Slashdot Mirror


Sen. Ron Wyden Says CISA Data Collection Could Put Americans At Risk

blottsie writes: In a new interview, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) says the Cyber Information Sharing Act of 2015 (CISA) may put more Americans at risk because the U.S. government has failed to learn the right security lessons from the attack on the Office of Personnel Management. He says, in part: "I've been watching as this goes forward—there's this phrase going around the cybersecurity community, 'If you can't protect it, don't collect it.' Now, there is never going to be a system that's 100 percent safe. But what I'm going to start [saying] on the floor as we get to this [CISA debate], is, you give the government a huge new trove of personal information about Americans before you've addressed the problems that were documented all the way back to 2007—those security holes—before you address those, [before] you plug them, that's like responding to a bear attack by stockpiling honey. That's going to be how I open the debate."

4 of 58 comments (clear)

  1. The US gov't is fundamentally incompetent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No security measure can fix that.

    Hell, OPM handed out root access to "workers" remoting in from China, for fuck's sake. And the clowns who did it are still not in jail.

    It starts at the top, too. Just listen to Hillary! apologists making excuses for her and her classified emails in her fucking basement, all because they - for some strange reason - think Hillary! is on "their team", whatever team that may be.

    1. Re:The US gov't is fundamentally incompetent by steveg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The question is not whether an email server at home is less (or more) secure than one hosted by the NSA. It doesn't matter.

      Email is a fscking postcard! nothing of a classified nature should be sent unencrypted, no matter who is hosting it.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
    2. Re:The US gov't is fundamentally incompetent by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And even that misses the damn point: government communications need to be stored on official servers so that they can be properly supplied in response to FOIA requests. At best, hosting them privately was an attempt to circumvent public oversight, and therefore (IMO) grounds for immediate disqualification for any further public office. That's before even thinking about security issues!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  2. Keep the data secure by NOT COLLECTING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you aren't collecting it, it's going to be far more secure in the long run.

    These idiots who think putting us all under surveillance, or monetizing our personal information, need to be forced to stop this BS legally.