Slashdot Mirror


Full Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement Intellectual Property Chapter Analyzed (freezenet.ca)

Dangerous_Minds writes: Freezenet seems to be the first website to publish a full run-down of the final draft of the Intellectual Property chapter in the Trans-Pacific Partnership. The leak was published on Wikileaks earlier. The analysis seems to confirm what the EFF has said, saying that the chapter "confirms our worst fears about the agreement, and dashes the few hopes that we held out that its most onerous provisions wouldn't survive to the end of the negotiations." The analysis focuses mainly on copyright enforcement on the Internet and the impact the chapter would have on personal devices, VPN services, and ISPs. One noteworthy find by Freezenet is the inclusion of a "TPP Commission" which would decide when different countries are supposed to meet outside of the 10-year cycle, discussing "market circumstances" of "the development of new pharmaceutical products." What other roles the TPP Commission takes on is unclear given that it is not mentioned anywhere else in the chapter.

5 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. Re:So to summarize... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, more like by the horse they rode in on.

    This is yet another example of idiot governments rolling over and giving corporations everything they want, and utterly failing to serve the people who voted for them.

    This shit needs to stop. Because governments should be looking out for our interests, instead of lying to us and telling us what is good for corporations benefits us.

    Welcome to the oligarchy kids. We're all pretty much fucked now.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  2. Re:So to summarize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "This is yet another example of idiot governments rolling over and giving corporations everything they want, and utterly failing to serve the people who voted for them."

    You're under the dangerous idea that they ever worked for you.

    First, our brains are much worse at reality and thinking than thought. Science on reasoning:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYmi0DLzBdQ

    Protectionism for the rich and big business by state intervention, radical market interference.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHj2GaPuEhY#t=349

    Why you can't have capitalist democracy

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mxp_wgFWQo&feature=youtu.be&list=PLKR2GeygdHomOZeVKx3P0fqH58T3VghOj&t=724

    From war is a racket:

    "I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil intersts in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested."[p. 10]

    "War is a racket. ...It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives." [p. 23]
    "The general public shoulders the bill [for war]. This bill renders a horrible accounting. Newly placed gravestones. Mangled bodies. Shattered minds. Broken hearts and homes. Economic instability. Depression and all its attendant miseries. Back-breaking taxation for generations and generations." [p. 24]

    General Butler is especially trenchant when he looks at post-war casualties. He writes with great emotion about the thousands of tramautized soldiers, many of who lose their minds and are penned like animals until they die, and he notes that in his time, returning veterans are three times more likely to die prematurely than those who stayed home.

    http://www.amazon.com/War-Racket-Antiwar-Americas-Decorated/dp/0922915865/

    Some history on US imperialism by us corporations.

    https://kurukshetra1.wordpress.com/2015/09/27/a-brief-history-of-imperialism-and-state-violence-in-colombia/

    What happens when government tries to help its people - greece

    http://williamblum.org/

    US distribution of wealth

    https://imgur.com/a/FShfb/

    http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html

  3. Re: Governments = Evil. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

    Except with healthcare. More government control has been proven to be a good thing.

    ... and roads. Also public health and sanitation. And peace and public order. And the aqueduct. But apart from the aqueduct, roads, public health, sanitation, peace, public order, education, and healthcare, what have the Romans ... uh, government, what has the government done for us?

  4. Re:Governments = Evil. by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Govenments CAN be beneficial for those who lack power if, and only if, the government itself does not ally itself with those in power. Then it is at best useless. At worst compounding the problem.

    An absence of government creates a power vacuum that will instantly be filled by whoever has the most power. In our world this essentially means that the entity with the most money will rule. And of course abuse its power to suppress anyone wanting to either rise to power himself or to force those lacking the ability to defend themselves against it to bend to his interests. In short, that "rich" entity will force the "poor" ones to work against their own interest and for his.

    Any government that supports such a system can as well be considered failed because it serves no purpose. This is the state a society would assume anyway without government.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. Re:Governments = Evil. by tomthepom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    however in a free market capitalism monopolies are temporary and their existence depends on them providing a good enough product / service in the most cost effective way possible.

    ...or product dumping, price fixing, dividing markets, buying up competitors etc. etc.

    In the real world businesses hate competition, and will do anything legal to prevent it.