Should Japan Restart More Nuclear Power Plants? (thebulletin.org)
Lasrick writes: Seth Baum, executive director of the Global Catastrophic Risk Institute, writes in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists that Japan should restart more of its nuclear reactors (the Sendai nuclear plant was restarted in August). The reason is simple, writes Baum: "Japan is now building 45 new coal power plants, but if it turned its nuclear power plants back on... it could cut coal consumption in half. And coal poses more health and climate change dangers than nuclear power."
...abandoning nuclear because of things like that is like abandoning air travel...
I beg to differ. Air travel can't wipe out the whole human race. An apocalyptic nuclear event can.
"Trump!!", the new Godwin.
Or they're morons with no grasp of the topic - which is often the case.
I realize this sounds weird and paranoid, but from years of experience on Slashdot, I have gotten the strong impression that there is some kind of pro-nuclear lobbying going on on this site. Articles with a pro-nuclear tone, well formulated posts critical of nuclear energy being modded down rather insistently...
But of course there is the possibility that its the Slashdot crowd itself who is on average very pro-nuclear, giving this kind of impression.
I am pro-nuclear and I go out of my way to use my mod points whenever I get them to mod down anti-nuclear posts. It isn't a conspiracy I just think the anti-nuclear crowd are dangerous fools and idiot technophobes that are endangering everyone on the planet and unless you are offering a real alternative then you are part of the problem.
Wind is not a big hazard to birds, 1000x bigger hazards are windows and cats.
Solar and wind don't need much space and the are needed keeps shrinking as the technologies improve.
AreaRequired1000.jpg (JPEG Image, 1000ÂÃ--Â706 pixels)
AreaRequiredWindOnly.jpg (JPEG Image, 1000ÂÃ--Â753 pixels)
Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.