Slashdot Mirror
10 Major Automakers Agree To Include Automatic Emergency Braking On New Vehicles
An anonymous reader writes: The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation, and Institute for Highway Safety announced today a landmark agreement from 10 of the world's biggest automakers to include automatic emergency braking on all new vehicles as a standard safety feature. The car manufacturers are: Audi, BMW, Ford, General Motors, Mazda, Mercedes Benz, Tesla, Toyota, Volkswagen and Volvo. "Automatic emergency braking includes a range of systems designed to address the large number of crashes, especially rear-end crashes, in which drivers do not apply the brakes or fail to apply sufficient braking power to avoid or mitigate a crash. AEB systems use on-vehicle sensors such as radar, cameras or lasers to detect an imminent crash, warn the driver and, if the driver does not take sufficient action, engage the brakes."
You mean that automakers are allowing the police to stop people's vehicles at any time for any reason, remotely.
I bought a new car this year, and it has it. I'm very glad to have it, even though it has triggered once or twice when there was nothing there due to a sensor glitch. The reason I have a new car is that I failed to brake in time to avoid an accident.
Yes, the technology isn't perfect, but it's a lot better than not having it.
As we get more of these features, it should result in fewer accidents and lower insurance rates.
My last 2 accidents came from being rear ended by jackoff distracted drivers. One of them was quite serious.
bullshit, no way I'm letting the car brake for me.
if you have ABS, the car is already deciding when you can brake and when you can't.
if you have an automatic transmission, the "gas" pedal is merely a "suggestion" to the system that actually controls the throttle.
if you are driving on public roadways you have already agreed to follow whatever regulations the government has decided to impose on you
I like that all of the Big Three American automakers are included: Ford, GM, and Tesla.
The biggest names missing are Fiat/Chrysler, Honda, Hyundai, and Kia. I'm not surprised that the Koreans aren't included, as they are going for the bottom of the market where there's not as much padding for added costs.
And you also have the responsibility of paying for poor decisions. .
How precisely does one bring back the dead? Do you really think that perpetrators are actually capable of restoring the damage they've caused? huh?
Why don't we put some effort into human factors and get people to put their hands on the wheel and pay attention?
If you're going to get fancy and throw technology at the problem, how about spending some effort to force people to shut their fucking cell phones off while driving? There has to be a way that you can brick cell phones while it is in the vehicle. Get some people on this, find a way. I see idiots fumbling on their phone and drifting off the highway or across lanes of traffic all the time. Let's fix this, OK?
Automating car response like braking is not going to work well on a snowy day with slick roads. Might be dandy in sunny, dry California, but the rest of the world actually has weather and precipitation. Having cars slamming on the brakes randomly because the computer mistook a drift of snowflakes or blowing leaves for a car bumper is going to cause more accidents, not less.
Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!
Vote for Bernie in 2016!
The so-called Big Three automakers in America are Ford, GM, and Chrysler. Tesla has yet to ship even 100,000 vehicles in one year; the rest each have over a dozen models that ship that many, several that ship well over a million, and there's a few models between them that ship into the tens of millions.
Sorry to be so pedantic and punchy in correcting this, but I think it's a little annoying - bordering on delusional - how often slashdot people, reddit people, etc. give Tesla and SpaceX credit for things far, far beyond what they've actually accomplished so far. Those companies have impressive potential, but they're **far** from replacing Chrysler, NASA, Lockheed, or any other the other entities in their markets.
All this does is do what you should be doing anyhow. If the guy behind you is going to rear-end you because you stopped safely to avoid a collision, he was doing to rear-end you after you rear-end the car ahead of you. This isn't rocket science. The only thing that understandably scares people is that if computers are making decisions for us, even if it makes a significant reduction in accidents, we feel like we could have done better had the computer not intervened. It's a blame thing. But any accidents involve victims who did nothing but be in the wrong car at the wrong time. But yes, we crave control, it's built into our fabric of the instinct to survive. Unfortunately, we're also great at making things that we can't control very well.
"Old man yells at systemd"
No, it doesn't. (And yes, I drive stick, and also road race motorcycles and am familiar with clutchless shifting using the throttle there.) The ignition cut out is what temporarily unloads the transmission making for a smoother shift, the linkage doesn't 'pull back' on the throttle. Think of it this way, have you ever felt the throttle pedal 'push back' more during a shift? You actually don't need to unload a traditional planetary gear automatic to shift anyways, the gear change is accomplished by bands restraining outer gearsets. Again, to demonstrate this unplug the ignition cutout feed from the transmission, floor it and hang on as you get hard but functional shifts.
The problem is the low speed limits. They make driving so boring..
People like you are why human drivers will soon be outlawed.
God you are dense.
Following your line of logic, if you have electric windows, the car is deciding to open and close them, not you. If you have power brakes, the car is deciding to brake, not you. If you have cruise control, air conditioning, etc.
ABS modulates the brakes. That is more than fine hair away from deciding when you can and can not brake. Those of us who grew up without ABS still reflexively take our foot off the brakes when the wheel goes numb, and reapply because, get this, ABS only allows you to steer with locked brakes. Your actual stopping distance is longer than if you had applied the brakes short of engaging the ABS.
And you might have discovered the "1,2,3" past the "D" on an automatic transmission. Surprise! You can control the gearing just like a manual. The throttle body controls the throttle for automatic or manual.
But more to the point, implementation of automatic braking is going to be key. If it is noticeable for all the wrong reasons, it is just inviting people to disable it. And if it can't differentiate between a semi in front of me or a motorcycle, or when you happen to drafting on track days, several automakers could be facing lawsuits when sudden, unanticipated application of the brakes cause the vehicle to go out of control.
Three short blasts of the horn when its doing this...
Gets everyone around you alerted to the fact your car thinks an accident is likely.
Speaking as someone who lives in WI, USA and, until recently, drove a car _without_ antilock brakes, you're nuts if you think that ABS is doing more harm than good. It takes very little to lock non-antilock brakes on a sowy road. ABS aren't part of some conspiracy. They're life savers. (FWIW I speak as an defacto American automotive Luddite with my manual transmission.)