Slashdot Mirror
Apple Usurps Oracle As the Biggest Threat To PC Security
AmiMoJo writes: According to data from Secunia, Apple's software for Windows is now the biggest threat to PC security, surpassing previous long term champion Java. Among U.S. users, some 61 percent of computers detected running QuickTime did not have the latest version. With iTunes, 47 percent of the installations were outdated versions. There were 18 vulnerabilities in Apple QuickTime 7 at the time of the study. Oracle has now fallen/risen to 2nd place, followed by Adobe. All three vendors bundle automatic updater utilities with their software, but users seem to be declining new versions. Update fatigue, perhaps?
iTunes.
iTunes attempts to install a fuckton of useless shit, and let's face it, most people are just going to click 'lolwut okay'.
Valid question. I used to install Quicktime... 4? On my Pentium 2 MMX 200mhz computer back in the mid 1990's so I could watch movie trailers on Apple's website in middle school. That's the last time I installed Quicktime that I can remember. I'm honestly curious what purpose it serves today? Is it a web browser plugin or what? I haven't even thought of Quicktime in YEARS.... let alone had a reason to use it...
My understanding is that versions of iTunes prior to 10.5 required Quicktime. Quicktime has always been more than a video player -- it's an entire multimedia framework, with APIs for doing a whole host of multimedia playback, editing, and conversion capabilities. It was the main multimedia framework for Mac OS X up until 10.7 (Lion).
iTunes would have used it for both media playback, as well as for transcoding video from various formats/sizes for various Apple devices (iPhone, AppleTV, etc.). Newer versions no longer require Quicktime so far as I'm aware -- however, this article is about people who aren't keeping their software up-to-date, so it wouldn't be surprising to learn that they're still running older OS's and older versions of iTunes.
Yaz
Plus we're tired of being tricked into accidentally downloading unwanted virusscanners (flash), toolbars (java), and whatever other crap they want to bundle. We are tired of running two dozen automatic update tools at all times, all fighting for internet access and all using memory and CPU time. Sure, it's very little and it mostly ends up in swap anyways - but it adds up. And we are certainly tired of having to deal with that crap every time we boot the machine.
It's a great mystery to me why Windows does not have a unified update service (like Windows Update, but also including tools from 3rd parties). It doesn't even have to go through Microsofts servers - just let programs register their own server with the update service, and then let the update service do updates at times when it is convenient to me.
I've solved at least part of this problem by simply not having QuickTime or Java installed. Flash is installed, but only runs on demand (which is actually far less often than you'd imagine). Windows Update I've shut down after Microsoft started pushing spyware and adware as "important updates". So now I run a risk of "hackers". So far they've proven less of a nuisance than actual vendors...
From TFS, the biggest infection vector isn't "Apple", it is simply users who have failed to update.
Clickbait nonsense. Dice. But I repeat myself.
I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
The Apple HIG was around long before Windows was even released, much less 10 years later when Microsoft formalized the Windows HIG.
Apple builds UI's to their own HIG, and builds their software to conform to their HIG across any platforms they port it to.
Microsoft builds their UI's to the port's platform's HIG. (Most other companies do this too.)
That's why you get retarded shit in the Windows version of iTunes, like the [Cancel] [OK] button sequence instead of the Windows standard [OK] [Cancel] sequence. The Windows HIG specifies that they should be [OK] [Cancel] and OK should be the default action on the form. This allows keyboard users to tab out of the last form field and "click" the button with the spacebar without even reaching for the mouse. The Apple HIG specifies those buttons in the opposite order because right-handed mouse users (that's 75% of the user base, generally speaking) find it easiest to click the right-most button in a set of buttons, making the OK button the easiest to reach. And that's just one example of piddly little differences between MacOS (and Mac OS X) and Windows HIG's.
You can argue (and argue, and argue...) that Apple's way is better or worse or whatever. But don't argue that Apple's way wasn't around first. It was. It was by far the first formal HIG of any of the modern OS platforms. A better argument would be that Apple needs to follow the "when in Rome" principle, and build UI's to the platform's HIG rather than their own in-house HIG.