Slashdot Mirror


US Will Clean Area In Spain Where Hydrogen Bombs Fell (nytimes.com)

HughPickens.com writes: Rafael Minder writes in the NY Times that almost 50 years after coming close to possibly provoking a nuclear disaster, Secretary of State John Kerry, following years of wrangling between Spain and the U.S., signed an agreement to remove contaminated soil from an area in southern Spain where an American warplane accidentally dropped hydrogen bombs. In 1966 a bomber collided with a refueling tanker in midair and dropped four hydrogen bombs, two of which released plutonium into the atmosphere. No warheads detonated, narrowly averting what could have been an explosion more powerful than the atomic strikes against Japan at the end of World War II. Four days after the accident, the Spanish government stated that "the Palomares incident was evidence of the dangers created by NATO's use of the Gibraltar airstrip," announcing that NATO aircraft would no longer be permitted to fly over Spanish territory either to or from Gibraltar. The U.S. later announced that it would no longer fly over Spain with nuclear weapons, and the Spanish government formally banned U.S. flights over its territory that carried such weapons.

Neither Kerry nor Spanish Foreign Minister García-Margallo said exactly how much contaminated soil would be sent back, where it would be stored in the United States, or who would pay for the cleanup — some of the issues that have held up a deal until now. Spain has insisted that any contaminated soil be sent to the United States, because Spain does not have plants to store it. Concern over the site was reawakened in the 1990s when tests revealed high levels of americium, an isotope of plutonium, and further tests showed that 50,000 cubic meters of earth were still contaminated. The Spanish government appropriated the land in 2003 to prevent it being used.

12 of 216 comments (clear)

  1. Re:wait a second by sexconker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know I shat on your carpet while running through your house uninvited, but why should I have to clean it up?

  2. That's not what "narrow" means by chispito · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Sorry, but that's not what "narrow" means, because that's not how nuclear weapons are detonated. If there was a remote chance of setting off a hydrogen bomb simply by dropping it, I don't think even the craziest hawk would have been putting the things in planes to begin with.

    No warheads detonated, narrowly averting what could have been an explosion more powerful than the atomic strikes against Japan at the end of World War II.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  3. Re:wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because when you go to a party, get drunk, and shit yourself on the sofa, you stay behind to help clean up or you never get invited back again.

  4. Re: "No Explosion" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They actually might be, because they are the only things designed by man that NEEDS to work as intended.

  5. Re:Sell it all to FirstAlert by sims+2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Either way would it kill them to have the low battery chirp start in the day time? instead of at 3-5am every time?

    I had a CO gas detector go to chirping (one of three) at 3am earlier this year the battery cover was screwed on so outside it went. It's still outside I think. Now I use the 10 year battery models exclusively.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  6. Re:wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    no, it's more like saying your grandfather took a dump on my carpet and the estate has been dodging responsibility ever since.

  7. Re:Long time by lhowaf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, we'll all remember your name, A.C.

    So much for accepting responsibility...

  8. Narrowly averted apocalypse my ass by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nukes from day one have been designed to only detonate after a specific series of human and environmental interactions. A non-activated nuke is dirty, but it's never going to explode.

  9. Re:wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are you serious ?
    If it were Spanish H bombs on US soil would you let Spain off the hook for the expensive cleanup ?
    Since you don't believe in responsibility, let's give BP a refund for clearing up their own mess too.

    Fuckwit.

  10. Re:wait a second by bobbied · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i mean it sucks and all, but why should we be on the hook for this???

    Well, let me see. The aircraft that crashed where ours. The bombs where ours. The pilots where ours and we where flying alone. The wreckage from the accident which was totally our fault fell on Spain... Hmmm...I don't know, Maybe we are responsible for the mess and should clean it up?

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  11. Re:wait a second by readin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because when you go to a party, get drunk, and shit yourself on the sofa, you stay behind to help clean up or you never get invited back again.

    On the other hand if show up and spend 40 years keeping someone from getting killed they might seem a bit ungrateful if they complain about you getting diarrhea while doing so.

    --
    I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
  12. Re:wait a second by readin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are they able to ask us to clean up the mess in fluent Russian? If not then maybe they should be a little more grateful.

    --
    I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.