Sen. Ron Wyden Explains the Fight Ahead Over CISA
blottsie writes: Sen. Ron Wyden has led the fight against the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA), which the Senate advanced on Thursday in a 84-14 vote. In a new interview with the Daily Dot, Wyden explains why privacy advocates call CISA a "surveillance bill," and discusses why an amendment from Sen. Whitehouse could make CISA more problematic for Internet users' civil liberties.
congress-critters are scared of cyber-spooks, so spooks get what spooks want. similar to -back in the day- Hoover's FBI which had the "dirt" on everyone of national political consequence.
Everything can be undone and fixed when I have divine authority over the industry.
They will just change the name slightly and try to pass it again.. Soap, Cispa, Crispa, Pisspa, etc..
This is the Republican way.. then they will take everything they did and try to say that Obama did it, or Democrat -X did what they did..
Republicans are morons
This also isn't really a case of balancing the pros and cons. The justification is to allow private business to share information about emerging security threats. Just like Alert Logic's existing weekly threat report, which they manage to produce without any legislation or special protections from privacy laws:
https://www.alertlogic.com/res...
They also manage to do longer term analysis and share it, without revealing personal information:
https://www.alertlogic.com/res...
There are of course many other companies and organizations already compiling and sharing information about emerging threats - no special laws required.
Never forget that Wyden was the primary reason we are not living with SOPA today. Too bad he is outnumbered by the other senators who are more interested in padding their bank accounts rather than serving the American people.
To Slashdot editors: the acronym in the summary is wrongly explained!