Slashdot Mirror


Paternal Stress Is Passed To Offspring (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Researchers have discovered that stress experienced by male mice can be passed on to their offspring. "In earlier work, these scientists exposed male mice to six weeks of alternating stressors like 36 hours of constant light, a 15-minute exposure to fox odor, exposure to a novel object (marbles) overnight, 15 minutes of restraint in a 50 mL conical tube, multiple cage changes, white noise all night long, or saturated bedding.

Then the scientists allowed the mice to breed (abstract). Adult offspring of these chronically stressed dads had reduced hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress axis reactivity; when they themselves were restrained for 15 minutes, they did not make as much corticosterone as mice sired by relaxed dads. This is relevant, and problematic, because blunted stress responses in humans are associated with neuropsychiatric disorders like depression, schizophrenia, and autism."

100 comments

  1. Poor mice by captaindomon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seems like a pretty barbaric test on the subjects. I know, for the greater good and everything etc. etc., but at some point where do we draw the line and say this isn't humane to perform?

    --
    Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
    1. Re:Poor mice by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Those mice still are better off than cows and pigs.

    2. Re:Poor mice by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Anyway, compare that to the stresses imposed by society on humans. Alarm clocks, driving to work, job stress and anxiety, family matters, bills to pay, house and mortgage, etc. It's different but since we have a longer lifespan I'd say we have it worst than the mice.

      Also, since this is Slashdot, I'll add that at least those mice were allowed to have sex.

    3. Re:Poor mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humans.

    4. Re:Poor mice by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Human meaning humanity, meaning empathy and compassion. Something you seem to lack since you jumped at the dictionary definition instead of being human.

    5. Re:Poor mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or human meaning homo sapiens, and NOT an animal. Do you not understand the scientific process?

    6. Re:Poor mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Homo sapiens is subset of animals.

    7. Re:Poor mice by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      They don't even seem different from stresses on humans. Most of those are things that a significant part of first-world humanity deals with on a daily basis.

    8. Re:Poor mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taxonomically, yes. But colloquially and historically, animals are the things that move around that are not human.

    9. Re:Poor mice by HairyNevus · · Score: 1

      You should probably read this article, from America's Finest News Source. It explains everything.

      --
      You were critically hit for no damage. The bruise will look nice, and maybe the scars will make good party talk.
    10. Re:Poor mice by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Humans are animals too, no matter what you may reply with.

    11. Re:Poor mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Seems like a pretty barbaric test on the subjects. I know, for the greater good and everything etc. etc., but at some point where do we draw the line and say this isn't humane to perform?

      When it stops helping people.

    12. Re:Poor mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, it doesn't really matter what anyone replies with. If they think that humans are not animals they are simply wrong. Humans are animals too. End of story. Some of us just think that we aren't because we think we are more intelligent or morally superior, but then again we're the ones experimenting on animals.

    13. Re: Poor mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes because "third-world" humans don't suffer from any of this.. No need for the caveat

    14. Re:Poor mice by Razed+By+TV · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, god will make more mice.

    15. Re:Poor mice by Nyder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree, this is inhumane to do to mice. We should just start making clones of humans so we can do the experiments on them.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    16. Re:Poor mice by Kohath · · Score: 2

      Oh no, exposure to marbles!

    17. Re: Poor mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also no need to hedge everything we say just so people like you didn't get indignant.

    18. Re:Poor mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was my thought exactly.

    19. Re:Poor mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The experimental sounded similar CIA stressing of captured combatants. (If the USA does it to humans it must be humane - isn't anything we do officially just part of our exceptionalism?)

    20. Re:Poor mice by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      All the great new drugs are tested on mice first... some of those mice are like, totally trippin' man... know what I mean?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    21. Re:Poor mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo pedants!

    22. Re:Poor Mice by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 2

      That rat just ate it's own shit and fucked it's mother in the cage. I guess we aren't more intelligent and superior?

      There are websites that you can find to show that some humans do exactly the same sort of thing. On the other hand, mice don't watch reality TV shows so that's a win for them!

    23. Re:Poor mice by LessThanObvious · · Score: 1

      The real purpose of the study is to find alternatives to waterboarding at Gitmo, but so far prisoners don't seem to be all that bothered by marbles or fox odor. Hopes were high when 96% of mice tested eventually admitted to having ties to extremist factions.

    24. Re: Poor mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's common sense, be kind of a jerk to your kids and your kids will kind of be jerks too.

    25. Re:Poor mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Animal cruelty in scientific testing presents a moral dilemma. We need the knowledge. If we choose not to do the tests, then we choose to remain in ignorance, which could result in suffering and death for uncountable numbers of people.

      The means of gaining life-saving knowledge is before us. But it requires us to inflict a lot of suffering on animals. So it is a tough call.

    26. Re:Poor mice by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Human meaning humanity, meaning empathy and compassion. Something you seem to lack since you jumped at the dictionary definition instead of being human.

      Humane, like the cake, is a lie.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    27. Re:Poor mice by Radish03 · · Score: 2

      It's actually the withdrawal symptoms with that one. Have you ever seen a mouse who's lost his marbles?

    28. Re:Poor mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One day they'll bulldoze our planet and all will be even.

    29. Re:Poor mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? What do you think happens when the experiment is over?

    30. Re:Poor mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those mice still are better off than cows and pigs.

      No, they aren't. Cows and pigs have a chance at being treated reasonably well right up until the point we kill them.

      These mice are made to suffer their entire lives before they are killed and disposed of.

      I'd rather be lazing about, fattened up, then killed then be tortured my whole life and killed all the same.

    31. Re:Poor mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But this study's result seems obvious and is not new. It's unnecessary torture.

    32. Re:Poor mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we're talking about cows/pigs in US or EU countries, i would say they actually live in luxury.
      The dogs/cats that people lock up in their flats on the other hand.. :(

    33. Re: Poor mice by Falos · · Score: 1

      Apparently it should have been framed in reverse as an implicit umbrella - "even [working class] first-worlders" - to avoid affecting the more sensitive hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal glands in the audience.

      Then again, some stressors are exclusive to the subgroup - third worlders don't have to tiptoe around said SJW glands.

    34. Re:Poor mice by Falos · · Score: 1

      > obvious
      I must be less familiar with epigenetics than you. At any rate, science will happily rely on "obvious" to choose studies, but doesn't recognize it as a valid metric in formal conclusions. Mad rigogs, yo.

    35. Re: Poor mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But this has to do with genetics, not how the mice treat their offspring. Personally, this is great, because it shows the male side of things matters when creating offspring, something that radical feminists have been attempting to deny for a long time now.

  2. epigenetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    tag

  3. That explains it by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

    Fearful parents have crazy kids

    Suddenly the Middle East makes sense.

    And certain political groups.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:That explains it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jews? You're talking about the Jews right?

    2. Re:That explains it by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      So maybe we need to stop putting people into tiny fabric boxes and subjecting them to annual "performance review" torture processes. As a recent dad I am struck how much rearing kids in a good environment is a low priority in this and many other countries.

  4. Re:And to think someone got paid for this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If a dude works out a lot, their kids won't be born with super massive muscles, no matter what you might think from watching Dragon Ball Z. Genetics doesn't work that way.

    So, no, it isn't "obvious - common sense" when we do discover new things that we would think won't be passed on, but in actuality, do get passed on.

  5. Humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As expected based on what's seen in humans.

    Some reading: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713176/ and more accessible: http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2010/05/05/racism-behind-disgracefulinfant-mortality-rates-among-africanamericans/

  6. Was Darwin partially wrong then? by parallel_prankster · · Score: 1

    It seems like stress can have an impact on our genetic system that can be passed down to the offspring. Seems like an evolution not just based on natural selection but also based on the parent gene's experience as well. This is just a long shot, I am not an expert on this by any means!

    1. Re:Was Darwin partially wrong then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetics

      So, I'd say no, the information passed around is more than just pure DNA. That does not make Darwin 'wrong'.

    2. Re:Was Darwin partially wrong then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pssst... Darwin and his contemporaries never heard of DNA

    3. Re:Was Darwin partially wrong then? by alvinrod · · Score: 3, Informative

      Darwin just wasn't aware of epigenetics, but that doesn't make him wrong. Like many other scientific theories, we do additional studies and and refine the theories when we find results that they fail to explain or results that contradict our hypotheses. This isn't something completely new, but we're just scratching at the surfaces of how it works.

      Here's one particular study in the area that's particularly interesting. What the researchers found was that people who's grandparents had suffered through a famine had lower mortality rates for certain diseases. What we're learning is that our DNA has some feedback mechanisms to environmental responses and isn't just a simple matter of passing along traits through genes. It's some really fascinating stuff.

    4. Re:Was Darwin partially wrong then? by parallel_prankster · · Score: 1

      Is this a genetic trait passed down ? Or is this a mutation that just happens to affect the next in line?

    5. Re:Was Darwin partially wrong then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fail at biology.

    6. Re:Was Darwin partially wrong then? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It's really pathetic how so many young, enthusiastic, pro-science kids know so little about the stuff they champion. They'll scream for hours own end about people needing to get educated about the subject because they're on some sort of political tirade and have decided that the subject is an "issue" that their political party of choice depends on. Yet they can't tell you the first fucking thing about the issue beyond the talking points in their memo.

    7. Re:Was Darwin partially wrong then? by narcc · · Score: 1

      Inheritance of acquired characteristics, not very long ago, was scientific heresy. There was evidence for it, but was lambasted and dismissed. (International politics may have played a role here.) There's a real danger in elevating things like this to sacred truths.

      Darwin just wasn't aware of epigenetics, but that doesn't make him wrong.

      On the contrary, it would appear that he was wrong. He went out of his way to deny just about everything Lamarck put forward. On the Origin of Species is not a holy book, sacred text, or any other similar thing. We've long moved beyond it. It was not the final word, nor is it (or Darwin) infallible.

      What you really want to say is something obvious like "this doesn't mean evolution isn't true". That's fine, but why not just say that instead of some silly, indefensible, nonsense like this?

    8. Re:Was Darwin partially wrong then? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It seems like stress can have an impact on our genetic system that can be passed down to the offspring. Seems like an evolution not just based on natural selection but also based on the parent gene's experience as well. This is just a long shot, I am not an expert on this by any means!

      Not likely Natural selection is natural selection. Ignoring th efact that Darwin didn't even know about genes, teh question isn't relevant to him. More likely (though I do nopt know at this time) the stress has an effect on the genetic makeup of the father's sperm.

      Another similar thing is a "maybe" link between obesity issues, possibly caused by exposure to estrogen mimic plastics, that may be pased to future generations.

      http://www.sciencedaily.com/re...

      Now DES is a mimic that has been already linked to birth defects.

      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pm...

      And bispnenol-A was yanked for being a mimic. That was in a lot of childrens drinking bottles.

      A long, but good paper on xenoestrogens and the problems they cause.. Xenoestrogens's links to obesity

      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pm... But here is where it gets even more interesting. http://www.technology.org/2013...

      Now scientists may indeed tie the two together. Too much estrognen mimic substances causeing male birth defects and obesity, being passed down to offspring by way of damaged genes. These damaged genes might be (un) natural selection in reverse. Not so good.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    9. Re:Was Darwin partially wrong then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inheritance of acquired characteristics, not very long ago, was scientific heresy. There was evidence for it, but was lambasted and dismissed. (International politics may have played a role here.)

      Care to explain? I'm always fond of hearing new conspiracy theories. Do you mean the West dismissed Lamarck because the Soviets had Lysenko? But Lysenkoism was crazier than Welteislehre.

    10. Re:Was Darwin partially wrong then? by narcc · · Score: 1

      Who is suggesting a conspiracy? I don't know how you came to that conclusion. I was suggesting that politics/nationalism is one reason that it remained a heresy, despite the existing evidence.

      Did I really need to explain this?

  7. Flynn effect by avandesande · · Score: 2

    This could explain the Flynn effect, which still exists when controlling for nutrition. I've often thought this is why problems can persist in children of extreme poverty and can persist over generations.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re: Flynn effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The disorders listed are also pet features studied in novel intellectual abilities.

  8. Relevant for humans? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Unless humans women are breeding with male mice, I don't see this as being immediately relevant. Something to test for, to be sure, but there are some minor differences between the species.

    1. Re:Relevant for humans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here:

      http://www.livescience.com/32860-why-do-medical-researchers-use-mice.html

      Fifth paragraph.

      You're welcome, although you did not deserve it.

    2. Re:Relevant for humans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does gravity only affect apples falling from trees? Until we've measured it on every possible type of matter, we probably shouldn't generalize.

    3. Re:Relevant for humans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Few years ago there was a study of the opposite effect when it comes to human females. If the mother is exposed to elevated levels of stress, the children show more sensitivity to the stress hormones, not less as it was here.

    4. Re:Relevant for humans? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Unless humans women are breeding with male mice

      I'm sure that there is a Tube for that, but you'll have to google it yourself.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  9. Just have to love epigenetics... by digitus2001 · · Score: 1

    "Another investigation highlighted that a sharp change in food availability in paternal grandmothers' resulted in an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality in granddaughters adults' life" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%96verkalix_study)

    Not only what you do can be passed to you children, but maybe also what your parents did!

    1. Re: Just have to love epigenetics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there was a similar study that recently concluded that fear can be passed down to the offspring of mice. mice were subjected to a smell and trained to fear it, then it's offspring wound up be afraid of it.

  10. How long would it take to filter out the stress? by Sowelu · · Score: 1

    Suppose this applies to humans the same as mice. How long do you think it takes for the effects of stress to show up in RNA, and how long does it take for it to be cleared? Of course there's there's some delay because of sperm production, but I didn't see any other info about the time required in that abstract. (Probably makes sense that it would be a study of its own.)

    Depending on how rapid the onset and falloff are, it might be pretty reasonable to say "yeah, that was a pretty bad couple weeks, let's put off trying for kids for a month".

  11. This makes me stressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm bearing a lot of stress from the implications of this new finding. The prospect of passing this stress to my child stresses me.

    1. Re:This makes me stressed by Marginal+Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm bearing a lot of stress from the implications of this new finding. The prospect of passing this stress to my child stresses me.

      In that vein, when you do have a child, don't be surprised if the poor little thing starts crying practically the moment it's born.

  12. Immigration by gurps_npc · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Modern common sense (which is often wrong), believes that:

    1) First generation immigrants work very hard, but rarely become successful themselves. They live a very high stress life, but do manage to send their kids to college...

    2) Second generation immigrants succeed far beyond their parents, becoming doctors, lawyers, and other upper class positions. By the time they father children, they usually have made it, and live with less stress than their parents.

    3) Whereupon their children have no stress and become wastrels,

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Immigration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never knew exactly what to define myself as. Wastrel. Perfect.

    2. Re:Immigration by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      I think all this depends on the behavior of the male mice . . .did they stay around to take care and nurture their offspring? Did they pass off the stress to the mouse mother, who in turn, passed it off to the mouse child . . . ?

      The behavior of a human male, after the birth of a child has more affect on the baby, then anything that happened before the birth.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Immigration by techno-vampire · · Score: 2

      Actually, many first-generation immigrants are quite successful, at least by their own standards. They have much better lives than they would have had if they'd stayed home, and are able to send their children to college, something that they'd never have dreamt of doing in the Old Country. Just because they don't end up in the 1% doesn't mean that they're not a success.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  13. Note To Self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do not lock self, children in 50ml tube.

  14. Re:And to think someone got paid for this.... by x0ra · · Score: 3, Informative

    We're talking epigenetics here, so environmentally driven gene expression in the father might be passed down to the kid. Beside, a father working out is more likely to have a proper nutrition and saner lifestyle (better sleep pattern, less partying / drinking, less overall stress), and thus give good habit to his kid giving him key to succeed..

  15. Poor Mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that's why It's called Humane and not Animalane. That rat just ate it's own shit and fucked it's mother in the cage. I guess we aren't more intelligent and superior?

    Give me a break.

  16. Komunitas Belajar Komputer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Visit me please.... i'm from indonesia...

    http://komunitasbelajarkomputer.blogspot.co.id/

  17. Time to sterlize criminal inmates then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine the kind of stress they will pass on...

    1. Re:Time to sterlize criminal inmates then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lamarck of Cain?

  18. What doesn't kill you makes your kids weaker? by __aasehi2499 · · Score: 1

    What doesn't kill you makes your kids weaker?

    1. Re:What doesn't kill you makes your kids weaker? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. It causes your kids to seek a less stressful environment and move to a hippie commune where they can commune with nature.

      Or hermits.

      That is the takeaway message from this study.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  19. Same thing happens with humans by koan · · Score: 1

    It's called epigenetics.
    https://www.google.com/search?...

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  20. Lysenkoism? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    After 60 years, we've turned around and decided discredited Russian biologist Trofim Lysenko was actually right??

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Lysenkoism? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      After 60 years, we've turned around and decided discredited Russian biologist Trofim Lysenko was actually right??

      I hope you are joking.

      Lysenkoism It was a politically based movement - one that reminds me of denialists, that believed that things like wheat and barley could spontaneously transmute to each other, and many other odd beliefs. It's right up there with the idea that if your hand was cut off, your children will be born without one of their hands.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Lysenkoism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Lysenkoism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, I cut my finger off and my daughter has trigger finger in her thumbs.

    4. Re:Lysenkoism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't call her Trigger or she'll pull it on you.

  21. Darwin was right by tomhath · · Score: 1

    He theorized that organisms adapt to their environment. If the environment causes stress in the parents you should expect to see changes in the offspring as a result.

    1. Re:Darwin was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you go to school in the bible belt that you don't know the difference between Darwin and Lamarck?

  22. Paternal Stress Is Passed To Offspring by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    (in mice)

    Typical headline soundbite bullshit.

  23. 65% by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2

    Is this one of those unduplicateable experiments?

  24. There are some human studies too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Study of Holocaust survivors finds trauma passed on to children's genes
    http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/21/study-of-holocaust-survivors-finds-trauma-passed-on-to-childrens-genes

  25. Re:And to think someone got paid for this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the people I know who work out have the worse life styles. The fatter people just eat too much bad food. The ones working out party more, drink more, and often do drugs. They have more stress in trying to keep their body looking good for night 'conquests' than the people who accept their physical makeup and do other things.

  26. Re:And to think someone got paid for this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But that's only because of the strange idea most people have about exercise, that it's meant to make you look pumped up instead of improving your health and wellbeing. I don't go to the gym because I don't want to meet these idiots. I work out by myself because it makes me feel good and because it might give me a couple more years of autonomous life than my car-driving, couch-sitting parents who both died early after long illness. Looking younger is a nice side effect, feeling younger is what matters.

  27. More fraudulent ''research' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Not shit Sherlock, to the entire paper
    2) Human beings aren't mice. What sort of cretin can't even understand that?

    This is yet another example of the tens of thousands of pointless examples of vivisection that take place every year.

  28. Boy, was I mistaken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All along I thought this was a rat race. I guess it's only been mice. Not as bad, when you think about it.

  29. Proper controls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did they impregnate the female mice by hand artificial insemination, or just let the male interact with the female? If the latter, how do they know it was not stress effects passed from the male to the female, and then to the offspring? I did not see anything in the paper that mentioned they controlled for this. I really hate reading papers where they just assume everything is done properly and attempt to infer indirect molecular effects of environmental factors. Until they show they have put in place the proper controls this is junk science.

  30. Like many things do, this story reminds me of ... by timothy · · Score: 1

    the "I learned it by watching you!" anti-drug commercial of the '80s.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    It is amazing how things that aren't obviously genetic can be so linked to parentage ... I can understand hair color, facial structure, height, etc, but some behaviors like facial expression, or posture, or even complex behaviors like hoarding that I used to assume were entirely learned just seem too spookily similar from one generation to the next for them to be only imitation. Of course maybe they *are* just imitation anyhow, but I like to hope not ;)

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5