Slashdot Mirror
The IRS Has Stingray Devices (theguardian.com)
An anonymous reader writes: The Guardian reports that the use of stingray technology — devices that simulate cell towers in order to gather phone data — is not limited to intelligence agencies and law enforcement. It turns out the Internal Revenue Service owns some of the devices as well. It's unknown how or why the tax agency uses the stingray devices. The only reason The Guardian figured it out was that they happened to see an IRS invoice from when they paid a company to upgrade one of their devices and provide training on its use. It's thought they're being used when the IRS collaborates with other agencies to knock down money laundering operations. "... there are currently between 2,000 and 3,000 "special agents" in the IRS who form the criminal investigation division (CID). They have the ability to get PEN register orders – the only authority needed to use Stingray devices."
so they can spy on TeaParty orgs...
I'd think they'd be using them on their own employees, given the shenanigans at the IRS over the past few years.
I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?
We'll see that agencies of all types will have been using these. I can see how the military may feel compelled to switch these on around bases to eavesdrop after the Fort Hood shooting, and the IRS when conducting Department of Treasury-related investigations to bring down Al Capone might need one on a stake out, but these are exceptions rather than daily operations. Are we all really well served by just any government department messing about with communications?
For example, do rail transport officials need to have cell phone eavesdropping to prevent the stealing of valuable cargo because of the latest hot tip? Do the people around airports and sea ports? Ag and Fish people looking for people hunting out of season?
This is the government mind-set of us versus them. Rather than have departments handle things like investigations and smart information sharing, power brokers compartmentalize, see what other agencies have, and then decide they need it for themselves. We have dod/cia/nsa/dia/dhs/atf/doj/local police/state police/city police/etc/etc. Sometimes they play ball and sometimes they don't. When they don't or cant because of inefficiency or ineptness, they just buy what they want and bam, duplicity and overlap arrives and never goes away once it becomes status quo, forever perpetuated and grown as an expense-sink in the budgets. Small government conservatives recognize this insanity (except the douche-bag war hawks who give 'defense' spending a pass since it wins them nationalist 'murica votes). New normal.
'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
The IRS has a law enforcement group that frequently goes after organized crime. I'd imagine they need to spy on criminal communications as much as anyone.
Aside from wondering whether any agency should have them, I don't know what makes the IRS worthy of note as an operator.
What could possibly go wrong?
You should have nothing to hide, citizen.
If you can read this, it means that I bothered to log in.
with lasers!
the use of stingray technology is not limited to intelligence agencies and law enforcement.
there are currently between 2,000 and 3,000 "special agents" in the IRS who form the criminal investigation division (CID).
Does that not count as law enforcement? I mean, yeah, it's tax, so it's not one of the cool crimes, but still.
systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
are stingrays illegal to purchase? are they difficult to build? this would be an awesome hobby project.
All your freedom is belong to Russia.
Way to sell out your freedom for Security Paranoia, America!
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
FTFY : The IRS is an organized crime that frequently goes after the people who pay for it's existence. I'd imagine they need to spy on criminal communications as much as anyone.
J. Edgar Hoover was head of the FBI, and nobody really wanted to give him more power if they could help it.
A perfectly logical move, come to think of it. Honestly, the federal government is large enough that some police for most of it's branches makes some sense.
Plus, by having each 'police department' in it's own agency, you don't have the problems of them getting distracted all going after pedophiles or something. Good for catching pedophiles, but eventually allowing the polluters, poachers, bank transfer fraudsters, and everybody else 'off the hook' isn't a good outcome either.
I don't read AC A human right
nt....
What gets me, at this point, is why would a serious criminal carry a cell phone ?
If you're a serious terrorist or a member of $criminal_organization, carrying a cell phone seems to have more risks than benefits. So why do it ?
The more intelligent folks out there with an agenda aren't going to talk about this over a GD cell phone. They're not going to carry one so you can track their movements.
The government has to know this, so I question who / what their real targets are.
If I were of evil-mind, I would leave my cell phone in some abandoned building with a whole bunch of stuff that goes BOOM to greet the entry team that kicks down the door after tracking the phone.
Or, the not so evil version.
Box the phone up, FedEx that bad boy around the US for a while just to drive people crazy.
The FBI is no longer in the law enforcement business. The FBI is now primarily concerned with 'national security.'
New York Times:
foreignpolicy.com:
Aren't we just supposed to assume that all our shit is being recorded, and *just keep shopping*? I mean, like, what? Is any of this going to make one bit of difference during the elections? Please! The resistance against any of this is so feeble, it does not register anywhere outside the truther sites.
“He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
"What is your hypothetical administration going to do to end this nonsense of the federal government spying on it's citizens without a warrant when: ,turning the US into a "Surveillance State" where anyone with any level of technical sophistication wants nothing to do with contributing their expertise to the betterment of said society.
1- Historical information shows clearly that incidents of crime and terrorism have not been reduced in a credible way by warrantless wiretapping of citizens.
2- Warrantless wiretapping has lead to trials where the first and fourth amendment rights of the defendants has been largely ignored
3- Evidence collected by warrantless wiretapping of citizens has been used to support charges against said defendants despite their rights being violated.
4- Spying on citizens CLEARLY represents a waste of taxpayer dollars that could be spent on using said resources to fight terrorism.
5- Repeated spying on defendants such as Aaron Schwartz, has lead to situations where the very people who are experts that could contribute to the improvement of the use of surveillance where it is warranted in a fair and lawful way are victimized
And finally:
6- Any credible polling of the American public indicates that constituents of both major political parties clearly DO NOT WANT to live in a surveillance state?"
Ask Donald Trump, Ask Hillary Clinton, ask Bernie Sanders etc.. and watch them stumble and hone and haw or watch them go into some circular non-sequitur argument about "Well I love America and those people who have nothing to hide have nothing to fear and we are trying to prevent 9-11, thats right Nine Eleven! Nine Eleven was bad!" and other tired old clap trap.
Core point breakthrough, winning channel A disadvantage is T brand breakthrough brand for its channel chaos, the channel characteristics of low profits, A brand should be looking for key distributors to establish a model market, were major breakthroughs. First, find the where can buy the cheapest composite fencing core dealers. Since these products are dispensable, while T brand has controlled the part of the dealer, then A brand should have a strategic position to find dealers focus on breakthroughs, focusing on support. You can find other medium-sized dealers, or focus on supporting the original loyal dealers, increased advertising and promotional efforts, let A main push products, manufacturers work together with the dealer, the depth distribution, establish a model market. A brand because of the higher cost of products, consumer choice is inevitable, therefore, after major breakthroughs market is bound to attract the attention of other dealers. Second, increase efforts in building distribution channels for second installment tracking service and training upgrade and enhance their confidence. Since T brand channel chaos, the price wpc fence post in uk system is not stable, because A brand can not make the same mistake, in the key markets breakthrough, A brand may have become consumers of named products, manufacturers and you should then do the second installment of the Joint Dealer Network The building, formed a sound marketing network, covering the retail market, the consolidation of the strategic position. Thirdly, the integrated marketing channels, channel cost compression. A channel is the high cost of malpractice brand's largest market, fourth, stable price system, to ensure that dealers profit. T brand price confusion, low profit channel is well known, and therefore. A brand from the outset has formulated strict norms of channel policy, improve the price system to ensure that all levels of dealer profits, and the formation of a uniform price level in the terminal market in order to get the brand's influence. Disease status quo, is also changing. Specific circumstances change, then our approach should also be changed, should not be rigid. Because the overall competitiveness A brand is weak, relatively difficult market to 8ft fence panels South Africa break through, so the focus point on the market, key distributors breakthrough is the first step, the next to point, and gradually expand to form the surface of a breakthrough, A brand can finally achieve a competitive position. More solutions than problems! When we are faced with difficult problems, the traditional ways of thinking can not be solved, it is necessary out of conventional restraint, combined with the correct time and space, focusing on aging, effective combination, the result might suddenly see the light. http://wpcdeckingplank.com/dec... http://ecodeckingboard.com/
I would have thought, with The Leveson Inquiry and all, that if a newspaper managed to get hold of such a device they'd keep quiet about it.
At the bottom of the
Special agents tap phones in the pursuit of legal cases. Its not that shocking that the IRS has stingrays. The FDA probably has them too. Back in the 80s I had a friend whose phone was tapped by the IRS because he was a manager for an idiot that absconded with the employee withholding and blew that money along with another million or so dollars at a strip club. It took the IRS a while to believe that the business owner really was that big of an idiot and they did a thorough investigation before deciding not to throw him in prison and just garnish his wages till the end of time.
Here's how it goes:
1) Give stingray technology to multiple agencies.
2) Reduce the number of stingrays your agency operates to avoid those pesky congressional investigations AND reduce your yearly operating budget.
3) Get data from other agencies on request.
4) Profit!
Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
Not only has the IRS become the largest welfare agency in the US, it's now being used extensively to spy upon the citizens of the US. The US two-party system has collapsed into a single fascist collaboration.
"If I were not in the CID..."
So when are cell phone comms going to be encrypted? Why should operators like T-mobile and Sprint allow this to continue? AT&T/Verizon are hopelessly corrupt at this point. I only hold out hope where there's some desire for competition.
What can be encrypted using existing technologies and what can't?
Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
How bad could it be? Let's see here... We have a now retired head of the IRS who many believe should be indicted for wrong doing against American citizens. We have a justice department who many know does not enforce the rule of law (and constitution) but rather have a penchant for wrongly persecuting innocent American citizens. We have and administration, and their constituents, which seek to dismantle government mechanisms that were put in place to keep the government in check from becoming tyrannical and oppressive. We have a president who bypasses an elected legislative branch when he doesn't get his way. We have activist judges enacting their beliefs rather than the rule of law.
What could possibly go wrong with the IRS possessing stingrays?!??
Is to repeal the 16th Amendment, abolish the IRS and institute the Fair Tax.
It's my understanding that to catch crooks (in this case, the IRS) with a Stingray, you need to set it up near the crooks. It's not a bug that you plant in their phone and give the phone back to them.