Slashdot Mirror


Beware: FBI, Other Agencies Might Go After Your Voluntary DNA Records (theneworleansadvocate.com)

Kashmir Hill reports at Fusion that DNA results from companies like 23andMe are being requested by law enforcement agencies, something that is likely to start happening more and more. From the article: Both Ancestry.com and 23andMe stipulate in their privacy policies that they will turn information over to law enforcement if served with a court order. 23andMe says it's received a couple of requests from both state law enforcement and the FBI, but that it has "successfully resisted them." ... Ancestry.com would not say specifically how many requests it's gotten from law enforcement. ... "On occasion when required by law to do so, and in this instance we were, we have cooperated with law enforcement and the courts to provide only the specific information requested but we don’t comment on the specifics of cases,” said a spokesperson. (Related Wired article here.)

5 of 132 comments (clear)

  1. Re:You should have expected this. by PRMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As long as there is a warrant and it is for a single suspect's DNA then it is lawful and I am fine with it. Without a warrant is a different story.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  2. Re:What's A Criminal To Do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it is going to get harder and harder for people to be criminals.

    On the contrary: with more and more laws in your face, it's going to get easier and easier to find yourself on the wrong side of one.

  3. Re:You should have expected this. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We are currently in a state where we are shifting our private info, our "papers" in 4th Amendment terms, outside our houses and into the hands of others, and anachronistic Supreme Court rulings have held we have no expectation of privacy in such things held by 3rd parties.

    This needs to change, given people view themselves as holding a virtual presence out there on the nebulous Internet and in the computers thereon. It may need another amendment, but the Supreme Court could clear it all up tomorrow.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  4. Surprise vs Problem Solving by ohnocitizen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I see more responses saying "Not surprised" than suggesting we take steps to address this, or that it is ethically acceptable. Either this is fine, in which case it is good law enforcement can obtain our DNA in this fashion. Or it is a worrying and unethical issue and we need to take concrete action such as contacting representatives and organizing to try and shut this shit down. But the least useful thing to do is say "I saw this coming.". Who. Fucking. Cares.

  5. Re:You should have expected this. by kwbauer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This such a patently false statement. I truly wonder about the motivations of people who repeat it.

    The courts long ago ruled that your property, papers and effects do not become the property of somebody else just because you asked them to store them for you. Banks don't simply open safe deposit boxes without court orders (warrants). Rented storage units also require search warrants.

    The problem is that so many people give in to the anti-gun position of "if it is modern, then the Constitution doesn't cover it" bullshit reasoning that we are completely losing our rights on all fronts.