Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Have Spotted the Signs of Flowing Water On Mars

New submitter universe520 writes: Using neat imaging technology that allows them to determine the chemical compound of a substance by looking at the light reflected from it, scientists have spotted the traces of flowing water on Mars. By looking at the dark streaks on some photos of Mars, Lujendra Ojha from Georgia Tech has found compounds that are made in liquid water—meaning that water may be trickling down those streaks when the climate is just right. From the linked Economist piece: Details remain to be worked out, including where the water in question originates. Possibly, it derives from subsurface ice. Or it might condense out of Mars’s thin, dry atmosphere. Wherever it does come from, though, the amounts in question are modest in the extreme. But even modest amounts of water are intriguing to biologists. If Martians evolved during their planet’s earlier, wetter phase, the continued presence of water means it is just about possible that a few especially hardy types have survived until the present day—clinging on in dwindling pockets of dampness in the way that some “extremophile” bacteria on Earth are able to live in cold, salty and arid environments.

5 of 260 comments (clear)

  1. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Using neat imaging technology that allows them to determine the chemical compound of a substance by looking at the light reflected from it

    The author has never heard the term "spectroscopy?"

  2. Re:Let's face it... by Beezlebub33 · · Score: 1, Informative
    Take a look at this article from Answers in Genesis". Here's the key point:

    Extraterrestrial life is an evolutionary concept; it does not comport with the biblical teachings of the uniqueness of the earth and the distinct spiritual position of human beings.

    So, Earth is special, Jesus is special, so humans are special, so aliens don't exist.

    --
    The more people I meet, the better I like my dog.
  3. Re:All the proof we need by Beezlebub33 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I would encourage everybody reading the parent post to actually read the article. Just take a look at the image at the top of the article: the overwhelming majority of the planet is heating up, setting all sorts of records, except for one small part of the ocean. And that part of the ocean is getting colder (it appears) because of all the melting fresh water (because the planet is heating up), which is screwing up a major circulation current. And _that_ is their evidence that global warming is a lie: taking a small part of evidence out of context, wilfully mis-interpreting it, and ignoring almost all the rest of the evidence.

    --
    The more people I meet, the better I like my dog.
  4. Re:All the proof we need by doublebackslash · · Score: 3, Informative

    The parent is drawing their own conclusions from the article. Here is a key quote, but please read the whole article. It is actually quite good.

    At this point, it’s time to ask what the heck is going on here. And while there may not yet be any scientific consensus on the matter, at least some scientists suspect that the cooling seen in these maps is no fluke but, rather, part of a process that has been long feared by climate researchers — the slowing of Atlantic Ocean circulation.

    The Atlantic ocean's circulation patterns for that area are driven by density differences. Warm water from further south moves north along the surface and when it gets to Greenland it freezes as sea ice. That process greatly increases the salinity, and therefore density, of the remaining water and so it sinks and circulates south again.
    This loop is critically important for certain favorable climate features of Western Europe.

    If this is in fact what is occurring then this isn't evidence against climate change, it was one of the more extreme predictions OF climate change.

    --
    md5sum /boot/vmlinuz
    d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e /boot/vmlinuz
  5. Stars [Re:Let's face it...] by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 3, Informative

    One anecdote that is related indirectly to the topic is the ignorance of the nature of stars. Someone in my family didn't know that stars are like our sun but much further away. There was no malice or contradiction of beliefs and they took it as a VERY awesome fact, but that sort of gap in knowledge combined with religious fervor can, and does, lead to the outright denial of even the possibility of life elsewhere.

    Indeed.

    The first person to clearly state the hypothesis that stars are other suns like ours, but much farther away, was Giordano Bruno-- who also said that since they're like the sun, they undoubtedly also have planets with life. A pretty far-thinking hypothesis, considering that Copernicus' work saying that the Earth circled the sun (instead of vice versa) was still newly published when he asserted it.

    Of course, he was burned at the stake for it.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com