Slashdot Mirror


A Broke Fan Owes $5,400 For Pokemon-Themed Party Posters

Jason Koebler writes: A fan has been ordered by a Washington judge to pay the Pokémon Company International $5,400 for copyright infringement after attempting to throw a Pokemon-themed party earlier this summer. Even though he canceled the free event, the Pokemon Company successfully sued Ramar Larkin Jones, for using an image of Pikachu to promote the Unofficial PAX Pokemon Kickoff Party.

11 of 212 comments (clear)

  1. Business by darkain · · Score: 5, Informative

    The big piece of information that always gets neglected in these articles is that they didn't sue because he was throwing a party, but because he runs a business which hosts party events and then used Pokémon to promote such an event. Here is the company's trashy Facebook page. "Fans" and "Businesses" are NOT the same thing. https://www.facebook.com/Rucku...

    1. Re:Business by sjames · · Score: 3, Informative

      If they're suing for trademark, then they kind of have to.

      Actually, they don't, that's a myth created by assholes that don't want to look like assholes. Other valid defenses of the mark include sending a letter granting a one time only limited license and cautioning the person not to do it again, offering a license for $1, granting a revocable continuing license, etc.

  2. Re:Marketing 101 by TWX · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hahahahaha!

    Oh, wait... you're serious?

    As long as there are MBAs looking how to squeeze the last dime out of every potential customer and there are lawyers concerned about the loss of trademark through failure to defend that trademark there will be these kinds of lawsuits.

    Quite honestly, I'm amazed that armies of lawyers haven't descended upon ComiCons and other fandom gatherings to sue the shit out of all of the artists and merchants selling unlicensed comic book derivative works. You wander around the dealers' rooms at the big cons and there are booths upon booths of artists with their own takes on Phoenix or The Hulk or Supergirl or any other hot comic book character of the moment. Based on current law I'm amazed that the continued creation of these unlicensed derivative works hasn't given the trademark holders panic that they could lose control over their characters. Indeed, it appears that they already have lost control over them, it simply hasn't been declared through trial yet.

    Given what lawyers cost, I'm really surprised that the judgement against him is as small as it is. From the lawyers' perspective this is chump-change even if it would bankrupt half the households in the country to suddenly owe $5400.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  3. Re:If that's how Pokemon Int'l treats its fans... by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative

    If that's how Pokemon Int'l treats its fans

    Ramar Larkin Jones isn't a "fan" - he's a event organizer who was running a Pokemon themed event for which he was selling tickets. The selling tickets parts got left out of the linked article somehow - I wonder why. (Actually, I don't need to wonder - the article is slanted all to hell and back.)

  4. Re:If that's how Pokemon Int'l treats its fans... by Gryle · · Score: 4, Informative

    The fan launched the GoFundMe page because the litigants are insisting on a lump-sum payment. From ArsTechnica "Jones even offered to pay the full $4,000 over the course of a year, but Pokémon's lawyers from the firm of Davis Wright Tremaine wouldn't budge on the deadline."

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  5. Re:If that's how Pokemon Int'l treats its fans... by Gryle · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to ArsTechnica, tickets were $2.00 each and covered the expenses. This wasn't a for-profit endeavor. Now, as Jones is an event organizer, he may have been using this party as something to add to his resume.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  6. Re:If that's how Pokemon Int'l treats its fans... by sexconker · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's means it is.

    Not always. It's been fun proving you wrong.

  7. Re:People say RMS is nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Get real, the next time Mickey Mouse is about to expire, copyright will be extended again. Are you that naive you believe congress won't pass infinity-1 sooner or later? Nothing will come into the public domain ever again. Never. Get it?

  8. Re: If that's how Pokemon Int'l treats its fans... by lpevey · · Score: 4, Informative

    Truth of a statement is a valid legal defense against libel accusations in the U.S. And many other Western countries, but not in the UK. That is what the poster was referencing.

  9. Re: Is it a good game? by St.Creed · · Score: 3, Informative

    True. If we didn't fine people who put up pokemon posters, we'd rapidly slide into anarchy!

    --
    Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)