Amazon Reportedly Aiming For the Low End With a Loss-Leader $50 Tablet
Amazon has been dogged with criticism for its high-end, somewhat oddball phone, but done rather better with its high-end Fire tablets, and has mostly defined the market for e-ink book-reading devices with its long-lived Kindle series. Now, according to a report in the WSJ echoed by Fortune (and by Ars Technica and many others), the company is said to be working on a tablet aimed at the low end of the market, with a 6-inch screen, a mono speaker, and a tiny pricetag -- which could be as low as $50. "At the bottom end of the range at least, the devices won’t be priced to make a profit," writes Fortune. "The dirt-cheap price tag is intended to maximise the reach of its e-book and Amazon Prime video streaming content."
>> a mono speaker
I just read that and thought, "tablets have stereo speakers"? Isn't that what headphones are for? Would having stereo speakers really make a difference on a 9-inch wide device?
My wife loves the classics, pretty much all of which are in the public domain, and have been put into some kind of e-book format at Project Gutenberg. I read a lot of Baen books from their free e-book library that one can download in several formats and often come with the paper books on a disc in the back. If this thing will work for that then we'll probably get one. Otherwise, probably not.
Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
Seriously, you know people are going to be all over this and root with some version of some alternate OS. Either android or one of the tablet Linuxes.
Hajo Monogamy: Belief so strong that millions of people end perfectly good relationships in order to start a new one.
No worries. They'll make it up in volume.
"No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
I think some no-name Android tablets are already available at about $50 price, but this one should set the standard in value per dollar and push other major vendors to shift their prices down. This may also affect laptop and smartphone prices a little.
Sure, there will be some of those folks.Overwhelmingly people just take defaults even when it doesn't take much effort to change, unless the default is very clearly perceived as horrible.
XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
In honor of the good old days of Woot, I searched Amazon for the infamous "Bag O' Crap". Sure enough... http://amzn.com/B0092FJDA2
Pretending this is my office full of bitter coworkers..