Slashdot Mirror


New Star Trek TV Series Coming In 2017 (hollywoodreporter.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Star Trek is returning to television. In January, 2017, a new series will begin. The first episode will air on CBS, and subsequent episodes will appear on CBS's online platform, "All Access." "The new Star Trek will introduce new characters seeking imaginative new worlds and new civilizations, while exploring the dramatic contemporary themes that have been a signature of the franchise since its inception in 1966." The show will be produced by Alex Kurtzman, who produced the two recent Star Trek films in 2009 and 2013. No details have been released regarding what the show will be about, or who will star in it. CBS is currently looking for a writer to helm the show.

12 of 438 comments (clear)

  1. "TV series" by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it loses the ability to call itself a "TV series" when it refuses to air over a conventional method for getting television into your home... Just sayin'. I love Trek, but I hope this flops so CBS will know their service is lame. (But if it flops, CBS will likely blame Trek and keep pushing ahead with the service anyways).

    --
    All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
  2. Social Justice Warrioring by Tokolosh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why do I have this nagging feeling that will be less of going boldly?

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  3. It'll be aired in todays conventional methods by future+assassin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It'll be on a torrent site 10 min after airing so you can watch it are you leisure. Now if I was them I'd put it up on a torrent site right after it aired with the commercial intact. That way you beat the pirates to the punch and people probably wouldn't care about the tv ads.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  4. Re:10 years was a decent rest by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually its creator wasn't that great. TNG seasons 1 and 2 were kinda bad, and those were the only two seasons that he had a heavy influence. After that, the writers started breaking some of the rules that Roddenberry had established for the series.

  5. Re:10 years was a decent rest by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh please. Enterprise was actually a pretty good show. I'm only sorry I listened to people like you and didn't watch it until about a year ago on Netflix.

    There's two main problems with Enterprise: 1) the opening theme song sucks donkey balls (except for the two mirror-universe episodes in season 4, that opening sequence is fantastic). 2) the whole Xindi arc in season 3.

    Voyager was pretty bad, especially because of the annoying captain. It was far worse than Enterprise.

  6. Re:10 years was a decent rest by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It can't get any worse than Enterprise.

    Then again, I thought it couldn't get any worse than Voyager, so I could be wrong.

    Rule #1 of sequels: It can always get worse.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  7. Re:10 years was a decent rest by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Enterprise was awesome as all the technology from the original Star Trek series wasn't fully developed yet. The transporters were still experimental for human transport. Tactical alert — RED ALERT! — took several seasons to fall into place. The captain chair needed tweaking to get just right.

  8. Re:First salvo! by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good luck with that. This series is being headed by the producers involved with JJTrek.

    It'd be interesting to see more episodes in the mirror universe though, even if it is a little depressing because that's actually our universe. The "prime" universe you speak of, where most Star Trek occurs, is actually a parallel universe for us. Humans in our universe are nothing like that; we're really a bunch of evil, power-hungry murderers just like depicted in the mirror universe episodes.

  9. Re:First salvo! by sycodon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You two must be Gay.

    T'Pol was HOT. So was Hoshi Sato

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  10. Re:Trek is ABOUT Social Justice Warrioring by Tokolosh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    SJW = equality of outcome
    Boldly = equality of opportunity

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  11. Re:10 years was a decent rest by grimmjeeper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Barbie of Borg was there only to rescue the failing ratings. The character added nothing of significant value beyond looking good in a tight jumpsuit.

  12. Great, let's sink the franchise even lower by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The first episode will air on CBS

    Red flag #1. CBS sucks ass and they have 0 balls. If this show is anything like all the other bland shit that's on network TV these days, it will make even Voyager look good by comparison.

    subsequent episodes will appear on CBS's online platform, "All Access."

    subsequent episodes will appear on CBS's online platform, "All Access."

    Red flag #2. Network doesn't even believe in it enough to put it on their regular broadcast channel. They're just using it to promote their shitty also-ran streaming channel. Hello, lots of low budget episodes.

    The show will be produced by Alex Kurtzman

    Red Flag #3. Let's get the fucktard behind those shitty action-movies-with-a-Star-Trek-skin to produce! He understands that REAL Star Trek ain't about all that thinkin' shit, it's about 'PLOSIONS!!!!

    CBS is currently looking for a writer to helm the show.

    Red Flag #4. CBS says "We don't even have a clue yet what it's going to be about, where we're going to go with it, or who's going to write it. But dammit, let's greenlight this thing! Just slap a Star Trek label on it and people will watch, right?"

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.