Slashdot Mirror


John McAfee On Why He's Running For President

Velcroman1 writes: Our government is in a dysfunctional state. It is also illiterate when it comes to technology. Technology is not a tool that should be used for a government to invade our privacy. Technology should not be the scapegoat when we fail to protect our digital assets and tools of commerce. These are matters of priorities." So says John McAfee, offering up a brief explanation into why he's running for president. As noted earlier on slashdot, McAfee has filed paperwork already (PDF) to found a new party.

12 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. Who cares? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really, who cares? Trump's in it to win it and popcorn futures are tapped out. This idiot's got less chance than Palin at winning the Golden Ticket.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    1. Re:Who cares? by JackieBrown · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or like Obama ran his companies, or Hilary, or Sanders, or...

      Wait, do any of the democrats actually have experience creating private sector jobs?

    2. Re:Who cares? by Coren22 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately, they are part time minimum wage jobs replacing full time salaried positions, so it is a net negative.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    3. Re:Who cares? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Job growth" sounds great and all... until you realize all that growth was at minimum wage corporate subsidy farms like McDonalds and WalMart.

      "Jobs" != sustainable wages

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  2. Well,one thing we can expect by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Funny

    He will slow down the government...

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  3. Lottery by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Being president is sort of like winning the lottery, but in reverse. You accept the blame for everything that happens during the next 4 years, and sometimes you get to take credit for a few things... then you ride the gravy train down to your grave. Anyone who believes that the president alone can fix "Our government is in a dysfunctional state. It is also illiterate when it comes to technology." is already drinking the cool-aid. It takes a president, a congress, and state politicians working together to effect change, and nobody's been able to round up that crowd in a few decades now.

    --
    Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
  4. well by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At least politics is no longer boring...

  5. Re:I'll vote for him by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Be fair. When he was running the company it was pretty good. That was 20+ years ago.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  6. Crazy is our Last Hope by draftmonkey2016 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's easy and predictable to sit back and call John McAfee crazy. It is also unhelpful.

    Some of the nice, responsible people that do this actually believe that the system of government in place in the US is fully functional and healthy. I can't say much to these people except: see you at the finish line.

    The remaining people with functioning brains realize that many, many things are going horribly wrong with the US system of government. In fact a majority of Americans believe this today. Trust in government is at an all time low. For these people, even if they disagree on the specifics, clearly things are not going well. Many even doubt for any future at all if we continue down the same course.

    And yet many of these people will also stand up and say McAfee is crazy. Well so what? Beyond that, will anything be done in the absence of a crazy person to attempt it? To win one would have to usurp the Political Machine by defeating both the Republicans and Democrats in the election, the whole time thwarting their joint efforts to protect their system. They will literally be walking around with a target on their back. Who but a crazy person would attempt it?

    It also shouldn't be forgotten that crazy often comes part and parcel with a whole host of other traits and characteristics that are very desirable. That Mr. McAfee has at least some spark of these is evident in the success that he has met with in the past. To dismiss him as a gibbering loon would not only be a mistake, it would be completely in error.

    --
    In 2016 Let's Put Career Politicians on the Unemployment Line
  7. Re:Is he even eligible? by myowntrueself · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, you can. You can also renounce it. But that's irrelevant to my point. I'm not talking about citizenship, nor questioning his status as a natural born citizen.

    But, rather the last part of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5: ...neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

    The "been fourteen Years a Resident" part.

    And they won't let you renounce your US citizenship if they think its because you want to avoid paying taxes on overseas earnings!

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  8. Try using REAL DATA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Daily Kos is not a valid source; it's on par with Bozo the Clown or Big Bird. It's a site set up by hard-left activists to advance hard-left politics and is no better than Politifact, which is run by Democrats.

    Try THIS CHART from the St Louis Fed which shows that the NET gain in jobs for all of the Obama years is only about 1 million, and THIS CHART which shows NET gain in jobs for foreign-born workers over the same span of the Obama years as nearly 2 million.

    All the political candidates (on BOTH SIDES) and their paid hacks, activist mouthpieces, and corporate and/or union shills play with numbers to mislead people in various ways; some compare data from different time spans, some (usually Obama supporters) cite all the increases but ignore the losses (same trick they use with Obamacare coverage) some cite all the monthly gains (hoping the reader will misunderstand the data and mentally add them all up and see tens of millions on new jobs). Incidentally, the GOP is just as guilty when they are in power of citing a list of monthly gains and knowing they are tricking the average user into misleading himself. The problems with summing the monthlies are: [a] they do not include the monthly losses, [b] they include very temporary and seasonal jobs.

  9. Just makin' the best of a bad situation: by Hartree · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Our government is in a dysfunctional state."

    So, John's saying he wants to be president so he can put the fun back in dysfunctional?