Google Is Removing the Desktop Notification Center From Chrome (chromium.org)

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Google Is Removing the Desktop Notification Center From Chrome (chromium.org)

Posted by Soulskill on Wednesday October 14, 2015 @04:38AM from the you-don't-need-to-know-things-when-they-happen dept.

An anonymous reader writes: Google today announced it is removing the notification center from Chrome for Windows, Mac, and Linux. The reason the company is giving for the change is simple: "In practice, few users visit the notification center." The notification center in Chrome OS will remain. Google said this change will take effect for Windows, Mac, and Linux users "in the upcoming release." To be clear, this is not in reference to yesterday's Chrome 46 launch — the notification center is still there. We thus expect that the notification center will thus be removed in Chrome 47, which is slated to arrive in about six weeks.

116 comments

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Yes, but.... by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 04:44 · Score: 1

Removing Google from the desktop could be advantageous also.
1. Re:Yes, but.... by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 16:08 · Score: 0
  
  There's a notification centre in Chrome?
2. Re:Yes, but.... by Lord+Bitman · 2015-10-15 13:34 · Score: 1
  
  That's the problem with this story.
  "Nobody uses this thing... I guess we should get rid of it completely. I guess people don't want to access their missed notifications"
  I *knew* the thing existed, and I still couldn't get to it when I wanted it.
  
  --
  -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
Who used it? by gstoddart · 2015-10-14 04:46 · Score: 5, Insightful

Why would I want my web browser to give me desktop notifications? Why the hell would I want a website to give me push notifications even if my browser is closed?
Somehow apparently Google decided what users really wanted was an annoying and intrusive browser, when nothing could be further from the truth.
Definitely a feature which needed to be disabled as soon as it was discovered.

--
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
1. Re:Who used it? by tripleevenfall · 2015-10-14 04:47 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  I've been looking for something like the notification center ever since I lost my Bonzi Buddy :(
2. Re:Who used it? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 04:58 · Score: 0
  
  ^ YES
3. Re:Who used it? by gmack · 2015-10-14 05:02 · Score: 1
  
  Keep in mind that they are using it to push chrome apps as desktop apps. A good example of this is Google hangouts which does not have a native app with voice/video and so uses chrome as it's platform.
4. Re:Who used it? by gstoddart · 2015-10-14 05:07 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  Keep in mind that they are using it to push chrome apps as desktop apps
  Yeah, not bloody interested.
  It's a web browser. It needs to stay as a web browser. Don't try to integrate with my desktop. Don't create new vectors for shitware to get inroads into my OS. Show me a damned web page, and then STFU.
  Stop trying to make the #*()%^$&*( web browser part of my desktop. It doesn't belong there, and I'm not interested in it.
  It's "innovative" stuff like this which turns into security holes.
  
  --
  Lost at C:>. Found at C.
5. Re:Who used it? by Luthair · 2015-10-14 05:12 · Score: 1
  
  Personally it never actually notified me of anything, I had forgotten it existed until recently when I accidentally clicked on it and it mentioned I had a delivery. Unfortunately this could have been useful, e.g. calendar (still nothing good exists on the desktop imo), flights, traffic, etc.
6. Re:Who used it? by jedidiah · 2015-10-14 05:17 · Score: 3, Insightful
  
  > Why would I want my web browser to give me desktop notifications? Why the hell would I want a website to give me push notifications even if my browser is closed?
  web applications.
  The same reason for a normal application. You might not have your eyes glued on it 24/7 and you might want some indication that you need to go look at it again.
  
  --
  A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
7. Re:Who used it? by markhb · 2015-10-14 05:17 · Score: 1
  
  I could see it being a useful feature in companies that have switched from Outlook to GMail (although I don't work for such a company and use Firefox at home).
  
  --
  Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
8. Re:Who used it? by grimmjeeper · 2015-10-14 05:35 · Score: 2
  
  But how are they going to monetize all of the revenue streams if they can't push a bunch of crap on you that you don't want?
9. Re:Who used it? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 05:47 · Score: 0
  
  That's because apps are APPIER than LUDDITE software, and Google knows that only apps can app apps!
  
  Apps!
10. Re:Who used it? by XxtraLarGe · 2015-10-14 05:48 · Score: 1
  
  Why would I want my web browser to give me desktop notifications? Why the hell would I want a website to give me push notifications even if my browser is closed?
  It may be an organizational thing, but I seem to recall that we had to intentionally turn it on. Since my institution decided to swallow the Google pill instead of the Microsoft one, Desktop notifications are useful if I'm doing something other than browsing the web to get my meeting updates from calendars, chat requests, etc. Since I do some web development, I'm usually switching between browsers as well to test different things out, so I might not always be using Chrome or even have it running.
  
  --
  Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
11. Re:Who used it? by biojayc · 2015-10-14 05:55 · Score: 1
  
  Keep in mind that they are using it to push chrome apps as desktop apps
  Yeah, not bloody interested.
  It's a web browser. It needs to stay as a web browser. Don't try to integrate with my desktop. Don't create new vectors for shitware to get inroads into my OS. Show me a damned web page, and then STFU.
  Stop trying to make the #*()%^$&*( web browser part of my desktop. It doesn't belong there, and I'm not interested in it.
  It's "innovative" stuff like this which turns into security holes.
  Tell us how you really feel?
  To me the problem is about expectations. People have come to expect that the browser just requests information and displays it and then does nothing else. I think there is a place for a web app though, as it's really know different than a desktop app accept that the front end is html+javascript rather than native code, and it can be updated with just a server deployment rather than requiring everyone download the new version. This just isn't how people have come to expect a web browser to work (myself included). Perhaps if there was a separate chrome platform apart from the chrome browser it would work better.
12. Re:Who used it? by hawguy · 2015-10-14 06:18 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  Why would I want my web browser to give me desktop notifications? Why the hell would I want a website to give me push notifications even if my browser is closed?
  Somehow apparently Google decided what users really wanted was an annoying and intrusive browser, when nothing could be further from the truth.
  Definitely a feature which needed to be disabled as soon as it was discovered.
  Because you get your emails, calendar appointments, and chat messages in your web browser?
13. Re:Who used it? by fluffernutter · 2015-10-14 06:20 · Score: 1
  
  Just out of interest.... I used to rely on SMS notifications from Google for reminders. Now that is gone. How can I get these reminders without having some sort of widget on my desktop? Keep in mind I can't use push email because my battery doesn't last. Too much spam.
  
  --
  Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
14. Re:Who used it? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 06:51 · Score: 0
  
  Yes, but why the fuck does it have to be HTML requested from a web server? Why can't it be Win32 controls created from a program, or Windows.UI controls created from a XAML file, or NSView/UIView objects created from an XIB file, or GTKWidget objects created from a GnomeBuilder file? Those are totally different and blar blar blargh APP APP COW MOO or whatever the latest slashdot trolling trend is
15. Re:Who used it? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 07:14 · Score: 0
  
  I thought MS tried that with Active Desktop...
16. Re:Who used it? by squiggleslash · 2015-10-14 07:17 · Score: 1
  
  Disclaimer: No idea what the "Notification center" is, that sounds like they're talking about something you explicitly go to.
  But... certain applications, such as GMail, are also web pages, and you'd expect applications like email clients to notify you of new messages.
  I was asked recently to integrate a third party "live helpdesk" widget into a website I maintain. It was one of those things that you click on and you get an IM-style chat with a helpdesk support person. On the helpdesk end, the third party service was implemented as a webpage that used notifications to warn logged in users that a "call" was coming in.
  So, yeah, it's potentially a useful technology. It's a little awkward though, the potential for abuse means a clumsy permissions front-end on most browsers that users tend to have problems with when a legitimate webpage asks them to allow it to put up notifications.
  
  --
  You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
17. Re:Who used it? by swillden · 2015-10-14 07:48 · Score: 1
  
  But how are they going to monetize all of the revenue streams if they can't push a bunch of crap on you that you don't want?
  Also, how are your e-mail, calendar and instant messaging web apps going to notify you of messages and appointments?
  
  --
  Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
18. Re:Who used it? by grimmjeeper · 2015-10-14 07:54 · Score: 1
  
  There are other notification methods available in standard HTML.
19. Re:Who used it? by swillden · 2015-10-14 08:08 · Score: 1
  
  There are other notification methods available in standard HTML.
  But only if the tab is open. The idea with the notification center (and the W3C standardized version Google is switching to) was to enable notifications even when you've closed the relevant tab.
  
  --
  Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
20. Re:Who used it? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 08:08 · Score: 0
  
  aww i kinda miss ol bonzi buddy. that was one acquisition opportunity microsoft completely whiffed on. he would have made the perfect BFF for clippy and we'd still have office assistant today.
21. Re:Who used it? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 08:13 · Score: 0
  
  One would have thought the lesson had been learned back with Windows' IE integration. Some bad ideas just never die.
22. Re:Who used it? by grimmjeeper · 2015-10-14 08:25 · Score: 2
  
  So leave the tab open.
23. Re:Who used it? by almitydave · 2015-10-14 08:51 · Score: 1
  
  I could see it being a useful feature in companies that have switched from Outlook to GMail (although I don't work for such a company and use Firefox at home).
  There's an app for that! It's called Thunderbird.
  Chrome, with two tabs open (Gmail & calendar): 9 processes, 585MB of memory
  Thunderbird with integrated Gmail, calendar, and chat: 1 process, 230MB of memory
  
  --
  my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
  I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
24. Re:Who used it? by almitydave · 2015-10-14 08:52 · Score: 1
  
  Besides which, I think you can actually use Outlook for Gmail.
  
  --
  my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
  I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
25. Re:Who used it? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 09:31 · Score: 0
  
  i actually do want that, it's kinda handy when you want notifications from constantly updating websites. the desktop notification thing is poorly implemented and poorly supported and should be opt in rather than automatically installed and impossible to use.
26. Re:Who used it? by swillden · 2015-10-15 01:30 · Score: 1
  
  So leave the tab open.
  And if you don't want to leave the tab, or even the window open, but still want to be notified when e-mail arrives, then you can answer "yes" when the site asks if you want notifications. The default on the current notification center, and almost certainly on the coming standardized versionl, is to ask on a per-site basis whether or not you want to allow that site to notify you. So, there is no pushing "a bunch of crap on you that you don't want". If you don't want it, you click "no", and you don't get it.
  Notifications are a useful feature, and totally under user control.
  
  --
  Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
27. Re:Who used it? by grimmjeeper · 2015-10-15 02:21 · Score: 1
  
  There are these things called applications. You can start them and run them. They can even connect to other computers over the internet. We used to use them for things like email and word processing before all the hipsters started trying to do everything in a web browser. You should try it. It's "retro".
28. Re:Who used it? by swillden · 2015-10-15 02:53 · Score: 1
  
  There are these things called applications. You can start them and run them. They can even connect to other computers over the internet. We used to use them for things like email and word processing before all the hipsters started trying to do everything in a web browser. You should try it. It's "retro".
  Bah. BTDT, the web is more convenient, which is why it has taken over and relatively few people use local applications for inherently-connected operations like e-mail.
  It's interesting to me that on mobile devices we've been going the opposite direction, though much of that is probably driven by performance. Web apps are very convenient, but not terribly efficient compared to local native binaries. On laptops and desktops that performance differential doesn't matter much. On mobile devices, it does. Today. In a few years that will likely change.
  
  --
  Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
29. Re:Who used it? by swillden · 2015-10-15 02:55 · Score: 1
  
  There are these things called applications. You can start them and run them. They can even connect to other computers over the internet. We used to use them for things like email and word processing before all the hipsters started trying to do everything in a web browser. You should try it. It's "retro".
  Oh, it also occurs to me that if you really prefer that, you shouldn't be using slashdot. USENET with a dedicated NNTP reader app would be much better for you. If you're too young to know what those acronyms mean, Google 'em. Sorry, I don't have a non-web recommendation for searching the web.
  
  --
  Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
30. Re:Who used it? by grimmjeeper · 2015-10-15 03:16 · Score: 0
  
  Someone has a lot of sand in his mangina this morning. LOL
31. Re:Who used it? by lsatenstein · 2015-10-15 08:48 · Score: 1
  
  Why would I want my web browser to give me desktop notifications? Why the hell would I want a website to give me push notifications even if my browser is closed?
  Somehow apparently Google decided what users really wanted was an annoying and intrusive browser, when nothing could be further from the truth.
  Definitely a feature which needed to be disabled as soon as it was discovered.
  Gnome Linux already includes desktop notification. Eg. if I run a compile job in the background, I receive a popup notification when the job is completed. Ditto for file transfers, etc.
  
  --
  Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
32. Re:Who used it? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-15 09:40 · Score: 0
  
  It's mostly useful for content updates, such as chat sites when new posts arrive. Slack uses it.
  I don't mind it as it can be shut off completely. I'd rather have that ability using a web based "light" app rather than have to install some fat client for every communication medium I use.
  Too bad google doesn't just leave it in and have it disabled by default, allowing the user to turn it on if they want that functionality.
33. Re:Who used it? by swillden · 2015-10-16 02:53 · Score: 1
  
  I've never understood why people bother with posts like that one. I suppose I should thank you for letting me know that I should just ignore you in the future.
  
  --
  Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
34. Re:Who used it? by grimmjeeper · 2015-10-16 03:07 · Score: 1
  
  This coming from someone who is so frustrated he goes on a tirade about me going back to 80's tech? You are a funny guy. Worth a good laugh.
  Here's a hint. If you start making things personal, people will dismiss you with insulting retorts and ignore you.
35. Re:Who used it? by Evan+Langlois · 2015-10-19 04:18 · Score: 1
  
  My Gnome desktop notifies me about all those things without Chrome. Seamless integration for chats, calendars, contacts ... I don't even open the equivalent Gnome apps, but since I clicked the "OK to Sync" buttons for these items when I gave it my Google Account info, they integrate. I use the desktop search to find contacts - never saw it import. I just know my phone and desktop are in perfect sync. Windows users will have to run about 100 hacks and spyware-laden tools to get anything similar. And as a Web Developer, switching browsers makes no sense. Don't you mean that you have 3 different browsers open at once? Why close it? Oh yeah, Microsoft memory management blows. If my browser did notifications, it would just duplicate stuff, and I'd have to remember to have that particular tab open. Doesn't sound very user friendly to me.
Already gone in Dev channel by The+MAZZTer · 2015-10-14 04:47 · Score: 2

It's annoying because it FEELS like a bug. There's no way to view Google Now cards, or to access the "clear all" button, or the "do not disturb" functionality.
Desktop Notification? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 04:47 · Score: 0

Why not remove all the spy features instead? Shows where their priorities are.
1. Re:Desktop Notification? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 04:53 · Score: 0
  
  What spy features?
2. Re:Desktop Notification? by ZipK · 2015-10-14 05:05 · Score: 4, Funny
  
  What spy features?
  Cyanide cigarette, tape recorder camera, dagger shoe, garrote watch, underwater jet pack, oil slick tail pipe.
3. Re: Desktop Notification? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 05:16 · Score: 2, Funny
  
  How about the one that told them that nobody was using it
4. Re:Desktop Notification? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 05:36 · Score: 0
  
  Because they make too much money. This didn't.
5. Re: Desktop Notification? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 05:36 · Score: 0
  
  Ding! Ding!
  We have a winner!
6. Re: Desktop Notification? by BronsCon · 2015-10-14 06:06 · Score: 1
  
  You mean the opt-in telemetry reporting that you have to enable during install? Spying is typically much more covert than that.
  
  --
  APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
7. Re: Desktop Notification? by amRadioHed · 2015-10-14 07:18 · Score: 1
  
  If you don't like it why did you enable it?
  
  --
  We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
I'm using Google Chrome now by I'm+New+Around+Here · 2015-10-14 04:48 · Score: 3

I have no idea what the Desktop Notification Center is, or how to find it. I even followed a couple links in that post, and still have no idea how to access it. One link says to pull it up from the System Tray, but I have no Google icon there.
I can see why they are disabling the feature. No one knows about it.

--
If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
1. Re:I'm using Google Chrome now by gstoddart · 2015-10-14 04:57 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  Settings > Show Advanced Settings > Privacy > Content Settings > Notifications.
  Pretty much I went through that whole Content Settings section and selected "oh hell no" on day one of having Chrome.
  Let a web page give push notifications to my desktop? No, hell no, oh god no, please fuck off and go away no. Just no.
  I just want a damned web browser. That's it.
  
  --
  Lost at C:>. Found at C.
2. Re:I'm using Google Chrome now by Snotnose · 2015-10-14 04:58 · Score: 1
  
  This. I never heard of it before this article. That said, I don't see why I would need or even want it. It's a farkin browser for $diety's sake.
3. Re:I'm using Google Chrome now by MagicM · 2015-10-14 05:02 · Score: 1
  
  Same here. I allow Chrome to show notifications from Gmail, and those pop up whenever I get new mail. I still have no idea what the "Notification Center" is.
4. Re:I'm using Google Chrome now by Carewolf · 2015-10-14 05:17 · Score: 2
  
  Settings > Show Advanced Settings > Privacy > Content Settings > Notifications.
  Pretty much I went through that whole Content Settings section and selected "oh hell no" on day one of having Chrome.
  Let a web page give push notifications to my desktop? No, hell no, oh god no, please fuck off and go away no.
  It requires explicit persmission from the user before sending any, and is useful if you are using webmail, web-based calender or a web-based chat/conference solution. For ChromeOS it makes sense because everything there is a web-app, so it is the way to make notifications.
5. Re:I'm using Google Chrome now by fahrbot-bot · 2015-10-14 05:43 · Score: 4, Insightful
  Let a web page give push notifications to my desktop? No, hell no, oh god no, please fuck off and go away no. Just no.
  I just want a damned web browser. That's it.
  Anyway we can get Mozilla to create survey pages for the various "features" they're cramming into Firefox with multiple choice options like that? Because, I'd like to have just a damned web browser too...
  
  Yes
  
  No
  
  Hell No
  
  Oh God No.
  
  Please fuck off and go away.
  --
  It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
6. Re:I'm using Google Chrome now by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 06:52 · Score: 0
  
  Kinda useful for Slack and stuff like that
7. Re:I'm using Google Chrome now by swillden · 2015-10-14 07:43 · Score: 1
  
  I just want a damned web browser. That's it.
  What's a web browser?
  My web browser is my e-mail client, appointment calendar, instant messaging app, social media client and a lot more. And for many of those things I actually *do* want notifications. Of course, because my web browser is all of those things I don't actually need notifications when the browser is closed, because the browser is never closed.
  But if I had realized I could get notifications even when the browser isn't running, maybe I would close the browser. Probably not.
  
  --
  Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
8. Re:I'm using Google Chrome now by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 08:10 · Score: 0
  
  > and is useful if you are using webmail,
  No it isn't. There already exists an API in HTML5 to display popup notifications when needed. This notification center is nothing more than the continued desire to turn desktops into fucking smartphones.
9. Re:I'm using Google Chrome now by countach74 · 2015-10-14 08:39 · Score: 1
  
  The notification settings that the GP referenced is simply the UI to configure permissions for the HTML 5 notifications API that you're referring to. What makes things confusing is that Chrome also has a different notification API available to extensions and chrome apps. But I'm pretty sure those can't be configured because permission for those features are granted at install time for the extension/app in question.
  What I'm confused about is this: Are they removing the Chrome-specific notifications API and leaving the HTML 5 API intact? I assume that's a yes. And if so, I think that's a good thing.
10. Re:I'm using Google Chrome now by Carewolf · 2015-10-14 09:21 · Score: 1
  
  > and is useful if you are using webmail,
  No it isn't. There already exists an API in HTML5 to display popup notifications when needed.
  
  Yes, that is what we are talking about. What are YOU talking about?
11. Re:I'm using Google Chrome now by jrumney · 2015-10-14 12:32 · Score: 1
  
  What makes things confusing is that Chrome also has a different notification API available to extensions and chrome apps. But I'm pretty sure those can't be configured because permission for those features are granted at install time for the extension/app in question.
  That would explain why pushbullet is not in the list of permitted sites, but I get notifications from it then.
12. Re:I'm using Google Chrome now by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 15:14 · Score: 0
  
  My web browser is my e-mail client, appointment calendar, instant messaging app, social media client and a lot more.
  
  And all of those functions take place in the Google Mothership because you're a GoogleBot who lives on nothing but the kool-aid. You can seek out and turn these little features on yourself so that you don't get lonely outside of Google's protective gaze.
  Honestly, I wonder why gstoddart (or anyone who isn't a exhibitionist creepshow) even uses Chrome to begin with...
13. Re:I'm using Google Chrome now by swillden · 2015-10-15 01:41 · Score: 1
  
  My web browser is my e-mail client, appointment calendar, instant messaging app, social media client and a lot more.
  And all of those functions take place in the Google Mothership because you're a GoogleBot who lives on nothing but the kool-aid. You can seek out and turn these little features on yourself so that you don't get lonely outside of Google's protective gaze.
  Or it could be that they're useful and more convenient than using multiple separate apps and doing the work needed to get the data synchronized to my phone... the same reason that hundreds of millions of other people use them.
  
  --
  Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
chrome 47 by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 04:55 · Score: 0

did you ever wonder why the numbers are so big? usually people do major releases and point releases. why dont they do that?
1. Re: chrome 47 by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 05:02 · Score: 0
  
  Bigger version numbers mean it's better.
2. Re:chrome 47 by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 06:54 · Score: 0
  
  Major releases are meaningless on the web from a semantic versioning perspective. We never break backwards compatibility, ever. Basically, if the large number irks you so much, then imagine a 1 and a period in front of it. There. It's Chrome 1.47 now. Happy?
Good by sexconker · 2015-10-14 04:55 · Score: 4, Informative

The "notifications center" is the fucking shit that lives in the system tray 24/7 and spams you when shittysite.com wants to send you a notification, even after you've closed the tab. Websites pushing notifications that you didn't send a GET request for is an absolutely horrid idea, and I hope this is an indication that Google is giving up on it.
1. Re:Good by fhage · 2015-10-14 05:30 · Score: 1
  
  The "notifications center" is the fucking shit that lives in the system tray 24/7 and spams you when shittysite.com wants to send you a notification, even after you've closed the tab. Websites pushing notifications that you didn't send a GET request for is an absolutely horrid idea, and I hope this is an indication that Google is giving up on it.
  Is getting a notification you are about to be hit by a tornado a horrid idea?
  Push (subscription based) notification can be pretty useful. It's been around a long time, in many forms. I doubt Google is giving up on the concept.
2. Re:Good by war4peace · 2015-10-14 06:05 · Score: 2
  
  I have it, never got shitty notifications, only buggy ones.
  Somehow Google got this Google Maps weird setting in its head and notifies me on a daily basis about how congested the route from home to work is. Now, it would be a nice thing to have, except:
  1. I have no idea how it got enabled;
  2. It notifies me at 8 AM but my shift starts at 5 PM.
  3. I have no idea how to edit or disable it.
  The technology has potential, if implemented correctly. IMO its implementation was a fucking catastrophe.
  
  --
  ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
3. Re:Good by ArchieBunker · 2015-10-14 06:12 · Score: 1
  
  Never encountered this before in my life.
  
  --
  Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
4. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 06:20 · Score: 0
  
  But then how will you receive the latest news and updates from Marimba Castanet?
  Seriously, though, this was Google's attempt at reimplementing "push" for web-based gmail and calendar (without going through a MUA or calendar program on the client end, since you can't trust a client-side program to show ads). The problem, of course, was that web-based gmail and calendar suck, and that some things should be handled by local clients (especially when there's the possibility of not having internet access).
5. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 07:35 · Score: 0
  
  Is getting a notification you are about to be hit by a tornado a horrid idea?
  Push (subscription based) notification can be pretty useful. It's been around a long time, in many forms. I doubt Google is giving up on the concept.
  I would NEVER rely on ANY web connected device to give me timely severe weather notifications. That's why I have a good old-fashioned weather alert radio. Proven technology from the 1950s, nationwide by the 1970s, still expanding today. Runs on batteries, less than $20. No subscription.
6. Re:Good by 93+Escort+Wagon · 2015-10-14 07:50 · Score: 1
  
  Yeah, Waze does this too - it tells me about significant congestion that will impact my commute. Thing is, it seems to tell me about it regardless of whether I am ever traveling at that time of day. For that matter, most of the time I take a train, so I'm not driving to work at all... (not that Waze could understand that of course)
  Guess I just need to remove Waze from the notification center. I've left it alone for a while, thinking sometime there might actually be something useful that comes up... but nope.
  
  --
  #DeleteChrome
Amazing by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 04:56 · Score: 0

What an incredibly important piece of "News for Nerds"!
Google Is doing whatever they want by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 05:01 · Score: 0

Google is doing whatever they want whenever they want to do it to whomever they want to do it at all times. they are beholden to nobody they can do whatever they feel like they never suffer consequences and they are in cahoots with the government.
What??? by Vlijmen+Fileer · 2015-10-14 05:03 · Score: 1

Google has a browser that generates desktop notifications?
I never noticed. My virus scanner must have caught them, and so it should. Derailed Google fools, what was in their heads, soup?
Good thing they're removing it.
1. Re:What??? by Luthair · 2015-10-14 05:14 · Score: 1
  
  Wait a minute, you're still using a virus scanner and still have the gall to complain about technology? :)
Pushbullet by craters · 2015-10-14 05:03 · Score: 4, Interesting

How will this affect Pushbullet (https://www.pushbullet.com/)? I've come to rely on that a lot. I believe it uses Chrome notifications.
1. Re:Pushbullet by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 06:52 · Score: 0
  
  Don't you know the pattern by now?
  Par for the course, of course!
  It will die on the vine.
2. Re:Pushbullet by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 08:22 · Score: 0
  
  The website you linked has a Windows application. Additionally, note that a quick Google search yielded a few methods of integrating pushbullet with Growl notifications, which may also serve the purpose.
W3C Push API by Njovich · 2015-10-14 05:03 · Score: 4, Informative

This is mostly a change in API, Google is now pushing for the W3C Push API to become the standard for web push notifications. This (amongst other things) allows developers to use the same much more commonly used push code used for Android notifications (Google Cloud Messaging) to send messages to web browsers. As Google is trying to push this API, having it's own internal (and hardly used) competitor doesn't make sense.
1. Re:W3C Push API by Scorpinox · 2015-10-14 05:11 · Score: 1
  
  It's too bad the Push API is such a mess to implement. It feels like an afterthought to make it available as an API, like Google wanted push notifications for their own sites and thought, "eh what the hell, expose this narrow-use-case API to web developers too."
2. Re:W3C Push API by Njovich · 2015-10-14 05:18 · Score: 2
  
  Yes, if you follow the docs it's not really hard but feels like a mess... There is no way to send any payload or data with the message, they use registration id's which are depricated in real GCM, the service-worker and manifest seem overkill just to receive a message, and you need HTTPS for the service-worker (which is fine for production, but a bit of a pain for development). Hopefully they will improve things in the coming times.
3. Re:W3C Push API by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 07:46 · Score: 0
  
  Ah, I was about to say why they were dropping an actual spec feature.
  I never realized it was their own implementation.
  Push API is pretty damn handy for various uses.
  Of course, you will have the retarded whiners on here who will moan and bitch at a feature they don't even understand and cry about how it will hack and destroy their lives. You need to give a site permission to destroy your life first, kiddos.
  The whitelisting systems in place for the entire new spec of features since WhatWG took over are actually really solid. This is no ActiveX-tier crap.
  The Push spec needs some tidying up though. And more features. It feels horribly limited.
Doesn't Affect Web Notifications by Scorpinox · 2015-10-14 05:12 · Score: 3, Informative

Note that the chrome rich notification center is different from the standardized Web Notifications API https://developer.mozilla.org/...
This story kind of freaked me out at first because I thought it was referring to that Web Notifications API, which I rely on heavily for web based chat and email apps.
Re:The Republucan rulers... by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 05:14 · Score: 0

They hate us and are destroying lives with their decisions, like the one to drop Wave which caused me to lose my job and thus my house and wife, but I wouldn't go so far as to say they're racists that want to kill most of humanity. Calling them Republicans is hyperbole.
Amazing Update by Annacollins · 2015-10-14 05:20 · Score: 1

But if they also focus on increasing the browsing speed that will good for the users.
Seconded! by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 05:20 · Score: 0

n/t
Nobody used it because they never finished it by Tony+Isaac · 2015-10-14 05:25 · Score: 1

I tried it for a while, but it didn't work well. Once you saw an email notification, for example, it would keep showing it to you anyway. You couldn't choose to exclude notification types JUST from the desktop (without affecting your Chrome or Android notifications). Basically, it was always half-baked.
1. Re:Nobody used it because they never finished it by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 06:32 · Score: 0
  
  Google: everything is free and is usually worth exactly what you paid for it.
2. Re:Nobody used it because they never finished it by tnk1 · 2015-10-14 07:20 · Score: 1
  
  Which makes me wonder if they are collecting the right data as to why people didn't use it.
  For me, I was sort of aware it was there, but it never really did anything. I was at first apprehensive that I'd have to turn it off, because it would send me crap I didn't care about. But for the most part, it did nothing but sit there doing nothing. In that case, all I could complain about was the waste of memory, but if they saw that no one was going to the notification center, perhaps they skipped the step where they actually determine "Why?".
  Sometimes I think Google is too inclined to write something, and then not support their product at all with a launch or good data collection. They just throw it out there, and if it doesn't stick, it gets pulled back without even an attempt to fix it.
  Their behavior makes me extremely apprehensive about using any of their products that I think are interesting, but I am afraid I'll get used to and they'll end the product.
Chrome is the systemd of the browser world by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 05:31 · Score: 0

My browser obviously needs the capability to:
* spam notifications at me from tray
* render things in 3D
* play sounds
* detect, dump and modify the system BIOS / UEFI
* detect if the system uses FDE and record the user's private key in unencrypted RAM
* dump a list of installed software on the system and send it back to Google / Microsoft / Whoever for telemetry purposes
* dump system ram to send back to Google / Microsoft / Whoever for telemetry purposes
* turn my webcam on and off and send stills and video back to Google / Microsoft / Whoever for telemetry purposes
* turn my mic on and off to send recordings of me screaming at my shitty browser back to Google / Microsoft / Whoever for telemetry purposes
* record every typed password and send them back to Google / Microsoft / Whoever for telemetry purposes
* store and utilize a massive database for detecting pirated software, music and movies
1. Re:Chrome is the systemd of the browser world by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-15 01:55 · Score: 0
  
  Just fuck off and run Lynx then.
FOR by fulldecent · 2015-10-14 05:32 · Score: 1

Better than desktop notifications are App Badges. See https://code.google.com/p/chro...

--
-- I was raised on the command line, bitch
Number 1 search related to this feature by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 05:38 · Score: 0

How do I disable the Chrome desktop notification icon
Beware of Leopard by Overzeetop · 2015-10-14 05:43 · Score: 2

"It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leopard.”"
The switch to turn it on was only five layers deep?
It amazing it wasn't adopted more universally with how obvious it was. If they wanted it to be used they should have only included it as an undocumented registry key hack. Then everyone would want it and there'd be dozens of site showing you how to enable it.

--
Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
1. Re:Beware of Leopard by jonnythan · 2015-10-14 06:00 · Score: 1
  
  No, it was on by default. That was how you managed which notifications you got.
Why??? by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 06:44 · Score: 0

Is this the same thing that extension use? For example when someone on twitch comes live it tells me, or my twitter messages. All gonsky?
Google just feels confused by perryizgr8 · 2015-10-14 06:52 · Score: 1

They feel like they're making this awesome stuff but nobody wants to use it. The notification system is a nice example to see why. Windows and Mac both have their own notification systems. They're both very nice, reasonably out-of-the-way and very well integrated with the OS. They both have well-documented APIs that every app uses. But Chrome? No sir. We'll die before we do not reinvent the fucking nut treads on the wheel. I hate it because of it being so intrusive and not respecting any OS design and policy.

--
Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
1. Re:Google just feels confused by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 09:49 · Score: 0
  
  They run out of useful features so they throw this crap in. I don't need to be nagged about shit that is not important. Much of it can wait, and I certainly already have plenty of ways to read email, get text, and be informed. I don't need more notifications. Windows and OS X do the same crap thinking everyone wants instant information. Maybe that's why so many stick with Windows 7 its a OS not a personal assistant.
2. Re:Google just feels confused by Kid+CUDA · 2015-10-14 17:44 · Score: 1
  
  Thank you for this. I also never understood why they felt they had to roll out their own thing. Just use the existing notification APIs in the OS!
3. Re:Google just feels confused by perryizgr8 · 2015-10-14 17:57 · Score: 1
  
  Yeah, imagine what would happen if some mobile app (say Facebook) would make their own notification center separate form the one in Android and push all messages to that. It would be utter shit and people wouldn't use it for one second. Then why not the same in desktop? I am using the OS I am using because I mostly like it, and I like the way it does things. So just respect that and let the OS handle notifications. Maybe this is what they plan to do from now on. Notifications certainly are useful for some stuff (gmail, whatsapp). And I don't want that floating grey piece-of-shit fading in and blocking everything and getting lost unless I click it right then.
  
  --
  Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
Who the hell is stupid enough by hamsjael · 2015-10-14 06:59 · Score: 0

To install that kind of spyware on THEIR OWN computers???
I just do not understand the compelling reason to install google shit on YOUR computer.. why??
Do you not know that their business model as privacy parasitism? If not, this is (or was anyhow.. shrug) probably not the news site for you.
PS: if "gmail" is your reason to volunteer to be assraped by those assholes you are either a lay bastard or a stupid bastard
I'll miss it by Geeky · 2015-10-14 07:06 · Score: 1

I actually use and like the feature. Gmail works best in a browser, but I still like having pop up notifications of new mail. I have my inbox configured so that only useful mail reaches it, and it's nice not to have to keep an eye on the browser when I've got another application maximised.
It might make me unusual, but I'm sure I'm not the only one. Shame google can't keep niche features that some people use, I'm sure now it's been developed that it can't cost a lot to maintain. But then I thought that about Reader as well, so I ought to know better by now.

--
Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
1. Re:I'll miss it by 0bject · 2015-10-14 07:30 · Score: 1
  
  You just need a separate monitor dedicated to email.
Got an idea ! by Pop69 · 2015-10-14 08:44 · Score: 1

How about you give us a way to add permanent trust for self signed SSL certs to replace it ?
YAAAAAAY by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 08:55 · Score: 0

YAAAAAAY
Notifications are annoying by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-14 09:45 · Score: 0

Almost any OS today offers some sort of Notification feature and browsers seem to have taken note that users want to be annoyed constantly by stuff. Having been using OS X for some time I have to say the notification feature is totally dumb. Why do I need to be notified of something when I am using my computer? I definitely feel overwhelmed sometimes with information. Glad Google dropped it, I get to stuff when I get to it. I already get too many notifications and most are totally not important in the least.
Who would've thought? by Kid+CUDA · 2015-10-14 17:31 · Score: 1

Google introduce a useless, obstrusive feature no-one uses!

Are they going to remove the profile switcher button now? Seriously, who shares a computer with enough people to warrant having a button like that breaking every UI standard out there?
Amazing... by Not-a-Neg · 2015-10-15 03:47 · Score: 1

Today: more people learned that Chrome has a notification center, than the number of people that actually use it. To think I've been using an extension all this time just to receive GMail notifications when there was functionality built-in to the browser that could have been doing the same without the need for the extension. Shame on Google for not advertising this feature and making it user friendly. Oh well, I guess rather than make any effort to advertise the feature it's better to just kill it off entirely. Chrome has been feeling a little slow lately, maybe this will improve performance.

--
-==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
STOP by TFlan91 · 2015-10-15 05:00 · Score: 1

stop changing dev tools EVERY DAMN RELEASE!
you just killed 30 minutes of my time trying to find the damn hide console button
Google is the new Taco Bell. by Anonymous Coward · 2015-10-20 07:55 · Score: 0

Yea, this is just like the fucking flatbread sandwiches. Whoosh. Gone again.
It was the only way I'd get instant notification of a Facebook PM, because FB won't send an email if you have a tab open, and I don't have a fucking cell phone.
-ClintJCL (tired of logging in)