Slashdot Mirror


Google May Try To Recruit You For a Job Based On Your Search Queries

HughPickens.com writes: If Google sees that you're searching for specific programming terms, they may ask you to apply for a job as Max Rossett writes that three months ago while working on a project, he Googled "python lambda function list comprehension." The familiar blue links appeared on the search page, and he started to look for the most relevant one. But then something unusual happened. The search results split and folded back to reveal a box that said "You're speaking our language. Up for a challenge?" Clicking on the link took Rossett to a page called "foo.bar" that outlined a programming challenge and gave instructions on how to submit his solution. "I had 48 hours to solve it, and the timer was ticking," writes Rossett. "I had the option to code in Python or Java. I set to work and solved the first problem in a couple hours. Each time I submitted a solution, foo.bar tested my code against five hidden test cases."

After solving another five problems the page gave Rossett the option to submit his contact information and much to his surprise, a recruiter emailed him a couple days later asking for a copy of his resume. Three months after the mysterious invitation appeared, Rossett started at Google. Apparently Google has been using this recruiting tactic for some time.

182 comments

  1. Google may try....lots of things by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    and Google may succeed

    1. Re:Google may try....lots of things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Just so you know we're not kidding, here, let us send you $1,000 in magic internet money."

  2. Google did this to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Told me to write a mail program. It's now called Google Maps. You're welcome.

  3. too cool for google by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Funny

    My queries in the past few years have never triggered that, so google must not have interest in say advanced compiler theory, aspect oriented extensions to scripting languages, atomicity and failure recovery for clustered filesystem design.....google you're too lame for me I guess

    1. Re:too cool for google by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 5, Funny

      Same for me. I've been searching for hentai furry porn for months now and I've never seen that banner either.

    2. Re:too cool for google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you logged in? I suspect this only works if you are.

    3. Re:too cool for google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, they also see what you search for when you look for porn. They were disappointed in you.

    4. Re:too cool for google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My queries in the past few years have never triggered that, so google must not have interest in say advanced compiler theory, aspect oriented extensions to scripting languages, atomicity and failure recovery for clustered filesystem design.....google you're too lame for me I guess

      Your searches for gay midget animal granny porn freaked them out.

    5. Re:too cool for google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like someone has a bad case of butthurt.

    6. Re:too cool for google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Says the AC.

    7. Re:too cool for google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is actually a recent feature, so you probably haven't searched since they launched it.

    8. Re:too cool for google by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      not at all, I have a good job already, thanks. hence the cool searches

    9. Re:too cool for google by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Silly, you need to be hitting google.co.jp when you do that, and using kanji

    10. Re:too cool for google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would also assume you need to have no-script disabled for this to work properly. I surf with it on because I got tired of the trojans.

    11. Re:too cool for google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more like they've also read your other queries, and most of your emails, and determined they didn't want anything to do with the type of person who, given such evidence, would spin it about them and go whine on the internet.

    12. Re:too cool for google by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      They probably also found a selfie you sent, automatically applied the latest AI image analysis techniques to it using a whole airplane hanger full of compute servers, and determined that you are not sufficiently, ahem, *equipped* to work at Google.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    13. Re:too cool for google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Have you tried sending in your résumé?

    14. Re:too cool for google by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      So why can't you afford a proper keyboard?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    15. Re:too cool for google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's kind of what I was thinking. They're basically excluding everyone who already knows the stuff they're monitoring searches for.

    16. Re:too cool for google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here, of course does searches on "Google sucks hard" doesn't help either...

    17. Re:too cool for google by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Don't confuse laziness for poverty

    18. Re:too cool for google by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Google has called me for positions in which I have no interest

    19. Re:too cool for google by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      No, but they have found mine and called my phone on three separate occasions. I had no interest in either the positions or locations for which they were seeking candidates.

    20. Re:too cool for google by Chalnoth · · Score: 1

      Meh. I'm sure they use some kind of machine learning algorithm, and especially given the relatively small number of examples they have available to train such an algorithm, it's probably not terribly accurate so that they only let through the people whose queries are matched very strongly. After all, for privacy (and practicality) reasons they can't very well have a person actually look at the queries.

      tl;dr: The algorithm probably misses lots of people who Google would otherwise consider good candidates.

    21. Re:too cool for google by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      They discovered I wanted to work from bed with a starting salary of 220K and I never heard from them again

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    22. Re:too cool for google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably many queries/factors and not just one. He probably wrote "I love Google" and "I hate my job" in an email and that triggered it.

      (Kidding... sort of)

    23. Re:too cool for google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...for privacy (and practicality) reasons they can't very well have a person actually look at the queries.

      Why not? The first stage would have to be done with machine learning, but I don't think the TOS say that no one at Google can read your queries/email. I'm not saying that they are doing it, but I don't think that there is a reason why they couldn't.

    24. Re:too cool for google by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      You wanted to be a high priced call girl? Performance counts as much as looks for that occupation, and in person interview is the only way such is secured

  4. Copy Pasta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, they're going to start recruiting the same labour pool as everyone else–developers with a mastery of the CTL+C / CTL+V development environment.

    1. Re:Copy Pasta by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Copy and paste will carry you only so far. The trick is figure out someone else's code snippet and make it work in your own code. Unless you have a good understanding of programming, you will make spaghetti code instead.

    2. Re:Copy Pasta by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But google interviews people based upon a random selection of interviewers. That is, no matter how technical and detailed your knowledge is, you may end up being interviewed by someone in the marketing or accounting department; if you're a hardware guru someone may ask you about Arduino; if you're an embedded systems expert someone may ask you about JavaScript.
      So at Google it's better to know how to fit in than know how to do the job. Ctrl-C/Ctrl-V is probably a good job skill for that.

    3. Re:Copy Pasta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what? The next step is to patent and exploit that free labour method masking jobs as puzzles in a dominant search engine. Like amazon mechanical turk but with $0 expense.

      1.Present a current problem to zillions of people as a "puzzle"
      2.Check that the free solutions works.
      3.???
      4.Profit!

    4. Re:Copy Pasta by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      But Google values spaghetti code above all else, so you're good.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    5. Re:Copy Pasta by __aabppq7737 · · Score: 1

      But Larry Page personally signs off on each employee

    6. Re:Copy Pasta by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I had a job interview with 3Dfx in 1997 for a QA position. The QA manager freaked me out with his tattoos and body piercings (he offered to show me the ones he had below his belt). The second interview was with his boss who was the head of marketing. If you read Dilbert extensively, any hardware company run by the marketing department was ultimately doom. I didn't take the job. No surprise that 3Dfx went out of business a few years later.

    7. Re:Copy Pasta by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      That's Microsoft.

    8. Re:Copy Pasta by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Google admires Microsoft

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  5. Cmon Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Let me know why Google is evil for this, too.

    1. Re:Cmon Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The author of TFA forgot to mention that *she* also searched for "summer dresses" and "Swiss chocolates", along with "Python Spark list comprehension".

      Turns out that helps...

    2. Re:Cmon Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Now my work will block Google since I might get a new job based on my work-related searches.
      No access to Google means that I'll be revealed as a fraud, unable to solve the simplest of technical problems without getting the answer from someone else.
      I'll be fired, lose my apartment, live on the streets, and go on welfare.
      I'll probably get hooked on drugs and maybe, just maybe!, I'll switch to Bing.

  6. I just tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I searched for "C# DataGridView Windows Forms ADO.NET"

    Google gave me a sidebar that said, "You might have better luck searching with Bing!"

    1. Re:I just tried it by nicoleb_x · · Score: 1

      They lie! You would think that Bing is better at searching .Net stuff but it's not. Usually it sucks more than Google.

    2. Re:I just tried it by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Bing only excels at one thing: searching for porn. No other search engine even comes close.

      For anything else, Bing is the worst choice.

  7. Optimizing for technical over people skills by captaindomon · · Score: 0

    So that means Google feels it is more important to have technical skills than to have soft skills. Hopefully they have stronger filters on the interview side of things, or over time they will have tons of brilliant engineers that can solve puzzles but can't work with other people or understand user's problems.

    --
    Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
    1. Re: Optimizing for technical over people skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it doesn't mean that at all. It means that one recruitment tool (of many) is looking for people who are solving problems that Google thinks are relevant. This tool tests an engineers tech skills, and curiosity.

    2. Re:Optimizing for technical over people skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      over time they will have tons of brilliant engineers that can solve puzzles but can't work with other people or understand user's problems.

      I have been an engineer for 30 years, have managed to meet only a handful that are actually brilliant, none of them have had any inkling of being bad at working with other people or understanding user's problem. In fact, their social skills were about where their engineering skills were. Smart is smart. Stop believing childish myths.

    3. Re: Optimizing for technical over people skills by Jahf · · Score: 1

      Soft skills would be much harder for them to determine via automated systems. This is their way of skimming for a few specific skill sets and obviously is not the only way to apply for a job at Google. Given that of the 4 Google employees (past+present) I know personally 3 of them would have fallen into a soft skill set by my connotation (able to grasp new things quickly but not necessarily deep dive level on most of them) ... this likely isn't a predominant method of recruiting for them.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    4. Re: Optimizing for technical over people skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they should be able to look at your porn habits to determine how your soft skills are.

    5. Re:Optimizing for technical over people skills by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      You got all of that from a guy getting a job offer from a search query?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Optimizing for technical over people skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      understand user's problems.

      I doubt that the new Maps and other horrible stuff that they did in the last 4 years was decided by engineers

    7. Re:Optimizing for technical over people skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      over time they will have tons of brilliant engineers that can solve puzzles but can't work with other people or understand user's problems.

      Yeah, you already said "engineers."

    8. Re: Optimizing for technical over people skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case it's
      Soft skills - 0
      Hard skills - over 9000

    9. Re:Optimizing for technical over people skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To add to this - in my experience (which is therefore universal fact) - the better your soft skills, the less you want to sit in front of a computer all day

    10. Re:Optimizing for technical over people skills by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Google can only hope they have that problem. Right now they have social butterflies everywhere with just a few engineers who keep things afloat.

    11. Re:Optimizing for technical over people skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MightyMartian afraid to answer a simple question http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ? Yes. How's that flamebait downmod treating you too? Shouldn't start things with your betters, oh delusional online 20 year fake name using loser. You'll lose every time. You're used to that though you loser. Hence your hiding behind fake names online.

    12. Re: Optimizing for technical over people skills by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      This is their way of skimming for a few specific skill sets and obviously is not the only way to apply for a job at Google.

      Or just a way of getting stuff done for free.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re: Optimizing for technical over people skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And apparently hire people who waste hours and hours on a SQUIRREL *runs off*

    14. Re:Optimizing for technical over people skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      none of them have had any inkling of being bad at working with other people

      You mean they had no people skills and didn't know they had no people skills? Engineers? Tell me it ain't so.

    15. Re:Optimizing for technical over people skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi APK.

    16. Re:Optimizing for technical over people skills by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Um, I believe you're misreading his post. He appears to be asserting that the truly brilliant engineers he met also had excellent social skills.

      Personally, I find this extremely hard to believe. Maybe for some other sectors of engineering, such as civil engineering, where being a lead engineer is really more of a project-management role, it would make sense, but not in software engineering. I've worked with plenty of software engineers (and also electrical engineers who did software), and I wouldn't say they had *bad* social skills on average, but they definitely weren't the most outgoing people in the world by a long shot. This includes the more brilliant ones. They weren't bad at all at dealing with people, even having leadership roles to some extent, but they sure as hell wouldn't have been any good at a sales job, for instance, nor were they ladies' men in any way (extremely socially-skilled men can be expected to do much better with the opposite sex: talking your way into a woman's pants is a big benefit to being socially skilled).

    17. Re:Optimizing for technical over people skills by ajzimm3rman · · Score: 0

      Do they need to work with other people in order to develop code? I think not.

    18. Re:Optimizing for technical over people skills by Heart44 · · Score: 1

      You are writing about social skills yet to be social on slashdot is to have an account and not post as AC.

    19. Re:Optimizing for technical over people skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google does require certain technical skills. Why do you conclude that they don't require other skills as well? It's not like you automatically get the job if you pass this online test. All you get is an interview.

  8. Time investment by mwehle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I set to work and solved the first problem in a couple hours. Each time I submitted a solution, foo.bar tested my code against five hidden test cases." After solving another five problems the page gave Rossett the option to submit his contact information

    Curious: what prompted Max Rossett to spend hours solving programming puzzles before being even given the opportunity to submit contact information for a job consideration?

    --
    Wir sind geboren, um frei zu sein - Rio Reiser
    1. Re:Time investment by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Curious: what prompted Max Rossett to spend hours solving programming puzzles before being even given the opportunity to submit contact information for a job consideration?

      Maybe he thinks solving programming puzzles is fun. Some people actually enjoy exercising their brains.

    2. Re:Time investment by heezer7 · · Score: 2

      I got into this a few weeks ago as well. Mine was threw an easter egg hidden on one of their site pages. It was in the middle of a work mess so I only ended up ever completing 2 of the tests. You do have the option of logging in via google account so I'm sure they already know allll about me.

    3. Re:Time investment by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Curious: what prompted Max Rossett to spend hours solving programming puzzles before being even given the opportunity to submit contact information for a job consideration?

      This may be news to you, but many people will take on a challenge just because it's a challenge like climbing a mountain only to climb back down. Particularly if you think it would impress someone you'd like to impress. And unless you think Google has an odd way of providing entertainment, it should be pretty obvious they want to find someone who can solve those puzzles. If a company is looking for your competence, well then add 2+2 (no, that won't qualify you for a position at Google) about what might come next. And if not a job offer, then probably some kind of PR stunt price. Whatever it is, would it be rational to think at the end of it all they're going to say "Hope you enjoyed the challenge, have a nice day!" and nothing more?

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:Time investment by goodmanj · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ray, when Google asks you if you're up for a challenge, you say YES!

    5. Re:Time investment by meta-monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude got nerd sniped. I wouldn't be able to resist. An interesting puzzle mysteriously shows up? Yes please. Basically how I got into programming and math in general.

      Of course all they're going to get are people who aren't savvy enough to use ad/tracking blockers and duckduckgo...

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    6. Re:Time investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i stumbled on this same test/puzzle thing while at work (i'm an RTL guy that had to ramp on some C++). seemed amusing, but... my employer was not paying me to interview with google. also, i am blatantly not a SW guy...

    7. Re:Time investment by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny

      And the rest of us post on Slashdot!

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:Time investment by swillden · · Score: 2

      I set to work and solved the first problem in a couple hours. Each time I submitted a solution, foo.bar tested my code against five hidden test cases." After solving another five problems the page gave Rossett the option to submit his contact information

      Curious: what prompted Max Rossett to spend hours solving programming puzzles before being even given the opportunity to submit contact information for a job consideration?

      The same thing that prompts people to spend hours solving Project Euler or Top Coder or similar puzzles, with absolutely no expectation of return beyond the joy and satisfaction they derive from solving the problems.

      Whether or not the sort of person who does is what Google needs is an open question, but it's definitely the sort of person Google hires. The interview process is composed of a series of programming puzzles, and one of the things interviewers look for is people who not only handle that sort of challenge, but who clearly enjoy it -- largely because the interviewers and all of their co-workers like such puzzles, and anyone else who does is very likely to fit in.

      It makes perfect sense; the recruiting tool selects for exactly the sort of person who is likely to get hired, and to fit into the culture.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    9. Re:Time investment by swillden · · Score: 1

      Dude got nerd sniped. I wouldn't be able to resist. An interesting puzzle mysteriously shows up? Yes please. Basically how I got into programming and math in general.

      Of course all they're going to get are people who aren't savvy enough to use ad/tracking blockers and duckduckgo...

      Heh. Google Foobar popped up for me last week. I blew two hours solving problems before I pulled myself away and got back to work.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    10. Re:Time investment by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      That's dangerous. You may accidentally end up with a job at Google.

    11. Re:Time investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, it's a pitch, but a pitch for a good cause.

      There are many kinds of puzzles out there. For those that remember GAMES magazine, keep in mind that they are still in print.

      If you are a puzzle fan, it might not be your cup of tea, but it's still good fun for those it appeals to.

    12. Re:Time investment by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What's it like hiding behind online fake names for 20 yrs. as a loser in life? That's symptomatic of losers, you know.

      So what is not even logging in when you insult people symptomatic of? Do they have a name for your condition?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Time investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're watching you right now. Gently back away and go turn a tap on and await the signal

    14. Re:Time investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too would be surprised what would happen when submitting this 'easter egg'. I would also have at least tried.

    15. Re:Time investment by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 1

      Dude got nerd sniped. I wouldn't be able to resist. An interesting puzzle mysteriously shows up? Yes please. Basically how I got into programming and math in general.

      Of course all they're going to get are people who aren't savvy enough to use ad/tracking blockers and duckduckgo...

      Speak for yourseelf. Somebody is monitoring your searches and evaluating you remotely like some lab rat in a glass cage. To me that is ceepy just like all other surveillance, nothing else, just creepy.

    16. Re:Time investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So people that are easily distracted when a new more interesting challenge pops up? Is this why so many of Google's projects never leave the beta status and get abandoned after a short period? The workers on those projects were distracted and working on a more interesting challenge.

    17. Re:Time investment by rhazz · · Score: 1
    18. Re:Time investment by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      Just fyi: everyone is watching and evaluating you all the time. Your neighbors notice you stumbling in at 2 am and wonder how your date went. Your mailman sees your copy of IEEE Spectrum and daydreams of asking you to chat with his nerdy nephew. Your garbage man hears the clink of bottles in your trash and guesses you're an alcoholic.

      Like it or not, you *are* a rat in a glass cage. It's utterly impossible to live in modern society without leaking bits of your identity to the people around you. The question is, what do they do with the scraps they pick up on? And in this case, inviting you to participate in a fun, challenging game that might lead to an awesome career seems like a pretty good outcome.

    19. Re:Time investment by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      I had an awesome career and I left it all to live on 66 acres in the bush with hardly any income and I am happier now than I ever was in my 'awesome career'. I actually enjoy life a lot more than I ever did. I'm not in a glass cage. The only person who evaluates me is me and that is great. Those reading this with mortgages and debts crawling their way up the path to success and wealth I can only recommend getting away from it all, getting out of debt and pursuing things that make you really happy(for those who say they are happy think about it for a while). When you can sit and watch a chicken for an hour and really enjoy that process then you've really made it.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  9. webp? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

    I don't fucking care if you're the almighty Google or not, webp is not a supported image file format for the Web.

    1. Re:webp? by cruff · · Score: 1

      webp is not a supported image file format for the Web.

      When I clicked on it, Firefox offered up Chrome as the application to display it. Of course it did.

    2. Re:webp? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      I just upgraded the Picasa program on a customer's office computers. They use it to keep track of their patients (dentist office). After starting the install, the program mentions it can install the Picasa Image Viewer program, and associate common image files extensions to it. Of course jpg, gif, png, bmp were all listed, as well as webp, which I haven't heard of. On the computers with Chrome installed, that check box was blank,and next to it is listed (Chrome) as the program currently displaying it. So I guess it is a Chrome image type?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    3. Re:webp? by petermgreen · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes webp is a google creation. It's basically a single still frame from the vp8 video codec (as used by webm). Being based on modern techniques it gives a better quality for a given size (or smaller size for a given quality) than JPEG and if you have support for webm then implementing webp as well requires very little extra code.

      However it has failed to catch on more widely. Afaict chrome is the only major browser that supports it. There is a bug requesting supporting in firefox but it doesn't seem to be going anywhere. IE and safari seem even less likely to adopt it.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    4. Re:webp? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Note that while it may sound ridiculously wasteful, it is an option to have unsupported browsers decode it with client-side javascript. There even are audio javascript decoders (or video decoders for that matter but hopefully those are toys for browser devs to play with)

  10. I search for this kind of stuff all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I haven't received any offers. I do try to intersperse those searches with lots of tits and ass queries in case there are other types of positions to be filled.

    1. Re:I search for this kind of stuff all the time by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Mom, get off the line! You're embarrassing me.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  11. Free lunches by Lauriy · · Score: 1

    I guess I should turn all the cool W10 spyware back on just in case they'll hire me.

  12. The stole this from God by borgauf · · Score: 2

    God plays this trick on me all the time. But I purposefully flunk the tests so He'll leave me the x!y@z+ alone.

  13. No Interest in me, either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since most of my queries regarding coding are Perl or Bash related. Sorry, Google, I'm old school. Perl and Bash are still my bread and butter, and Perl developers are still getting heaps of job offers. Some amazing stuff is being done with Perl (Fastmail and others), but it's no longer the flavour of the month for the kids, so it gets ignored. Perl, though, does not suffer the internal split that Python has with 2.x vs 3.x development. Python devs still overwhelmingly use 2.x. Perl just works.

    1. Re:No Interest in me, either by hawguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Since most of my queries regarding coding are Perl or Bash related. Sorry, Google, I'm old school. Perl and Bash are still my bread and butter, and Perl developers are still getting heaps of job offers. Some amazing stuff is being done with Perl (Fastmail and others), but it's no longer the flavour of the month for the kids, so it gets ignored. Perl, though, does not suffer the internal split that Python has with 2.x vs 3.x development. Python devs still overwhelmingly use 2.x. Perl just works.

      Perl would suffer the same split problem if Perl6 were ever released. 15 years in the making and it might (finally) be released by the end of this year.

    2. Re:No Interest in me, either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. Perl 6, though, is almost a different language, sadly. They've added, changed, and tweaked more than they needed to, all to seemingly get Perl more users. Nothing at all wrong with Perl 5. It does what's it supposed to. Old school Perl guys still prefer Perl 4.

      I do so much in Bash at work because I have to. I frequently find myself having to write me own tools because I refuse to do things by hand more than twice. If I need to do it, it can/should be automated. Bash is simple, easy enough, and works across all my work-related Linux boxes.

    3. Re:No Interest in me, either by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Some amazing stuff is being done with Perl (Fastmail and others)

      I just would like to point out that your example of "amazing" is in one of the oldest, most boring genres of programs.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  14. Alright! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Professional masturbater, here I come! Thanks Google!

  15. Same thing happened to me! by hawguy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I searched for "How can I do evil after claiming that I will do no evil", and the search result was a job offer letter from Google.

    1. Re:Same thing happened to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did nobody watch Ex Machina? This is exactly what happened.

    2. Re:Same thing happened to me! by wezelboy · · Score: 1

      In management!

  16. Annoying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I do searches like that all the time and keep getting the prompt. I'm looking for the Stack Exchange, not a job offer!

  17. Great experience by goodmanj · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I got invited into Google Foobar last winter, pretty much an identical experience to what's written in the article. I love my job as a college physics professor, so I didn't go for the "recruitme" command when it appeared, but it was a really fun brain-stretcher. I got through eight of 'em before work caught up with me and I ran out of free time to work on a really hard one.

    I won't spoil the puzzles, but they require working skills in discrete math, logic, data structures, algorithms, and cryptography, and the easiest ones are about at the limit of what I'd be comfortable asking an undergraduate to solve. They're all a lot of fun, in a nerd sniping kind of way. And I really liked that none of them relied on arcane knowledge of fiddly trivia, all it takes is high school math/CS and tons of brainpower.

    Rumor has it the selection process happens through your Google search history over a long period of time, so you're not going to be able to just spam Python jargon at the search engine and get in tomorrow. But if you do get an invite, drop what you're doing and accept it!

    I was really disappointed that when the semester ended and I had time to go back to Google Foobar, I was locked out. Sure, I failed a puzzle, so the rules say it's game over, but I'd really love to take a crack at more of them just for fun. Maybe someday I'll get another invite.

    1. Re:Great experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you'd be interested in Project Euler? It has a mix of math and programming problems. I worked through a bunch some years ago and found it really enjoyable. After you solve problems you can see others' solutions--which for me was really neat to see elegant solutions to problems that I had to brute force due to not being very familiar with the math.

    2. Re:Great experience by michaelmath · · Score: 1
      They asked me a bunch of graph theory / number theory problems, if you didn't know the algorithms and could implement them quickly you'd be SoL.

      For me programming challenges were my way to get a foot in the door without a degree. I remember getting interviews from Google after their first Code Jam. And facebook after I solved a bunch of programming puzzles they released. But topcoder was my real salvation from my parent's basement.

      Even though I have a career now, I find solving them lots of fun. Sometimes I come to the solutions when I'm drowsy before bed and have to get up and write it down before I forget!

      Project Euler

      UVa Online Judge

      Kaggle

      TopCoder

    3. Re:Great experience by jittles · · Score: 1

      Rumor has it the selection process happens through your Google search history over a long period of time, so you're not going to be able to just spam Python jargon at the search engine and get in tomorrow.

      Do you keep yourself logged in with a google account when you search? I specifically try to avoid Google tracking my searches to the extent that I can control. This whole thing is kind of creepy to me, and I never ever log into a google account unless I'm in a VM, though I am sure there are still ways to track me.

    4. Re:Great experience by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      Do you keep yourself logged in with a google account when you search?

      Yes, for everyday use. I've decided that protecting your privacy while working with a search engine is like maintaining anonymity with your pharmacist. The system makes it practically impossible, and there are some real advantages to the personalized help you can get by granting it your trust. Which isn't to say your trust should be blind: you should pick your pharmacist and your search engine carefully, and keep an eye out for weird behavior, but in the end, they're inevitably going to learn something about you.

      Or another way to put it: those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither, but giving up a little privacy to get an essential service is a trade worth considering.

    5. Re:Great experience by swillden · · Score: 1

      Rumor has it the selection process happens through your Google search history over a long period of time, so you're not going to be able to just spam Python jargon at the search engine and get in tomorrow.

      Do you keep yourself logged in with a google account when you search? I specifically try to avoid Google tracking my searches to the extent that I can control. This whole thing is kind of creepy to me, and I never ever log into a google account unless I'm in a VM, though I am sure there are still ways to track me.

      Out of curiosity, what are you concerned that Google is going to do with your search history?

      FWIW, my approach is that I stay logged in all the time, with web history enabled (so Chrome sends a log of every page I visit to Google for storage, not just my searches) and open an incognito window when I'm doing something I don't want recorded. I try not to do that much, though, because I get a lot of value from being able to search my own web history (web history allows you to search in all the stuff you've looked at, so when you find yourself thinking, "I know I read that on some site..." you can typically find it pretty easily).

      While there probably is stuff that I'd rather not share with the world, I really have no concern about sharing it with Google, because no one is ever going to see it. Unless there's a warrant or a subpoena for my information, but that seems pretty unlikely, and even more unlikely that any warrant or subpoena wouldn't get more from my e-mail, bank records, etc.

      In the interest of full disclosure I should mention that I'm a Google employee, but this post really isn't about trying to convince you that you're wrong. I'm just curious.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:Great experience by jittles · · Score: 1

      Rumor has it the selection process happens through your Google search history over a long period of time, so you're not going to be able to just spam Python jargon at the search engine and get in tomorrow.

      Do you keep yourself logged in with a google account when you search? I specifically try to avoid Google tracking my searches to the extent that I can control. This whole thing is kind of creepy to me, and I never ever log into a google account unless I'm in a VM, though I am sure there are still ways to track me.

      Out of curiosity, what are you concerned that Google is going to do with your search history?

      FWIW, my approach is that I stay logged in all the time, with web history enabled (so Chrome sends a log of every page I visit to Google for storage, not just my searches) and open an incognito window when I'm doing something I don't want recorded. I try not to do that much, though, because I get a lot of value from being able to search my own web history (web history allows you to search in all the stuff you've looked at, so when you find yourself thinking, "I know I read that on some site..." you can typically find it pretty easily).

      While there probably is stuff that I'd rather not share with the world, I really have no concern about sharing it with Google, because no one is ever going to see it. Unless there's a warrant or a subpoena for my information, but that seems pretty unlikely, and even more unlikely that any warrant or subpoena wouldn't get more from my e-mail, bank records, etc.

      In the interest of full disclosure I should mention that I'm a Google employee, but this post really isn't about trying to convince you that you're wrong. I'm just curious.

      It's not so much that I don't trust Google. It's just that I want control over what I trust to Google. That is a very difficult thing to manage. I trust Google no more or no less than any other standard corporation or government entity. The less they know about me, the better. And obviously Google is already using information it knows about users to make recruiting decisions so clearly they are using the data for more than just advertising.

      Suppose that I use an Android phone and I have all my web browsers signed in to a Google account. Google now has access to all my phone data, my contact data, calendar data, search history, and even info about websites that I go to directly w/o the help of google (thanks to Google ads). That's a lot of data for Google to know about me. I don't think that Google forgets much, if anything. Text storage is cheap. Google has the potential to be just as creepy as all those data analysts snooping through everyone's text messages at the NSA.

    7. Re:Great experience by swillden · · Score: 1

      I buy the "potential" issue. I have enough confidence in the leadership and the culture that I don't worry about it being abused in the near term, but eventually that could change. I actually do have a greater degree of trust in Google than I do other corporations or government agencies, though. I expect that's mostly because of the visibility I have as an employee.

      The less they know about me, the better.

      In the abstract I see that. But Google Now is useful... and I expect it to become vastly more useful. It's going to be interesting to see how this evolves over the next decade or so, whether most everyone decides that having an excellent personal digital assistant is worth allowing someone to know so much about them. At least it's shaping up that there will be competition... Now, Siri, Cortana, Echo...

      And obviously Google is already using information it knows about users to make recruiting decisions so clearly they are using the data for more than just advertising.

      Recruiting is advertising.

      Suppose that I use an Android phone and I have all my web browsers signed in to a Google account. Google now has access to all my phone data, my contact data, calendar data, search history, and even info about websites that I go to directly w/o the help of google (thanks to Google ads)

      Chrome can also tell Google everywhere you go even without the help of ads. It only does that if you turn on web history, though. Same with location. If you turn on location history, Google stores it. If not, Google doesn't get it. As for phone, contacts, calendar, photos, etc., that's true if you turn on backup for everything. If you turn off backup, the data doesn't go to Google. Of course, then you don't get the cross-platform always-updated calendar and contacts list, and if your phone gets run over by a bus it's all gone. Whether or not to use backup isn't a one-time decision, though; if you use it and then later decide not to you can use the privacy dashboard to delete stuff.

      And Google does forget the data you ask it to delete. It's a good idea to check the dashboard periodically and wipe out anything you don't want to be there. You should probably do that if you haven't.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    8. Re:Great experience by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Google is creepier than all those data analysts snooping through everyone's text messages at the NSA.

      The NSA analysts at least in theory need permission to trawl through your data and there is theoretical oversight. After all, its' the government's data, not a private companies.

      Also, if you accept Google's default hooks, Google knows far more about you than the NSA.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    9. Re:Great experience by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I really have no concern about sharing it with Google, because no one is ever going to see it.

      Well, an individual person doesn't need to see it. If they're willing to use searches to send people job offers and ads, what else can they automate?

      And what happens when Google has a breech or a bad setting. Remember when Google signed people up for G+,. and a lot of private data got exposed. Then a person will see it, because many eyes all looking at their friend's data.

      I suppose if Google is beneficent, never hacked, and remains both of those forever, we're fine.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    10. Re:Great experience by jittles · · Score: 1

      Google is creepier than all those data analysts snooping through everyone's text messages at the NSA.

      The NSA analysts at least in theory need permission to trawl through your data and there is theoretical oversight. After all, its' the government's data, not a private companies.

      Also, if you accept Google's default hooks, Google knows far more about you than the NSA.

      See I run my own caldav and carddav servers to avoid sending that info to Google. Google knows my location due to my use of Google Maps, but the NSA already knows that too from their meta data collection. I also don't actually use my android phone anymore. The fact of the matter is, though, that someone has access to whatever data I don't have 100% control over myself. Whether that is my cell phone provider, the NSA, Apple, Google, Microsoft, or whoever, I can't keep that info from being available while using the conveniences of our modern society. But at least I feel like I have some control.

    11. Re:Great experience by swillden · · Score: 1

      I really have no concern about sharing it with Google, because no one is ever going to see it.

      Well, an individual person doesn't need to see it. If they're willing to use searches to send people job offers and ads, what else can they automate?

      They can also remind you when it's time to leave for an appointment, and that you have a coupon you can use at the store you just entered, and that your wife's birthday is coming up, and much, much more... but only with your permission. If you don't want it, turn it off and delete the data. Google provides the tools.

      And what happens when Google has a breech or a bad setting. Remember when Google signed people up for G+,. and a lot of private data got exposed.

      I think you're thinking about Buzz, not Google+. That was bad; Buzz auto-friended contacts, exposing relationships. The fact that that's the worst thing that's happened, and that happened before all of the internal privacy review policies were put in place is pretty indicative, IMO.

      As for a breach... nothing is impossible, but I spent 15 years as a security consultant to US corporations, mostly banks, and Google has dramatically better security systems than anyone I ever saw. I'm not worried about my data at Google.

      However, if you are I highly recommend going to your Google account dashboard and deleting whatever information there you're concerned about.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    12. Re:Great experience by swillden · · Score: 1

      Google knows my location due to my use of Google Maps

      Google receives the map tile requests, etc., but if location history is turned off nothing about it is stored. I have no idea what your cell provider may store, though.

      Again, I actually like the location history. I find it convenient to be able to look back and see where I was at a particular date and time. But it's under your control.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  18. Wuh oh by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

    But I only have limited experience as a lesbian bondage school girl uniform milf best deals memory SD card entity framework linq execute not in select no duplicates top ten nick cage movies minecraft obs settings

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  19. I guess I'll... by Arkh89 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess I'll just have to write a bot generating random technical search queries then...
    Welcome in the 21st century...

    1. Re:I guess I'll... by abies · · Score: 1

      It cannot be too fake, or they will spot it. And if you write realistically behaving bot AI pretending to be programmer working on real problems... They might want to hire you just for that ;)

    2. Re:I guess I'll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that's the way they do it normally. Google AI is always looking for a mate.

  20. Wait for the lawsuit by viperidaenz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Recruitment companies are going to sue Google for using it's search monopoly to rob them of their commissions.

    1. Re:Wait for the lawsuit by coofercat · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Using one's dominance in one market to gain advantage in another = antitrust. If they just bid on adwords like everyone else gets to then they'd be fine, but doing something special not available to anyone else is a problem (at least here in Europe - where I suspect they're not doing this).

    2. Re:Wait for the lawsuit by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Um, this isn't an antitrust issue, unless Google decides to get into the recruiting industry (meaning they look for candidates and then sell their services as a recruiter to *other* companies, to help find them employees).

      If Google got in trouble for recruiting employees on their own instead of hiring a recruiter, that's be a really bad precedent. By the same logic, taxi companies could sue you for driving yourself to work instead of taking a cab or hiring a chauffeur. Restaurants could sue you (and grocery stores) for cooking your own dinner instead of going to a restaurant. Merry Maids could sue you for cleaning your own toilet and making your own bed.

  21. I get that a lot on porntube.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yup, I search for all kinds of stuff there. One day I got a mysterious search result saying "we need dudes like you"

    Golly gee, now I'm working with them!! /s

    Obviously trying to boost google search usage.

  22. Apple did this to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Told me to write a random maze generator. It's now called Apple Maps. You're welcome.

    1. Re:Apple did this to me by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Funny

      Told me to write Hello World. It's now called Google+. Don't blame me.

    2. Re:Apple did this to me by Lisias · · Score: 1

      Told me to write Hello World. It's now called Google+. Don't blame me.

      FSCKING BEAUTIFUL! :-D

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
    3. Re:Apple did this to me by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Fucking programmers never read the requirements.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    4. Re:Apple did this to me by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Be fair, they read them almost 50% of the time. On a related note, almost 50% of requirements documents are worth reading.

      It's left as an exercise for the reader to determine the degree of overlap.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:Apple did this to me by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      How many times can you read "I have this great idea for an online and it will make me a lot of money. Go write it for me." before you stop bothering.

        is something random thing that has existed for years.

  23. Privacy by lucm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If Microsoft was to do the same thing in Bing - or God forbids in Windows 10 directly, it would be a scandal and there would be endless blog posts and tv interviews about it. And of course people on Slashdot would get their panties in a bunch.

    But with Google it's kewl.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re:Privacy by Tough+Love · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's creepy either way. The want people to help make it creepier. The best way to find those is to see how they respond to a creepy opener.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, it's creepy as hell. What's next, they'll start driving white windowless vans around tech conferences?

    3. Re:Privacy by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      It's also creepy when Googlers with mod points get on Slashdot and mod down comments that they really should think seriously about instead.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    4. Re:Privacy by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's not quite right. A lot of people do give a shit about Bing, and use it, because it's hands-down the best search engine for porn.

      But for anything else, yeah, it sucks.

    5. Re:Privacy by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      I'll admit I was kind of creeped out when I got invited to Foobar, but what sold me was the fun, spirited, and intellectually challenging puzzles it offered. That may be a compromise of my ethical principles, but I don't care.

      If you knock on my door at 10 p.m., I'm going to be annoyed. But if you knock on my door at 10 p.m. to hand me the keys to a new Ferrari, I'll probably forgive the intrusion.

  24. So if I'm CEO at a tech company, block google? by cfalcon · · Score: 2

    Is it now rational for a CEO at a tech company to insist that google searches be blocked? I mean, your programmers are searching for solutions to stuff a lot, and you wouldn't want google to take the fact that they are searching for solutions and....

    1)- Directly recruit your top men.
    2)- Figure out what you are working on.
    3)- Hey, google knows a lot about the people who are logged into it. They can probably flag by race and sex pretty easily...

    If you're in charge of programmers at any level, do you now have to weight the possibility that the tools you supply them will be used to recruit them away from you? Do you have to weight the advantages of letting your programmers have access to a superior search versus the cons of that superior search poaching your peeps?

    1. Re:So if I'm CEO at a tech company, block google? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Google already knows who you work for. Google already knows what you're working on. Heck, if you have an Android with default settings, they have all your whiteboard pictures. This likely isn't a "candidate identification" tool, but rather a way to get people more interested in saying "yes" to the recruiter - oh, those were fun puzzles, maybe I do want to work for Google.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:So if I'm CEO at a tech company, block google? by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Sign them all in under a fake user account and you are set :)

    3. Re:So if I'm CEO at a tech company, block google? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't worry too much about it. There are a tons of top-flight programmers who have zero interest in working for Google.

  25. Strange by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Don't know why, but I only get offers to become a porn evaluator.

  26. What if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want to work in the porn industry?

  27. Don't google, just know by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    Or use the language's built-in help features, or its dedicated documentation, on or offline. If you need to google everything, you're probably not the best for the job.

    I'm tired of these targeted job adverts anyway. If I'm really looking for a job, then I'll probably figure out where to look myself. If they really want me, they should either contact me directly, if not, stay the fuck out of my life.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  28. Not if you're searching for Maaaaaaatlock... ;-) by BringMyShuttle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "64-year-old engineer sues Google for age discrimination" http://arstechnica.com/tech-po...

    Even too much knowledge of 1980s pop culture will put you on thin ice: "Median age at Google is 29, says age discrimination lawsuit" http://www.computerworld.com/a...

    Teletubbies is still fine. FOR NOW! :-O

  29. Real programmers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Real programmers don't need to search Google, they already know how to do it.

  30. Cue mass searches designed to get invitations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will result in a bunch of people, who want to work at their dream version of Google, spamming the search engine with terms they think will make them get an offer. If it works, they're going to find that artificial passion will not get them past the quiz.

    Pure speculation of course. :)

  31. Time Management by PPH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Person is researching python lambda function list comprehension for a programming project. Gets sidetracked for a couple of hours by popup puzzles.

    Yep. This is the employee we want.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Time Management by swillden · · Score: 2

      Person is researching python lambda function list comprehension for a programming project. Gets sidetracked for a couple of hours by popup puzzles.

      Yep. This is the employee we want.

      You mean the sort of person who is an avid problem solver but bored in their current job? Yes, that's exactly who you want to hire if you're going to put them in an environment rich in productive puzzles to solve. Yes, you do also need them to be able to maintain focus when it really matters, but it's far easier to teach brilliant problem solvers some time management skills than it is to teach plodding, methodical thinkers to be brilliant problem solvers.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:Time Management by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      It is if you're Google.

    3. Re:Time Management by PPH · · Score: 1

      but bored in their current job?

      I'd expect a self motivated worker to already be looking for a new one.

      easier to teach brilliant problem solvers some time management skills

      That's an optinion that not many employers share. Companys that take it upon themselves to teach basic skills tend to hire people without them. And then everyone suffers, because everyone is expected to help out the special snowflakes.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:Time Management by swillden · · Score: 1

      but bored in their current job?

      I'd expect a self motivated worker to already be looking for a new one.

      Bah. There are different kinds of people. Some will search out a better job, but many of the more introverted sorts won't. It doesn't mean they're not motivated, just that they're not comfortable with interviewing. A lot of top-performing software engineers are very introverted.

      easier to teach brilliant problem solvers some time management skills

      That's an optinion that not many employers share. Companys that take it upon themselves to teach basic skills tend to hire people without them. And then everyone suffers, because everyone is expected to help out the special snowflakes.

      There are no "special snowflakes" at Google. Google gives people time and resources to address their shortcomings, and it's expected that everyone be helpful, but if you can't pull your weight for whatever reason, it'll come out. Your peers will tell you that you need to manage your time better, and your manager will expect you to make use of the internal resources available to improve. It's even fine if you take time away from your job to do what's needed to improve... but if you don't, you'll eventually be gone. It's not like learning to manage your time is hard. If you're capable of solving hard computer science problems, you can learn that, too.

      In practice, it's really not a problem. If you find smart people and keep them challenged (or enable them to keep themselves challenged), and give them feedback on how they can do better, it works.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  32. The NSA has been doing this for a while, albeit m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google isn't the first doing this. The NSA does it too. One 5am Saturday I was searching lisajous trajectory calculations and all of the banner ads pointed me to NSA's official recruiting website. I'd never before seen such ads. Google is just following this precident

  33. It is Not Just Google.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My local Spy Agency (I am in a five eyes country that I shall not name) is also doing this. I keep getting recruiter adds when I do certain searches.

    1. Re:It is Not Just Google.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ASIO. Anonymous posting won't hide you from us.

  34. Anyone remember when by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2

    the Air Force used to recruit people based on their video game scores?

    1. Re: Anyone remember when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome Starfighter!

    2. Re:Anyone remember when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is actually a good approach. Air Force pilots, especially fighter pilots need to have lightning fast reflexes and make correct decisions in fractions of a second. many games required very similar skills back in the day.

    3. Re:Anyone remember when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but it is how I became the last starfighter.

    4. Re:Anyone remember when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I don't. But I remember when the Rylan Star League did.

    5. Re:Anyone remember when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but I remember when Last Starfighter pilots were recruited by video game scores, does that count?

    6. Re:Anyone remember when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wasn't the Air Force, it was the Intergalactic Alliance.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_Starfighter

  35. dependency injection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... was the search query that brought me into the foobar console. I was trying to template a C++ class so that it could accept a mock object for unit testing. Sadly, all their games are in java or python. The one it assigned me was "guard game". I wrote them a note that I'm just a mechanical engineer and that I only know C++ and Mathematica. Then I signed out. So sad :-(
    -Chris Chiasson

  36. ran into this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a college student... I was either researching cfd or computer vision.

    Unfortunately, the problems were too hard for me. I banged my head against the first one for a while and gave up. Maybe when I've got 10 years of experience under my belt...

  37. Microsoft does a similar thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you search for Gloryhole and Rim jobs on bing

  38. Re:Python or Java? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spoken like a true idiot.

  39. Old Scam, people fall for it still. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    This is a scam, so let me explain how it works. And then the history behind it.

      You are a company, and you want to find creative innovation without needing to pay for it.
      You pretend to hire people, and you give part of the problem, and see if people can solve it. You make it part of "see how smart you are."
      You appeal to peoples intellect, while you are getting free work from your creative ideas or knowledge.
      So next time you get it, don't get suckered in for doing free work for which you will never get credit for.

      History.

      My friends father is from former communist country and he told me a story how outside his mathematics polytechnic institute, there was a flier from this company that says they are looking for mathematicians who just graduated. Great position with good pay. Before the interview, he was given a piece of paper, sliding ruler, and 1 hour to solve one very complicated math problem. He was suppose to make some proof or something. It was cutting edge according to the father. He took it, and did his best. His friend, a week later was chatting up with him, and somehow they ended up talking about the job. The girl who was chatting said she had a really hard problem. The more she talked, my friends father realized that she was doing the second part of the equation from where he left because she used his proof! That was in 1960s. Later they started contacting other students, and they found out that everyone did a little part of complicated work. Now, he can't imagine it was not checked, but all the work was portioned under the guise of "hey are you smart and creative? Prove it to us."

      So long story short. He just wrote a free code for a billion dollar company for which he will not get compensated, but it will solve their problem. In a funny way, he got himself out of the job if he did a good job. There is another sucker who will be given instructions, "optimize this code! You got 1 hour. Go!"

      Since I know Google, Microsoft and Apple and other employees visit /. read this -- fuck you for being part of the machine that has became an insidious and invasive parasites that you help to create. fuck you because you are the biggest fucking hypocrites in the world. privacy matters, you drive towards manipulating others into giving you something you will not pay in the first place is despicable. free society can only function when individuality is protected not categorized for monetary gains.

      so yeah - fuck you.

     

    1. Re:Old Scam, people fall for it still. by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      I agree that what you're talking about is a problem, and it sounds like your friend's father got really screwed, but having done a bunch of the Google Foobar puzzles, I can assure you that they have nothing to do with actual problems Google needs to solve for its business.

      I don't want to give them away -- though I'm sure you can find them on the Web if you hunted -- but by way of example, the first one I did involved finding the smallest numbers which were palindromes (read the same backwards and forwards) subject to certain additional criteria. They're all straight up math/logic brainteasers with no practical use to anyone.

  40. They recruited me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be their Anal Porn Guru. That's the "official" title, anyway.

  41. Stupid google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's pretty stupid. If somebody was searching for that term, then they obviously don't know the subject and need to read about it. Why would you hire someone who does not know the subject?

    1. Re:Stupid google by phmadore · · Score: 1

      Because then they'll learn Google python and be forever grateful for their middle management position. Cradle to grave. I see anti-trust in the cards for ABC.XYZ.

  42. abc.wtf by phmadore · · Score: 1

    That is all.

  43. Greetings, Starfighter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have been recruited by the Star League to defend the Frontier against Xur and the Ko-Dan Armada!

  44. a cunning plan by hraponssi · · Score: 1

    This is obviously a cunning plan to profile them nerds better. If your average slashdotter has ghostery, adblock, etc. installed and use google without logging in, how do you profile them. You give them the elusive chance of hitting Google Foobar and have them log in for every query. Cause then you could brag to your friends (assuming you have friends..) you got invited. Whooppee :P. Now, where is my Google login button..

  45. This is really old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the fall of 2003 I was building a versioning and content-addressable file system (for Windows even, imagine the pain!) to store digital assets for computer games. I googled for papers on "the elephant file system", and was greeted with a "you should work at Google!" link. 12 years later, the story hits slashdot...

    1. Re:This is really old news by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      It's the same basic premise, but this is a *lot* more elaborate than what you ran into.

  46. The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The worst bit is you can't even google for the answer, cause they'll know.

  47. H1B visa holder? Live in Silicon Valley? Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone else, you're out of luck.

  48. Re:Not if you're searching for Maaaaaaatlock... ;- by swillden · · Score: 1

    FWIW, I'm a Google engineer. I'm 46. Many members of my previous team were in their 50s and 60s, and the median age there was probably around my age. That team was working on complex internal enterprise systems, where decades of experience with complex business logic was at a premium. My current team is younger... but I'm not the oldest.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.