Slashdot Mirror


Vivaldi Hits Its First Beta (vivaldi.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Following well over 50 developer snapshots and 4 technical previews (Alpha), the new browser upstart has hit its first Beta release today. Following almost a year of work on alpha, Vivaldi is coming out with many unique features such as tab stacking and tiling, notes, and quick commands for navigating and feature use. Other features are in the works, such as sync and built-in mail client that will be introduced when they hit a more stable state. It's a refreshing take on the browser: as many others are diverging to a common design template, Vivaldi is taking a more feature-rich and customization-heavy approach. (We linked to a hands-on report about Vivaldi earlier this year, too.)

140 comments

  1. The browser wars are over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nobody needs a new browser.

    1. Re:The browser wars are over by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, but this browser is robust, and innovative, and refreshing, and exciting, and some other PR buzzwords that are supposed to make us give a flying fuck.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:The browser wars are over by nmb3000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Especially not one that looks like the UI was designed with MS Paint. Seriously... this is what passes for a modern and aesthetically pleasing application these days?

      The Notes feature sounds marginally useful, but that's already in Firefox via one of a dozen addons. Actually, all of their "killer features" exist already or could easily be implemented as addons for Firefox. Remind me again why I should change to an ugly Chromium clone without advertising or script blocking features?

      Don't get me wrong -- Firefox is going to hell too, but it seems to be running a slightly slower race than other browsers. I'm not going to switch to a front-runner.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    3. Re:The browser wars are over by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some, maybe even most, of the Vivaldi developers' experiments will fail miserably. What counts is that they're shaking things up slightly, and that's a good thing. With Firefox and Chrome increasingly becoming a mutual admiration society and MS Edge looking like it'll end up just as shitty as its predecessor, another player in this horse-race might effect some positive changes.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    4. Re:The browser wars are over by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2

      >> Nobody needs a new browser.

      This project appears to specifically be after Opera users, whoever they are. From the "our story" page:
      "In 1994...Opera was born...Fast forward to 2015. The browser we once loved has changed its direction. Sadly....we came to a natural conclusion: we must make a new browser."

    5. Re:The browser wars are over by xrobertcmx · · Score: 1

      I use Opera. It actually works fairly well. On lower power systems it is faster than Firefox or Chrome.

    6. Re:The browser wars are over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IE sucks, Chrome, sucks, Opera is a chrome clone now, and firefox went off the rails years ago.

      I welcome this announcement and will be trying this new browser out.

    7. Re:The browser wars are over by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      The UI looks fine, it's a minimal UI that is to be expected with today's browsers. It doesn't look any less professional than any other browser.

      Remind me again why I should change to an ugly Chromium clone without advertising or script blocking features?

      ...he says, while linking to a screenshot that shows Ghostery installed.

      http://www.ghacks.net/2015/03/...

      Firefox has been relegated to the back burner for years now. It does a decent job as a development tool with Firebug, but otherwise it's pretty slow and clunky. And according to my task manager it still hasn't managed to figure out process separation for tabs.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    8. Re:The browser wars are over by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      That screenshot shows Ghostery installed and running.... so clearly it supports ad/tracker blocking

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    9. Re:The browser wars are over by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The mere fact that it's not Firefox, which seems to get more annoying with every release, is reason enough to give it a try.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:The browser wars are over by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Maybe its just me, but i really like the clean, no frills UI shown on Vivaldi screenshots...

    11. Re:The browser wars are over by KGIII · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just load the unpacked Opera or Chrome/Chromium extensions of your choice. The extensions that I've tried have all worked.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    12. Re:The browser wars are over by dejitaru · · Score: 2

      "The browser wars are over, Nobody needs a new browser." I think people thought that too after IE dominated Netscape... and we were left with a stale IE6 until Firefox shook things up.

    13. Re:The browser wars are over by guestapoo · · Score: 2

      Addons could be obsoleted, and never be updated.
      Addons could be crashed, and not works each browser's update.
      Addons could make browser much slower.

      Not mention that somethings "easily be implemented as addons for Firefox" are not the same things (those) addons intend to be implemented.

      Example, I use Opera 12 (Presto), one function that sometime I need is "Cached images", which is disable displaying, completely/partially load/not load images in webpages. Firefox has an addons called "imgLikeOpera", which does not worked with current Firefox if not do some work-around, and not easier, be convenient as Opera 12.

      Opera 12 has function of selecting any text on pages, include the links, by holding the mouse's left-button while moving cursor like text editor. There is a work-around solution in Opera-Chrome but cause some unwanted side-effect. Firefox, does not have this.

    14. Re:The browser wars are over by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      ...he says, while linking to a screenshot that shows Ghostery installed.

      Ghostery is neither an ad-blocker nor a Javascript manager.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    15. Re:The browser wars are over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a bit like Opera in that respect - nobody uses Opera nowadays, but everyone uses tabbed browsing.

    16. Re:The browser wars are over by Picass0 · · Score: 2

      Nobody needs a new browser.

      Mmmm. Good point. And the world only needs 4 or 5 different kinds on cars. No point to innovating or trying new things.

      You must be very valuable where you work.

    17. Re:The browser wars are over by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      So you're thinking that the browser supports Ghostery, but not other extensions? Did you look at that link I posted?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    18. Re:The browser wars are over by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      I have now, but obviously hadn't when I posted my original comment. I saw the icon, but for all I knew it was just a custom version of ghostery that they'd added to the browser. Of course even your link says "it supports the majority of extensions published for Google Chrome", so who knows what works and what doesn't (though they do say uBlock appears to function, so that's good).

      So perhaps it's on par with Chrome when it comes to extensions, but that almost makes me wonder even more what the point of Vivaldi is. Seems like it's just Chrome with an ugly theme and some built-in extensions.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    19. Re:The browser wars are over by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I do. I am still on Opera 12 as, frankly, all new current mainstream browsers have a really bad and broken UI, including any post-12 versions of Opera. Now Opera 12 mostly works fine today, but the number of sites broken with it is slowly increasing.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    20. Re:The browser wars are over by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Not everybody wants to use the same 2nd-rate trash the mainstream likes. There are quite a few people that will move to Vivaldi once it is done.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    21. Re:The browser wars are over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blink-based Opera is shit, Presto-based used to be brilliant. I don't care about them switching the core engine, but they changed their development strategy completely. So many features were left behind without any sign of them returning.

    22. Re:The browser wars are over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you fucking kidding? All current browsers suck ass. We need new browsers more now than ever.

      Vivaldi is a huge piece of shit, but that shouldn't stop others from trying to raise the bar.

    23. Re:The browser wars are over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vivaldi does not respect the OS UI theme. That is reason enough to not use it.

    24. Re:The browser wars are over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course we need this, Mozilla and Opera abandoned power users, Vivaldi fills that void!

    25. Re:The browser wars are over by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Then I suppose the irony that it was made by a group of defectors from Opera browser missed you.

    26. Re:The browser wars are over by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Just an FYI, it supports all chrome extensions. Until this release it had a few bugs in that, but I'm currently testing it and everything works without issue so far. I really hope that it turns out to be completely compatible, and so far it looks like it is. Also, I'm surprised with how fast it runs.

    27. Re:The browser wars are over by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      That is in the options.

    28. Re:The browser wars are over by allo · · Score: 1

      Use the dark theme, its nice.
      And wait for theme support, it will come.

    29. Re:The browser wars are over by allo · · Score: 1

      It's not like opera invented it. There was an IE addon (i am not sure if inofficial), which added the really oldschool tabs from win95 (think of excel / libreoffice table tabs) in the win98 days .

    30. Re:The browser wars are over by dave.haku · · Score: 1

      Especially not one that looks like the UI was designed with MS Paint. Seriously... this is what passes for a modern and aesthetically pleasing application these days?

      What were you expecting? Glossy? Skeuomorphic buttons? Glowing buttons? Glass imitation?

    31. Re:The browser wars are over by WQSE · · Score: 1

      Opera 12 has function of selecting any text on pages, include the links, by holding the mouse's left-button while moving cursor like text editor. There is a work-around solution in Opera-Chrome but cause some unwanted side-effect. Firefox, does not have this.

      Maybe I'm following, but I usually copy snippets exactly like that; left button selecting some displayed text, in both current Opera and Chromium and Firefox(ESR). For precision I adjust the selection with shift arrows. Works in all browsers/engins I tried, including Vivaldi alfa.

      What I really miss from the early browsers (up to IE5) is the half page scrolling using the keyboard (d/D iirc?). Today there's only the whole page scrolling by space/shift-space.

    32. Re:The browser wars are over by guestapoo · · Score: 1

      In Firefox and Chrome if you hold the mouse left-button and drag the cursor above a link, this will not work as you want.
      In Opera (= 12), if mouse left-button was held long enough (less than a second), the browser knows that you want to select text instead of drag a link.

  2. Privacy policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is the privacy policy?

    1. Re:Privacy policy by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

      No privacy policy and no adblocker = No sale, chick.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:Privacy policy by paulatz · · Score: 1

      No adblocker is the main turn-off for me, I've long lost the habit of reading text with 89 flash animation popping all around

      --
      this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
    3. Re:Privacy policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Chrome uBlock extension works perfectly well with Vivaldi.

    4. Re:Privacy policy by Tyrannosaur · · Score: 3, Informative

      Privacy policy? https://vivaldi.com/privacy... What exactly are you looking for?

      Adblocker? I am currently running Vivaldi with Adguard Adblocker, although many others are available. It runs chrome extensions, so.... yeah.

    5. Re:Privacy policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Privacy policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No privacy policy and no adblocker = No sale, chick.

      Add AdBlock Extension in Vivaldi Web Browser

  3. Looking Glass? by s.petry · · Score: 1

    Sounds like they are implementing lots of features I saw in Solaris over a decade ago. Sure, it's a browser instead of an OS but.... Well, I'l give it a look just like I did with Sun's uber desktop.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  4. Huh? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "diverging to a common design template" does not compute

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    1. Re:Huh? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2

      Agreed. I believe the phrase is "converging on a common design template".

      People want browsers that are fast, light, and get out of the way. All the focus should be on the content!

    2. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dang - beat me to it ...

    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the they meant "diverging" in the sense of change from something that was good to something that was bad.

    4. Re: Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As more and more of the content is annoying and intrusive ads, I find I want less content and more functionality to parse and filter the content for me.

    5. Re:Huh? by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      All the focus should be on the content!

      No, the focus should be on allowing the user to view, organize, and access the content in a way that is intuitive and convenient. Of course, the components of this ideal are vastly different across the user base - hence Firefox addons and 'about:config'. Firefox's market share has gone down as Mozilla has tried to force a more uniform, less configurable browser experience on their users - I doubt that a new browser with even less configurability is going to gain much traction.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    6. Re:Huh? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      I think ffx went down because users switched to chrome. if what your saying is correct and people wanted configurability, why would they be switching to chrome in the first place?? maybe ur wrong? just a question, not saying one way or the other.

    7. Re:Huh? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      the phrase is "converging on a common design template".

      Agreed. I think that was the writer's intention.

      It's an unusual brain-fart.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    8. Re:Huh? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      allowing the user to view, organize, and access the content in a way that is intuitive and convenient.

      So, that would be approximately one different browser and work flow for every user.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  5. diverging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    as many others are diverging to a common design template

    No. Diverging is what the editors are doing from the English language.

  6. ...many others are diverging to a common... by kamakazi · · Score: 2

    diverging:

    I do not think that word means what you think it means.

    --
    "Proximity to wonder has blunted our perception and appreciation of it" --Tim Hartnell in 'Exploring ARTIFICIAL INTELLI
    1. Re:...many others are diverging to a common... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit. My exact words.

  7. Would love a "simplified" browser project by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >> Vivaldi is taking a more feature-rich and customization-heavy approach

    No thanks - we already have this from Firefox (yuck) and to a lesser extent Chrome. Give us the ability to shut off Flash animations and HTML5 video by default on our browser and you'll have millions of downloads.

    1. Re:Would love a "simplified" browser project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Presumably all repeat downloads by the same 10000 people who give a shit about this, want to pretend it's a huge deal, and who don't realize you can already easily turn those things off in at least one existing browser.

    2. Re:Would love a "simplified" browser project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What.

      Chrome IS the simplified browser, you divvy.

    3. Re:Would love a "simplified" browser project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok how about one you can reasonable run with 4GB of ram then....

    4. Re:Would love a "simplified" browser project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have stuff like QupZilla which doesn't tout as many features as other browsers, which means less junk to fix when it might inevitably break.

      I mean, you can look at something like SlimJet which is fast but also tries to cram in lots of features and gadgets. Some are nice, some I wish I could remove.

      You want barebones, go for OffByOne or D+ (though that Dillo Win32 port was last updated 2013, and OffByOne hasn't been updated since 2006—though neither does Flash or JavaScript so you might be safe).

      Hell, K-Meleon was recently updated to version 75. Highest version number means most polished best browser! ;)

    5. Re:Would love a "simplified" browser project by gweihir · · Score: 1

      You forget that anything Firefox or Chrome have, they ripped off (badly) from Opera 12 and before. Vivaldi is just a revival of that older and actually much, much better technology with modern tools.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    6. Re:Would love a "simplified" browser project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox is trying hard to become Chrome light - this is no customizable browser anymore out of the box without add-ons. Will be even worse after XUL is killed off! Vivaldi's UI can be totally rewritten. So in a way, Vivaldi is the only real Oldskool Firefox and Opera successor!

    7. Re:Would love a "simplified" browser project by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      I'm running it in a virtual machine with only 4GB of ram right now, and it is responding very fast. Faster than firefox is outside of the VM.
      I actually just dropped it down to 2GB and it is still running beautifully. I admit it is running on Linux, but still 2GB isn't much these days.

  8. rpm for linux does't work centos 6 by Drew+Sullivan · · Score: 1

    $ vivaldi-beta

    /usr/bin/vivaldi-beta: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by /usr/bin/vivaldi-beta)

    If they are going to build a binary, then at least staticly link it.

    --
    -- Linux Consultant
  9. Opera bad, Puffin stutters by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Will it work with AMC.com on 5.0 Android? Chrome is a POS there to watch shows.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  10. Where are the trumpeting unicorns? by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

    Just installed Vivaldi. After 15 seconds of use. ....

    No trumpeting unicorns. I still have to get up to get some coffee. I don't see what's so special about it :-)

    --
    If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
    Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    1. Re:Where are the trumpeting unicorns? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Informative

      Me too. My notes on Mac:
      - Bing is default search engine.
      - The colored bar at the top changes from red to orange to blue to ??? (who wrote this, the Melnorme?)
      - Videos loaded and ran automatically (Booooo!)
      - Asked to use my Chrome Keychain upon connect.
      - Integrates with Google Phishing/Malware and Safe Browsing interfaces
      - Do not track is off by default
      - There's some kind of "Vivaldi Mail" sidebar ("coming soon") - do not want
      - There's some kind of notetaking facility (independent of current page) built in - for what purpose I do not know
      - The bookmarks were prepopulated with US-based (and New York / San Francisco centric) items

    2. Re:Where are the trumpeting unicorns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The colored bar at the top changes from red to orange to blue to ???

      Brogrammers strike again!

    3. Re:Where are the trumpeting unicorns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had mod points, you'd get them all just for the SC reference =)

    4. Re:Where are the trumpeting unicorns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Do not track is off by default

      At least this statement is wrong. And what do you mean by "bookmarks were prepopulated"? If it loaded your bookmarks, it loaded the names you had already given them. Frankly I think you're just karma whoring.

    5. Re:Where are the trumpeting unicorns? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      >>>> Do not track is off by default
      >> At least this statement is wrong

      On a Mac, under my privacy settings, on a fresh copy of Vivaldi (which I'd never installed before), the "Preferences | Privacy | Do Not Track | Ask Websites Not to Track Me" is UNCHECKED. I'd post a screenshot if I could, but doesn't that mean "do not track is off by default?"

      >> what do you mean by "bookmarks were prepopulated"?

      When I opened my bookmarks on my virgin Vivaldi browser, they already had "Speed Dial", "Technology" and a bunch of other categories that I didn't put there, each which a bunch of named links (e.g., Local | Open Table...") I'd never visited. I don't have these bookmarks in Chrome or Firefox, so it didn't get them from there, and the default bookmarks in Safari are different, so it didn't get them from there. From there, I easily concluded that Vivaldi is bringing its own set of "prepopulated" bookmarks with it. Does that make sense now?

    6. Re:Where are the trumpeting unicorns? by war4peace · · Score: 4, Informative

      Adding the following:
      - Huge memory footprint, on par with Chrome. This is the #1 issue I have with most modern browsers and Chrome is by far the worst offender. I understand RAM is fairly cheap, but fuck, 2 GB RAM occupied with 4 tabs (GMail, Forge of Empires, Google.com main page and Slashdot) achieves full retard status.
      - Bookmark import works, but creates a sub-folder in the Bookmarks Bar / Imported Bookmarks rather than the expected behavior of asking whether prepopulated bookmarks should be replaced.
      - You can't move multiple bookmark folders to the bookmark bar although you can select multiple folders (it only moves them one by one).

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    7. Re:Where are the trumpeting unicorns? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Do not Track was off by default on my installation as well.
      About bookmarks, he means the browser comes bundled with a gazillion bookmarks to shit I don't need.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    8. Re:Where are the trumpeting unicorns? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Isn't the consensus that "Do Not Track" is supposed to be off by default? I think the argument goes that if it's on by default, then web developers won't take it seriously because most people who have it turned on didn't make a conscious decision to say they didn't want to be tracked. By leaving it off by default, it's sends a stronger message, that the person made a conscious decision to say they didn't want to be tracked.

      Personally, I think the whole thing is stupid. I don't think that websites pay any attention to it anyway. If they want to track you, they will. Sending a flag in the header isn't going to stop them.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:Where are the trumpeting unicorns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not track is off by default

      As it should be! If they want to make sure that users know about it, they can prompt them for a decision. But if it were on by default, it would be just another useless header littering each and every HTTP request (not saying that it isn't).

    10. Re:Where are the trumpeting unicorns? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      On a Mac, under my privacy settings, on a fresh copy of Vivaldi (which I'd never installed before), the "Preferences | Privacy | Do Not Track | Ask Websites Not to Track Me" is UNCHECKED. I'd post a screenshot if I could, but doesn't that mean "do not track is off by default?"

      "Do not track" is an option which MUST be off by default. If you don't understand why, you don't understand what it does. Enabling it by default actually, really, DISables it for everyone.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    11. Re:Where are the trumpeting unicorns? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      >> "Do not track" is an option which MUST be off by default.

      Then you should be happy - it appears to be OFF in Vivaldi. If you follow the thread, though, you'll see that I was responding to an AC who said that it was ON by default.

      (I really don't care one way or the other because no one really seems to take the Do Not Track option seriously, least of all web sites.)

    12. Re:Where are the trumpeting unicorns? by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

      - The colored bar at the top changes from red to orange to blue to ??? (who wrote this, the Melnorme?)

      This is because 'Use Page Theme Color in User Interface' is enabled. It can be disabled in the Appearance section of Settings.

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
  11. Firefox 3.x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All they have to do is provide a modern replica of firefox 3.x and I'd switch in a heartbeat. The firefox of 2015 is ugly, frustrating, and feature-incomplete (for christ's sake, you can't even sort your bookmarks anymore, can't stop a page from loading, can't go to the previous page, the list goes on and on). It's about damn time we got our desktop browser back.

  12. "Awesome. Another browser to check my page in!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... said no web designer, ever.

  13. Open Source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The browser isn't Open Source, but uses Open Source. That makes it a non-starter. Nice try. Actually, no, bad try. Try again.

  14. Re:"Awesome. Another browser to check my page in!" by aicrules · · Score: 1

    Don't worry, it's 97% compatible with HTML5 and ECMAScript 5 specs *** (Citation needed)

  15. Firefox has perhaps 2 more years, then it's done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I look at the latest browser market share stats, I can't help but notice that things aren't looking good for Firefox at all.

    Being generous, Firefox only has maybe 8% of the entire browser market. Firefox has almost no mobile presence at all (0.05%). We see Chrome for Android alone having about twice the market share that Firefox has across all platforms. iOS Safari has about the same market share as Firefox does on all platforms. Even Opera Mini has about the same market share. There are a couple of individual versions of desktop Chrome that have almost twice the market share of Firefox!

    Mozilla is only relevant because of Firefox. It's the only product of theirs that still has at least some users. They pretty much abandoned Thunderbird, so its users have been slowly dwindling away. Bugzilla is a relic. Firefox OS has been a disaster. Servo is going nowhere. Rust blew its chance by taking so long to get to 1.0, and people have lost interest in it now that C++14 is a better alternative.

    Given how we see Firefox's market share continually dropping, thanks to Mozilla screwing up the user experience so badly, I don't think it will be relevant 2 years from now. When Firefox is down at 0.5% of the browser market by that time, nobody will care about what Mozilla and Firefox users have to say about the direction that the web is taking.

    It didn't have to be this way, of course. All Mozilla had to do was provide a good user experience. Like you point out, they used to know how to do this. But ever since Firefox 4, it has been a total disaster, and the next-to-nothing market share proves this. Users don't want to use Firefox any longer because it is so awful, even if the alternatives aren't necessarily that much better.

    At least those behind Vivaldi seem to know what users want. Maybe Mozilla could save itself by imitating Vivaldi instead of imitating Chrome. Clearly, imitating Chrome has done nothing for Firefox but drive away its users.

  16. New from scratch Opera by Tran · · Score: 1

    Will be worth checking out. Was a fan of Opera from back in the Win 3.xx days.

    But if it uses JavaScript to do its thing, can JavaScript be turned off for sites? Hmm. I normally run with no-script in Firefox.

    1. Re:New from scratch Opera by Tran · · Score: 2

      replying to myself - not form scratch after all - uses chromium as the base...

      From the forum re memory usage/optimization:

      "Not to burst some bubbles, but I'm afraid that great optimizations will never happen.

      Chromium is the base of Vivaldi, and Chromium is resource hungry, period.

      Optimize Vivaldi would mean to fork and heavily patch its code base, that would be an effort impossible to sustain for a small company like Vivaldi.

      Surely some small optimizations would be possible on the Vivaldi specific code, but don't expect miracles.

      If you are on low end/old HW Vivaldi isn't the browser for you, better to look at Otter, Qupzilla, Fifth browser, in that case. "

      Oh well.

    2. Re:New from scratch Opera by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      uses chromium as the base...

      I was hoping for a completely new engine, or a resurrection of Opera, so I was disappointed with this especially given how disillusioned I've become with Mozilla's insanity lately. It seems every "new" browser is actually Chrome with a different veneer.

    3. Re:New from scratch Opera by KGIII · · Score: 1

      The new Opera (v. 33 or dev build 34) is based on Chromium, correct. It is vastly different and, by my guess, so far from the original that it could never be pulled back into the Chromium base. The source if available but it is not free, as in libre, if one wants to distribute it with their proprietary bits (that's my reading of the license). It is not in the repos for any distro that I'm aware of, only the older version exists there. There's no BSD version, as of yet, so that's a bit of a pisser.

      I'm an Opera fan since the days when we had to pay for it. At first I didn't like the newer version but it has grown on me. At one point, I'd donated so much to Mozilla that they put my name in the newspaper in a big full page ad, along with a number of other people. Even then, I was still using Opera but I wanted to like Firefox. Gone are the days when Firefox was usable for me. It's unfortunate, really. But, I do enjoy Opera. The ecosystem is huge - you can use any Chrome extension, for example. I find it speedier than most, like they've potentially closed some memory leaks. It's stable as all hell - and this is from someone who actively tries to break stuff.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  17. How about feature-poor? by tompaulco · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We have lots of browsers with too many features. At the moment, I am staring at my Firefox session using nearly 1 GB of memory. I usually shut it down when it hits 1.5 GB. There is really no excuse for a browser to be using that much memory. Including images, each tab is probably using less than 1 MB of space. I have maybe 20 tabs open, so 20 MB seems like a reasonable amount of memory to be using. A feature I WOULD like to see is a breakdown of memory and CPU usage by tab, so I can permanently block sites that use too much CPU or memory. Also, something which can tell me which tab is playing some audio, so I can permanently block any site that does that without being told to do that.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    1. Re:How about feature-poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know tabs show an audio icon when that page is making noise now. In firefox you can use the audio icon to mute that tab.

    2. Re:How about feature-poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You've got single images using just 1 MB. you're lucky if you're using only 20 MB per tab.

    3. Re:How about feature-poor? by DanJ_UK · · Score: 1

      If you want to see a breakdown of memory and CPU usage by tab open the task manager in chrome under window -> task manager.

      --
      - Dan
    4. Re:How about feature-poor? by DanJ_UK · · Score: 2

      This page / tab is currently using 161mb for me at the moment.

      --
      - Dan
    5. Re:How about feature-poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're in for a surprise. In the Firefox address bar type in about:memory. Clicking Measure will reveal how much memory is being used per tab. Even using an adblocker, having flash disabled, and being as heavy-handed with NoScript as is usable for me (only allowing scripts from the visited site and its CDN if required), even with all that tabs use more memory than I would expect. The /. tabs I have open are using between 5-9 MB each. Amazon tabs typically use 15+ MB from what I've seen. It's not just Firefox. Chromium-based browsers (and Internet Explorer up to 11--I haven't tried Edge) use just as much--in fact I just checked it out and loading this Slashdot page in IE is using 100 MB of memory, holy hell.

      Web quality images are pretty small in terms of disk space at least on the sites I visit--it's very common to scale them down from whatever their full-size was. This particular /. page has 111 KB total of images/icons/backgrounds (keep in mind NoScript/adblocker), and 129 KB of HTML. I guess somehow rendering that and keeping it in memory shoots up to 6.56 MB (according to about:memory) (or 100 MB in IE...).

      Apparently there are add-ons that can help you figure out the CPU per tab but I have no experience with them. Usually a CPU-heavy tab (i.e. shit-coded website) hangs immediately upon opening or when trying to do something on the page, so it's rather obvious where the problem is. I haven't really had a problem with pages using CPU in the background and I sometimes have 100-200 tabs open (yes, yes, not the most glamorous organizational style but it's worked well for me). If you have problems with sneaky CPU usage I would highly recommend NoScript to block all unneeded scripts from running.

    6. Re:How about feature-poor? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      You know tabs show an audio icon when that page is making noise now. In firefox you can use the audio icon to mute that tab.

      Hmm, mine doesn't. But then I am only on 41.0.2.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    7. Re:How about feature-poor? by erapert · · Score: 2

      Also, something which can tell me which tab is playing some audio,

      I've been using the Vivaldi nighltlies on Ubuntu for about a month now and it does show an audio icon when a tab is playing sound.

  18. Once Converged, thus Divergence Commences by pz · · Score: 1

    Let the recapitulation begin!

    Or, at least, let Timothy please look up the difference between convergence and divergence.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  19. Any new functionality by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

    So it's a new browser. So what any new functionality that's cool and people like will simply get absorbed into Chrome, Firefox etc the last thing we need is yet another platform to test on.

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  20. Testing nightmare by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new testing nightmare overlords

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    1. Re:Testing nightmare by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Why would you bother testing for a platform with no discernible browser share?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Testing nightmare by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Moreover, even if it does, we already have to test under IE8, IE9, IE11, Edge, Firefox, Chrome, Safari on Mac if possible, Android Chrome, and iOS Safari. What difference does one more browser make? Especially a desktop browser?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  21. Dear world ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Other features are in the works, such as sync and built-in mail client that will be introduced when they hit a more stable state

    Can we have a browser which is, you know, just a browser?

    We don't want social integrations, we don't want cross device linking, we don't need an emailclient, a chat client, something to manage our contacts, sidebars, or any of a dozen features we just turn off an ignore.

    We want a browser, small, lean, standards compliant, not a memory pig, and which respects our privacy.

    Stop trying to make some do-everything turd which wants to be the center of our freaking lives. We don't need another one of those.

    Do one thing, a web browser, that's it.

    kthanksbye

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Dear world ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other features are in the works, such as sync and built-in mail client that will be introduced when they hit a more stable state

      Can we have a browser which is, you know, just a browser?

      We don't want social integrations, we don't want cross device linking, we don't need an emailclient, a chat client, something to manage our contacts, sidebars, or any of a dozen features we just turn off an ignore.

      We want a browser, small, lean, standards compliant, not a memory pig, and which respects our privacy.

      Stop trying to make some do-everything turd which wants to be the center of our freaking lives. We don't need another one of those.

      Do one thing, a web browser, that's it.

      kthanksbye

      If we did actually get this, over time it would become a bloated turd again. I miss the early days of Firefox too.

    2. Re:Dear world ... by guestapoo · · Score: 2

      We don't need another one of those.

      Vivaldi is built for the ex-Opera-Presto users. They focus on this community.
      This browser is not for you, so move on.

    3. Re:Dear world ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a current Opera Presto (12.17) user. I checked out Vivaldi when I first heard of it. The browser itself was not very impressive, and I have no interest in the community.

      This browser is not for me, so I moved on (or rather, back).

  22. Herp Derp. by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    Doesn't firefox already have notes (without an addon)? It's kind of a hassle on my touch enabled devices, actually. All browsers even ie2 have quick commands for navigating and feature use. So it's a new browser that brings tab stacking to the table!

    How did the world get by before vivaldi?

    1. Re:Herp Derp. by Tyrannosaur · · Score: 1

      So it's a new browser that brings tab stacking back to the table!

      We used opera 12, which was before opera dropped the tab stacks. You should try them sometime; they are super nice.

  23. My two wishes by myid · · Score: 1

    I just played with the beta a bit on Mac OS X 10.8.5.

    The good: A respectable score of 521 in html5test.com.

    The bad:

    1) Bookmarklets apparently aren't supported in the beta. I created one
    javascript:alert("bye");
    which works fine on Safari, but which gives me an error message "Inalid URL." when I define it.

    And according the discussion here, other users can't do bookmarklets either.

    2) I also wish they'd have a way for me to request a peaceful, quiet, calm, whatever you want to call it, mode. No sound, no movies played, no animated gifs, no carousels that automatically play. Of course, no blinking or marquee. Even better, run only JavaScript from the web page's site and bookmarklets. Don't run JavaScript from adware sites.

    1. Re:My two wishes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the heck are you running a 3.5 year out of date version of OSX? You do know the updates are free right.

    2. Re:My two wishes by Dashiva+Dan · · Score: 1

      The problem with only running javascript from a webpage's own site is that these days many web pages spread their 'site' over multiple URLs, using CDNs for jQuery and such (which could be handled with a whitelist, but can't cover everything), CSS, images, font's with icon sets, etc...
      I'm sure before too long someone (let's be honest. Google.) will develop a full 'machine learning' system to learn which javascript to block, etc, automatically (and then someone will find a way to use it to end... i don't know, the world or something, I guess) :)

      --
      "lt;dr" is the correct response to most of my posts.
    3. Re:My two wishes by damnbunni · · Score: 1

      Probably because the updates add suck without adding any useful new features.

      I finally moved from 10.6.8 to 10.10 and honestly the only thing that really feels like an 'improvement' is that I can disable transparency in the UI. There's a whole lot of new annoying crap to deal with, though.

  24. Cannot wait until this browser matures. by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 2

    I've been following the snapshot diligently, and as a huge fan of Presto Opera, it's almost everything that I've been missing (still currently using Opera w/Blink). The one deal-breaker for me is the fact that a few of my absolutely extensions don't work properly.

    1. Re:Cannot wait until this browser matures. by almitydave · · Score: 1

      I've been following the snapshot diligently, and as a huge fan of Presto Opera, it's almost everything that I've been missing (still currently using Opera w/Blink). The one deal-breaker for me is the fact that a few of my absolutely extensions don't work properly.

      This. People here don't seem to realize that Vivaldi is the spiritual successor to Opera Presto, which was beloved by its fans in part for the features it offered. When Opera became just another simple Chrome clone, it lost that which made it special.

      I hung onto Opera 12.xx as long as possible (until the major websites actively started blocking its user agent), and was so disappointed by Opera Chromium I went to Pale Moon. I've been using Vivaldi occasionally since early preview releases, and lately it's become so stable that it's been my default browser for the last month or two. Performance-wise, it seems faster than most other browsers, taking advantage of Chromium's excellent rendering and Javascript engines.

      Features and settings have been constantly added in over time, but you have to remember that it's been in alpha until just now, and as such, is remarkably well-rounded. I expect many of the features people here need (flash blocking etc.) to appear over time, as well as the power features traditional Opera users love.

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
    2. Re:Cannot wait until this browser matures. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (until the major websites actively started blocking its user agent)

      Might this by any chance be Wordpress sites? I was (until recently) using Opera 12.16, and all Wordpress-hosted sites would reject any requests from my exact user agent. Upgrading to 12.17 (which changed the user agent, of course!) fixed that problem.

      Other than the weird Wordpress issue I don't really have any problems with 12.17 anymore.

    3. Re:Cannot wait until this browser matures. by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Give the v. 33 a shot w/regards to Opera. I used Opera back in the days when I had to pay for it. It's not that bad. I hated it, at first. Oh, did I hate it. (I gotta tell ya, I was some pissed.) They have improved greatly since around the v. 28 days.

      I want to like Vivaldi but now, instead of just one, I must run it with --no-gpu-composting and it fills up the terminal with a stream of errors. *sighs* I'm waiting for it to improve. I've been tracking it faithfully. I even did a small journal post on it.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    4. Re:Cannot wait until this browser matures. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still on version 12.17 here.

      I will be looking into this new browser.

    5. Re:Cannot wait until this browser matures. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about, Opera 12.17 being actively blocked? I have not run into that and I still use it for most browsing.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    6. Re:Cannot wait until this browser matures. by almitydave · · Score: 1

      Basically anything with sophisticated Javascript or AJAX. Most Google sites (Maps started reverting to a dumbed-down html version before Google forced the new Maps), Facebook, bank websites, T-Mobile's website, etc. etc. Many, many different websites would show messages along the lines of "upgrade to a modern browser to use this site." It was also really slow and unresponsive especially with many tabs open. (PC is Win7 Pro 64-bit, Core i7 with 16GB RAM, SSD).

      The final straw for Opera Chromium was that it stopped handling common MIME types: e.g. you couldn't have it open a PDF with an app (much less in-browser), it forced you to download everything.

      So Vivaldi is potentially the best of both worlds - the ethos and usability of Opera Presto, with the speed and compatibility of Blink/V8. I like it so far.

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
  25. A built-in mail client by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    It's aimed at old people then?

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    1. Re:A built-in mail client by guestapoo · · Score: 1

      In Opera (Presto), email client could be used as feed reader.
      I don't know what if Vivaldi will be if it has, but in Opera 12, built-in feed reader (mail) has advantages, and it consumes zero additional resource.

  26. UI work needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They need to do some user interface work. The menu is cluttered and hard to find options compared to Chrome's menu. The themes of Vivaldi to match websites are wonderful, but the starting red color is very harsh. The smooth scrolling is also off-putting. There is some noticeable lag that is unfamiliar to people who use Chrome and Firefox.

  27. Vivaldi is Opera by janoc · · Score: 1

    Vivaldi is built by the same people as the original (before it became a "skin" for Chrome) Opera was, so the design and features are not really surprising.

    I wonder what will we have to sell to be able to use this browser, though. Aka, how is Vivaldi going to make money with this "free" (as in beer) browser?

    1. Re:Vivaldi is Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is vivaldi based on webkit or it's own engine?

    2. Re:Vivaldi is Opera by almitydave · · Score: 2

      is vivaldi based on webkit or it's own engine?

      It uses Blink, which is itself derived from WebKit. Blink is used by Chrome and Opera Chromium.

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
    3. Re:Vivaldi is Opera by Tyrannosaur · · Score: 1

      It's chromium-based, so Blink. (So yeah webkit...)

  28. Vivaldi was Interesting - a year ago by CrashNBrn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now Though? It's taken over a year for any extension at all to be able to be used (from it's icon). Vivaldi is closed source like everything that Jon von Tetzchner is involved in. The whole "for our friends" and placating manner seems disingenuous.

    Personally, I can't stand their implementation of Tab-Stacks - it is less than useless, and just makes finding a given tab even more difficult than it already is when you have "too many" open.

    Then there's the whole censorship crap that goes on in the forums - just like it always was over at Opera HQ - though perhaps the mods aren't as completely off the hook over on Opera's side these days --- though it still is prevalent.
    I got banned from Vivaldi.net last week because it's auto-spam detector didn't like a forum post that did word|word|word|word. I had been a member since the beginning, had a post history over the last year+. At this point, well fuck you Vivaldi.

    1. Re:Vivaldi was Interesting - a year ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got banned from Vivaldi.net last week because it's auto-spam detector didn't like a forum post that did word|word|word|word. I had been a member since the beginning, had a post history over the last year+. At this point, well fuck you Vivaldi.

      Automated spam blocker blocked you, It MUST be a conspiracy because they didn't like you!

    2. Re:Vivaldi was Interesting - a year ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had been a member since the beginning, had a post history over the last year+. At this point, well fuck you Vivaldi.

      Hmm... Name checks out. Crash and burn, indeed! :D

  29. Vivaldi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use it, like it.

  30. Built with java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and a long list of NPM modules.
    No thanks!

  31. Crap removal? by IMightB · · Score: 2

    Since it is chromium based, does it

    1) remove all the google phone home junk?
    2) block ads
    3) block js/flash
    4) remove all the google phone home junk?
    5) block all tracking?

    if it doesn't do any of the above, what is the reason to switch?

  32. Oblig. by MrKevvy · · Score: 2

    "Following almost a year of work on alpha..."

    So... Four Seasons of Vivaldi then?

    --
    -- Insert witty one-liner here. --
    1. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was *almost* tempted to try to recover a password to log in to see if I had points to mod this up for being amusing. Then I remembered where I was and that as I hadn't bothered in ages, why change now? Still... Well played!

    2. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the other AC I have no mod points to give, but I lol'd.

  33. Not Another Browser??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the browser market is saturated.

  34. good keyboard only interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it does not support some kind of vimperator like interface and does not allow to hide a lot of UI elements then it is useless to me. And it needs integrated (or as a plugin) adblock, noscript, or at least policeman.

  35. Re:"Awesome. Another browser to check my page in!" by gweihir · · Score: 1

    For really incompetent values of "web designers", i.e. the average one.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  36. Melnorme, that takes me back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The colored bar at the top changes from red to orange to blue to ??? (who wrote this, the Melnorme?)

    Web analytics are internet purveyors of fine trade goods and valuable information. Our origins and purposes are, frankly, mysterious and due to several unavoidable factors we are unable to discuss ourselves in any great detail.

    First and foremost among these factors is our unwillingness to GIVE away information about our history, psychology and mental powers, our unique economy, the exact locations of home-servers, or our potentially ominous, long-range plans.

    However, these important and relevant pieces of information ARE available for a nominal sum of Credits.

  37. Amicusnycl it definitely supports this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not an addon & does far more w/ less using what you have natively: APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    ---

    FREE & not 'souled-out' to advertisers + adds speed, security & reliability & does FAR more w/ FAR less more efficiently vs. redundant browser addons & locally installed DNS servers @ home + fixes DNS' many security issues & it stops a LOT of tracking @ webpage + DNS levels combined too from 1 file you already NATIVELY have - firewalls do the rest (on far lesser used IP address based tracking vs. host-domain name type).

    ---

    It obtains data vs. online threats & for adbanner blocking from 10 reputable sites in the security community!

    ---

    It SPEEDS YOU UP 2 ways (adblocking + locally cached in RAM favorites @ the TOP of hosts for fastest resolution speed vs. remote DNS also aiding reliability) vs. other "so-called security 'solutions'" SLOWING YOU!

    ---

    It does all that via something you already natively have vs. "bolting on browser addons 'MOAR'" that's usermode slower & increases messagepassing, cpu + ram overheads!

    ---

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe proven by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    In its 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    ---

    * "The premise is quite simple: Take something designed by nature & reprogram it to make it work for the body rather than against it..." - Dr. Alice Krippen: "I am legend".

    APK

    P.S.=> By "yours truly" - "The Lord of Hosts" so-to-speak:

    "The image this title brings to mind is of a mighty military commander, one who can at a mere word summon rank upon rank of protective power" from https://answers.yahoo.com/ques... & THAT WORD = hosts!

    (Accept NO substitutes!)

    ...apk

  38. Ghostery = 'souled-out' & inferior vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can ghostery do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop communique to C&C servers
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phishing
    10.) Protect vs. bandwidth caps
    11.) Get you by a dns blocking
    12.) Keep you off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
    14.) Work on anything webbound (e.g. stand-alone email programs) multiplatform.
    15.) Give you easily controlled data
    16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu + memory use vs. addons

    * ANSWER ="NO" to each on Ghostery doing all that let alone as well as hosts do!

    APK

    P.S.=> Addons do FAR less than hosts do & FAR less efficiently - hosts by way of comparison, do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):

    Ghostery (Advertiser owned) - "Fox guards henhouse" -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...

    ---

    Addons add complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    ClarityRay DETECTS browser addons like Ghostery & blocks them (not hosts) via native browser methods.

    ---

    What's better than ghostery by FAR?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    ... apk

  39. It's better than the new Opera and more satisfying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a former Opera user I finally feel appreciated with this browser. Opera after 12.XX was just Chrome with the Opera logo on it. They took for eternety to get important features like the bookmarks bar into the browser...
    All the features I loved with old opera were just scrapped. -.-

    I loved taking notes without having to install some sh**** addon. I love Vivaldis WebPanels and I can assign any letter I want for search engines.
    Seriously Opera what's wrong with you? I can't assign my most used search engines to the standard letters because you overwrite it with yahoo and duckduckgo boo!
    What I still miss in Vivaldi is saving multiple sessions like one for developers, one for videos, etc.

    Vivaldi is the only browser trying to give me back what I miss in ALL new browsers and I feel very comfortable using it.
    Vivaldi team you're doing a great job.