Slashdot Mirror


US Weighs Sanctioning Russia As Well As China In Cyber Attacks

New submitter lvbees7 writes with news that U.S. officials have warned that the government may impose sanctions against Russia and China following cyber attacks to commercial targets. According to the Reuters story: The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said no final decision had been made on imposing sanctions, which could strain relations with Russia further and, if they came soon, cast a pall over a state visit by Chinese President Xi Jinping in September. The Washington Post first reported the Obama administration was considering sanctioning Chinese targets, possibly within the next few weeks, and said that individuals and firms from other nations could also be targeted. It did not mention Russia.

78 comments

  1. Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Framboise · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A little consistence would be nice.

    1. Re:Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To be fair, I think the problem with Russian/Chinese cyber attacks is that they're designed to embarass governments and disrupt civilian life or gain commercial advantage - leaking people's personal details, or stealing corporate secrets.

      The US' argument is probably that it's programs are oriented wholly towards state security rather than to gain explicit commercial advantage or simply to be dicks for the sake of it.

      There's still some hypocrisy, but this is a fairly reasonable explanation for the most part. I don't see the US hacking into China or Russia's massive state run organisations and releasing all the personal data they hold just for shits and giggles to embarrass them.

      So I think the point the US is making is that rather than descend quite to their level, it'd rather punish them. The alternative is that the US expands it's programs to steal more Chinese/Russian corporate data, and to generally make life miserable for their citizens by stealing and releasing all their personal data, or DDoSing their bank websites and such.

      Yes, as a non-American US spying is incredibly annoying, but you can't really use it as a catch all "But you do it too!" argument against every initiative the US takes in this area.

      Personally I'd much rather see this sort of response, than I would all out international cyber warfare where as with all warfare where it just escalates and escalates, and the only real victims are civilians who lose their jobs and become victims of identity theft and so forth.

      So yeah, US spying is wrong, but this response is far better than responding in kind and risking escalation.

    2. Re:Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      The U.S. is going to feel really bad one day when China announces that it's freezing all electronics exports to the U.S. for a period because of U.S. attempts to put spyware on routers sent to China.

      I just hope they do it right as Apple is ramping up for a new iPhone launch. There is nothing prettier that watching an Apple hipster cry.

    3. Re:Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      But they are consistent. They sanction everybody for every thing they do themselves! Be it in a nuclear, financial, violent or digital way...

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    4. Re: Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Idk about Russia but China deserves it. From trying to DDoS Gothub for hosting VPN software. The same to Hong Kong protest sites during the protests, ans even HK government site and polical party site (HK Democratic Party). And that's not to mention paying the HK triad to stab random people during the protests to control it. And generally waging cyber war on its citizen with so much censorship, China deserves it.

      I'm from Hong Kong but in China now so the VPN going on...

    5. Re:Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by plopez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The US is consistent. The US is the good guy, everyone else are the bad guys. Bad guys play dirty, that means whatever the good guy does to fight the bad guys is OK. I thought everybody knew that.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    6. Re:Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by abhisri · · Score: 0

      So I think the point the US is making is that rather than descend quite to their level, it'd rather punish them. The alternative is that the US expands it's programs to steal more Chinese/Russian corporate data, and to generally make life miserable for their citizens by stealing and releasing all their personal data, or DDoSing their bank websites and such.

      Have a rather high/delusional opinion of USA, don't you?

      USA will never use cyberattacks against enemy/rival nations?
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    7. Re: Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just hope they do it right as Apple is ramping up for a new iPhone launch. There is nothing prettier that watching an Apple hipster DIE.

      Ftfy

    8. Re:Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Rei · · Score: 2

      Things like Stuxnet is not at all what the person was talking about. They're talking about hacks to try to embarrass people or steal corporate secrets. Stuxnet was to take down a nuclear program, which is clearly a geopolitical, not industrial, goal.

      My personal opinion: countries breaking into each other's governments or trying in general to gather/use classic "spying" data for geopolitical purposes is fair game. State-sponsored industrial espionage is not. That said, even in the first case, one runs the risk of uncontrolled escalation, so it's important for all sides to keep themselves in check and mutually agree to ratchet down the activity from time to time, for everyone's sake.

      Also: it probably hasn't gotten past the US that it's in an advantageous state right now. Russia hasn't been more vulnerable in a long time, and now even China's star has taken a pounding in the market. US industry is benefiting from cheap thermal energy prices due to low cost shale gas. And Europe is probably going to be on the US's side in all of this.

      --
      Stale pastry is hollow succor to one who is bereft of ostrich.
    9. Re:Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      To be fair, I think the problem with Russian/Chinese cyber attacks is that they're designed to embarass governments and disrupt civilian life or gain commercial advantage - leaking people's personal details, or stealing corporate secrets.

      Whereas here in the good ol' US of A, we have corporations that do that.

      Can we maybe get the FBI to look into Google's attacks on my privacy?

    10. Re:Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by swb · · Score: 1

      What's the Chinese version of "cutting off your nose to spite your face"?

    11. Re:Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      China and Russia are likely to respond in kind with sanctions of their own, more than justified of course. The whole thing is a backhand trade deal. Can't block certain imports/exports or you get in trouble with the WHO, so just accuse the other side of cybercrime and enact sanctions instead. The other side gets to ban some US stuff in exchange.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You completely failed to grasp everything I said.

      I didn't say the US doesn't carry out cyber attacks, I said it limits it's cyber attacks largely to real or perceived threats to it's national security. Iran's nuclear program was very much in that remit - whatever you think about Iran's nuclear program, the US clearly believed they were gunning for nuclear weapons, or were at least at risk of developing nuclear materials that could leak into the hands of terrorist groups - based on that not wholly unreasonable belief therefore and the subsequent risk that might pose for the US, the Iranian nuclear program would be a clearly legitimate target for cyber-warfare, and cyber-warfare to slow down or cripple such a program is still surely better than an air incursion and 1000lb's of high explosive.

      I don't actually have a high opinion of the US whatsoever for what it's worth, that low opinion however have is still drastically higher than that I hold of Russia/China where hacking is carried out for great patriotic good and to embarrass those Western pig-dogs or whatever bullshit they use to justify arbitrary attacks against non-threatening civilian infrastructure.

      You seem to be arguing that if America uses cyber-warfare against foreign military threats, then that's justification for everyone else to use cyber-warfare against American civilians. This is really the same justification that groups like ISIS use - they say that if the US bombs their tanks, training camps, and ammo dumps, then it's okay for them to blow up and kill American civilians.

      I think that's wrong, I think civilians should never be legitimate targets no matter what the justification (and yes, I agree that the US has a lot to answer for in killing civilians too FWIW - but that still doesn't make it right).

    13. Re: Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Descending to their level? The US has been involved in covert 'wars' since its beginning. They can only hope to rise to their level.

    14. Re:Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The alternative is that the US expands it's programs to steal more Chinese/Russian corporate data, and to generally make life miserable for their citizens by stealing and releasing all their personal data, or DDoSing their bank websites and such.

      The U.S. could steal manufacturing secrets from China, and set up their own competing manufacturers here. That will teach them!

    15. Re:Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      When Google hacks into your Hotmail account to find out more information about you, you can feel free to prosecute them. When you throw everything you can at them, shouting "take it all!", you can't really complain.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    16. Re:Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't say the US doesn't carry out cyber attacks, I said it limits it's cyber attacks largely to real or perceived threats to it's national security.

      That's exactly what other nations do, too. Or do you honestly believe that Russia and China are actively attacking US infrastructure as opposed to spying and information gathering?

      AFAIK, the only known real attack in the sense of 'cyber-warfare' so far was Stuxnet.

    17. Re:Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much where the norms should be.

      Hacking a foreign government's computers to steal secrets? Fair game.
      Hacking a foreign defense contracting company? Eh, probably fair game too.
      Hacking a foreign non-military company to provide commercial advantage? Nope, out of bounds.

      The US has held this viewpoint for a long time - I seem to remember some issue something like 15-20 years ago where it came out that Air France had bugged the seats of its planes on behalf of French intelligence (or was accused of doing so) to spy on businesspeople. It was something of a big deal at the time.

    18. Re: Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we certainly believe the word of an american. not.

    19. Re:Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's still some hypocrisy, but this is a fairly reasonable explanation for the most part. I don't see the US hacking into China or Russia's massive state run organisations and releasing all the personal data they hold just for shits and giggles to embarrass them.

      Hey cold fjord, sorry I mean anonymous coward:
      Maybe the US should sanction The New York Times while they are at it?

    20. Re:Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that the average Chinese does not have enough nose to cut off to start with, cf. "big nosed barbarians".

    21. Re: Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And generally waging cyber war on its citizen with so much censorship, China deserves it.

      AC is extremely insightful.
      But do not limit your anger to China alone my friend.
      Our so called ally Germany wants to shut down Holocaust denial, those German bastards. WW3 could be started by us against them Krauts as easily as against China.
      Keep up the good fight my friend.

    22. Re:Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's strange, I remember the US government spying on Airbus and providing this information to Boeing to give them an advantage during contract negotiations.

    23. Re:Sanctioning NSA/FBI for spying all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US sanctioning anything is pointless and meaningless considering what this current administration has done to the concept.

  2. Pussies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuke 'em! Nuke 'em NOW!

    #2

  3. Maxim of the 21st Century by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's only ok when we do it"

    1. Re:Maxim of the 21st Century by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      But we don't do what they're talking about. It's a specific kind of cybercrime.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  4. Not far enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cant say Im too bothered about sanctioning Russia or not but China cant come soon enough.

    Next India.

    Im not interested in political sanctions of these countries - only environmental ones.

    India and China have outsourced the West's pollution. They are building factories and power stations by the week with a 19th century regard [lack of] to the environment.

    Europe and the US (reluctantly) have signed up to aggressive environmental change programs - India and China are dragging their heels.

    Sanction them. Exclude them from the world market.

    Dont buy their products. They'll stop making all this crap if we refuse to buy it - or even better - keep making this crap, but do it responsibly.

    1. Re:Not far enough. by Dunbal · · Score: 0

      And what are you going to do when they sanction you? It's ok to blame China for its disastrous environmental damage. It's not ok to fail to recognize that Chinese industry is primarily servicing the manufacturing needs of the US. Look how green we are - (we don't produce anything anymore)! Look how filthy China is (only they happen to be making the components for everything the entire world needs). Seriously, stop being a hypocrite. And as for sanctioning - don't bite the hand that feeds you. China is now the world's #1 economy. It can survive without the US - there would be hard times, but it can. The US, however, cannot survive without China thanks to the fabulous strategic decision of outsourcing everything to there.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Not far enough. by cobbaut · · Score: 1

      India and China have outsourced the West's pollution. They are building factories and power stations by the week with a 19th century regard [lack of] to the environment.

      You do realize that this is exactly the reason a lot of *American* companies are building/using factories in China., right?

      On a side note, you cannot just sanction Russia + China + India + Iran + N.Korea + Syria + Lybia + $evil_state_of_the_week since this would isolate the USA from most of the world's economy. Not to mention that the USA still relies on Russian rockets to get to the space station.

      --
      European Linux user, living in Antwerp
    3. Re:Not far enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make an interesting point regarding the American companies setting up shop in China.

      However it doesn't need to be this way. Germany is a very successful manufacturing economy for example - and is meeting it's environmental objectives IIRC.

      We here in the west are the customers. If our jobs are bleeding away to China... so be it if thats the market forces in labour rates. But our companies (especially those in Europe) are also subject to environmental levies. Are Chinese? I doubt it.

      Customers have a right to refuse to buy from any provider for any reason. I only buy high animal welfare eggs for instance. I can choose that.

      I cannot buy an environmentally responsibly manufactured shower curtain tho. Or a tyre for my car. Or a cotton ball (beech! is heavily used in the whitening process). The list is endless.

      The [crude] low price is rigged.
      The environmental price is very high, and deliberately hidden.

      It's up to us as consumers to force the issue.

    4. Re:Not far enough. by Rei · · Score: 1

      IMHO, countries that care about pollution should set up a Pollution-Added Tax (PAT), equivalent to VAT, replacing their current patchwork of pollution regulations. Since VAT is already clearly in compliance with WTO rules (given that it exists), PAT should be as well. Just like how VAT works by taxing products at each stage of adding value to them during manufacture, PAT would tax them by the embodied pollution in their manufacture during that stage (plus any "delayed" pollution released when the product is consumed). And like VAT, PAT goods for export would receive a full tax rebate, and goods for import from non-PAT states would be taxed on entry.

      The main point is that states with weaker pollution regulations cannot gain an unfair economic advantage over states with stronger pollution regulations. Thus it encourages even non-member-states to tighten their regulations.

      --
      Stale pastry is hollow succor to one who is bereft of ostrich.
    5. Re:Not far enough. by Archtech · · Score: 1

      "Sanction them. Exclude them from the world market".

      Assuming much? We have already seen how sanctions on Russia have stimulated its economy while seriously damaging Europe's. I seriously wonder which of those (or both) the US government finds more rewarding.

      The important question, however, is why the US government thinks that it can "exclude" other countries "from the world market". Given that the USA has less than 5 percent of the world's population, and has been spectacularly successful in lining up dozens of other nations against its policies - including several of the world's largest. They started by placing sanctions on Russia (see the link below). Now they want to sanction China. Maybe India and Brazil might follow - four out of the five BRICS nations. But at some point, when less than 5 percent of the world's population starts sanctioning and excluding others, one wonders just who is excluding and who is being excluded. Or maybe someone is contriving to exclude themselves?

      http://www.zerohedge.com/news/...

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    6. Re:Not far enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have already seen how sanctions on Russia have stimulated its economy while seriously damaging Europe's.

      Who are "we" in this regard? The rest of the world has seen the sanctions damaging Russia's economy while only hurting European economies to a small extent.

    7. Re:Not far enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankyou for recognising that we in BRICS oriented countries can survive without the patronising old countries. I know businesses that trade internationally, but the focus is on the BR+C part, the US/Europe not even featuring in their plans. At all. "Not interested in the slightest, they're too much trouble to work with" - to translate a quote from a friend.
      And they're doing just fine thankyou very much.

      Personally speaking, apart from the occaisional piece of software, I haven't bought anything Western made for years now, and no reason to visit except to see family.

      Add the Islamic semi-circle as a third bloc, and the West looks even less important.

      There's also a move away from English as second language - Portuguese and Chinese (and German, for some reason) becoming more popular by the minute.

      Take home: you can't continually shit on people and expect them to love you.

    8. Re:Not far enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Between the USA, Europe (Germany), Korea, and Taiwan is there any manufactured good you can't get if you are willing to pay a bit more for quality?

    9. Re:Not far enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Portuguese? Really? I'd believe Spanish in the Western Hemisphere. You must not have been following the economic news out of Brazil, Russia, or even China lately, either. Try this recent piece from CNN Money: http://money.cnn.com/2015/08/1...
      A little statistic from the story: "Brazil's currency, the real, has fallen 24% against the US dollar this year to its lowest point since 2003."

    10. Re:Not far enough. by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      This is why the WTO sucks. Tariffs give you leverage to negotiate both commercial and political issues. Trading with the USA is a privilege, not a right.

    11. Re:Not far enough. by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      if you are willing to pay a bit more for quality?

      The real question is - can you afford the quality?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    12. Re:Not far enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody will buy your environmentally responsibly manufacture if they cost 2 or 3 times the price of a regular "dirty" one.
      OK some people will buy them, but not enough people.

      Go and buy your shower curtain from some (local) artist. You dont want to pay that price? Why, but you do like the "environmentally responsible" product?

    13. Re:Not far enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Small extent?
      Countries in easter-europe are struggling greatly becouse the sanctions on russia.
      I live there, so i know first hand.

    14. Re:Not far enough. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      There's also a move away from English as second language - Portuguese and Chinese (and German, for some reason) becoming more popular by the minute.

      I'm taking a wild guess you're Brazilian?

      No one else believes that Portugese is a major world language, even people from Portugal.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  5. Sanctions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So will they also sanction themselves? The US is by far the worst perpetrator in this regard.

  6. Consistency is very hard to come by by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately the word "consistency" is extremely difficult to be had, from that particular nation which accuses others of violating 'human rights' while itself violating the human rights of others

  7. Why now? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pollute like the earth was going out of style? Meh. Murder your own people? Meh. Play thought police at a level that would make Big Brother jealous. Meh. Invade a neighboring country? Meh. But steal a database or two? Now THAT really pisses me off.

    1. Re:Why now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably useful as a pretext to force china to govern its own cyberspace to be more in line with TPP laws without actually requiring china to join the TPP

    2. Re:Why now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, imagine you are polluting the earth, murdering own people, running worldwide spying and hacking operation that would make Big Brother jealous, invading countries, etc... and you would like people keep thinking about something else than you and all these little things you are doing.

      The classic way is to accuse others of what you are doing and pretend you are under attack from outsiders so people can rally around you, the leader.

      So, did you know that THE RUSSIAN, CHINESE, MUSLIM, ETC. HORDES ARE COMMING?

    3. Re:Why now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pollute the earth. Check.
      Murder your own people. Well, the Tuskeegee syphilis experiment is well known. I expect there are others where it wasn't "just" a disease.
      Play thought police. Although I'm sure some Tea Party / Breitbart / Limbaugh crowd would say yes. That's pretty much a no. But spin is deep all around.
      Invade a neighboring country. Check.

      The US hasn't exactly led from behind.

    4. Re:Why now? by Archtech · · Score: 1

      Assuming that the Chinese DID do it. For which we have the unsupported word of the US government, whose unbelievable incompetence and/or negligence allowed the theft to take place. What better - indeed, what more irresistible knee-jerk - reaction than to blame the horrid foreigners?

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    5. Re:Why now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese economy is in a slump. Applying sanctions would hurt China more than us right now.
      As to Russia... standard cold war tactic in response to Russian aggression in Ukraine.

    6. Re:Why now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess where the US government gets their reports on Chinese-based APTs?

      A: The private Information Security community. People like us doing our job with a focus on tracking and preventing security treat-agents from doing what they do have been crying bloody murder for a decade about China. They have been doing the same about Russia for two decades. They have the evidence. You just need to go look at it. Go ahead. Hell, even Kapersky admits what is going on, writing reports and everything, and they have an invested interest to lie.

      Look, I understand that it is hard to take the word of the US government and it looks like a knee-jerk reaction, but to choose to not dig into the details and realize there is a mountain of evidence from multiple independent sources or claiming a grand conspiracy is just as much a knee-jerk reaction.

  8. That'll Turn Out Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These clueless morons.

    How many attacks against Chinese and Russian entities do they think originate in the U.S and what will they feel if these nations sanction the U.S. in their most effective way?

    How many attacks from China or Russia are false flag operations(bot nets)?

    You can't use legislation to provide security. Legislation stops no one from doing anything. The whole idea is moronic.

  9. The world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The world should set up trade embargo on the USA due to the NSA spying..

    1. Re:The world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't pull Superman's cape.

    2. Re:The world by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Don't pull Superman's cape.

      But without his cape, he's just Clark Kent.

      Back on topic, this is just another sign that the American government has gone batshit crazy.

      1. Export most of our manufacturing to China.
      2. Impose sanctions on China.
      3. ???

  10. Start with H1B by plopez · · Score: 1

    Send them home enmass carrying the contagion of US culture. Assimilate our foes.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:Start with H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US culture? No such thing. Besides, these countries are already totally DEGENERATE, e.g. India: shitting and pissing in the streets, corpses floating on the river, dogs eating human remains on the river bank, etc.

    2. Re:Start with H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you have never seen Camden NJ....

    3. Re:Start with H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the poop cleaners in San Francisco

  11. Flood the market by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    With sanctions China and Russia will stop importing so much expensive, exotic, bespoke US designed computer system hardware.
    How is US Tailored Access Operations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... going to get to the exported hardware if its not been shipped around the world?
    Without that secret spyware and hardware been installed as delivered how will the product sold be found on an open network again?
    The US mil had the right idea in the 1990's - flood the export market with tame US brands and watch as every nation installs ever more complex trap doored networked products.
    All sanctions do is support local production and reduce the need to even considering any tame Western brands.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  12. Well, Jimmy's parents let HIM do it! by rmdingler · · Score: 1
    Perhaps the worst thing to come out of the Snowden revelations is not this apathy towards the surveillance state.

    Reform may have been the the benign goal of the surveillance leaks, but as that just hasn't happened, the bar where right vs. wrong is set has been lowered along with the stock that is the United States.

    Perhaps worse than people not caring (enough) that their whole world is fast becoming an Orwellian nightmare, we are now left without a credible nation to voice the message of Worldly evil.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Well, Jimmy's parents let HIM do it! by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "Perhaps worse than people not caring (enough) that their whole world is fast becoming an Orwellian nightmare, we are now left without a credible nation to voice the message of Worldly evil."
      With "Our Government Has Weaponized The Internet. Here’s How They Did It" http://www.wired.com/2013/11/t... (11.13.13) even finding the "individuals and firms from other nations" is going to be tricky.
      All the other 5 eye nations, their staff, ex staff and former staff, contractors and other "friendly" 3rd party nations have some idea about the more advanced methods.
      Anyone could set the end point as the most expected nations, use the correct time zone and the found log would be detailed junk..
      The other question is why would any nation just allow a plain text "treasure trove of data about government employees" to exist in any form just facing the net?
      Boondoggle to find contractors, limited hangout or honey pot?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  13. Uncle Sam only knows to blame others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take environment

    US blames China / India for polluting the world's environment while the usage of fossil fuel per population in the US is several times that of China and India combined

    Take Human Rights
    US blames China / Russia of violating human rights while the US itself violating the human rights of its own citizens by spying on them - from intercepting mobile phone signals (via stingrays) to wiretapping to whatever that they can think of

    US of A is also the country whereby the ratio of imprisoned citizen per capita is 5 times that of China (which supposed to be evil, according to the US of A)

    Take Terrorism
    US blames the Muslims for terrorism but it was US and its allies who have fucked up the power balance in the Middle East to begin with. With the killing of Saddam Hussein of Iraq and Qaddafi of Libya, and the current push to topple the Sadad regime in Syria, the Middle Eastern region is engulfed in a huge rage of turmoil and strives, the perfect breeding ground for terrorists

    To Uncle Sam, it's always "THEM" who fuck-up.

    Uncle Sam never ever blames himself for causing all the fuckups of others.

    1. Re:Uncle Sam only knows to blame others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Go back to RT, hater.

      How about we put blame where it really belongs in the middle east? On the middle easterners. The US tried to free them from Hussein and the Taliban, and it fell apart why? Because of their mindset, their religion, their warlords, their culture. That's all on them. The fact that it takes a tyrannical dictator to hold a country in line should tell you something about it's people.

      China human rights? Seriously? They do a lot worse than just spy on people's metadata. Nice try.

    2. Re:Uncle Sam only knows to blame others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The US tried to free them from Hussein and the Taliban

      Why? The people there lived quite good lives, compared to now, when all they have are western backed puppet governments and murder-mayhem all day long.
      Saddam killed very little, compared to every-day killings of today.
      Taliban did not operate outside of muslim countries. Al-quiada and all the other CIA-MI6 backed terrorist groups were not there at that time. There was no mass immigration to Europe.

  14. Has anybody ever heard of a firewall? by Kevin+by+the+Beach · · Score: 1

    Just wondering.. we already monitor 100% of traffic leaving our shores, why can't we use that deep packet inspection to build a firewall?

    Plus, we could whitelist packets from known addresses and charge a penny per packet for "trusted" delivery. That sucking sound you would hear is all of the call centers and offshore support organizations being sucked back to our shores....

    1. Re:Has anybody ever heard of a firewall? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "Just wondering.. we already monitor 100% of traffic leaving our shores, why can't we use that deep packet inspection to build a firewall?"
      It depends on what the network evolved into. An encrypted, air gapped mil/gov only list of expert staff to a readable vendor friendly cloud database for finding or clearing skilled staff?
      Say some distant country had freedom needs, a plain text, unencrypted list of cleared contractors would be great, no encryption to worry about, keys to request, logged trail. Get the contractors and "freedom" support is shipped.
      The US wanted to removed all the red tape, to get ideas, people and missions flowing supported by all contractors. Gov only firewalls would have stopped contractors from finding, selecting, sorting plain text lists of skilled staff for amazing no bid contracts. Someone requested and got that "treasure trove of data" open, readable and very networked.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Has anybody ever heard of a firewall? by Kevin+by+the+Beach · · Score: 1

      I agree that the evolution/purpose of the internet (and all wide area networks) can be exploited for nefarious purposes.

      But, to not have a firewall is STUPIDITY!

      Tea Leaves show that people/businesses/government entities can and will be sued for cyber security breaches. I'm just asking our government to do the most basic of functions that "a government" is created for, wielding the collective power of it's people. If a government can't protect it's own its not really fulfilling its purpose.

    3. Re:Has anybody ever heard of a firewall? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "government to do the most basic of functions that "a government" is created for, wielding the collective power of it's people. If a government can't protect it's own its not really fulfilling its purpose."
      The database was created for needs of powerful contractors and expensive projects in plain text. The question about projects listed in letter of commendation, work history is the open question. What agencies, gov, mil where told they could keep their own internal lists is also interesting and over what years the unencrypted data was kept. Since the years after 2000? Encryption would have allowed nothing that readable to be found.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  15. Headline disproved by summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously people.
    Get it together

  16. Sanction them both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are bad actors. The US will cross swords with both eventually.

  17. How cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's like when my 4 year old tells me he's the boss of the house.

    The US is a rapidly declining power. The rest of the world has already surpassed us and all we can do is talk about sanctioning the new superpowers. Way to go America.

  18. The US wants war. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They want it badly. They know the American Century is over and they'd rather blow up the whole world rather than see someone else take their place.

  19. ISS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sure you want to sanction the only method you have of getting people/cargo to and from the ISS?

  20. The US has no credibility to sanction over hacking by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    Over other things... arguably... but hacking? No. pardon snowden and don't engage in that sort of behavior for a decade and you MIGHT get some credibility there. But what value is it to the US to sanction anyway?

    We probably get more out of hacking than the sanctions anyway.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  21. Baby Weighs Sanctioning Mother in Diaper Change by r-diddly · · Score: 1

    China: where everything is made, with a big-ass army and 1 billion people
    Russia: where all the oil is, with a big-ass army and a stubbornness that seems like 1 billion people
    Good luck with those "sanctions" USA!