challenges this country faces, top men put war on terrorism which includes need for extensive surveillance the top priority over other issues. Even if govt were better organized in disaster relief, they still would not able help everyone (that's why it is a disaster) but would not be constantly ridiculed for poor performance. However there were some officials saw impending disaster so they forward based a lot of resources closer to Louisiana knowing the state will be calling for help once the winds die down. However, they were a minority because most were focused on terrorist attacks.

    Regarding FEMA, I was talking with a emergency manager for a city, he said FEMA does not have response teams like state, county, or city OES departments. FEMA is mostly a fund provider and insurance for disasters.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
    1. Re:Priorities by Scutter · · Score: 1

      FEMA is mostly a fund provider and insurance for disasters.

      And they're terrible at it.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    2. Re:Priorities by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Some hams who were present to aid communication with families outside the area reported that their antennas were destroyed without reasonable explanation. So one may guess that aiding communication was not their priority. Also, IIRC, some doctors were shot at by law enforcement while attempting to provide medical assistance, so that probably wasn't their priority either.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:Priorities by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      Following up on FEMA, it's common to hear about how money is distributed and how much, i.e. many never got fully reimbursed from damage by hurricane Sandy.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
  15. Isn't this supposed to be the FBI's job? by DickBreath · · Score: 2

    Why would anyone be complaining about this?

    Isn't the FBI supposed to be trying to track down the person responsible for causing Katrina?


    Oh, wait. Nevermind.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    1. Re:Isn't this supposed to be the FBI's job? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Isn't the FBI supposed to be trying to track down the person responsible for causing Katrina?

      Iran has repeatedly blamed the US for causing various natural disasters that have befallen that country. Apparently the FBI knows something we don't...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Isn't this supposed to be the FBI's job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iran has repeatedly blamed the US for causing various natural disasters that have befallen that country. Apparently the FBI knows something we don't...

      Everyone knows gay marriage causes natural disasters.

    3. Re:Isn't this supposed to be the FBI's job? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Causing Katrina? There isn't anyone who causes hurricanes to form. They're natural disasters that form by themselves. Is this a late-stage version of Bush Derangement Syndrome? It's fallen off greatly but still affects some patients.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Isn't this supposed to be the FBI's job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like the government has technology to cause hurricanes.

    5. Re:Isn't this supposed to be the FBI's job? by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      That's what they want you to think. You have been affected by the government's invisible brain lasers!

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    6. Re:Isn't this supposed to be the FBI's job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The disaster in Louisiana was the levees breaking, only exacerbated by the hurricane winds, extra rain, and storm surge. The hurricane hit several other large cities, in multiple states, wreaked havoc. But the disaster in Louisiana was a man-made disaster, not natural. The investigation has already found the corp of engineers to be at fault for most of the levees breaking either through bad design or negligent maintenance. As far as I know no one has ever been held accountable.

  16. takeing a $400 case of water is Grand larceny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    takeing a $400 case of water is Grand larceny even when it's real non storm mark up price is $5 or less.

  17. They followed the playbook book exactly as describ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as an authoritiarian never waste a good crisis to futher curtail civil liberties or take new powers !

  18. Missing Persons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Cell phone ping leads rescue crews to missing jet skier," "Missing Kalamazoo women cell phone pings Albion Tower," should I continue?

    1. Re: Missing Persons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok but there were no working towers... what part of that did you miss?

  19. Local Story about one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am anonymous coward now right? OK, so the story isn't juicy without details sorry. But the take away is that a local tech person working for... a business in Louisiana... was dealing with some weird cell phone problems in an apartment. Details this, details that... and some guys in black stepped into the picture and said "please disregard the problem in room XYZ. We're here on business" indicated there was a bad guy in the area and indicated the tech person should hold off for a day till they could put the guy behind bars.

    Apparently they got the guy... organized crime or something is the impression I was given when told the story. So... as much as I hate trampled on rights, I guess there is one case I can believe (because the tech guy told me himself) were surveillance was good and hurt only the criminals.

    Sorry no details... don't want to help the bad guys around here. Matter of fact, I hope they all go out of business in my neck of the woods! But please law enforcement type guys... get the warrant if at all possible!!!! And don't spy on innocent people, seriously. It isn't right and you will get your ass in the wringer eventually.

    1. Re:Local Story about one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... as much as I hate trampled on rights, I guess there is one case I can believe (because the tech guy told me himself) were surveillance was good and hurt only the criminals.

      It "hurt only the criminals" except for whoever else's phone service was also being interfered with, necessitating the cell tech being called out to investigate the problem in the first place...

      The general public is always going to be collateral damage when a stingray is in operation, that's how they're designed. You cannot use it against just one person or just one phone. That's why they can't get warrants for the damned things, and why they're scared shitless to have any of this come before a judge.

  20. Unlimited! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    if the fbi wants to spy on everyones cellphones.

    why not just start a cellphone company and offer unlimited free calls and data?
    EVERYONE would sign up.

    1. Re:Unlimited! by buck-yar · · Score: 1

      You sure they haven't? ;) H20 wireless... Tracphone...

  21. Sure it can by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    First, Stingray is now a 'generic' term for these sorts of devices. So I'd be careful about claiming they all have the same functionality, or lack of it.

    Second, operating as a bridge is actually the primary usage mode when operating in 'active' mode - where it 'forces' phones to connect to it instead of the normal tower.

    Third, from what I remember, at least the first ones were built off of standard mobile cell tower systems, just with extra intercepts and data recording equipment.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  22. Re: Rampant Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In reality, the governor of Louisiana, Kathleen Blanco, declined to nationalize the Louisiana National Guard so that they would retain policing powers that would have been lost under Federalization due to the Posse Comitatus Act.

    The same action was taken by the Governor of Mississippi.

    None of this would have prevented effective deployment of federal resources. But don't let being factual get in your way. Tell the story you want to tell without worrying about the truth.

    Much like now Governor of Louisiana Boby Jindal cutting off Planned Parenthood in the state from Medicaid despite the fact that they don't actually perform abortions. Who cares? They saw some videos and have to act.

  23. Arggh! "you're", not "your"! by HiThere · · Score: 1

    Sorry for the slip.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  24. Re:Rampant Crime by HiThere · · Score: 1

    You can't really reasonably blame that on Bush. The Scientific American had an article about New Orleans and subsidence that had basically left much of the city below sea level.

    Now one *could* blame the Army Corps of Engineers for not doing a better job supporting the levees...but that's not the only place in the country that has decaying infrastructure. They've only got so much time and money. And local businesses (almost) always object to their construction projects.

    For that matter, this is predicted to be a record El Nino year, and IIRC the levees on the Sacramento river need a LOT of work. Which they aren't getting. We're in the middle of a drought, so why shore up the levees?

    All that said, the Corps of Engineers has made some rather striking mistakes, also, so they tend to be a bit careful about work when there isn't a real emergency.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  25. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personal privacy always trumps national security. I want anyone eavesdropping to get the death penalty.

  26. So what? by kenh · · Score: 1

    The Stingray needs an active tower to allow it to be a 'man in themiddle', so they could only monitor completed calls.

    Do you think there might have been phone calls like "hey steve, we're heading over to the rich side of town to go 'shopping'" or "we're heading over to the hospital to steal OxyContin"...

    After Katrina hit, New Orleans was essentially a lawless region for a handful of days - shouldn't federal law enforcement ramp up their efforts to enforce the law?

    --
    Ken
    1. Re: So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when does the federal government have jurisdiction over violations of state and local law?

      I must have missed the constitutional amandement that enabled that.

    2. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Because we needed more law and order to protect those rich people's possessions!

      Fuck those 1000+ people that died, right?

    3. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't protect people from their own stupidity. It's not as if they didn't have DAYS of warning that perhaps they should leave the area.