Slashdot Mirror


Oracle Fixes Java Vulnerability Used By Russian Cyberspies (itworld.com)

itwbennett writes: Oracle said that it has fixed 154 security flaws in Java and a wide range of its other products, including one that Russian cyberespionage group Pawn Storm used to launch stealthy attacks earlier this year. The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2015-4902, was being used by the Pawn Storm attackers to enable the execution of a malicious Java application without user interaction.

3 of 126 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What if we make them legally responsible for bu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Every software company would go out of business. How many non-embedded, non-life critical developers here check every mathematical operation for under or over flows? How many computer systems are hardened against a random bit flip? And how would the world react to the sudden and massive increase in unemployment as all employees of those companies lose their jobs.

    It'll never happen. Consumers don't care about buggy software and non-buggy software is too difficult to code. Perfect code can fail on bad hardware too.

  2. Re:remove Java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bytecode language bullshit? The majority of languages these days compile down to bytecode. And while verbose, Java is one of the best statically typed, cross-platform languages out there. The core library is massive and well documented. Cross-platform threading, cross-platform GUI, cross-platform networking, etc... No need to worry about managing a bunch of dependices and versions upgrades for the collection of libraries you'd need to replace what you'd get from the main Java library, all consistently documented, updated, and supported for you for free. A lot of the Python documentation doesn't even tell you the structure or type of what is returned. The Java docs handle all parameters, return values, and most of the edge causes like what happens when you pass in a bad value. Many 'modern' languages leave that important info out.

    All these massive security holes in Java are actually in the C++ code. Part of the web start framework. Anyone bashing Java about it's security vulnerabilities is actually basing C++.

    We're going to be wishing for flash to come back. HTML5, canvas only websites will be much worse.

  3. Re:What if we make them legally responsible for bu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It is worse than that. I work for a 'security' startup that has many fortune 500s as customers. Developers ignore security reports and will mark most of the issues as false positive because they don't want to do defensive programming. They even will use years old outdated libraries, known to have security holes, to develop new features because they would have to learn the new APIs of the new versions and that would hinder their perceived development speed.