Slashdot Mirror
Australians Set To Pay 50% More For Apps After Apple Price Spike (heraldsun.com.au)
SlappingOysters writes: Within 36-hours the price of Apple apps is set to increase in Australia, Sweden and Indonesia. It will bring the price of buying an app out of alignment with the value of the Australian dollar, and leave the country's Apple fans paying 50% more for their iOS software than their American counterparts. It's unfortunate timing, with the recent launch of the iPhone 6s and the upcoming fourth generation of Apple TV.
Those photons are heavy.
Whoa, this is going to cost them! Oh wait, the App Store prices have hit rock bottom for a couple of years now, so I guess this is not going to cost them hardly anything at all.
Disclaimer: I'm an iOS developer who does barely anything in the App Store. Instead, I develop for clients who at least pay me decently.
8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
I have an iPhone 5s from work, and one of the benefits of these devices having so little storage coupled with the bloating of applications in the last couple of years is that is that it's just too much of a pain in the arse to install a new app. There is very little to entice me to spend money on the app store. ;)
Now I just wish all those websites that try to push you to their pointless app would stop interrupting my browsing.
You should consider setting up manufacturing home, or if that's too expensive, maybe Papua New Guinea. Heck, even Philippines, Thailand & Vietnam are close enough
They were just holding off until after the TPP was signed.
"out of alignment with the value of the Australian dollar,"
Sounds like Apple disagrees.
It is simply the us price converted to aud, plus GST. The Aussie dollar has dropped from parity to 0.75/USD.
Yup, exactly. Not sure why people are bitching about it.
The title of the parent post is totally misleading and shows a clear sign of not having passed basic algebra. Australians are going to pay 15% more for their apps and not 50%.
First $1 AU = 0.70 US. Taking currency conversion into consideration, this means that a 0.99 App in the US store would cost $1.29 AU.
Next, we see that that $1.29 apps are being raised to $1.49. That's a $0.20 AU or a 15% price hike.
Converting that back to US, we see that the equivalent cost is $1.09 US vs the original $0.99 US. This $0.10 US difference equates to an actual 10% markup between the AU and the US markets.
I would have to assume that Apple is passing on their operational overhead costs in the pricing of apps.
Something to think about - developers are permitted to set the price of their apps. In the US, other than free, the minimum cost is $0.99 as that is the lowest tier that Apple permits. Should developers be forced to take a pay cut because they are selling in a market with a poor currency exchange rate or should they be permitted to sell their wares at a specific price they deem appropriate?
Given that Apple is going to reintroduce a $0.99 tier in those markets, should developers be expected to sell their apps at a 30% discount in the US as well? After the Apple tax of 30% on goods sold in the store, the developer makes a $0.50 on an item they originally sold for $0.99. Is that fair?
If developers are willing to take such a hit on their profits at the benefit of maybe selling more at the lower price and gaining a PR boost, then we will see them moving to the $0.99 plan in those poorer performing markets.
Because price parity has never been a two way street. Each corporation likes to set the price to what they believe the market will bear. Any excuse like currency fluctuation allows them to use another reason to up the price. When the AUD eventually rises, you can bet the prices will not be reduced and realigned. That's why "people are bitching about it."
Comment removed based on user account deletion
The summary is bs as usual. The story says apps are going from 1.29 to 1.49 which in US dollars comes to .79 and 1.09. 10% more than the us, not 50%. I'm guessing they anticipate a further slide in the near future.
"In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson
who wouldn't take the opportunity to gtfo of the middle east?
Unlike in the US where taxes are separate, GST (10%) is included in the app store price.
$0.99 US pre-tax + 10% GST = $1.089 US post-tax
currently $1 US = 1.3713 AUD
so $1.089 US = 1.4933457 AUD
So Aussies are in fact getting a $0.0033457 AUD discount over the US.
us 99c = AUD 1.36 at todays rate. Australia, like most countries, includes tax in the quoted price, so add 10% tax to get $1.49 . The only surprise here is that Apple actually collects and pays the tax.
Why don't they flee to other Muslim countries?
Because many of those countries have the same regimes that they are fleeing from.
[Rent This Space]
You know, there is this thing called a price curve. At $0.99 you sell 10,000 copies of your cool game,
at $0.79 you sell 20,000 copies, or maybe only 5,000. The price of a game does effect how many copies
you sell, so just blindly assuming that developers "take a hit on their profit" because the price goes down
to $0.79 is a very simplistic view.
The distance between point A and point B is not the primary drive of costs of maritime shipping. Australia's problem is they have about five or six container ports which makes shipping to Australia horrendously cost inefficient due to their total population. Any one port cannot handle the total tonnage coming into Australia, which means container vessels are diverted among all of these ports and either have to spend more time loading and unloading to get to the goods being shipped to Australia or run in underloaded both of which cost money and drive up the costs to ship to Australia.
There is a push right now to contract Australia to a single international container port and instead have local coastal shipping services handle delivery to the other container ports which would help in bringing down shipping costs by reducing the overhead costs of time spent in port or underloaded container vessels.
"Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
Don't just blame Apple for all this. Blame the Australian government and their protectionist policies that enable companies to take advantage of customers because they have no alternatives.
Go to Australia and you will see ridiculously priced cars, books, food items, software, tons of other consumer items. All protected from imports in the name of "promoting Australian industry", i.e. protecting them from competition.
Software licenses that cost 2-3x in the US or 10x in India. And books? Are you kidding? Books? No -- it is real. Australian authors "protected" from competition by charging more for books from overseas. As if you can promote Australian writing by taxing foreign books more...
These are the idiots that we put in charge of our interests.
Foster's is piss that they export to gullible people and sell to tourists. They've got a few good beers in Australia. Foster's is not one of them.
"So long and thanks for all the fish."
No, the issue would be that you need to pay in US dollars. So, you still need to take the hit on the exchange rate.
Something that costs $1.49AUD costs $0.98USD, after you take in to account the current exchange rate of 73c per $1AUD and the 10% sales tax included in the $1.49
The aussie dollar has plummeted against the greenback.
At the start if the year it was 80c,
Mid 2014 it was 95c
From 2011 to 2013 it was around $1.00
Australians are getting apps for 1% less than Americans.
The summary is bs as usual. The story says apps are going from 1.29 to 1.49 which in US dollars comes to .79 and 1.09. 10% more than the us, not 50%. I'm guessing they anticipate a further slide in the near future.
It's Australian maths. $1.49 (Australian) is clearly 50 percent more than $0.99 (US).
Veblen software. Now I've seen it all...
Ezekiel 23:20
The guy with iphone has as much control over the exchange rate as Apple or you do, "absolutely fuck-all".
And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
It seems as though much of the traffic into Australia is via fiber optic submarine cables such as the Southern Cross Cable (3.6 Tbits/sec), but I don't know how this compares to the amount of data shipped in via electron oscillations.
The number of Christians in this discussion are miniscule. Christians were there in the rebel held strongholds of Aleppo and Homs, from where they were driven out by the Free Syrian Army, and fled to Lebanon and Europe already. The ones currently fleeing Syria are not Christians. In fact, a lot of Iraqi Christians had fled Iraq as well.
The vast majority of Syrians are Sunni Arabs. They are definitely 'religious' (read Jihadi): you are projecting the characterestics of the Baath regime onto the population that they mutually despise. The Baath Party was/is (for Iraq/Syria) a party of socialists belonging to minority Muslim sects. In Iraq, that minority was Sunni Arabs: in Syria, that minority was Alawites. As a result, both countries looked secular due to their opposition to the majority Muslim sects, who would define what Islamic means in their respective countries. In Iraq, it means Shia, which is the de-facto definition today in Baghdad, while in Syria, it means Sunni, which is what ISIS has defined, but which even other Syrian opposition forces, be it FAS or al-Nusra or Khorasan have it.
For the vast majority of Syrians, who are Sunnis, there are plenty of neighboring options where to flee. Jordan is one, and they've already taken in a lot, as have Lebanon. But the other countries more to their south - Saudi Arabia in particular - has plenty of space in which to house them. It is a lot smoother transition than anywhere in Europe, or even Turkey, for that matter. For one, the distance is a lot shorter than the distance to Europe, and there are no seas in b/w where they'd drown trying to get there. The people are Sunni Arabs in both countries, so neither language nor religion would be an issue. It's a lie that Syrian Sunnis are secular: most of them owe allegiance to the Ikhwan/Muslim Brotherhood. Only difference b/w Syrian and Saudis are that the Saudis base their Islamic laws on Hanbali jurisprudence, while the Syrians do a combination of Hanafi and Shafi'i. That's peanuts compared to the differences b/w Syrians and Germans/Austrians/Hungarians/Romanians/Serbs.
In fact, Europe's utopian approach to the refugee crisis has been wrong all along. It should have been to put pressure on the GCC to take in the refugees, who are more similar to them, and would assimilate a lot easier, if needed. Give a major incentive to the Saudis and others to stabilize Syria, rather than fund their own Jihadi groups there. Once Saudi Arabia has millions of Syrian refugees, they'll be very determined to restore a situation in Syria where the refugees can return.
A more humane approach would be to move them all to the Arabian peninsula countries, and let them handle it any which way