Slashdot Mirror
First Planet Known To Orbit a White Dwarf Is Falling Apart (nasa.gov)
schwit1 writes: It's virtually certain that some white dwarfs still have planets in orbit despite their violent histories, but seeing those planets has proven difficult... at least, until now. Astronomers using the Kepler space observatory have spotted a planet circling around WD 1145+017, a white dwarf 570 light years away. Not that it's in great shape, mind you. The unusual light signature (PDF) from the dying star hints that the planet is disintegrating under the star's gravitational pressure, leaving behind a giant dust cloud. Researchers suspect it fell into its fatal orbit after the star's rapid change in mass triggered a planetary collision.
You should see more discoveries like this in the future, since the weaker light of a white dwarf is less likely to obscure planets. There's even a chance (however small) that collisions have bumped some planets into habitable zones, giving scientists an unusually clear view of worlds that could support life. Either way, it's evident that planetary systems don't vanish simply because their host stars are running out of time.
You should see more discoveries like this in the future, since the weaker light of a white dwarf is less likely to obscure planets. There's even a chance (however small) that collisions have bumped some planets into habitable zones, giving scientists an unusually clear view of worlds that could support life. Either way, it's evident that planetary systems don't vanish simply because their host stars are running out of time.
Nope.
White dwarfs are stars that have gone through an expansion to red giants & then shrink back down once they run out of low atomic level fuel like hydrogen & helium.
All planets close enough to be in a white dwarf's "habitable zone" would have been well inside the star during the star's red giant phase.
Unless someone comes up with a mechanism for the planets to escape from the red giant & then migrate even further inward to the white dwarf's now much smaller & closer "habitable zone", its extremely implausible.
Somebody please reassure me that this is once again a "journalist" attempting to talk of matters that far outstrip his comprehension & not an astrophysicist gone barking mad.
Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
"gradually lose about half their mass,"
"Still doesn't change mass"
So losing half the mass doesn't change the mass?
The mass of the star has changed, in that perhaps half of its mass has been expelled into a planetary nebula. That expelled mass is beyond the planet's orbit, and the orbit of the planet is subsequently determined only by the remaining stellar mass. Also, that expelled mass is moving away from the remaining white dwarf, and is being diluted in interstellar space. I've forgotten enough college physics to be unable to say what the expected effect on the planet is due to the combined effects of the force of expulsion and the reduced mass of the central star on the planet's orbit should be (does it move in or out, etc).