Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Dislike Hype Exploited In Phishing Campaign

An anonymous reader writes: A new Facebook scam is quickly spreading across the social network which plays on the announcement of the highly-anticipated 'Dislike' button. A new scamming campaign is now exploiting impatient Facebook users anxiously awaiting the dislike button addition, by tricking them into believing that they can click on a link to gain early access to the feature. Once the unsuspecting victim selects a link, they are led to a malicious website, which enables access to their private Facebook accounts and allows the hackers to share further scam links on their behalf.

1 of 54 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Moderation system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    It's an interesting comparison. While the slashdot system obviously allows us a more fine-grained expression of opinion, it's widely abused, e.g. people modding down posts as redundant or overrated because they disagree with the content of the post. And the maximum +5 score means you can't tell if just a handfull of people found a post interesting, or thousands of people. You also can't really tell how controversial a post is from the score on slashdot, you just get a majority result, whereas e.g. on theregister.co.uk, if your post gets a lot of upvotes and downvotes, you can see that it was controversial, not just that you got a few more of one than the other. While the like/dislike or upvote/downvote system is much simpler, there is some power in that simplicity; you get a very simple measure of approval/disapproval, and it lets the content of a post speak for itself as to why it was approved/disapproved of. I actually kind of prefer that system.

    BTW I'm assuming that facebook intends to separately show how many likes and dislikes a post gets, rather than just having dislikes cancel out likes, which would be lame. But I'm not interested enough to actually go and confirm that, as I don't used fb.