Slashdot Mirror


Amazon To Cease Sale of Apple TV and Chromecast

Mark Wilson writes: As of 29 October, shoppers will no longer be able to buy Apple TV or Chromecast devices from Amazon. Citing compatibility issues with Prime Video, Amazon emailed marketplace sellers to inform them it is not accepting new listings for the two media devices, and any existing listings will be removed at the end of October. The move indicates not only the importance Amazon places on its streaming Prime Video service, but also that it views Apple and Google as serious rivals. The two companies have yet to respond to the news, but it is unlikely to be well-received.

13 of 223 comments (clear)

  1. Amazon Fire? No, thanks. by ErikTheRed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Their terms of service and privacy policy make Google look downright disinterested in collecting its users data by comparison.

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    1. Re:Amazon Fire? No, thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure if Google started dropping Amazon from their searches there would be alarm at Amazon and threats of lawsuits

  2. Got Anymore Of That 4K Content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Does Aamzon have anymore of that 4K content?
    Does Amazon have any decent Prime Instant Video content?
    Can I "rent" decent/new content 1080p or greater content for $2 or less like I can with RedBox BlueRays?

    No? Then Amazon Prime Instant Video isn't going to happen.

    $10 to "rent" a three year old movie? WTF are you smoking?

  3. Antitrust... by x0ra · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How couldn't this be a base for a an anti-trust lawsuit against amazon ?

    1. Re:Antitrust... by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because Amazon doesn't have a monopoly on small electronics sales?

    2. Re:Antitrust... by macs4all · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This isn't about "small electronics". It's about streamers and content. And yes, having their own vertically integrated platform does make them ripe for an anti-trust inquiry. The same goes for Apple too.

      There's no reason to lick their boots, either of them.

      Sigh.

      Yet another Slashtard that is mind-numbingly ignorant if how law REALLY works.

    3. Re: Antitrust... by JimMcc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. They are intentionally not selling the _devices_ manufactured by their two biggest competitors. Big difference.

      I think Amazon is acting like a spoiled three year old, but it doesn't strike me as antitrust. People can get Chromecast and Apple TV lots of other places. It's not like Amazon was the only outlet.

  4. "in order to avoid customer confusion" by j2.718ff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Over the last three years, Prime Video has become an important part of Prime. It's important that the streaming media players we sell interact well with Prime Video in order to avoid customer confusion.

    I really wish companies would drop the BS when announcing things like this. Customers aren't going to be confused. Amazon doesn't want to sell products that compete with their own, fine. I just wish they didn't pretend like they were doing this to make customers happier.

  5. Re:I have a problem with Amazon Prime Video... by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have 70Mbps high speed cable it but has a 350Gb cap

    I found your problem...

  6. Re: hey, CBS doesn't promote Fox, either by jxander · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A critical difference however: neither Fox nor CBS sell the means of access.

    Amazon is showing textbook Conflict of Interest.

    It's getting worse, and Amazon is hardly the only culprit. Netflix original series are a problem, despite many of them being awesome shows.

    How much longer until "meet the new boss, same as the old boss."

    --
    This signature is false.
  7. Try it. by ledow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I watch Amazon Instant Video, using Chrome, pushed across a ChromeCast to my TV.

    When Chrome brought out the new ChromeCast, I bought one immediately just to get the 5GHz version, if nothing else (my 5GHz channels are dead, but the 2.4Ghz are jam-packed).

    Fuck that up for me, Amazon, and I will just cancel the Prime subscription and not trust any software or online service from you again. I won't stop buying physical products, but you can forget all the add-on shit. No way I'm having my video library (which is 50% Amazon, 50% Google Play at the moment) tied into a format that I am denied playing how I like even though there is NO TECHNICAL BARRIER as far as I'm concerned. It works today, it should work tomorrow. If it doesn't, I'll reconsider how I use your service.

    P.S. Why you'd buy a ChromeCast from Amazon anyway, I can't fathom. Bought from the Google website yesterday, have a delivery waiting for me at the post office today - not bad given that everyone was buying them. Same experience when I bought a Nexus for my daughter. Amazon is great, but you don't buy everything from Amazon just because it's convenient. It still has to be a good deal that you can't get elsewhere.

  8. Re: hey, CBS doesn't promote Fox, either by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't see it as a COI. Amazon sells stuff, including streaming services, that is their Primary Interest. If a hardware vendor chooses not to support the streaming service Amazon sells, why should Amazon sell the hardware? My corner grocer stopped selling a cream cheese made from yogurt and that space is now filled by it's own brand of similar (but lesser value) yogurt cheese... that's OK because they own the store, not me. I wish they would sell what I want, but they don't so if really I want it I can shop elsewhere. Not every store has to sell every product. Other stores sell the products, and if the products are good they may soon be selling more of them.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_interest

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  9. Re: hey, CBS doesn't promote Fox, either by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This has nothing at all to do with selling stuff and nothing to do with appliances or applications. This is all about who gets to be the global publishers of content, who gets the lions share of content profits, who takes 30% for doing fuck all (realistically managing a marketing engine is pretty much doing fuck all except adding massive cost to the end user).

    So they are all in it, the ISPs, the internet backbone companies (may ex incumbent telcos), the online sales companies and existing publishers. The people excluded being the people producing the content, thou shalt not direct publish else thou wilst be destroyed by the DMCA and court costs. They are all fighting for monopoly domination of that 30% for doing fuck all and seeking to extend it out to 50% and even 100% ie huffington post you should be thankful for the exposure and ha ha fuck you.

    Nothing to do with end users or content producers and everything to do with locking in publishing monopolies.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen