Slashdot Mirror


Rupert Murdoch Buys National Geographic Magazine

dywolf writes: In a move that has inspired "dread" among the publication's journalists, as well as long time readers, Rupert Murdoch has just bought a controlling interest in all of National Geographic's media properties. The move turns the long time non-profit into a for-profit media corporation in the process. Some commenters have pointed to Murdoch's previous collaboration with the National Geographic Society, the NatGeo TV channel, as well other once respected publications he has bought such as the Wall Street Journal, as an example of what to expect, and to explain their apprehension at the deal. This raises a question for reader KatchooNJ: As many of you likely know, Rupert Murdoch has famously not been quiet about his denial of climate change. National Geographic gives grants to scientists... so, is anything going to now change with the focus of National Geographic's organization?

3 of 286 comments (clear)

  1. penetrating coverage by nimbius · · Score: 5, Funny

    people are worried about this buyout and its usually because Murdoch owned fox news and the Wallstreet Journal slid hard right when they were bought by him,but i think its important to put this in perspective. hes a businessman.

    Ive seen upcoming articles, and they look promising. "Gazelles, harbingers of homosexual war on christmas" seems to tackle a subject in a fair and balanced manner. "Penguins, natures undercover abortion factories" and "pot smoking illegal immigrant peregrine falcon migrations" might sound a bit heavy handed but the cover art is very dynamic.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  2. Re:I also subscribe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not voting for them is kind of the point of royalty...

  3. Re:Rupert Murdoch by TapeCutter · · Score: 5, Funny

    In capitalist USA, fossils own National Geographic.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.