Slashdot Mirror


How Someone Acquired the Google.com Domain Name For a Single Minute

An anonymous reader writes with the story of how Sanmay Ved bought "Google.com" even though it only lasted a minute. BGR reports:We've all been there: It's nearly 2 in the morning and you're cruising around the Internet looking for new domain names to purchase. I mean, talk about a cliched night, right? Now imagine that during the course of your domain browsing, you unexpectedly discover that the holy grail of domain names — Google.com — is available for purchase for the low, low price of just $12. Testing fate, you attempt to initiate a transaction. Dare I say, you're feeling a little bit lucky. And just like that, in the blink of an eye, the transaction goes through and the vaunted and the highly valuable Google domain is in your possession. While this might read like a ridiculous plot summary from some horrible piece of nerd fiction, this series of events above, believe it or not, actually happened to former Googler Sanmay Ved earlier this week.

16 of 70 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Fuck you Dice!!! by pushing-robot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Also, please move the first button to the end, so I can read it as 'effing twit'

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  2. Were the nameservers updated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the nameservers never reflected this change, this is just an accounting issue. He never had control of the domain.

    Yawn..nothing to see here.

  3. Re:Were the nameservers updated? by slimjim8094 · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, he never owned the domain. google.com is registered through 2020 so the registry (Verisign) would've refused, and they certainly wouldn't have allowed the delegation to change. Even their system thought he had the domain for less than 1 minute. Clearly just a glitch.

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  4. So? by Dereck1701 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Even if you did manage to purchase a major domain what would it get you? For better or worse every case I've heard of where some individual was trying to elicit large amounts from a company/organization by sitting on a domain, the companies, without too much difficulty, took possession of a domain that related significantly to their company/organization. I suppose some companies would pay a bit to avoid litigation but not too much as they can get it with a little time and effort.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    1. Re:So? by PRMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ever been to http://nissan.com/?

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:So? by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Back in 2002 Price Waterhouse Coopers (PWC) were planning to massively re-brand themselves as Intruducingmonday.com, however, they forgot to register the .co.uk! Big mistake as it was soon registered by Rob Manuel of b3ta.com and USVSTH3M who quickly put a flash video largely consisting of Two Fingered salutes and Donkeys and a song with lyrics like "La la la we've got your name" and "We like donkeys". This quickly went viral resulting in PWC abandoning their re-branding efforts (Not sure if heads rolled or not) and b3ta.com getting thousands of new members.

      So yes you can do quite a bit if you manage to purchase an important domain

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  5. Re:Were the nameservers updated? by mysidia · · Score: 3, Interesting

    would've refused, and they certainly wouldn't have allowed the delegation to change.

    Unless Google was doing something whacky like running their Google domains service he bought the domain through on the same nameservers that the Google.com zone was hosted on, And allowing the buyer to edit their existing zone contents without needing to change the list of nameservers.

  6. Re:Fuck you Dice!!! by Falos · · Score: 2

    I dunno, I'm not particularly avephillic but I'm fond of the "bird fucking" we have now.

  7. Re:Were the nameservers updated? by tom229 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think everyone's a little bit confused here. Domain name registry is provided by authorized registrars on behalf on top level domains (tld); in this case .com. The "nameservers" addresses are registered with the tld, which will then provide second, third, forth, whatever you want level lookups. I haven't read tfa but this had to be a registrar goof up. Most give at least a 3 month grace period for renewals even after it expires. And that's just for regular joes. I'm sure titans of the internet have special rules.

    --
    If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
  8. Re:cruising at 2AM for new domains to purchase by penguinoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Parallel construction doesn't mean using a word wrongly.

    However, whenever an incredible "trust me, I found this by coincidence" occurs, it's quite possible that they actually found it from a source they don't care to admit.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  9. We've all been there? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We've all been there: It's nearly 2 in the morning and you're cruising around the Internet looking for new domain names to purchase.

    Actually, no - I can't say I've ever done this. It seems like a colossal waste of time.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:We've all been there? by dotancohen · · Score: 4, Funny

      We've all been there: It's nearly 2 in the morning and you're cruising around the Internet looking for new domain names to purchase.

      Actually, no - I can't say I've ever done this. It seems like a colossal waste of time.

      I think that the process goes like this:
      01:00 am OKCupid.com
      01:30 am PornHub.com
      02:00 am ExpiredDomains.com

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  10. actually, no... by theonlyholle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just an attention seeking idiot, in my humble opinion. Just because a registrar's system will let you put a domain that's actually not available into the shopping basket and even lets you pay for it doesn't mean that you "owned" it at any point. It's like a real estate agent "selling" you the White House and accepting payment for it - doesn't mean that you now own it.

    1. Re:actually, no... by Stewie241 · · Score: 2

      Meh.

      I mean, if something legitimately looked like it would make it possible to purchase google.com, for example, and it was a reputable site, then I would try it. Not because I would want to do evil, and not because I intend to cause harm. But only because I'm curious and would assume that it doesn't actually work, and the small part (ok, bigger than I'd like to think) of me that relates to this comic would be compelled to point out to the reputable vendor that something was obviously wrong with their site as I would expect to complete the transaction and not actually end up owning google.com.

      The surprise for this guy was probably that the transaction actually went through and some reputable system actually believed him to own the domain.

    2. Re:actually, no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      but then he got Google Webmaster Tools to recognize him as the owner, and he was getting information.
      He owned it, legitimately, but then before any opportunity to do much harm, Google responded and use a clause that allowed them to revert ownership. Pointless? To some degree, yes. But, did he technically own it? Yes.
      Also, that he was getting some notices means that there was a security lapse.

  11. Re:hosts file by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 2

    Hush! You'll get APK going about his hosts file.