Slashdot Mirror


Hardware Projects (and Pranks) That Have Scared Observers

In the wake of the arrest of Ahmed Mohamed in Irving, Texas, for carrying to school an electronics project believed by a teacher to look like a bomb, Make Magazine has a timely reminder that Ahmed's project is one of many home-brew efforts that sparked (or could have sparked) extreme reactions. Make's list includes a few from tinkerers -- and pranksters -- that not only looked like bombs, but were fully intended to look that way. ("Back in 1967, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak was arrested for building a metronome and storing it in a friend’s locker. He rigged a tin-foil contract sensor to the metronome in the locker, and set up the device to tick faster when his buddy opened the locker.") The article doesn't note the 2007 incident in Boston in which a guerilla advertising campaign for "Aqua Teen Hunger Force" raised fears of a terrorism and led to two arrests. Gawker has a slightly more pointed article about other students who have specifically brought home-assembled clocks to school, without being arrested.

13 of 193 comments (clear)

  1. Poptarts have gotten the same response by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but nobody invited that kid to the whitehouse. Ahmed's race has gotten media outrage on his side, but what happened to him was not remotely unique. Everything from pointing at someone and going "pow" to chewing poptarts into the wrong shape has gotten kids anything from arrested to expelled. The only commonality is it seems to be universally boys treated this way, likely due to society's compulsive need to pathologize everything about them and ascribe nefarious motivations to their every action.

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    1. Re:Poptarts have gotten the same response by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ahmed was trying to do something constructive, in the STEM area. the usa is trying to focus on STEM education. and here's a kid who goes out of his way to do something on his own initiative in the area, and he gets treated like a criminal because of his race/ religion. that's why it is so egregious

      the other overreactions by school for stupid things happens too, and are fucking stupid and the school admins should be punished. but they don't merit an invite to the white house because they are a different topic

      like this:

      http://kfor.com/2014/08/21/stu...

      the kid wrote a short story about shooting a neighbor's pet dinosaur *as requested by his teacher*. and he gets treated like a criminal and suspended for a week

      that's obviously fucking stupid. the school admins should be punished, the kid should be apologized to

      but there's no anti-muslim hysteria angle, and there's no STEM angle. so it doesn't pique people's interests above the local area

      the usa is trying to encourage STEM education. and the usa has a problem with anti-muslim bigots. therefore ahmed's case rises to national attention

      ahmed's case is simply not the same as the other cases you mention

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    2. Re:Poptarts have gotten the same response by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Insightful

      a white christian was treated badly

      therefore, racism and anti-muslim hysteria do not exist

      do you listen to yourself or is the grey matter in your skull really that thin?

      this is real:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      i suppose the next step is to claim it's all a set up. the alex jones "false flag! false flag!" crowd will come to defend good old american bigotry being framed and misconstrued by the mass media

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    3. Re:Poptarts have gotten the same response by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A brown muslim was treated badly in the exact same way as an enormous number of other non-brown non-muslim people in the exact same situation.

      Therefore, racism and anti-muslim hysteria is to blame.

      Do you listen to yourself?

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  2. Clear evidence of over-reaction by laird · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In the guerrilla advertising campaign for "Aqua Teen Hunger Force" there were blinkies spread around 12 cities, 11 of which managed to figure out that LEDs are not explosives. Only Boston cops freaked out, locking the city down (despite being told by MIT that there were no explosives) and wasting $millions. Of course Boston cops aren't big on apologizing after their screw-ups; they tend to double down despite reality. The silver lining is that 11 other cities' cops were rational and did the right thing, which is cause for some optimism.

    1. Re: Clear evidence of over-reaction by RogerWilco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Her claim of 'absent-mindedly' putting it on before going to the airport to pick up a friend (as I recall) was about as dubious as Ahmed's 'I invented this clock and wanted to show it off' claim.

      You have never met real nerds. They do these things all the time, completely oblivious to the real world.
      It's the kind of people that if you ask them how to make a bomb, the answer is: "Let me show you right now".
      And I know from experience that they will have a working bomb, or at least an explosion within a few minutes, just from the stuff lying around.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  3. Re:Ahmed's story doesn't hold up under scrutiny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The story that he was arrested for bringing a repackaged clock into school, because clocks in custom packaging are like movie bombs to the idiot Hollywood generation?

    Or that he lacked the hindsight to design a clock from discrete components in anticipation of global media attention, all to avoid strawmen such as that provided by the idiot article writer?

    FWIW I'm a casual electronics geek and I'm shit at building neat boxes. This has always frustrated me, and while it was immediately obvious from the photos that he had just re-used the innards from an old clock, I admired that this young kid was thinking more about the usability and elegance of the finished product than I seem able to. But now have I learnt that my shortcoming is a virtue: any small box containing electronics that doesn't look like an iPad or an iPhone should be regarded as probably the work of a bomber or hoaxer.

  4. Re:It's A Different World Today by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Today's post 9/11 world is a dangerous one

    No, it's really not. In the US, you're more likely to die from toenail fungus than from terrorist attacks.

    It just serves the purposes of the plutocrats to have every scared.

    I'm ok with a few innocent people being inconvenienced for my safety and my family's safety.

    The best things you can do for your family's safety is check the wiring in your house and not own a gun.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  5. So is this a project or a prank? by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Young Mr Mohammed seems to have
    a) not "built" anything, merely taken the case off a clock, and put it in a box....
    b)...which looked astonishingly suspicious with lots of bare wires all kludged in there...
    c) which was then closed with a cord (why? Why not just latch the case closed with its latches?)
    http://blogs.artvoice.com/tech...

    Personally, I don't see this as a binary issue where one has to pick one "side" or the other.
    I believe that:
    - Young Mr Mohammed was either deliberately trolling his school authorities, or he was used to do so.
    AND
    - the authorities overreacted as did the cops who absurdly put a non-threatening willowy boy in cuffs why again? ...and the media ate that narrative shit right up.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:So is this a project or a prank? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Perhaps its something much simpler. Face.

      People behaved like asses, making fools of themselves. They now need to rationalize this foolishness. By cognitive dissonance. In other cultures we call it "saving face".

      Nothing special, a normal human trait, so now they say "well it was a clock, but we were MISLED into thinking it was a bomb by the cunning of Mr Mohammed who pranked us by repeatedly telling us it was a clock!".

      Cognitive dissonance doesn't get anymore extreme than this.

      Normally what happens at this point, is normal sensible people who don't have to rationalize their bizarre unprofessional behavior, step in and put the nutters on leave from the school until they can accept the real world for what it is. They made a foolish mistake, but their failure to correct the simple mistake is a much bigger mistake. A far more serious mistake.

  6. Re: Ahmed's story doesn't hold up under scrutiny. by kenh · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What was Ahmed's 'accomplishment'?

    If Ahmed had taken the clock apart, organized the parts on a tri-fold poster board and could explain what each part did, that would be an accomplishment worthy of showing off - but that's not what he did, he claimed he 'invented' the clock.

    If he bought a clock kit off eBay, soldered it together and it worked that would be an accomplishment worthy of showing off - but that's not what he did, he took a working clock and wound up with a working clock!

    The only skill evidenced by Ahmed's 'invention' was his application of that engineering reminder - "Righty Tighty, Lefty Loosey" and earned himself a visit to MIT and the White House.

    --
    Ken
  7. Re:Actually... by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    why does the fact you're not impressed by his tinkering more important than a kid getting railroaded by moronic police and school admins?

    your priorities are... stupid. sorry, but that's really the best word for what you think is the important issue here

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  8. Re:Actually... by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's a war on law enforcement by the media these days, and this was being used as an example of "overreaching law enforcement" except that it turns out it WASN'T. Ahmed didn't build a clock. He built a PROP. And the police wanted to know what he was planning on doing with prop bomb at school, which Ahmed simply wouldn't answer. And that's why he was arrested.

    So, a kid repackages a clock to look like .... a clock. The kid tells anyone who asks that it's a clock. The police believe it is a clock. The whole "prop bomb" idea was invented whole cloth by the police.

    What you are accusing the kid of is pure thought crime.

    What they never did find out is why he felt the need to pull the parts out of a clock and shove them into a pencil case and bring it to school.

    Who cares? It was a clock. He did not display the clock in any manner that would suggest that it was a bomb.

    Perhaps the police and school were being trolled. But like the truism "you can't con an honest man", it's clear that the actions of the police were not motivated by rational thought. Instead, they were most likely motivated by racism. Racism that this device demonstrated most effectively.

    What this kid built (perhaps deliberately, perhaps inadvertantly) was a racism detector. Perhaps you would advocate a law against "racism detectors"?

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!