Slashdot Mirror


Verizon Boosts Price of Grandfathered Unlimited Data Plans By $20 (theverge.com)

nicholasjay writes: In November, Verizon Wireless is going to start charging its customers with the grandfathered "unlimited data" plans an extra $20 for the data. This is obviously an attempt to get people off of the old unlimited data plans. Even though a Verizon spokesperson confirmed the change, I'm hoping they won't go through with this plan — but right now I'm weighing all my options.

176 comments

  1. I don't like this at all by nicholasjay · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is being reported all over. Here's a link from CNN Money.

    http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/0...

    1. Re:I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is being reported all over. Here's a link from CNN Money.

      http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/0...

      Don't fret. The monopolistic tactics of the entire industry will all but guarantee your carrier too will offer this "feature" very soon.

      The utter lack of enforcement by our government ensures that anti-monopoly laws continue to be ignored as we all pay the Piper of Collusion.

      Clicking the "do not like" button and doing nothing else about it is why Verizon and others ritualistically shove their hand up the consumers ass.

    2. Re:I don't like this at all by tripleevenfall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because Verizon got rid of unlimited data plans, and then coaxed people into staying with Verizon by assuring them they'd be grandfathered in on their current plans - only to jack the prices way up later.

      It's a breach of trust and it rightly should send people fleeing to other carriers.

    3. Re:I don't like this at all by ardmhacha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "It's a breach of trust and it rightly should send people fleeing to other carriers."

      Where there would be no unlimited data plan.

    4. Re:I don't like this at all by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you trust any corporation then you are a fool.

      Corporations care for one thing, next quarter's profits.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you place trust in corporations to care about next quarter's profits, no?

    6. Re:I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Verizon got rid of unlimited data plans, and then coaxed people into staying with Verizon by assuring them they'd be grandfathered in on their current plans - only to jack the prices way up later.

      It's a breach of trust and it rightly should send people fleeing to other carriers.

      When did Verizon ever promise not to increase the cost of plans?

      All things get more expensive over time... It called inflation.

      You are an idiot.

    7. Re:I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anti-monopoly laws aren't the only problem, just look at the last major FCC wireless spectrum auction. From what I've heard most of what was bought up is just being sat on. Sizable chunks of various spectrum's should be opened up like they did with the bands Wi-Fi uses with proper power allowances. Even ISPs are being denied decent frequencies, I have at least fixed wireless 3 towers within range but can't get a signal to any of them because the frequencies they are forced to use can't penetrate the leaves on the trees.

    8. Re:I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Where there would be no unlimited data plan.

      One word: T-Mobile

      (It has unlimited data plans.)

    9. Re:I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... except the #3 carrier T-Mobile, which has an unlimited plan. Oh, and the #4 carrier Sprint, although they have the crappiest network of the big 4, they too have unlimited data.

    10. Re:I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >All things get more expensive over time... It called inflation.

      Data should be getting cheaper, not more expensive. Infrastructure costs big money upfront, less money when the investment's been recoup'd.

      Also, gasoline used to be $4/gallon. Now it's cheaper. Your whole statement is just wrong.

      YOU are the idiot.

    11. Re:I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't recall my wages going up 20 bucks a month

    12. Re:I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What job is that? Giving you attention? Is your life really that devoid of meaningful interaction?

    13. Re:I don't like this at all by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      T-Mobiles 'unlimited' isn't.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    14. Re:I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still responding to me? Successful troll is successful!

    15. Re:I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What job is that?

      To troll. That is all you need to know.

    16. Re:I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite right. I'm bored and getting amusement out of someone getting butthurt over irrelevant Internet posts.

    17. Re:I don't like this at all by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      When did Verizon ever promise not to increase the cost of plans?

      The question (that the fine article doesn't address...) is whether or not they're waiting until the next contract cycle to add this increase. If they are, then yes, you're at least partly right that this is a non-story.

      If they're upping the price right now and saying : "Well yes that is breach of contract, would you like to walk away from your unlimited plan that you'll never get again now?" ... then... yes, they're being downright underhanded and even hostile to their customers.

      All things get more expensive over time... It called inflation.

      You are an idiot.

      Two problems with calling him an idiot: First is that this isn't about inflation. $30 to $50 between 2010 and 2015 is not even close to the rate of inflation. Second, the 'idiot', in all likelihood, knows the history of Verizon (and AT&T for that matter) and their hostility towards unlimited customers. Now maybe I'm giving the poster you called an idiot more credit than he deserves, but AT&T's recently hundred-million-dollar-smackdown by the FCC recently was broadly reported. It turns out these carriers have been looking for ways to shed themselves of these unlimited customers.

      You're showing symptoms of irritability, I prescribe Googlin.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    18. Re:I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it is unprecedented in the world of mobile phone plans. At least I've never heard of a single instance where a mobile phone provider raised the price of a plan for existing customers. Instead, they force customers to switch plans if they want to get a new device without paying for it up front.

      Of course, with the carriers all switching to a choice of buying in installments or paying up front, now that the cost of the devices isn't hidden in the cost of the plan, and now that bringing your own device no longer costs you an extra twenty or thirty bucks a month, Verizon is getting scared that they won't ever be able to force people off of these plans, so they're resorting to these alternative tactics.

    19. Re:I don't like this at all by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      Maybe not, but what is? I've got it and I'd definitely recommend it over the cartel.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    20. Re:I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zing!

    21. Re:I don't like this at all by dj245 · · Score: 1

      T-Mobiles 'unlimited' isn't.

      T-mobile (and many various MVNO's) have unlimited data plans. They don't have an unlimited 4G data plan, but advertising as having unlimited data is perfectly correct based on how their plans work. They neither charge nor cut off your data if you exceed the 4G allowance.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    22. Re:I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ditched Verizon two years ago for Virgin and got unlimited. "Can you hear me NOW"

    23. Re:I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sprint has unlimited data. There are options.

    24. Re:I don't like this at all by jittles · · Score: 1

      T-Mobiles 'unlimited' isn't.

      That depends on your definition of unlimited. Do they throttle your connection speed after a certain cap? Yes. But so does AT&T with their 'unlimited' plans that people are grandfathered into. At least T-Mobile is honest and upfront about it AND a hell of a lot cheaper to boot./P.

    25. Re:I don't like this at all by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      However, as time goes by, people use more and more data on their mobile devices. All of which requires additional investment or incentivising customers to lower their data usage.

      A few years ago, average data usage on one of the UK's mobile networks was c. 2GB per month. This year, average data usage on the same network is c. 4GB per month. I have an unlimited (genuinely unlimited) plan with the same network and my average monthly usage has gone from 2GB to 15GB in the same period of time.

      So, in spite of prices going up, we are probably actually seeing a decrease in the cost per unit used.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    26. Re:I don't like this at all by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      Look they honored the unlimited data prices for the next contract period. How many *new* contracts are they morally obligated to renew at the reduced rate to not "breach your trust". All contracts end.

    27. Re:I don't like this at all by nmr_andrew · · Score: 1

      When did Verizon ever promise not to increase the cost of plans?

      The question (that the fine article doesn't address...) is whether or not they're waiting until the next contract cycle to add this increase.

      The story I read earlier this morning quoted someone or other as saying that customers currently in a contract won't see a change until the contract is up. If they renew, it will be at the new price.

    28. Re:I don't like this at all by rsborg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      T-Mobiles 'unlimited' isn't.

      It's near enough. Their highest tier 4G/LTE (yes, annoyingly called unlimited) allows for 21GB of high speed data before dropping down to 128KB/s. Same with AT&T's grandfathered plan. Don't know about Sprint, but I doubt its any higher.

      You also get data stash - I have 20GB in my stash and build it every month. Occasionally I dip into it (like when I do a lot of driving around for trips or business).

      With TMO, you get 7GB/mo of tethering with that plan - and the data stash can leverage that so you can in one month tether 10's of GB if you need it.

      Also music streaming is zero-rated on TMO with most streaming services (Apple music, Google, Amazon, Spotify, Pandora, etc) covered. So you're not going to have to spend GB's on that either.

      Maybe you can get unlimited with VZ, but do they allow for tethering as well? Do they zero-rate music streaming?

      T-mobile is as good as you can get right now without going for the "unicorn" of truly unlimited.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    29. Re:I don't like this at all by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      This is pretty common in every industry. The loyal customers are grandfathered in for a while and then eventually when they renew, they have to renew at the then current rate. As contracts are typically only 2 years and the unlimited has been phased out probably a decade ago, I'm surprised that it's taken them this long to up the price. I'm actually surprised they haven't gotten completely rid of unlimited. Do you really expect to sign a 2 year contract and never have your price increased, ever? Just inflation alone means that if you have an unlimited plan that you are paying considerably less than when you originally signed up for it.
      I sure wish my landline cost the same now as when I first got it. Same with cable, water, electric, etc... They all have yearly increase and my guess is that even with a $20 jump, many of the unlimited users are paying a lot less than someone who signs up today.

    30. Re:I don't like this at all by nabsltd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The story I read earlier this morning quoted someone or other as saying that customers currently in a contract won't see a change until the contract is up. If they renew, it will be at the new price.

      That's wrong, because nobody with an unlimited plan has a contract any more...they are all month-to-month, as their contracts have expired.

      If you had an unlimited plan and wanted to do something that forced you into a contract (subsidized phone, etc.), then you were told that you had to sign up for a new plan. For a while now, Verizon doesn't have an phone subsidies, so people with unlimited who stuck it out this long now had no incentive to switch off the plan...they would pay full price for any new device. So, Verizon is raising their rates to try to convince them to switch. It's not very nice, but it is unfortunately legal.

    31. Re:I don't like this at all by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      Sprint does too.

    32. Re:I don't like this at all by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      The story I read earlier this morning quoted someone or other as saying that customers currently in a contract won't see a change until the contract is up. If they renew, it will be at the new price.

      Ah. Well in that case, Verizon is doing nothing wrong. The main reason I suspected the other possibility is that, if memory serves, Verizon has told their unlimited peeps that they have to pay full price for their phones. Under that circumstance they would not care at all if anybody had walked away from their unlimited plan if they changed the price mid-stream.

      I have a grandfathered unlimited plan with AT&T and I'm paying $30/mo for it. If they raised it to $50 I wouldn't personally be too upset, but there is a key difference here that I don't think applies to Verizon: They've upped their throttling cap from 5 gigs to 22 gigs. So I'd be paying $50 for 22 gigs a month (plus it'll keep going, albeit slower) which is far better than their tiered options.

      On a side note, I do wish they'd quit screwing with us. What do you call someone that has a grandfathered unlimited plan from AT&T or Verizon? A loyal customer.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    33. Re:I don't like this at all by gaiageek · · Score: 1

      Sure there's inflation, but the price per gigabyte over the past several years has definitely gone down, as have the cost of monthly contracts in general (thanks to companies like T-Mobile). This does seem like a brash move by Verizon which will piss off a lot of their long-term customers. It would've been smarter to raise the price $10 now and another $10 in 2 years. Or if this is really a problem of trying to eliminate users who are using way too much bandwidth, just keep the price the same and start throttling after a certain amount.

      One has to wonder though: when are we ever going to see data caps that are in line with the speeds that LTE and the already-being-discussed 5G allow? It's kind of ridiculous that many users have broadband speeds on their phones which surpass the speeds of their home internet connection, yet they can only use a few GB before being essentially cut-off.

    34. Re:I don't like this at all by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      Yes, T-Mobile has an unlimited 4g plan. It costs about $30 above the base plan, but it is unlimited.

    35. Re:I don't like this at all by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Went over to Sprint from Verizon recently because they were offering cheaper unlimited data then my limited data plan with Verizon. When i was signing up the sales person mentioned that they used Verizon's towers as backup for their network with no roaming charges. So far I havent seen a spec of difference between the two carriers in terms of quality (spotty areas near where I live are spotty for both carriers) but I have yet to travel out to any real rural areas or do any real travel with it.

      Of course Sprint's even more recent financial issues have me a tad worried in regards to how long I'll be able to get unlimited data from Sprint but i can always change carriers again when my contract ends.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    36. Re:I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point being just what exactly? Sorry, didn't realize VZW need to peg their prices against YOUR personal income.

    37. Re:I don't like this at all by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      It's kind of ridiculous that many users have broadband speeds on their phones which surpass the speeds of their home internet connection, yet they can only use a few GB before being essentially cut-off.

      That's because the technology is different. Wireless technology is a shared medium. They can transmit at high speed just like wired connections but it has to be shared by everyone in the area. It makes sense with a shared medium to implement fair use policies. The other way to do it is give everyone an equal slice at 128k (or slower) but I think everyone prefers having high-speed to an unlimited trickle. T-mobile probably has the best compromise where they switch you to the low-speed after you use up your allotment. Modern phones all automatically switch to wifi when available, only download updates over wifi, and do all they can to keep the limited shared medium open for people who really need it. If you're using more than 10G/month on mobile, then you're probably doing something wrong, without looking, my guess is there is probably a gps enable app that can tell you where you're using all your data but most people probably already know that. Very few people are constantly mobile in areas where there is no wifi and if you are then expect to pay more for that privilege.

    38. Re:I don't like this at all by jratcliffe · · Score: 2

      Not true. I have an unlimited plan, and I'm in contract until October 2017.

    39. Re:I don't like this at all by Krojack · · Score: 1

      Still being on unlimited and paying for it on time each month this getting bent over like this enrages me. Less than 1% of Verizon's users are still on unlimited and of those it's a fraction that user crazy amounts of data. I use on average 8gigs a month but when traveling I might use up to 20gigs. I'm going to walk into a Verizon store and say, "You can keep getting my $96/month and keep me on the unlimited or you will get $0/month and I'll take my business somewhere else." I'm sure they won't care but I'll try to embarrass while i'm there in front of other customers.

      I'm looking into moving to Google's Project Fi. I'll have to watch my data usage while traveling till I'm use to it but that's ok.

    40. Re: I don't like this at all by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      T-mobile is $10 cheaper than my unlimited AT&T plan. And while I am technically on a 450 minute plan with AT&T (which I never used up anyway) they are now giving me unlimited talk, so unlimited everything. Plus I got the subsidized prices for my phone instead of that yearly upgrade scam.

    41. Re: I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has class action written all over it.

    42. Re: I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope! Cannot hear you.

    43. Re: I don't like this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the 1% of unlimited data users is adversely affecting the #1 carrier in the nation's ability to provide excellent service then why are they in the lead? This isn't about optimization of the network, the network is fine; and last I checked it was still the same 4G speeds I signed up for when I was encouraged to chose the unlimited data plan years ago. So unless this is a new 5G network they're trying to create on the rotting corpse of an old insufficient 4G network this is about optimizing their profits. This is an abuse of their position as the leader in wireless service. It might not be anti-competitive but it sure is anti-consumerism. When no one wanted to buy a smart Phone they hyped up this unlimited data thing to promote smart phones as an always accessible always on wealth of information. Now that we've all bought into this lie, they're trying to become the gatekeepers of that information. Control the way we access the internet and tax the hell out of it. It goes beyond GB of data its the actual financial burden that curiosity will cost you, what leisure will cost you, what peace of mind costs you.

    44. Re:I don't like this at all by sglewis100 · · Score: 1

      Because Verizon got rid of unlimited data plans, and then coaxed people into staying with Verizon by assuring them they'd be grandfathered in on their current plans - only to jack the prices way up later.

      It's a breach of trust and it rightly should send people fleeing to other carriers.

      So you are grandfathered. Forever. They can never raise rates? Ever? I don't see why that has to be true. Consider the last four years a parting gift from Verizon then... but seriously... people raise rates all the time. Some do it in the middle of a contract (Satellite TV I'm looking at you).

    45. Re:I don't like this at all by sglewis100 · · Score: 1

      >All things get more expensive over time... It called inflation.

      Data should be getting cheaper, not more expensive. Infrastructure costs big money upfront, less money when the investment's been recoup'd.

      Also, gasoline used to be $4/gallon. Now it's cheaper. Your whole statement is just wrong.

      YOU are the idiot.

      Umm. Didn't gasoline also used to NOT be $4/gallon? I'm not all that old, but remember it being 89 cents a gallon. Also, there are a few external influences that affect gas prices.

    46. Re:I don't like this at all by sglewis100 · · Score: 1

      Mine did. So much for sample sizes of one.

    47. Re:I don't like this at all by sglewis100 · · Score: 1

      The story I read earlier this morning quoted someone or other as saying that customers currently in a contract won't see a change until the contract is up. If they renew, it will be at the new price.

      That's wrong, because nobody with an unlimited plan has a contract any more...they are all month-to-month, as their contracts have expired.

      If you had an unlimited plan and wanted to do something that forced you into a contract (subsidized phone, etc.), then you were told that you had to sign up for a new plan. For a while now, Verizon doesn't have an phone subsidies, so people with unlimited who stuck it out this long now had no incentive to switch off the plan...they would pay full price for any new device. So, Verizon is raising their rates to try to convince them to switch. It's not very nice, but it is unfortunately legal.

      Except for the millions of people who've been upgrading their phones every 18-24 months and reupping their contract end date while keeping their original pricing plan and data allotment.

    48. Re: I don't like this at all by jittles · · Score: 1

      T-mobile is $10 cheaper than my unlimited AT&T plan. And while I am technically on a 450 minute plan with AT&T (which I never used up anyway) they are now giving me unlimited talk, so unlimited everything. Plus I got the subsidized prices for my phone instead of that yearly upgrade scam.

      Well if you want to compare apples to apples then, T-Mo also has a service plan that is not available anymore which is exactly like the one you describe for $30 a month. I had that one up until about a year ago when I ditched it to get a plan that included free data for multiple tablet devices for only $20 more. I pay $50 a month for unlimited everything, though I only get 3GB of data at 4G speeds, that is sufficient most months.

    49. Re:I don't like this at all by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      nabsltd's story makes a certain amount of sense. Any way you could share how you came by this situation?

    50. Re:I don't like this at all by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Two phones, one unlimited, one not. Transfer the upgrade from the unlimited phone to the non-unlimited, then upgrade the phone. Unlimited phone's upgrade is used, contract's locked in for another two years. Plus, iPhone 6s for $280.

  2. hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wouldn't this constitute a breach of contract?

    1. Re: hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most cell contracts say they can change the price anytime.

    2. Re:hmm... by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Not when the contract has a clause that says they can do exactly that. If you don't like the change, the contract allows you to back out.

    3. Re:hmm... by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is not a breach of contract (and likewise can't be used to get out of your contract without paying the ETF) because it doesn't go into effect until the contract ends for the folks that are still under contract. Now most folks who have unlimited data are not under contract but there still a number of them that use loop holes that allow you to continue with unlimited data and get subsidize phones but make you sign up for a contract. Generally the loopholes involve transferring the upgrade to a second line, doing the upgrade on that line, and transferring the new phone back.

      --
      Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
    4. Re: hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That has yet to be proven in court - my bet is that no, it would not stand up to a trial.

      The judge would laugh Verizon as he fined them billions for their antics.

    5. Re: hmm... by CimmerianX · · Score: 2

      IF it would ever get to trail since the contract states you agree to arbitration for everything.

    6. Re: hmm... by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      What court? You agreed to forced arbitration which the Supreme Court upheld as legal.

    7. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck trying to get the arbiter, with whom you agreed to forced arbitration, that Verizon hired to agree with that claim.

    8. Re:hmm... by houghi · · Score: 2

      You have two options.
      1) Agree with what they do and pay more
      2) Say it is a breach of contract and drop out

      With 1) the company gets what they want
      However with 2) the company gets what they want.

      I used to work for a company that was in a similar situation. We had contracts with customers. However our cost increased in such a way that there was no way we would be able to make a profit. However the contract was in such a way that a cancel from our side would take 3 months to do the cancel (legally) so that was not an option.

      The same would be for the customers. Their cancel would be three months as well. However when they contacted us and told they wanted to cancel due to the price increase, we would 'allow' the customer not to follow the letter of the law and cancel the accounts ASAP.

      The intend of the increase was so customers would cancel. This so we would not loose any more money. So instead of loosing money over a 3 month period (even with the price increase), we lost money only over a 2 week (on average) period.Those who did want to follow us received a cancel letter a bit later and we had to respect the 3 months cancel.

      Obviously I have no idea if they are actually loosing money or if the profit just is not high enough.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    9. Re: hmm... by Golddess · · Score: 2

      They can claim that that clause means I cannot sue them all they want, and in some circumstances, they might be right. But a clause that says "thou shalt not sue" does not protect them from being sued over that very same clause. At least I would hope it doesn't. IANAL.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    10. Re: hmm... by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      You can try to sue that the clause is illegal to invalidate the contract but you're facing very little success of winning that.

    11. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or buying from Best Buy, never turning the phone on so the BB sim never activates on the network, and then installing your old SIM in the new smartphone (cut to size if necessary). Worked beautifully when I upgraded to the LG G3 for $1 a year ago.

      Glad I did so, because I am under contract for another year. Enough time for me to plan out my transition from Verizon to a different carrier.

    12. Re:hmm... by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Lose, not loose. You did it THREE TIMES! It's practically a crime.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    13. Re:hmm... by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      wouldn't this constitute a breach of contract?

      You mean the 2 year contract that has long since expired?

    14. Re: hmm... by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Most cell contracts say they can change the price anytime.

      Some might but I haven't seen this but it doesn't really matter as most contracts are only good for 2 years and no judge is going to hold a company to a contract that expired 8 years ago. And yes, most contracts in any industry say they can adjust the price on renewal of the contract.

    15. Re:hmm... by gaiageek · · Score: 1

      You have two options. 1) Agree with what they do and pay more 2) Say it is a breach of contract and drop out

      With 1) the company gets what they want However with 2) the company gets what they want.

      While it makes sense in situation you describe (the company you work for losing money every week) for them to cut their loses, I'm doubting that Verizon is in that desperate a situation -- which means that if you take option 2 and drop out, switching to another carrier, no, Verizon isn't exactly get what it wants. They've lost a customer and whatever their monthly profit was on that customer, plus they'll have to spend money trying to get that customer back (which may not succeed).

    16. Re:hmm... by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      They've lost a customer and whatever their monthly profit was on that customer, plus they'll have to spend money trying to get that customer back (which may not succeed).

      Or they'll just get other subscribers to join that will start out on a higher-margin plan and thus Verizon wins. Why would they spend money to get a lower-profit customer over simply getting new customers that they'll extract more profit from?

    17. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There IS no contract to breach. That's the point.

    18. Re: hmm... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > And yes, most contracts in any industry say they can adjust the price on renewal of the contract.

      Uh, if the terms of the contract are changing, that's not a renewal, thats a new contract trying to be passed off as an existing one.

    19. Re: hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forced arbitration doesn't get rid of our right to sue in civil court in addition to arguing our case in arbitration so long as both remain private, the only thing that this does is gurantee NO CLASS ACTION, so that any settlement can be reached out of court likely with a gag order that prohibits the terms of that settlement being revealed publicly. Sometimes this is a good thing because if they lose they'll also pay your lawyer fees and if you lose they'll only require you to pay your own. But it doesn't punish them in a way that discourages continued abuse. Even if they lose that's one tiny slap on the wrist, it doesn't provoke a much needed national discussion, it doesn't prompt a review of best practices, it doesn't help introduce new legislation or stir any consumer advocates. The forced arbitration clause is archaic and in the long run it helps grant powers reserved for branches of the government to corporations. Do you know how volatile it would be to have the fate of democracy contingent on Verizon stock?

  3. They deserve a break by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Those bastards!

    Grandfathers are usually on fixed incomes.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  4. Seriously? Who uses Verizon? They're pure evil! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm not even in an area where I have good service with T-Mobile (it's actually not that bad although I'm in a remote area with less service coverage than most people would desire- ie no 3G/4G/5G) and yet I still stick to T-Mobile. Verizon is the equivalent of Comcast in the cellular industry. They've done all sorts of horrible things from cooperation with the NSA to crippling phone lines and landline internet services to prevent users from switching *back* to services they are legally required to offer (ie it costs the customer money to have someone come out and re-wire ones house). They even hate standards choosing to stick to there stupid proprietary formats (and yea- I know it has some advantages in certain areas- but come on- I shouldn't need to own multiple phones to switch between providers or travel). They've also stopped rolling out fiber service to areas where they think it won't be 'cost effective' despite promises to do so. Lets not forget that the government stole our money and funded these projects to begin with- and then never fulfilled there obligations!

    1. Re:Seriously? Who uses Verizon? They're pure evil! by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

      Seriously? Who uses Verizon?

      More than 1/3rd of the US population.

    2. Re:Seriously? Who uses Verizon? They're pure evil! by Vyse+of+Arcadia · · Score: 2

      They're the only provider with decent coverage in rural areas. If I wasn't on Verizon, I'd have spotty or no signal every time I drive outside the city limits (which is often.) I hate Verizon, but they're my only choice.

    3. Re:Seriously? Who uses Verizon? They're pure evil! by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 3, Informative

      U.S. Cellular roams off of Verizon towers, and vice versa. I switched about 2 years ago from Verizon, where I had the grandfathered unlimited data plan... and had been a Verizon customer for 10+ years, when they wouldn't let me upgrade phones without either losing my unlimited data plan or paying $600+ for a phone.

      U.S. Cellular _IS_ a little spottier in some very remote areas of my state, and roams on VZW towers anywhere ~1-2 hours north of my hometown, but otherwise is pretty comparable to VZW coverage... with a ~30+% reduction in my bill every month.

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
    4. Re:Seriously? Who uses Verizon? They're pure evil! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Not really... You can always sign up for a cheaper provider that allows roaming onto Verizon's network. But personally, I'd try carrying a portable signal booster and see if that improves the signal enough for another carrier to function in those areas.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  5. Sounds like you need the clue by four by enjar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Even though a Verizon spokesperson confirmed the change, I'm hoping they won't go through with this plan"

    I hate to break it to you, but they are going through with this plan.

    1. Re:Sounds like you need the clue by four by nicholasjay · · Score: 2

      In the past companies have reversed their decision based on public outcry; it's not unprecedented.

    2. Re:Sounds like you need the clue by four by enjar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Verizon has also been shown to not give a damn.
      I'd expect all the other telcos to follow suit pretty much immediately.

    3. Re:Sounds like you need the clue by four by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not this time. You drones will take it, and you will like it. Got it?
        Freaking cell phone junkies.

    4. Re:Sounds like you need the clue by four by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

      Only an immensely tiny minority of their current customers can still have these grandfathered plans. Even if all of those users left, Verizon would still have more than 130 million subscribers.

    5. Re:Sounds like you need the clue by four by olsmeister · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure there are not enough people left that have grandfathered unlimited data plans to generate any type of public outcry. It's funny, I had grandfathered unlimited data up until about 2 weeks ago (got it when I got my Galaxy S3, 3+ years ago). My average usage was between 1 and 2 GB per month. I finally bit the bullet and went in and got a Galaxy S6, because it was really kind of stupid to keep paying my old contract price which subsidized the phone after all this time. I got a 3 GB per month package, no contract, and Samsung is picking up the phone payments for the rest of 2015. It's really not such a bad deal. However giving up that unlimited data felt like giving up a part of my body... even though I didn't use it.

    6. Re:Sounds like you need the clue by four by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Verizon would likely prefer losing these customers rather than trying to appease them. The whole point of this action and all the previous ones is to get people to cancel their contract.

    7. Re:Sounds like you need the clue by four by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Yes but the 'public' consisting of a relative small number of cellular customers who have a plan that has not been offered in five years or so is a pretty small public. Even if its a public of atypically noisy early adopters.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    8. Re:Sounds like you need the clue by four by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Only an immensely tiny minority of their current customers can still have these grandfathered plans. Even if all of those users left, Verizon would still have more than 130 million subscribers.

      Assuming that's true - and I have no reason to doubt - then the amount of money Verizon stands to gain off these users is relatively small and the only reason for Verizon to dick them over is simply because they can.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    9. Re:Sounds like you need the clue by four by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By getting rid of them, they also get rid of having to serve them 200GB+/month of data. That's a win for Verizon.

    10. Re:Sounds like you need the clue by four by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Sure, that is the whole point. They are purposefully making the terms onerous to get peope to cancel their contract.

    11. Re:Sounds like you need the clue by four by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Less people on low-margin plans means that any revenue loss is more than offset by the ass-rape margins on their other plans.

    12. Re:Sounds like you need the clue by four by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

      TIL Darth Vader works at Verizon: I've altered the deal, pray I don't alter it further.

      I always kinda expected it because once I had a phone that didn't work well(dropped 50% of calls within a few minutes), yet Verizon wouldn't bow out of the contract. Verizon made me pay for a phone that didn't work because contracts only benefited them and not the customer.

    13. Re:Sounds like you need the clue by four by enjar · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I gave up on the stupid contracts years ago, when pay as you go phones were only marketed to criminals and old people. Buying a cheap GoPhone and plugging the SIM into an iPhone I picked up cheap worked just fine, all you had to do was change the APN, that took two seconds. When AT&T finally figured out what was going on circa 2013 and jacked up the rate for pay as you go, I happily jumped ship to Ting. Sure, I had to pay for the phone, but at this point I've saved quite literally thousands of dollars versus having a contract. On really heavy data months I might spend $31 total for my phone bill, but then again I never got "hooked" on the all you can eat data plan, either -- generally any "all you can *" anything is still making a tidy profit for whoever sells it, be it a buffet or cell phone company.

      My wife migrated off Sprint when she looked at how much "unlimited" data she was using and realized that she could move to T-Mobile and we could save $40/month. She also realized that there was some real low-hanging fruit she could trim from her phone use habits that would drop her use even further, like bothering to look for free wifi at many of the places she goes that have it.

    14. Re:Sounds like you need the clue by four by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      In the past companies have reversed their decision based on public outcry; it's not unprecedented.

      My guess is that Verizon loses money on the handful of grandfathered plans that remain. You can stomp your feet and pout but it's like the old "sure we're losing money on each item but we'll make up for it on volume."

      Getting people to quit is the *point* of this move. They want people to quit so that they stop wasting their attention and resources on a handful of entitled customers that they no longer want.

    15. Re:Sounds like you need the clue by four by sglewis100 · · Score: 1

      The customers they stand to lose are exactly the ones they are okay with losing.

  6. BAHAHAHA! GOODBYE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been hanging around on my old grandfather'd Verizon plan for ages because of the unlimited data. I had been recently considering switching to Google Fi. This just dropped a 50 ton weight on the other end of the see-saw I've been balancing on. Good bye and good riddance Verizon!

    1. Re:BAHAHAHA! GOODBYE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly the response they are hoping for.

    2. Re:BAHAHAHA! GOODBYE! by tgetzoya · · Score: 1

      I have Project Fi....... I like it, but it doesn't match the quality and speed of Verizon. Be prepared!

    3. Re:BAHAHAHA! GOODBYE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except they should be *happy* to have me. The only time I ever go near or over 1GB of data is when I'm suddenly somewhere where I need to tether my laptop for internet. And even then that's rare. Yeah, sure I could just get a plan with a smaller data cap, but that's not the point. I don't want to ever worry or think about my data.

    4. Re:BAHAHAHA! GOODBYE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? The unlimited plan is probably a PITA to maintain and folk like you are keeping it alive.

      You're just lucky they didn't turn around and say that they're just cancelling it by the end of the year (which they would have absolute full legal AND moral rights to do).

    5. Re:BAHAHAHA! GOODBYE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't want to ever worry or think about my data.

      Seems like this is very important to you. It has value to you. Verizon is suggesting the value of that piece of mind is worth an extra $20/month.

      I am happy to think about my data if it means I can save money.

      I have never needed to go over my 1GB plan, but if I did, it seems like paying an extra $15* for the overage makes sense and keep my monthly cost low. (Just like I am willing to pay extra for my cloud services if I ever have a spike in demand, but it is not cost-effective for me to have reserve instances.)

      *Actually I don't even know what the price is, because I never break 0.5GB.

    6. Re:BAHAHAHA! GOODBYE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except they should be *happy* to have me.

      Why? Because you're a special snowflake?

    7. Re:BAHAHAHA! GOODBYE! by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Because he pays "all you can eat" prices every day, and usually just grabs a sandwich.

      He's saying he is extremely profitable to them.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    8. Re:BAHAHAHA! GOODBYE! by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      But he's not. The unlimited plan isn't that profitable. That's why Verizon is trying to purposefully push people out of that contract by increasing the cost.

    9. Re:BAHAHAHA! GOODBYE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he was "extremely profitable" why would they have phased out the unlimited plan and for the people remaining they're raising the costs of the plan? What Verizon is doing actually shows the opposite of your claim.

    10. Re:BAHAHAHA! GOODBYE! by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      The plan overall isn't but he/his case is. It's like someone who buys an unlimited ride transit pass for $30, but the total cost of their trips during the validity period would have been $25 without the pass. For that one customer, the transit authority collected $5 more than if the unlimited pass weren't offered.

    11. Re:BAHAHAHA! GOODBYE! by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      He is extremely profitable, moreso than under a fixed plan. Many other users of the plans are less plan are not.

      This happens all the time. It's worth it for a candy bar company to sell "sitting on the fence" Pete a bar for half price. But not worth selling just to him to drop their price for everyone by half.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    12. Re:BAHAHAHA! GOODBYE! by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      If any of that were true they wouldn't be raising the costs of the plan where the goal is to get them off of it. Their metered plans are far, far more profitable.

    13. Re:BAHAHAHA! GOODBYE! by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      He is extremely profitable, moreso than under a fixed plan.

      He might bring in *more revenue*, but that doesn't mean that the user is *more profitable* for Verizon.

    14. Re:BAHAHAHA! GOODBYE! by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      You and the GP are talking about two different things. You are talking about the plan as a whole, he is talking about his specific data point. Him, specifically, as a customer generates more profit on the unlimited plan than a capped one (which are lower cost) since he barely uses any of it. If I ran an all you can eat restaurant, the guy who gets a salad every day and leaves is not the one I want going to a competitor, but rather the guy who sits there for 4 hours continuously eating to get two oversized meals worth out of it.

  7. Eh? Sorry Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once a person is on a plan, the "plan" cannot change without prior written consent of the customer.

    Have fun with your class action lawsuit there Verizon., you're gonna end up giving all the grandfathered accounts free unlimited for life.

  8. "Grandfathered" by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

    Used to mean the price was the same too. AT&T has been telling people they're tethering on their unlimited plan to boot them (even though there is no proof in many cases), Verizon is upping the price of their unlimited grandfathered plan to get people to switch to a more lucrative plan for the company, and then there are T-Mobile and Sprint. T-Mobile changed their unlimited policy to not raise when they throttled data and only during heavy load times, and Sprint has unlimited everything for like what $50? You can really see that if AT&T merged with T-Mobile those customers would have been a lot worse off. I used to have T-Mobile when I got back from Germany (it was Voicestream then) and when I turned on my Tri-Band Motorola their name came up so I signed up. It was great and I only switched off to AT&T for the iPhone 3G. It was worth it cause of my companies AT&T discount, now when my contract ends and my family members on my plan get off to another one I'm getting a dumb phone, not sure which carrier I'll move to, but I'm done with smartphones. The only smartphone I'd stay for is the new Windows 10 phones with continuum, but since I hardly ever use more than a tablet at home (on a computer all day at work) I don't really have the need for a PC/Phone. But a week long battery life with a dumb phone is the way to go for me in the future I think. I'll probably use my 1520 as a GPS after that since all the maps are saved to it (I did that to save on data usage and to have faster load times).

  9. Switch to another carrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife and I switched to Boost and we spend $50 on the same plans that costed me $90 before. Yeah I had to switch my phone number but the savings have been good. I'm even tempted just to drop the data plan and use only wifi on anything that work doesn't pay for.

  10. Who's going to make an app to burn 4G data by aka_bigred · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If I had the time, I'd write an app to burn data just to piss off big red. Since I'll be paying almost double for my unlimited data, it sure seem likes I should start getting a better value for my money?

    Seems like a simple app:
    -->If on 4G with excellent signal and over some battery full % (user configurable)
    ------>Download random data and discard, just to burn bandwidth.
    ------>Rinse/Repeat

    I've put of with a lot of BS from VZW to keep my grandfathered unlimited plan (locked bootloaders, crippled features VZW disables, etc), but jacking up the price like this really pisses me off.

    1. Re:Who's going to make an app to burn 4G data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I believe there are bit torrent apps with battery level or charging switches. That and a few linux isos might do it.

    2. Re:Who's going to make an app to burn 4G data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the way this works is that you generally *actually* get about 2GB of 4G speeds, and then they bump you down to 2G speeds. Enjoy burning 56kbps.

  11. Re:Eh? Sorry Verizon by nicholasjay · · Score: 1

    Once a person is on a plan, the "plan" cannot change without prior written consent of the customer.

    Have fun with your class action lawsuit there Verizon., you're gonna end up giving all the grandfathered accounts free unlimited for life.

    Does this still apply if the customers are on a month-by-month plan? There's no contract at that point, as the contracts only lasted two years and they have long since expired.

  12. Re:Eh? Sorry Verizon by adamstew · · Score: 1

    Actually it can. The contract people agreed to when signing up for service says that they can change the price at any time. However, if the price goes up you have the right to back out of the contract without paying the early termination fee.

  13. Verizon = Darth Vader by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Darth Vader: "I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further."

    Verizon: "I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further."

    Kind of hard to tell them apart if you ask me.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  14. Re:Verizon = Darth Vader by nicholasjay · · Score: 1

    Kind of hard to tell them apart if you ask me.

    No one dresses up like Verizon on Halloween?

  15. Re:Verizon = Darth Vader by enjar · · Score: 1

    Vader works for AT&T. They use the Death Star as their corporate logo.

  16. Sprint did this to me by BravoZuluM · · Score: 1

    I was a founding joiner of Sprint. Worked for Qualcomm, got a good deal on a Qualcomm candy bar. Anyway, I had unlimited data and a pretty good price on Sprint for about 10 years. Then they let me know they are moving me to a 3 gig plan and I get to pay a bit more for it. I said no thanks and moved to AT&T. That was 10 years ago. Sprint has spent time and money trying to woo people like me back. I think of the 1000's of $ that Sprint did not make off of me in an attempt to gouge every last cent out of me. When AT&T come and tell me that I no longer have unlimited data, I'll find something else. But AT&T not attempting to renegotiate my plans has resulted in a family of 5's iPhones, and iPhone upgrades and a $200 a month plus plan. Hum, $2400 a year * 10 years is $24,000. So Sprint, that is what your brilliant plan to gouge me cost you.

    Same with cable. Went to satelite. Now I am planning to drop off satellite and use my unlimited AT&T LTE connection feed my house.

    1. Re:Sprint did this to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      3 Gig data plan in 2005!! That was before real web browsers were baked into phones. I mean, iPhone wasn't even released for two more years yet. I can't believe Sprint has had a 3 Gig plan available for that long...

    2. Re:Sprint did this to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically what they do is convince 'reps' that they're totally in the right and can just switch people without warning....so that if there's an argument the rep will be totally confident that nothing can be done, fuck you, you're paying us more, goodbye. The people that want to fight it can keep it, the people that don't want to go through the hassle will get shifted over. Pretty old trick in the sales book, actually.

      They'll go so far as to say shit like 'you're already switched and there's no way you can go back because it isn't in the system sorry' but in reality its their problem to honor the conscionable parts of their contract.

  17. Re:Eh? Sorry Verizon by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    there are no active "plans" that are unlimited, only fools think they can sue this one out.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  18. Re:Verizon = Darth Vader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Darth Vader: "I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further."

    Verizon: "I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further."

    Comcast: "I am altering the deal. I will alter it further."

  19. Re:Verizon = Darth Vader by GungaDan · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Can you fear me now?"

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
  20. Re:Verizon = Darth Vader by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Kind of hard to tell them apart if you ask me.

    Vader is generally competent, a big blind spot around his kid aside. Verizon, OTOH...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  21. Re:Eh? Sorry Verizon by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

    Have fun with your class action lawsuit there Verizon., you're gonna end up giving all the grandfathered accounts free unlimited for life.

    Unless you can prove the contract illegal, have fun trying to get a class action lawsuit when you agreed to Supreme-Court-upheld forced arbitration.

  22. We Left AT&T for similar reasons by Striikerr · · Score: 1

    My wife and I were on the AT&T unlimited data plan which got grandfathered once they dropped that plan. AT&T was very interested in pushing people off of that plan which they achieved by throttling people who used too much data. My wife received notice that her data was going to be throttled for the remainder of the billing period for going over around 3 GB. This happened right around when T-Mobile started their "un-carrier" plan which included unlimited data, voice and text. We left AT&T shortly after and never looked back. Thanks to AT&T's shortsighted push to get people off of their unlimited plan, we found T-Mobile which has kept improving what it offers customers (we recently visited Canada and, thanks to their new plan which was added for a few dollars, we were able to use 4G /LTE data, make and receive unlimited calls and use text without worrying about data caps and ridiculous international overage charges). Verizon is doing ht same thing here. Is it really worth losing customers just to drop this unlimited plan? They lose out on added lines (we added another family member to our plan plus a couple of iPads which get data through T-Mobile now).

    As long as AT&T and Verizon continue to treat their customers with contempt, people will continue to leave for greener pastures.

  23. Everything has a price. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do carriers act like customers are their adversaries to be tricked and manipulated?

    Everything has a price. Why don't carriers try to figure out how much to charge for truly unlimited data that they will be happy with even if the customers actually use it and offer it at that price? Someone will surely buy it, even at a high price... then all it would take is another carrier to offer the same deal at a cheaper price to provide competition and eventually the price should eventually correct to a fair market value.

    Is there some reason that carriers won't offer these golden plans? Sounds like oligopoly to me...

    1. Re:Everything has a price. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      problem is that truly unlimited price would be something like $1000/month...and nobody would pay that. On the other hand, 99.9999% of the people who think they need "unlimited" actually end up using less than 1gig/month....and would be happy to pay $50 for their "unlimited" plan---where they don't have to think about how much they're browsing their emails.

      the few folks who actually read the fine print and claim that their $50/month covers the truly actually unlimited data cry foul when the carrier tries to throttle their connection past 20gig/month...

  24. Re:Eh? Sorry Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahaha....unlimited free for life. More like a $5 dollar gift card.

  25. Lost Customers by ShiftyOne · · Score: 1

    The thing that Verizon doesn't realize is that the type of people that hung onto this plan for 3 years are not the type of people that will stay with Verizon if they get off of unlimited, its the type of people that hang out on slick deals. They are going to be left with just the people who use 50+ GB a month and the ones that use 5-10GB are going to switch to another carrier where they can pay half the price for that amount of data.

    1. Re:Lost Customers by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      The thing that Verizon doesn't realize is that the type of people that hung onto this plan for 3 years are not the type of people that will stay with Verizon if they get off of unlimited, its the type of people that hang out on slick deals.

      And they are a microscopic minority of Verizon's 135 million subscribers. Verizon likely won't bat an eye if they leave.

    2. Re:Lost Customers by ShiftyOne · · Score: 1

      Verizon said it was 1% of their customers. 1% of their customers on a $100 a month plan adds up pretty quickly. The financials should show an increase in revenue, a flat or even 0.5% drop is "bad". Even if half of them leave they just lost a lot of revenue and didn't get rid of any of the high usage customers that they were aiming at.

    3. Re:Lost Customers by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Except that these customers are far more expensive to support than the people on higher margin plans. So likely they'll offset the revenue loss with more profit do to fatter margins.

    4. Re:Lost Customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .5% of 135 million at $100 a month adding $20 back in from the other .5% making it .5%(135m*$80) is a loss of $54 million a month...

    5. Re:Lost Customers by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 1

      Umm, no. The heavy users will pay the extra $20 and keep being heavy users since there is nowhere else they can go for the same price service, meanwhile the vast majority of grandfathered in users that I have talked to ( and I was one myself for many a year ) keep the unlimited data "in case of emergency" I.E. their internet at home goes down. Verizon will lose the people who didn't use an excessive amount of data, while STILL having to keep the big users.

      It's lose / lose. The customers lose their "safety net" and go somewhere else with cheaper data plans, and Verizon loses loyal customers ( all grandfathered in people have been with Verizon for more than a few years ). Verizon also gets bad PR, and bad word of mouth from the once loyal customers, who previously probably extolled the virtues of VZW.

      A happy long term customer is worth a LOT more than a new signed customer. You know the long term customer is going to stay if you keep with the times and don't try to screw them over, you also know they will pay their bills, and probably recommend you to friends and family. VZW should really learn this, the old steady customer is worth a lot more in the long turn than possibly flaky "carrier switching cruisers".

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
    6. Re:Lost Customers by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Umm, no. The heavy users will pay the extra $20 and keep being heavy users since there is nowhere else they can go for the same price service

      You just contradicted yourself. The whole reason why Verizon is trying to get people off of their grandfathered plans is because the heavy data usage costs Verizon more money. If being a heavy data user was more profitable for Verizon they would have never gotten rid of the unlimited plans to begin with.

      A happy long term customer is worth a LOT more than a new signed customer.

      Only if the long-term customer isn't one that costs more to support than a new user. And Verizon has already stated that these data-heavy users are more costly.

  26. Re:Eh? Sorry Verizon by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

    It never applied even for customers on a contract. GP apparently never read the contract they signed with Verizon.

  27. Re:Verizon = Darth Vader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it could be worse...

    This Deal's Getting Worse All The Time

  28. 20 bucks! I'm switching to a metered plan! NOT.... by Velociraptor101 · · Score: 1

    When you use more than 200 GB's a month, it takes more than 20 bucks to make you think about switching to a *uck everybody oops i mean a share everything plan... say they charge 20 bucks for 2 GB, so that would mean I'd have to pay 2000 dollars for 200 GB's... yeah I'll keep the unlimited... Also there has been some mention of letting grandfathered's use their upgrades... that's pure BS... The minute you press that button Verizon will put you on a minimum data plan and not tell you so they can get a big payday from you.. I haven't called customer service in four years because they'll move you off it in a second and CSR's get bonuses for doing it. I wonder what verizon's real world throughput per tower is.. because I'm betting they're using less than 10 % off of most rural towers... My point on that is they could easily handle a geometric increase in traffic with the bandwidth and towers they have and give everyone unlimited data but it's more profitable to meter to an insanely low threshold and charge 3x as much for an average customers unfettered usage...

  29. Re:Eh? Sorry Verizon by peon_a-z,A-Z,0-9$_+! · · Score: 1

    It only goes into effect on those who are "off-contract" and on month-to-month. If you are "on-contract" with unlimited data, it remains $29.99 until the end of your contract.

    Their contract lawyers have thought of everything so don't worry.

  30. Re:Eh? Sorry Verizon by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

    And the Supreme Court has upheld the forced arbitration clause which gives them even more leverage to fuck people over.

  31. Re:This is the future muslims want for us all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop spewing your bullshit, you disgusting hasbara troll. Fucking racist loser.

  32. Re:Verizon = Darth Vader by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

    So that's why Verizon got James Earl Jones to do their commercials.

  33. t-mobile by excursive · · Score: 1

    The t-mobile plan I have on my hotspot is unlimited in the sense that there will never be overage charges, but after a specified usage it reverts to a much slower connection. The main advantage is not having to worry about large unexpected charges.

    My Verizon hotspot has 15GB, but I have to watch to make sure I don't go over, because on their plan the overage charges add up very high very fast.

    Yes, I have two hotspots. One stays at home and is my full-time internet service there. The fastest DSN I can get in my location is half the speed of my mobile hotspot.

    I used to have a Sprint unlimited hotspot; they took that plan away from me, so I switched to a Clear device with an unlimited plan. That worked very well until Sprint bought Clear and turned off the local tower. So I dropped that plan and went to Verizon. That made me discover how much better Verizon coverage is, so I also switched my voice service. Sprint lost a couple of hundred dollars a month from me just because they were being greedy.
     

  34. We are are the Phone Company - We are Omnipotent, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apologies for the paraphrasing - We have one of the grandfathered unlimited plans with another company. Frankly, that is the primary reason we have stayed. If they decide to change that arrangement, that would be an incentive to look at alternatives. Up to now the pricing is still marginally better than the competition, but if it increases even $10/line then I definitely will search for another carrier.

  35. Re:This is the future muslims want for us all by Triklyn · · Score: 1

    ... wow, this is like... a nesting egg of awesome.

    one guys tosses in islamophobia... for some unknowable reason.
    the other guy assumes he's shilling for israel.

    We shoulda just given all the jews a state... maybe part of utah or part of new mexico... look what the mormons did with utah, and I at least think the jews are less crazy than the mormons. :)

    "You venture to call Ferdinand a wise ruler," he said to his courtiers — "he who has impoverished his own country and enriched mine!" Bayezid- ruler of ottoman empire on the explusion of jews and muslims from spain during the spanish inquisition.

  36. Turns out I dont need a hand held computer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I needed was phone.
    Fuc me once shame on you twice shame on me.

  37. AT&T raised throttling limit to 22GB by jmcbain · · Score: 1
    AT&T raised its throttling limit on its grandfathered unlimited plans on September 16 of this year. The new limit is 22GB.

    I'm sorry that you left AT&T and its unlimited plan. I've been with AT&T since 2008 and its unlimited plan. I pay $70/month, inclusive of everything.

  38. Re:This is the future muslims want for us all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one guy tosses in islamophobia... for some obvious reason -> he's shilling for israel.

    FTFY.

  39. Keep an eye on your data plan! by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    My phone is paid for by the company I work for, so data is Someone Else's Problem for now. My wife's phone is paid for by us, and she's been on the AT&T unlimited plan for ages. Every single time she's done equipment swaps, upgrades, any plan changes whatsoever, they very subtly try to sneak her out of the unlimited data plan. She's extremely savvy when it comes to this stuff, but it's amazing how slick they are when describing the change, and once you sign for the changes, you lose access to the old plan forever.

    Metered data is going to be the next thing that will force a change in the industry. Once the carriers start turning the prices up just a little too high, and as the massive amounts of data required for even basic Internet usage skyrocket, people will eventually complain.

  40. Re:This is the future muslims want for us all by Triklyn · · Score: 1

    nah, you don't need to shill for israel to be islamophobic.

    i'm under the impression that demographic-shifting waves of muslim immigration into europe have people slightly worried there on that front too... and those europeans are anti-semitic too.

    there's no reason he can't hate both muslims and jews, but had to choose one in this situation.

  41. Just saying "Thanks" by txoutback · · Score: 1

    Because you've been a loyal customer for more than 1/3 of your life, we're gonna put some Vaseline on this stick first. Consider how lucky you are.

  42. Must be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would gladly pay $20 more for truly unlimited data. But hey, Verizon happily brags about the fact that it doesn't throttle your data, it just charges you more for overage.

  43. Re:This is the future muslims want for us all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -you don't need to shill for israel to be islamophobic.

    No but islamophobia originated in israel. Nearly all anti-arab bigotry is propagated by the zionists.

    -and those europeans are anti-semitic too.

    Nice try.

    Busted, Tricky!

  44. Act Now, While Supplies Last... by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 1

    ...Free Super Cookies With Every Purchase!!!

  45. AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's hope AT&T doesn't get any ideas. I've been paying the same price for unlimited data for 6 years.

  46. Re:Verizon = Darth Vader by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    So that's why Verizon got James Earl Jones to do their commercials.

    It all makes sense now....

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  47. Does your carrier zero-rate music streaming? by rsborg · · Score: 1

    However, as time goes by, people use more and more data on their mobile devices. All of which requires additional investment or incentivising customers to lower their data usage.

    A few years ago, average data usage on one of the UK's mobile networks was c. 2GB per month. This year, average data usage on the same network is c. 4GB per month. I have an unlimited (genuinely unlimited) plan with the same network and my average monthly usage has gone from 2GB to 15GB in the same period of time.

    So, in spite of prices going up, we are probably actually seeing a decrease in the cost per unit used.

    I'm wondering how much of that is streaming music or video? Over here in the US, on Tmobile, I average about 1.5GB/mo with a lot of streaming, email and maps usage, but my music is zero-rated so it doesn't show up as used bandwidth.

    What's your usage pattern for 15GB/mo?

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  48. AT&T got me to give it up last year. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AT&T got me to off unlimited last year by lowering my bill, effectively giving me a free iphone 6 plus 64 gig, and enabling free tethering without a jailbreak. My wife and I now share 7 gigs a month with one month roll over so in any given month we usually have between 9-10 gigs should we need them. And as I said we pay less per month than we were before. It is basically a bet that unlimited will come back (like how talk and text how gone that way) before we find a reason to have to start paying attention to the amount of data we use. We were paying $162 a month for two phones, one with unlimited and the other with 2 gigs, and now we pay $150 per month.

  49. customer for 15+ years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    got to love the loyalty they have to their long term customers. they collect and sell all my information and they still are going to raise my rate by 20$ i really wish americans werent complete bitches when it comes to torching a companys infastructure when they give them the screw. im willing to believe after the 5th tower burns verizon might consider not screwing us for a change.

  50. Join Google Fi by thisisauniqueid · · Score: 1

    Google Fi is pretty darned awesome. It doesn't have unlimited data, but it's a flat $10/GB (only pay for what you use), and you pay the same rate roaming in 60 countries, albeit at 3G speeds.

  51. Class action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all need to try a class action lawsuit. There has to be a law. Adding taxes to your bill is one thing but has anyone ever been on a plan for a long time and the plan itself gone up? No. My dad had a phone for almost 10 years and had certain features no longer offered. They added taxes but never did the minute plan change price or did his text plan. Old ones just no longer offered and new ones were anyone interested send me an email TheRock40359@gmail.com and put "Verizon lawsuit" in the subject

  52. Re:Verizon = Darth Vader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lmfao

  53. Re:Verizon = Darth Vader by antdude · · Score: 1

    So, who is Luke Skywalker then? :P

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  54. Verizon wouldn't know the truth if it bit them... by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

    ...in the ass.

    They claim that less than 1% of their customers still have unlimited data. As if nobody remembers this time last year when they were talking about throttling grandfathered LTE service. Let me see if I can find the info from then...There it is. In August of 2014, they claimed that 20% of their customers still had unlimited data and 95% of those customers use less than 5 gigs of data.

    So I'm supposed to believe that they've managed to cull 95% of their grandfathered customers in the last year? Or were they lying a year ago when they claimed that 20% of their customers still had a data plan that hadn't been offered since, if memory serves, 2009. I signed up just before they stopped offering it then bought my next phone in 2011 just before they stopped renewing contracts and subsidizing phones.

    And, if they did manage to cut 95% of their unlimited customers in just a year by doing nothing but waiting, why would they bother taking additional action? If the holdouts are down to less than 1%, do they think $20 is going to be what pushes them over the edge?

    How am I supposed to take them seriously?