Slashdot Mirror


Comcast To Charge $30 For Unlimited Data Over 300GB Cap

For some time, Comcast has been testing 300 GB monthly data caps in certain markets. An anonymous reader notes a policy change unveiled today that gives customers in those markets the ability to switch back to unlimited data for $30 extra. Previously (and currently, for customers who don't pay the extra $30), Comcast would charge $10 per 50GB above the cap. "Comcast's intent on this front has been clear for some time. Comcast lobbyist and VP David Cohen last year strongly suggested that usage caps would be arriving for all Comcast customers sooner or later. The idea of charging users a premium to avoid arbitrary usage restrictions has been a pipe dream of incumbent ISP executives for a decade." The new policy goes into effect on October 1.

12 of 229 comments (clear)

  1. Limited unlimited by dshk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That is no problem, but they must not be allowed to advertise it as an unlimited plan. It also indicates that the government must work on strengthening free competition.

    1. Re:Limited unlimited by Radres · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Any presidential candidate that runs on the platform of regulating ISPs like a public utility has my vote, regardless of their stance on any other issue. I don't understand how this system is allowed to continue. It's clearly not a free market nor will it ever be.

  2. They almost got it right by mattventura · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The non-dick solution would to just be to keep the old system but cap the overage charges at $30, so you can get unlimited for $30/month without having to guess how much bandwidth you're going to use up to a month in advance.

    1. Re:They almost got it right by Cantankerous+Cur · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, the non-dick move is to stop trying to be greedy with arbitrary and inadequate (remember, it was 250GB in 2008) data caps.

    2. Re:They almost got it right by sabbede · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No, it doesn't slow you down. That's their excuse, and it is a lie. Even if it wasn't, it would be Comcast's fault for selling data rates they can't supply. If I'm paying for 75mbs, I get to use it. A monthly cap does nothing to secure your bandwidth - I could be maxing mine while you're asleep, never interfering with you and still facing an arbitrary cap.

      QoS throttling is what keeps your neighbor's torrents from impacting you, not a cap.

  3. Re:Type of data/download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd choose a cellular provider that gave me 300GB.

  4. I can already see the Slashdot headlines by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A year from now, I look forward to hearing Comcast whine about how "No legitimate user could seriously expect to pay $30 for 1.5 petabytes per month. Obviously, unlimited didn't mean unlimited - We intended it to give only another 300GB. We need to limit these greedy users out of fairness to our other customers."

    Fuck 'em. I don't know who to consider dumber - Comcast, or any of their customers who fall for this again.

  5. Comcast giveth and I taketh away by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Every time Comcast increases my bill, I drop a feature that costs the same amount. They're getting perilously close to the point where that feature will be "TV".

    An open message to Comcast execs: be absolutely sure you're ready to make customers decide between your content and Netflix. I bet you'd be surprised how often the response won't be what you'd hope.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:Comcast giveth and I taketh away by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      An open message to Comcast execs: be absolutely sure you're ready to make customers decide between your content and Netflix. I bet you'd be surprised how often the response won't be what you'd hope.

      Good luck with that. Netflix is busy dropping content, using the rationale that you can get that content from cable TV instead. We're approaching a point where the only winning move is not to pay; I predict many folks will soon cancel cable and Netflix, and just go back to torrents.

      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
  6. 4K streaming? by Jumunquo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comcast just officially killed 4k streaming. We'll be stuck in the dark ages of the Comonopoly while the world upgrades.

  7. Just a money grab by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only reason they are making any changes is because the FCC is considering doing something.

    As a point for comparison where I live there are two cable providers, Cox and Comcast, covering different parts of the city. Cox has a data cap, but it is 2TB. Also that is a soft cap. If you hit it, nothing happens. They may call and complain at you if you do it too much, but that's all. It is there to try and keep people reasonable, and so they can cut off someone in truly egregious cases (I've never actually heard of anyone getting cut off).

    Now somehow both these companies can make money, yet only Comcast charges for overages and yet has much lower caps.

    It is just a money grab. While some kind of soft cap or throttling can be needed to make sure people play nice (we can only have Internet fast and cheap if people share, otherwise the backhaul is prohibitively expensive) low hard caps with overage fees are just used to try and make more cash.

  8. Not everyone lives alone by tepples · · Score: 5, Insightful

    at that rate, you could watch HD content for 222 hours straight (9.25 days) before you'd hit your 300GB cap

    Divide by the number of people in the house who watch Netflix. And subtract all other uses of the connection, such as operating system and application updates on all devices in the household, downloads of purchased video games, web surfing, YouTube, and video chat with relatives in another state.