Slashdot Mirror
CIA Details Agency's New Digital and Cyber Espionage Focus
coondoggie writes: It's about 10 years late to the party, but come October 1, the Central Intelligence Agency will add a new directorate that will focus on all things cyber and digital espionage. The CIA's Deputy Director, David Cohen, said to a Cornell University audience last week that once the new Directorate of Digital Innovation (DDI) is up and running, "it will be at the center of the Agency's effort to inject digital solutions into every aspect of our work. It will be responsible for accelerating the integration of our digital and cyber capabilities across all our mission areas—human intelligence collection, all-source analysis, open source intelligence, and covert action."
the Central Intelligence Agency will ad a new directorate
Let loose the Hump Day Camel upon the masses!
"Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
It's all a distraction until CIA officials, agents, and various past elected officials are tried for their crimes against humanity: torture. It's time to re-convene Nuremberg.
And your work.
You are welcome on my lawn.
they secure the existing digtal assets of country from the not-so-scary-ists and educate the federa/state employees about social engineering. If they cant pass a basic cyber security evaluation, put them to work cleaning restrooms and kitchens where they wont endanger the rest of us.
There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
My god but that sounds like came out of a mission statement generator.
The CIA just fucking got Uberered
We seek to leverage synergies and holistically solve problems problems using agile methods and cutting edge technology while streamlining existing process via the generous application of "jazz hands".
And one time, at Band Camp ...
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
Your tax dollars, hard at work being redundant.
... they secure the existing digtal assets of country from the not-so-scary-ists and educate the federa/state employees about social engineering. If they cant pass a basic cyber security evaluation, put them to work cleaning restrooms and kitchens where they wont endanger the rest of us ...
The above job description fits Hillary Clinton to a 'T'
Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
Wow they just come right out and admit it.
People who use innovation' in the title usually don't have any.
.. will be responsible for accelerating the integration of our digital and cyber capabilities across all our mission areas"
"effort to inject digital solutions
Won't that make it for the 'cyber' spies to hack your infrastructure.
This would be funny if it wasn't too close to the reality of how large-scale-projects are contracted out.
We can tell if you're working for an aging government agency if you still use the word "cyber" to describe anything since the 1980's.
The funny part is "Cyber" is Hill-speak for "newfangled stuff" and the linguistic contortions are hideous: "His section is going to focus on cyber (and get the modems working right)" or "We're going to call in specialists who understand cyber (so that the VCR won't blink 12:00)." Cyber fits right into totally, grody, bitchin', illin', schweet, and wigging out. Living through the 80's was horrible the first time, and these guys just won't let go.
The sad part is that it actually has a negative impact on recruiting for intel roles, on top of the fact that a .gov/.mil role pays half what you can make in the private sector with similar skills. Flash up the word "cyber" and the recruits that visualize Johnny Mnemonic and stand up quick... those are the ones you want to filter out. Eventually the professionals stand up, see that the pay is shit, and sit back down. So the system actually is biased toward low-skill chaff, or the equivalent of guys who will do anything to be a cop because they really really really want a gun and authority; precisely the kind that you want to keep out of intel positions. It kinda drowns out the good guys, the smart ethical ones who actually want to do the public good.
Not good.
I think not...(*poof*)