Slashdot Mirror
eFast Malware Hijacks Browser With Chrome Clone (malwarebytes.org)
An anonymous reader writes with a report at The Stack that: eFast Browser, a new malicious adware which disguises itself as Google Chrome, has hijacked internet users' systems in an apparent effort to serve its own ads and harvest user activity to sell to third-party advertisers. It is able to mirror the aesthetics of Chrome as it uses the same source code, available across the open-source project Chromium. Once installed, eFast places ads across existing web pages, linking to third-party e-commerce sites or other malicious platforms.
Hmmm, "disguises itself as Google Chrome" and "mirror[s] the aesthetics of Chrome".
Sounds like Firefox!
The program appears to be available only for Windows.
I'm still the outlier, refusing to use Google or Windows.
But, I still don't feel safe.
LOL, WTF??? So, malware which rips out your browser, puts itself in its place, and then serves you ads and whatever the hell else it does ... and they're asking if it adheres to a damned privacy policy?
Anything which installs itself like that can safely be assumed to not give a flying crap about your damned privacy.
Why the hell they even ponder if something like this follows a privacy policy? It's malware. No, it isn't going to have a privacy policy.
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
is it hosted at sourceforge?
Wait, eFast is using the open source Chromium code to build a browser to serve ads and collect user PII, and that is wrong, but when Google uses the same open source code base to build a browser to serve ads and collect user PII that's great?!?
WTF?!?
windows and macosx users, listen up. GNU/Linux Distributions have a digitally-signed audit trail that goes all the way back to multiply personally-verified GPG key signatures. *NO* malware gets through that process - absolutely none. and the reason why is very simple: anyone who dares to install malware would, by virtue of the GPG-signed audit chain, be tracked back and their reputation so publicly destroyed - forever - that they would never work in the software industry ever again.
not even microsoft or apple, no matter how they try, can replicate this audit trail, because their software installation is (a) not transparent (i.e. not trustworthy) and (b) as those corporations set themselves up as the "single choke-point" they simply don't have the time, the resources or the financial incentive to support *YOU*, the user, when *YOU* want to install some random piece of third party software.
in short, i am sorry to have to inform you that if you run the windows or the macosx operating systems, *despite* the fact that you are perfectly entitled to install 3rd party software [for now, anyway: it's getting harder to do], despite the fact that if you choose not to install 3rd party software your computer would be completely useless - despite all these things being true and perfectly valid, i am sorry to have to inform you that *if* you choose to install 3rd party software, you get everything that you deserve.
people who install GNU/Linux OSes don't do it "because it's fun" or "because they want a challenge of running command-line tools", they do it because they *know* and trust the digital audit trail based on the publicly-verifiable reputation of the 1000+ developers behind each distribution, and, because that trail exists, they can feel that they're safe from malware and spyware when they follow the install procedures that come with their OS.
of course, there are those people - GNU/Linux users - who bypass that process, and perform manual installation of random unverified online packages. such people it has to be said _also_ get what they deserve.
now, we can indeed track the MD5 checksums, and manually check the digital signatures, or even manually build the software ourselves (regardless of the OS), but the inconvenience and complexity of doing so is beyond most people - often myself included: i just cannot be bothered to compile software from source these days unless it's absolutely essential. ... but why put yourself through that?? why are you risking yourself to exposure to privacy violations and data violatinos? i genuinely don't understand why you would do that to yourself. perhaps someone could explain it to me.
"...a new malicious adware which disguises itself as Google Chrome"
Is there a difference? Maybe it's faster.
Instead of going after those who plant the malware (in this case, the Chrome clone), why not go after those "third party advertisers" and those who place the ads on the hijacked browser?
Take it from someone who cleans up Windows infections on a daily basis: this is nothing new. PUP makers have been rebadging Chromium for years.
Sounds more like Chrome, because that's what it is: a version of Chrome for a competitors ad network.
If they fixed all the rampant memory leaks in Chrome in the process I wouldn't mind much.
Going through the SF repository for eFast, I have a name of one Mr. Isarith Mahappu K, of No: 15, Chapel Terrace, Stafford, ST163AH.
Last time I can see that property for sale on the market was 14 Dec, 2007. Odds are it is still owned, probably by this same person.
Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
Can I install the Ask toolbar on it?
love is just extroverted narcissism
It should be noted that all we know is that someone thought about publishing something called efast. We don't know that this person is involved with the Efast Browser malware.
Because they claim innocence. They thought the ads were being served on regular web pages, and had no idea that it was malware spewing it out and collecting the clickthrus,
So don't go after them through the legal system. It's too corrupt and too beholden to its corporate masters to be useful anyway. Go after them with one (or dozens) of the unregulated guns flooding our streets. Fight fire with fire, or more to the point, solve one problem by exploiting another.
Where there's a will, there's a way.
My friend showed me this the other week there (he does network security stuff and had to deal with it at a clients).
My first thoughts when I saw it was, "that looks fairly obvious even to a casual internet user that it isn't Chrome".
It looked blatantly not Chrome-like.
Hell, they even had eFast mentioned a few times.
Malware adware trying to be legitimately useful. Things are getting weirder and weirder man.
Next you are going to tell me that one of those fake adware anti-virus programs actually remove viruses to make them look legit.
Instead of asking for you to send them 15 bucks to remove, they could easily just do adware and remove a few well known viruses. What little work it would take to gather a list of regular viruses (or steal them from others), add a virus scanner and boom, something that will likely get you more money than demanding payments for removal.
I dunno, I haven't had to deal with those things for a while, maybe they do exist more these days.
I know there is a lot of plain adware with no other use, but useful adware software was far less common back when I dealt with things regularly.
I tried to remove myself from dealing with tech illiterates. I was mostly successful, besides having to deal with family. Kill me now.
A Chrome clone? Has the new "improved" Firefox been released already?
There are mitigations for this specific trust attack, but they're not practiced widely.
I assume you're referring to David A. Wheeler's "diverse double-compiling" mitigation for the Ken Thompson attack. How are you sure that the major GNU/Linux distributors don't do this on their compile farms?
And other similar trust attacks aren't mitigated at all.
To which "similar trust attacks" do you refer, so that we can put them on the wishlist for mitigation?
They should have called this thing Cymothoa Exigua instead.
Why would people go to download Chrome from a site that isn't the official Google page? It's not like it's hard to find... If somebody does download and get stuck with this crap, they deserve it.
GNU/Linux Distributions have a digitally-signed audit trail that goes all the way back to multiply personally-verified GPG key signatures. *NO* malware gets through that process - absolutely none.
By "multiply personally-verified GPG key signatures", I assume you're referring to the requirement to attend a key-signing party in person with a Debian Developer. For upstream maintainers who live outside cycling distance of a Debian Developer willing to act as a sponsor for the upstream maintainer's package, this could end up throwing out the baby (a useful application that happens to have been developed by an upstream maintainer living far from the nearest Debian Developer) with the bathwater (malware).
i just cannot be bothered to compile software from source these days unless it's absolutely essential. ... but why put yourself through that??
Because you want to use a particular program now, not wait for a few years down the road once its upstream maintainer's financial situation has improved to the point where its upstream maintainer can travel by airplane to key-signing parties.
Why would people go to download Chrome from a site that isn't the official Google page?
One possibility is that someone lives in a country where all ISPs block downloads from Google.
How is that different than Chrome itself? Isn't that the point of Google's browser; to serve 3rd party ads to me and track my usage?
"Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
Well...
Long story short? It all boils down to only installing things that you got from fully trusted sources (no, CNET's download.com is not a trusted source in my opinion, specifically because of the crapware/shovelware that they foist on the unwary user.) That, and avoid using fscking Windows, apparently...
Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
Where is the source to that software you're advertising in a way more obnoxious than flashing modal full-screen ads?
CLI paste? paste.pr0.tips!
[incoherent gibberish]
Sorry, I can't parse your message for the most part, maybe because it is full of advertisements.
Where exactly do I find the source code to your program?
CLI paste? paste.pr0.tips!
Blocking ads would be an early warning you caught this Malware once it started spamming you with advertising. Thank you ad blockers!
See subject: "Rinse, Lather, & Repeat" you illiterate dolt -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
* Tell us - how did "eating your words" taste, dimwit?
(No doubt terrible considering you STUCK YOUR FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH & rammed them down your throat, washed down with the "bitter taste of SELF-defeat", lol...)
APK
P.S.=> Lastly - If you can't determine the meaning of words or phrases from within the context of the framework in which they're used? YOU HAVE AN ILLITERACY PROBLEM - so, I'd recommend remedial reading lessons such as "hooked on phonics" for you, lmao... apk
See subject: 1st - trolls like you aren't capable of producing decent wares! 2nd - The article's source folks do (they've already blocked the download sources + the ads it injects, so my ware gets that benefit by accretion/osmosis from the data they produce which my ware imports) as they verified my code as safe before HOSTING & RECOMMENDING IT above all others like it here http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...
* :)
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
&
It's safe proven by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
In its 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
---
It doesn't GET anymore trustworthy than endorsements like that (which you don't have & never will, lol) - plus, face it: I don't OWE ANYONE my code, least of all "Open SORES" thiefs (which this article itself evidences using CHROME CODE for malicious purposes) - I am a FIRM BELIEVER that "Open SORES" merely compounds code thievery - this article proves it all the more & for MALICIOUS purposes!
APK
P.S.=> LASTLY - Good ole' "ne'er-do-well" FISTED couldn't stand having to "eat his words" so he TRIED vainly & effetely to "downmod hide" this-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... when I posted it before, lol... weak!
... apk
See subject: It stops this malware's ad sources APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...
---
FREE & not 'souled-out' to advertisers + adds speed, security & reliability & does FAR more w/ FAR less more efficiently vs. redundant browser addons & locally installed DNS servers @ home + fixes DNS' many security issues & it stops a LOT of tracking @ webpage + DNS levels combined too from 1 file you already NATIVELY have - firewalls do the rest (on lesser used IP address based tracking vs. host-domain name type).
---
It obtains data vs. many types of online threats & for adbanner blocking from 10 reputable sites in the security community!
---
It SPEEDS YOU UP 2 ways (adblocking + locally cached in RAM favorites placed @ the TOP of hosts for fastest resolution speed vs. remote DNS also aiding reliability) vs. other "so-called security 'solutions'" SLOWING YOU!
---
It does all that via something you natively have vs. "bolting on browser addons 'MOAR'" that's usermode slower & increases messagepassing, cpu + ram overheads!
---
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
&
It's safe proven by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
In its 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
---
* "The premise is quite simple: Take something designed by nature & reprogram it to make it work for the body rather than against it..." - Dr. Alice Krippen: "I am legend".
APK
P.S.=> By "yours truly" - "The Lord of Hosts" so-to-speak:
PERTINENT QUOTE/EXCERPT:
"The image this title brings to mind is of a mighty military commander, one who can at a mere word summon rank upon rank of protective power" from https://answers.yahoo.com/ques... & THAT WORD = hosts!
(Accept NO substitutes!)
...apk
See subject & the BEST adblocker (+ far more)-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... that does FAR MORE than ANY single browser addon (souled-out & crippled by default) for FAR LESS RESOURCES CONSUMED with something you already natively have!
* :)
APK
P.S.=> "Onwards & UPWARDS!!!"... apk
how much are you paid to shill for M$ and AMD, mythical small business owner?
See subject: ... All over the pages of /. @ some point on some topic. I say this due to your true cowardly unidentifiable post, worm.
* Individuals like yourself are pitiful. Did you know that? Now you do... since that's EXACTLY what normal folks like myself think of wastes of life like yourself.
APK
P.S.=> These puny reprehensible WORMS & trolls have no shame. Then again, they have NO PRIDE either (since all they are is waste of LIFE "ne'er-do-wells", & nothing more - AND THEY KNOW IT!)... apk
How does this malicious adware get installed onto the system and does it run on Apple OS X, Android or Linux?
My personal host file compilation is much better then yours. It is faster and smaller then yours can ever hope to be with no false positives.
Ask Mr. Steven Burn (great help to me MANY times, & very good researcher of malicious sites). That'll shut you up fast as always!
Why am I "keeping it secret"? It's MY work, NOT YOURS or ANYONE else's is why... so, I'll do as I see fit on that account!
Plus - IF THIS ARTICLE DOESN'T POINT OUT A WEAK SIDE OF "Open SORES" code?? Then you're outside your mind since Chrome's code was abused in it!
(No sir - that is NOT happening to me, ever!)
Nor as I said, am I "big" on letting others use my code UNLESS I see that it fixes theirs or helps it (as in the case of UltraDefrag for example as one of a few I've helped in that case).
APK
P.S.=> Lastly - please: You've "given me guff" before, so WHO are you trying to fool now, hmmm? I know you're a damned troll & this is proof thereof from the past + your trolling antics then too -> http://games.slashdot.org/comm... + http://linux.slashdot.org/comm...
YOU JUST DON'T "GET IT", DO YOU? EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU TROLLS? I've got you CLOCKED in many FAILS vs. myself, those are just some of what I have on you, so, please:
QUIT TRYING TO PLAY "INNOCENT" HERE TROLL - you're not fooling anyone but yourself ... apk
See subject: I don't know how it could be "better" since I use the security community's data for hosts vs. threats online... but then, ANYONE can just "talk a good game"... I actually am out there DOING a great game!
* :)
(That's in addition to the, oh, 200++ or so adbanners or sites I find with malscript in them too on my own each day...)
I rarely, if ever, get "false positives" - the security community sites I get my data from do 'purges' of those daily pretty much, if/when they happen (fairly rare actually).
Besides & here is the TRUE beauty of hosts files: Control!
You have TOTAL LOCAL EASY CONTROL of their content yourself, easily, since hosts have a very easily human readable format (try that with regular expressions that say, AlmostALLAdsBlocked, or UBlock use... ) using a texteditor like notepad.exe to remote 'false positives' you note for example!
APK
P.S.=> I let users BUILD THEIR OWN, I don't send out my hosts file - only the program that comes HIGHLY RECOMMENDED by the VERY BEST antimalware company on the planet that hosts it for me too... apk
So to summarize, you're heavily advertising a proprietary closed-source program that security-aware people are supposed to execute on their machines no questions asked.
You advertise this program in the name of stopping obnoxious advertising, the irony of which seems to be lost on you.
Plus, you get angry when being inquired about whether one could take a peek in.
It figures. I have no further questions.
BTW, if you want to make me look like a troll, don't use my +5 Informative comments as the base of your argument. Use those at -1, it will be more effective. HTH
CLI paste? paste.pr0.tips!
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
&
It's safe per 57 antivirus programs in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
a 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
APK
P.S.=> Heck, just for the heck of it & to put "salt in your wounds"? How about THIS too (Virscan says it's safe too):
http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...
... apk
Fisted does Symantec\Norton, Kaspersky, AVG, McAfee/Intel, or MalwareBytes open source their code for others to steal as Chrome's here was? Answer that weasel!
* :)
(Next I'll predict not ONLY will you evade that question, but also a "summary" of the link below (my other post to you)).
I also wouldn't even *TRY* to "cut them down" either, until YOU HAVE DONE BETTER yourself...
APK
P.S.=> - & again "summarize this" -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
Fisted anyone can use sockpuppet alternate accounts to upmod themselves like you do and +5's no big accomplishment. /. forums are a ridiculously abused moderation system here.
See subject: Says it all for me better than I can - you FAIL, troll...
(Cat got your tongue now?? LMAO!)
Try hard? I don't even HAVE TO TRY vs. trolls like you - facts do the job for me QUITE nicely shutting you up.
APK
P.S.=> What's the matter? Don't care to argue with facts you can't deny from almost 60 antivirus programs saying my program's safe from 3 different respected sources?? You can't argue with that. Nor could you validly argue vs. this -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ... apk
"FoAmiNg-@-TeH-MouTh" w/ failed off-topic illogical ad hominem attacks as you FAIL vs. this -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... & this -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
* :)
(Big talker "Fisted" hasn't done BETTER than the fairly highly esteemed companies that have been successful in security for decades BUT HASN'T DONE BETTER THAN THEY HAVE ON THE SECURITY FRONT HIMSELF!)
APK
P.S.=> Facts & truth from respected sources - they ALWAYS get these troll weasels like "Fisted" foaming & raging - So, DO take those meds you projected you need fisted, lol... apk
Both here http://it.slashdot.org/comment... + here http://it.slashdot.org/comment... badly. Facts too much for you? Yes.
Why label this software as "malicious"? It looks perfectly innocent and legal to me. They forked Chromium (legally) and are now pushing their freeware clone of Chromium to users, only asking them to watch some ads in return. So, it's an ordinary adware product, still perfectly legal. It looks to me that Chromium is trying to stifle the competition by spreading FUD. Now, this is an anticompetitive practice and as such it surely is illegal.
That doesn't explain where I can find the source.
CLI paste? paste.pr0.tips!
Interesting. Where can I read the source, though?
CLI paste? paste.pr0.tips!
I'm having a little trouble finding the source of your program.
CLI paste? paste.pr0.tips!
I don't understand. Where is the source again?
CLI paste? paste.pr0.tips!
See subject: Where's a "summary" of yours vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
APK
P.S.=> Cat got your tongue "suddenly"? apk
See subject: ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
APK
P.S.=> Cat got your tongue "suddenly"? apk
See subject: Where's a "summary" of yours vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
APK
P.S.=> Cat got your tongue "suddenly"? apk
See subject: Where's a "summary" of yours vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
APK
P.S.=> Cat got your tongue "suddenly"? apk
See subject: Where's a "summary" of yours vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
---
YOU LIKE APPLES?
How d'ya like THEM apples??
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: Where's a "summary" of yours vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
---
YOU LIKE APPLES?
How d'ya like THEM apples??
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: ...vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
Again: I'm NOT obligated to give away MY hard work so it can be stolen & misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Besides - a MENIAL TECHIE DOLT like you that can't code can't code... I see nothing from you that's any good (where's your code I can see or use that others here like? They do mine, see below...) - all "your kind" does is use others work, creating nothing of your own.
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to?
... apk
See subject: ...vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
Again: I'm NOT obligated to give away MY hard work so it can be stolen & misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
---
YOU LIKE APPLES?
How d'ya like THEM apples??
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: Where's your "summary" vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
Again: I'm NOT obligated to give away MY hard work so it can be stolen & misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
---
YOU LIKE APPLES?
How d'ya like THEM apples??
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
Again: I'm NOT obligated to give away MY hard work so it can be stolen & misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
---
YOU LIKE APPLES?
How d'ya like THEM apples??
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
How could I possibly write such a summary without being able to see "your ware"?
It can only mean you must be willing to provide your source code, so where exactly can I find it?
CLI paste? paste.pr0.tips!
Nothing wrong with it? This article shows how easily it's misused for malicious purposes!
APK
P.S.=> It's so easy to use OTHERS' WORK rather than doing your own, isn't it? That's part of why I don't give away my sourcecode (so it's not stolen & used by others taking credit for MY work OR how easily it can be misused as this article clearly proves)... apk
See subject: You can't code! Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses seeing my ware safe via 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
Again: I'm NOT obligated to give away MY hard work so it can be stolen & misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
---
YOU LIKE APPLES?
How d'ya like THEM apples??
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: Again: I'm NOT obligated to give away MY hard work so it can be stolen & misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
---
YOU LIKE APPLES?
How d'ya like THEM apples??
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: You can see my ware easily here http://start64.com/index.php?o... & I'm NOT obligated to give away MY hard work so it can be misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
You can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Where's YOUR CODE that's better? It's not. You can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
---
YOU LIKE APPLES?
How d'ya like THEM apples??
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Where's YOUR CODE that's better? It's not. You can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
---
YOU LIKE APPLES?
How d'ya like THEM apples??
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Where's YOUR CODE that's better? It's not. You can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
---
YOU LIKE APPLES?
How d'ya like THEM apples??
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: You wouldn't understand code & monkeys do a stupid thing to bolt on more w/security issues like DNS!
APK
P.S.=> I told you several times - YOU can't have my sourcecode. A menial monkey like you wouldn't understand it and probably misuses it the way Chrome's code was per this article OR claim it as "his own". Yes, you're unskilled in computing, stupid for "bolting on 'MoAr' that means more resource use & moving parts for breakdown + exploit, & yes - a mere MENIAL that can't create anything of his own, lol.... apk
See subject: I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Where's YOUR CODE that's better? It's not. You can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
---
YOU LIKE APPLES?
How d'ya like THEM apples??
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Where's YOUR CODE that's better? It's not. You can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
---
YOU LIKE APPLES?
How d'ya like THEM apples??
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Where's YOUR CODE that's better? It's not. You can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
---
YOU LIKE APPLES?
How d'ya like THEM apples??
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: Where's yours? I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Where's YOUR CODE that's better? It's not. You can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: It answers that. See subject: Where's yours? I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Where's YOUR CODE that's better? It's not. You can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: In the Fortune 500 & I told you MalwareBytes folks have my code & I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Where's YOUR CODE that's better? It's not. You can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> So where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: In the Fortune 500 & I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Where's YOUR CODE that's better? It's not. You can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: Where's yours others of that calibre host & recommend it + others here like it? It's NOT, lol! I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
You can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: That others here like & the likes of Malwarebytes' hosts + recommends? It's not. End of subject - I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused like Chrome's code is in this article!
Where's YOUR CODE that's better? It's not. You can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> You're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Where's YOUR CODE that's better? It's not. You can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> As far as "sucking", well ok - where's YOURS to compare it to? It's not since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: Where's yours others here like & that Malwarebytes hosts + recommends? I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Where's YOUR CODE that's better? It's not. You can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> You don't have anything to show since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: Where's yours others here like & that Malwarebytes hosts + recommends? I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Where's YOUR CODE that's better? It's not. You can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> You don't have anything to show since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Obviously you can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your program others here like & that Malwarebytes hosts + recommends??
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> You don't have anything to show since you're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: Does he endorse your work + host & recommend it? No. Where's yours others here like? It's not, lol (mere 'talk' from you, nothing more). I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Obviously you can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> You're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: Where's your WORKING program others here like that Malwarebytes folks host + recommend & have the source to? It's not. I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Obviously you can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> You don't have anything to show! You're an unskilled menial techie/admin - the kind that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: Where's your program others here like that Malwarebytes folks host + recommend & have the source to? LOL, it's not - just mere 'talk' outta you!
I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Obviously you can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> You don't have anything to show as you're an unskilled menial techie/admin that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: That Malwarebytes folks host + recommend & have the source to? LOL, it's not - just mere 'talk' outta you!
I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Obviously you can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> You don't have anything to show as you're an unskilled menial techie/admin that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: Where's your program others here like that Malwarebytes folks host + recommend & have the source to? LOL, it's not - just mere 'talk' outta you!
I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Obviously you can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> You don't have anything to show as you're an unskilled menial techie/admin that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: Where's your program others here like that Malwarebytes folks host + recommend & have the source to? LOL, it's not - just mere 'talk' outta you!
I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Obviously you can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> You don't have anything to show as you're an unskilled menial techie/admin that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: Where's your program others here like that Malwarebytes folks host + recommend & have source to? LOL, it's not - just mere 'talk' outta you & illiteracy!
I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Obviously you can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> You don't have anything to show! You're an unskilled menial techie/admin that couldn't do a thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
See subject: Where's your program others here like that Malwarebytes folks host + recommend & have the source to? LOL, it's not - just mere 'talk' outta you!
I'm NOT obligated to give away MY work so it's misused the way Chrome's code is in this article!
Obviously you can't code so how would you understand anyone's source?
Where's your 'summary' vs. ~60 antiviruses finding my ware safe from 3 diff. sources-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ?
* Cat got your tongue "suddenly"?
---
As far as opinions of my program & how it works, vs. your utter DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" troll MENIAL who can't code b.s from you?
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"Actually, APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa (366380) on Saturday May 16, 2015 @11:40AM (#49705641)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
APK
P.S.=> You don't have anything to show as you're an unskilled menial techie/admin that couldn't do a damn thing on computers minus gents like myself, software engineers/programmers, to make tools for you to USE, user... apk
No KGIII - the article PROVES Open "SORES" code gets misused, no questions asked...
APK
P.S.=> Tell us - what happened here? Didn't CHROME'S VERY CODE GET USED TO BUSHWHACK OTHERS ONLINE?? Absolutely... apk
Doesn't change the fact Open source Chrome's code was misused for malware showing it's that easy to do.
APK
P.S.=> You can *try* to "doubletalk" all day vs. that - doesn't change a damn thing... apk
Fact: Malware makers abusing Chrome's source to make a malware out of it. That's this article's facts which makes my point there, fact. Stupid people have NOTHING to do with that. Period. It clearly IS a weakness of "Open SORES" as this article proves it can be abused that way no questions asked.
I do this for a living, did pretty damn well at it (home, car all paid off, decent amount of saving & a business of my own in that & realestate too since 2009 due to that being the 'stepping stone' to being an OWNER, not a wageslave renter fool). Have you? No.
I & have as a pro for 23++ yrs. until I went part-time only 2008 onward consulting now for the likes of Hilton, United Airlines, Universities and Hospitals + Fortune 100-500 before it (Except now, for extremely high rates - I should've done this ages ago before that & colleagues I had told me I waited too long).
You don't, first of all. You can't "tell me how it is here" on MY ballcourt. Your forte is math, not computing. Don't even TRY tell me "they're the same" since they're NOT.
Secondly, those idiots arguing with me about hosts are exactly that. Like I told you: I've never, EVER had them take me down proving me incorrect on them. Not once and for many years.
I'm not stupid either on who they are or who they represent. I've LITERALLY busted 2-3 who work for advertisers, others that are LITERALLY professional trolls for hire.
Would you like proof of those words from me too, with easily verified backing?
I can have it to you right after you reply - just ask.
APK
P.S.=> KGIII, now *IF* you think that doesn't go on? Don't fool yourself... I've seen antivirus companies try shit on Spybot for example and got busted for it. It happens all the time in the political world (HBGary anyone?) and for the LOVE OF MONEY (Google's lost tons due to nearly 50% of internet users using adblockers now) they'll do anything - stupid bastards don't realize people are NOT stupid & see it too... they don't care: They think we're all stupid cattle... dumb: Underestimating your customer know-how is exactly that and makes them stupid... apk