Slashdot Mirror
National Coalition Calls for Campus Censorship of "Offensive" Speech (washingtonpost.com)
schwit1 writes with this opinion piece from Eugene Volokh, who teaches free speech law at UCLA School of Law, about the push to ban "offensive" speech and censor websites on campus. He writes: "A large coalition of advocacy groups has asked the U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights to pressure colleges to (1) punish students for their speech and (2) block student access to certain Web sites — especially sites such as Yik Yak, which allow students to anonymously post their views..... Yet another example of today's Anti-Free Speech Movement for American universities — unfortunately, one that fits well into the Education Department's attitudes. Fortunately, courts have firmly rejected these kinds of calls to restrict college student speech, though the OCR and the college administrations it pressures can get away with a lot of restrictions until the lawsuits are actually brought."
STFU. What was that? Rights. Well...
For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
... how very European of them.
Next thing you know the USA will have anti-holocaust denial laws (for the Nazi holocaust) and anti-holocaust assertion laws (for the Native American holocaust).
In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
I don't understand how they can function.
If they don't like free speech they should leave the country and go live in north korea.
Liberals are all about freedom, expression, tolerance, etc. until you do or say something that they don't like.
Tolerance and acceptance only apply to those they tolerate and accept. Everyone else gets branded a bigot hate monger, racist, misogynist, etc. the instant they exercise their own right to speak their mind or utter any un-PC truths. This behavior by liberals, of course, is the very definition of bigotry.
Free speech only means anything if it's the freedom to say things that are dangerous or unpopular.
It shouldn't mean the freedom to only say what is benign, acceptable, trivial, or politically correct.
During the 1960s college and university campuses were the birth places of free speech for students. Times have certainly changed with students demanding censorship.
political correctness offends me.
Why not? There are already folks who get all misty when they talk of censoring/criminalizing global warming skeptics.
OMG, if we let people say whatever they want, they might say something that conflicts with my worldview and gives me a boo-boo or a tummyache.
Wah Wah Wah!
SJWs, please help protect me from hearing anything I don't like!!
Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
You know, I was just struck with how like vaccination this whole thing is - these students grew up in a much more 'free speech' era than, say, the 1960s. As such, they aren't used to seeing the harm that anti-free speech laws and regulations cause.
Much like anti-vaxxors today who feel free to refuse vaccination because they haven't experienced the outbreaks and plagues that happened in history.
I mean, I understand because I'm old enough to have a grandfather who was permanently affected by polio. So I grew up with that. But those much younger than me?
I don't read AC A human right
Are we to ask them who was killed when they migrated across the land bridge from Asia? Or about internecine warfare prior to the coming of the white man? It seems that they're as much immigrants here in the Americas as are the Europeans; the only difference is they got here before the Europeans did. There's no evidence humans evolved on this continent at all.
What's always been surprising to me about the politically correct take on the Native American's situation is that it pays absolutely no mind to just how vicious and evil the Indians were to each other -- varied by tribe and time, of course, but still, they were all about conquer and murder and etc. before Europeans ever arrived here. Look at how the Aztec managed things, for example. You just haven't lived until you've seen the carved-out skull of a virgin, I tell ya.
Every taking of land -- ever, I suspect -- was done by some fairly active stomping of the locals into the ground or enslaving them, abusing them, etc. by the stronger and/or more technologically sophisticated party (but I repeat myself.)
Characterizing our Native Americans as innocents to whom evil was done doesn't seem to be even close to an accurate representation of history.
Finally, there's only just so much worship of "traditional ways" you can pursue before you've gone and shot yourself right in the foot. That's as much of a problem -- a self-inflicted one -- as anything that actually makes the news. But of course, you can't really say that without coming under some pretty heavy criticism. Not that such a thing could happen here on slashdot, of course. :)
I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
Kind of hard to talk about something that hasn't happened yet.
The vast majority of the Syrians that have fled their country have ended up in Turkey, Lebanon, and Jordan. Kind of hard to holocaust White Europeans from there...
Besides, this isn't Camp of the Saints . Pre-war, Syria had one of the best educated and least religious populations of the nominally Islamic nations. The Syrians would be much better able to integrate into the workforce to actually contribute to the countries they resettle in, and not simply drag the economy down. This isn't some mass of rural-villagers or subsistence farmers, there was an actual economy and education system in Syria before the civil war.
Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
So, you're saying that the technologically superior has the right to exterminate the inferior, especially if the latter is not as ethically immaculate as some positive racist (albeit outdated) narrative tells us?
Noticeably missing from that list are some of the bigger civil rights organizations like NAACP. It looks like mostly feminist SJWs tilting at windmills again.
Let me see if I can provide an analogy to your argument... "I knew that my neighbor beat his wife sometimes, so I was totally justified in burning their house to the ground."
What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
It's more apt to say that they tend to destroy or assimilate the inferior.
It's a rather hard moral dilemma whether or not to interact with technically inferior civilizations, often you can help them in many ways but the mere exposure tends to start the assimilation process.
No sir I dont like it.
What holocaust? The one that's never happened and never will, but liars cling to to justify their condemnation of others? If all the refugees were to go to Germany today, I read that the Islamic population would go from 3% to 4%. So your assertion is that 4% of the population would be able to holocaust the 96% with impunity? I question your logic, but your illogical racist position has already thrown your logic into question.
Learn to love Alaska
I remember when it was the religious right that was trying to impose its values on society using the government (eg: abortion rights). The left was positioning itself as supporting the live and let live attitude, especially concerning sex. Now, today's left is all about campus 'rape tribunals' that model soviet show trials and pushes out tons of fear-mongering propaganda to create neurotic behavior in young people (mostly men) about sex. Now this 'coalition'... I guess like the neocons censored for jesus, the New Left censors for marx. Yay for big statists!
How about we just let individuals speak their minds and deal with the fact that not everyone will agree? That is a required cornerstone of learning, right? Free thought? Free expression that includes criticism? What a bunch of pissant crybabies this society's become.
It may not be, but when it's super easy to expand the definitions of 'harassment' to include criticism, suddenly the law becomes a tool to censor speech.
STFU.
So what you are saying is that you find this idea highly offensive and would like to have the people who suggested it censored. ;-)
Mind you I think you have hit on by far the most educational response to this request which is to immediately censor the idiots who made it. This would of course trigger a huge backlash from them against the injustice of them being silenced which would be the perfect time to point out that you found their ideas highly offensive and were just giving them exactly what they asked for.
Hopefully that would teach them a valuable lesson on the importance of free speech but sadly I doubt it if they were stupid enough to come up with the request in the first place.
I don't like it, but honestly I feel like they should be able to say what they want so long as they don't get in my face about it. Most people are jerks anyway, so it makes sense that Yik Yak would be used to release all that pent up jerk-steam anonymously. Being a gentlemen in public, but a racist backwoods hick on your own time? That's fine by me. You can even have your little pseudo-intellectual conversations about it on Storm Front, call yourself a European American, and a "Paleo-conservative". I don't care. I'll defend your right to be a jerk and to have your online discourse come back to haunt you when you fail to be anonymous about it one day.
Indians were wiped out over the course of a couple hundred years, not the thousands it took them to colonize the Americas. And then you state they wiped out peoples as they settled (no evidence), and compare this thousands of years of settlement to a couple hundred years? Native Americans killed each other sometimes so Wounded Knee and the trail of tears are cool with you? What kind of logic is that?
fight stupidity with more stupidity
It seems like you've already started
In the US we already have less than 90% of the crime being perpetrated by less than 10% of the population. I can see why they might be upset with a 1% bump nearly made entirely of Muslim males from shit holes and failed states in the Middle East, in their teens and twenties, who are particularly notorious for their bad behavior.